{"id":385911,"date":"2025-06-30T10:31:09","date_gmt":"2025-06-30T08:31:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=385911"},"modified":"2025-06-30T10:31:11","modified_gmt":"2025-06-30T08:31:11","slug":"raise-a-glass-to-the-shuttering-of-climate-gov","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=385911","title":{"rendered":"Raise a Glass to the Shuttering of Climate.gov"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Charles Rotter<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In its steady promotion of fiscal frugality, the Trump administration has sent the entire content production staff of Climate.gov<\/a> packing as their NOAA contract expired on May 31\u2014effectively silencing the federal government\u2019s flagship climate propaganda platform overnight.<\/a> Rebecca Lindsey, Tom Di Liberto and the rest of the once\u2013highly paid spin doctors who churned out daily \u201curgent\u201d updates on melting ice sheets and CO\u2082 curves received form letters informing them that their \u201cknowledge, skills, and abilities are no longer of use to NOAA,\u201d a fitting epitaph for a site built on relentless hype.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, millions of casual web surfers landed on Climate.gov<\/a> only to be lectured by animated carbon-cycle maps, sliding-scale temperature-anomaly widgets and color-coded doom gauges predicting imminent coastal calamity. All of that eye-candy is now frozen in digital amber\u2014archived but never to be updated\u2014so that future historians can gawp at government-sponsored hysteria in its unedited glory. No more breathless countdowns to climate Armageddon<\/a>, no more click-bait pop-ups proclaiming every thunderstorm as \u201cproof\u201d of runaway warming. The propagandists have packed up their graph-generating scripts and left, leaving behind only static pages that serve as curious relics of alarmist marketing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Critics have wailed about \u201ccritical climate data\u201d being scrubbed, but their caterwauling stems from a basic misunderstanding: none of the raw measurements ever disappeared. The station records, satellite feeds, radar logs, ocean-buoy readings and even paleoclimate ice-core datasets remain untouched in the National Centers for Environmental Information archive, which manages over 60 petabytes of environmental data and continues to serve it up via Climate Data Online APIs, FTP servers and the NCEI Map Viewer<\/a>. In other words, the data weren\u2019t scrubbed\u2014they were never meant to be buried; only the politically curated presentation was.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let the narrative merchants keep insisting that \u201cwithout Climate.gov<\/a> the public will be left in the dark.\u201d All that\u2019s dark now is their empty echo chamber. Researchers already download the identical datasets through legacy servers and modern APIs, free from grant-dependent graphics and grant-writing obligations. The Trump administration didn\u2019t \u201cdestroy climate data\u201d\u2014it defunded a taxpayer-subsidized panic-porn production line. And if that leaves the fear-mongers shrieking into the void, that\u2019s just proof their only real product was panic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This isn\u2019t mere belt-tightening; it\u2019s the death rattle of a climate industrial complex enmeshed in grant cycles, media conferences and self-congratulatory symposia. First came the mid-winter purge of greenhouse-gas inventory portals and adaptation-strategy playbooks, then the layoff of hundreds of modelers and communicators\u2014including the entire team behind the National Climate Assessment. Now, the pi\u00e8ce de r\u00e9sistance: the mothballing of the flagship propaganda website itself.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

What happens next is deliciously ironic. Journalists will scramble to cite \u201cindependent experts\u201d instead of regurgitating White House press releases. Schoolchildren Googling \u201cClimate.gov<\/a>\u201d will find nothing but stale content from before June 2025. Policymakers who once leaned on slick NOAA pop-ups to justify mandates on electric cars and green subsidies will have to defend their proposals on substance rather than spun narratives. The very architects of alarm will discover that once you cut off the megaphone, the tornado of fear winds down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those who moan about a \u201cslippery slope of censorship\u201d conveniently ignore that Climate.gov was never a neutral repository; it functioned as a de facto propaganda arm for unverified worst-case projections. Now that the faucet of federal hype has been shut off, civic discourse can finally shift back toward sober cost-benefit analysis and genuine uncertainty. Markets and local communities\u2014far more responsive to observable risks than to speculative model output\u2014will decide how best to adapt, unfettered by taxpayer-funded hype.