{"id":383346,"date":"2025-06-15T16:37:17","date_gmt":"2025-06-15T14:37:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=383346"},"modified":"2025-06-15T16:37:18","modified_gmt":"2025-06-15T14:37:18","slug":"making-the-power-grid-great-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=383346","title":{"rendered":"Making the Power Grid Great Again"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"434\" data-attachment-id=\"375103\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=375103\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0LeeZeldin.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1200,720\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;1&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0LeeZeldin\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0LeeZeldin.jpg?fit=723%2C434&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0LeeZeldin.jpg?resize=723%2C434&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-375103\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0LeeZeldin.jpg?resize=1024%2C614&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0LeeZeldin.jpg?resize=300%2C180&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0LeeZeldin.jpg?resize=768%2C461&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0LeeZeldin.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2025\/06\/13\/making-the-power-grid-great-again\/\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/authors\/diana_furchtgott-roth\/\">Diana Furchtgott-Roth<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">June 12, 2025<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yesterday, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/system\/files\/documents\/2025-06\/12674-01-oar_carbon-pollution-standards-repeal-nrpm_proposal_20250611_clean_v3_0.pdf\">proposed repeal<\/a>&nbsp;of the Biden-era\u2019s Clean Power Plan 2.0, which ruled that coal-fired and many new natural gas power plants must capture and store over 90% of their carbon emissions by the 2030s\u2014or shut down by 2040. It\u2019s a costly mandate, resting on shaky legal and technical foundations. Americans would be fortunate to have it repealed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">President Biden issued his Clean Power Plan 2.0 after the Supreme Court ruled in&nbsp;<em>West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency<\/em>&nbsp;that President Obama\u2019s Clean Power Plan 1.0 exceeded the Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s (EPA) statutory authority. The Court\u2019s 2022 decision concluded that the EPA had overstepped by attempting to reshape the nation\u2019s energy grid without clear congressional approval.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In a world where energy security and affordability are paramount, one might assume that when the Supreme Court strikes down a sweeping environmental regulation, the EPA would reconsider its approach. But in Washington, ideology often trumps reason, and undeterred, the Biden administration returned in 2024 with a sequel that EPA now proposes to end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Clean Power Plan 1.0 attempted to force states to overhaul their energy systems entirely, compelling them to adopt renewable energy and shutter fossil fuel plants, regardless of local needs or economic consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Its successor, the Clean Power Plan 2.0, imposed an estimated $15 billion in regulatory costs over 20 years, and greater costs through increases in prices of electricity and slower economic growth. EPA&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/system\/files\/documents\/2025-06\/12674-01-oar_carbon-pollution-standards-repeal-nrpm_proposal_20250611_clean_v3_0.pdf\">argues<\/a>&nbsp;\u201cthat GHG emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants do not contribute significantly to dangerous air pollution.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Just as Chief Justice John Roberts warned in 2022 that the EPA had claimed \u201can unheralded power representing a transformative expansion of its regulatory authority,\u201d the EPA was trying to do through regulation with the Clean Power Plan 2.0 what Congress had repeatedly declined to do through legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fifteen years ago similar legislative proposals\u2014the Waxman-Markey and Kerry-Lieberman bills\u2014failed in the U.S. Congress even when Democrats held strong majorities. That should have signaled to regulators that such sweeping changes lacked democratic legitimacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yet ideology brooks no dissent, and the Biden administration\u2019s Clean Power Plan 2.0 pressed ahead, relying on technologies that are neither commercially viable nor widely demonstrated. Carbon capture and storage, the linchpin of the Biden plan, remains prohibitively expensive and technically uncertain. Hydrogen, another favored solution, is not cost-effective. The EPA\u2019s cost-benefit analysis glossed over these realities, assuming generous tax subsidies and benefits from reduced CO2 emissions would bridge the gap.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The consequences of this regulatory ambition are stark. The North American Electric Reliability Corporation warned in 2024 that the Biden plan\u2019s disincentives for baseload power would destabilize the electricity grid, increasing the risk of blackouts. Spain\u2019s recent 12-hour blackout offers a cautionary tale: rapid transitions to solar without reliable baseload power can lead to lack of backup power, causing the grid to crash.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Moreover, the Biden plan was regressive. It would raise electricity prices, disproportionately affecting low-income households, farmers, and small businesses. It would also undermine a reliable electricity grid and economic growth. By constraining energy supply and inflating costs, it would drive economic activity and jobs offshore, where goods would be manufactured with coal-fired energy in China.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The dirty secret, which Mr. Zeldin forced into the open, is that the Biden plan would not have helped the climate. The greenhouse gases emitted by the power sector do not significantly affect human health, and moving energy intensive manufacturing overseas where it is made with coal-fired power using older technology would have raised emissions, not lowered them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is also a deeper constitutional issue at play. The EPA is misusing its authority under the Clean Air Act to pressure states into adopting policies that lie outside its jurisdiction. The plan\u2019s emissions targets are so stringent that no state has voted them into law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Clean Power Plan 2.0 amounts to a form of federal commandeering. States are faced with a loss of a significant portion of their electricity generation capacity, and their manufacturing base, by restructuring their energy systems to align with the EPA\u2019s vision. This is not cooperative federalism; it is coercion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And it is unnecessary. America\u2019s carbon emissions have declined by about a billion metric tons over the past 15 years without such mandates. This progress has been driven by technological innovation, not federal diktats. Cleaner air and efficient power generation are worthy goals, but they must be pursued within the bounds of the law and with respect for democratic processes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The lesson from&nbsp;<em>West Virginia v. EPA<\/em>&nbsp;is clear: transformative policy changes require legislative backing. Agencies cannot conjure sweeping powers from ambiguous statutes. The rule of law