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, raise a glass to the shuttering of\u00a0Climate.gov<\/a>. This isn\u2019t just a budget cut but the vanquishing of one of the most lavishly promoted panic-mongering platforms in government history. For every ominous anomaly graph they spun, all that remains now is silence\u2014and silence is the most honest response to alarmism that could never hold up under real scrutiny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In its steady promotion of fiscal frugality, the Trump administration has sent the entire content production staff of Climate.gov packing as their NOAA contract expired on May 31\u2014effectively silencing the federal government\u2019s flagship climate propaganda platform overnight. Rebecca Lindsey, Tom Di Liberto and the rest of the once\u2013highly paid spin doctors who churned out daily \u201curgent\u201d updates on melting ice sheets and CO\u2082 curves received form letters informing them that their \u201cknowledge, skills, and abilities are no longer of use to NOAA,\u201d a fitting epitaph for a site built on relentless hype.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":385914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691819743,691836150,691835782,691833237,691836151,691831504],"class_list":{"0":"post-385911","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-propaganda","9":"tag-climate-propagandists","10":"tag-climate-gov","11":"tag-noaa-national-oceanic-and-atmospheric-administration","12":"tag-taxpayer-subsidized-panic-porn","13":"tag-trump-administration","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/ChatGPT-Image-14.-Juni-2025-09_40_09.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1Con","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":382970,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=382970","url_meta":{"origin":385911,"position":0},"title":"When the Narrative Dies: Climate.gov and the Quiet Collapse of Climate Alarmism","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/06\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"It appears the United States has quietly taken a scalpel\u2014rather than a chainsaw\u2014to one of its central instruments of climate orthodoxy: Climate.gov. According to reporting from The Guardian, the plug is being pulled on this site, which served as a flagship for NOAA\u2019s \u201cclimate communication, education, and engagement\u201d efforts. Its\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-2.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-2.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-2.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-2.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":407339,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=407339","url_meta":{"origin":385911,"position":1},"title":"Zeroing Out Taxpayer Funded Climate Propaganda","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/10\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Biology teachers should be teaching biology. Social studies teachers should be teaching anything other than actual science.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate propaganda\"","block_context":{"text":"climate propaganda","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-propaganda"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQM903n2lWo_SvxVrt_R4_hltafX1C3SfRoBcSDBOTa3IgEYt9EKlIbKSqhu7IJ4DY0wmsC7zcuQtqjKezsPZangvhJkT4af_1OsclCq0zNj7xCzgT5nAxs7W58rDjhYzYFjC4x1DIQpNfFJF4JYn2r_VcLmLQ.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQM903n2lWo_SvxVrt_R4_hltafX1C3SfRoBcSDBOTa3IgEYt9EKlIbKSqhu7IJ4DY0wmsC7zcuQtqjKezsPZangvhJkT4af_1OsclCq0zNj7xCzgT5nAxs7W58rDjhYzYFjC4x1DIQpNfFJF4JYn2r_VcLmLQ.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQM903n2lWo_SvxVrt_R4_hltafX1C3SfRoBcSDBOTa3IgEYt9EKlIbKSqhu7IJ4DY0wmsC7zcuQtqjKezsPZangvhJkT4af_1OsclCq0zNj7xCzgT5nAxs7W58rDjhYzYFjC4x1DIQpNfFJF4JYn2r_VcLmLQ.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQM903n2lWo_SvxVrt_R4_hltafX1C3SfRoBcSDBOTa3IgEYt9EKlIbKSqhu7IJ4DY0wmsC7zcuQtqjKezsPZangvhJkT4af_1OsclCq0zNj7xCzgT5nAxs7W58rDjhYzYFjC4x1DIQpNfFJF4JYn2r_VcLmLQ.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQM903n2lWo_SvxVrt_R4_hltafX1C3SfRoBcSDBOTa3IgEYt9EKlIbKSqhu7IJ4DY0wmsC7zcuQtqjKezsPZangvhJkT4af_1OsclCq0zNj7xCzgT5nAxs7W58rDjhYzYFjC4x1DIQpNfFJF4JYn2r_VcLmLQ.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":400660,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=400660","url_meta":{"origin":385911,"position":2},"title":"Fired Climate.gov Federal Employees Resurrect Website on their Own Dime","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/09\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"See, they didn\u2019t need federal funding after all.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate communication experts\"","block_context":{"text":"climate communication experts","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-communication-experts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMJyT9ttt2TxAAhND_zo4ixEwz_gJ0O5DAzksp89XBkZoTi7bgAooP4sIhUJiBvg8PTGmfh46nT-Le30WLS5TjSgo5Go5TugWL6wgmT53Oh8kl9_yPAXq9jK-0KzhyG7FnEs8Xrd5ARFm4AURL8BP55R0rT3Q.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMJyT9ttt2TxAAhND_zo4ixEwz_gJ0O5DAzksp89XBkZoTi7bgAooP4sIhUJiBvg8PTGmfh46nT-Le30WLS5TjSgo5Go5TugWL6wgmT53Oh8kl9_yPAXq9jK-0KzhyG7FnEs8Xrd5ARFm4AURL8BP55R0rT3Q.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMJyT9ttt2TxAAhND_zo4ixEwz_gJ0O5DAzksp89XBkZoTi7bgAooP4sIhUJiBvg8PTGmfh46nT-Le30WLS5TjSgo5Go5TugWL6wgmT53Oh8kl9_yPAXq9jK-0KzhyG7FnEs8Xrd5ARFm4AURL8BP55R0rT3Q.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMJyT9ttt2TxAAhND_zo4ixEwz_gJ0O5DAzksp89XBkZoTi7bgAooP4sIhUJiBvg8PTGmfh46nT-Le30WLS5TjSgo5Go5TugWL6wgmT53Oh8kl9_yPAXq9jK-0KzhyG7FnEs8Xrd5ARFm4AURL8BP55R0rT3Q.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMJyT9ttt2TxAAhND_zo4ixEwz_gJ0O5DAzksp89XBkZoTi7bgAooP4sIhUJiBvg8PTGmfh46nT-Le30WLS5TjSgo5Go5TugWL6wgmT53Oh8kl9_yPAXq9jK-0KzhyG7FnEs8Xrd5ARFm4AURL8BP55R0rT3Q.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196091,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=196091","url_meta":{"origin":385911,"position":3},"title":"Is a third La Ni\u00f1a coming?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"16\/04\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By\u00a0Kalte Sonne Is a third La Ni\u00f1a coming?\u00a0 It should be a groundbreaking forecast, the early forecast of the weather phenomena El Ni\u00f1o and La Ni\u00f1a. Both affect the weather in very different ways. It would have been too nice to know a year in advance what conditions would prevail\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/0ENSO_blog_Bjerknes-feedback-LaNina_large.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/0ENSO_blog_Bjerknes-feedback-LaNina_large.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/0ENSO_blog_Bjerknes-feedback-LaNina_large.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/0ENSO_blog_Bjerknes-feedback-LaNina_large.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/0ENSO_blog_Bjerknes-feedback-LaNina_large.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203974,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=203974","url_meta":{"origin":385911,"position":4},"title":"June 2022 ENSO update: how does your garden grow?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/06\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"BY EMILY BECKER I\u2019m definitely starting to sound like a broken record here! La Ni\u00f1a is favored to continue through the summer and into the winter. That said, chances of La Ni\u00f1a through summer have a fairly small edge over chances of a transition to neutral\u201452% for La Ni\u00f1a vs.\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/0Ocean-Monthly-Difference-from-average-Sea-Surface-Temperature-Pacific-2022-05-00-large.png?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/0Ocean-Monthly-Difference-from-average-Sea-Surface-Temperature-Pacific-2022-05-00-large.png?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/0Ocean-Monthly-Difference-from-average-Sea-Surface-Temperature-Pacific-2022-05-00-large.png?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/0Ocean-Monthly-Difference-from-average-Sea-Surface-Temperature-Pacific-2022-05-00-large.png?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298976,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=298976","url_meta":{"origin":385911,"position":5},"title":"NOAA\u2019s Graph Provides Best Evidence That Solar Heating Is Warming the Oceans, Not CO2","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"However, their regional changes in heat content are much more consistent with solar heating than from greenhouse theory.","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Ocean-Heat-Trends-1993-2022-scaled-1.webp?fit=1200%2C710&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Ocean-Heat-Trends-1993-2022-scaled-1.webp?fit=1200%2C710&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Ocean-Heat-Trends-1993-2022-scaled-1.webp?fit=1200%2C710&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Ocean-Heat-Trends-1993-2022-scaled-1.webp?fit=1200%2C710&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Ocean-Heat-Trends-1993-2022-scaled-1.webp?fit=1200%2C710&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/385911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=385911"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/385911\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":385915,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/385911\/revisions\/385915"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/385914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=385911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=385911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=385911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}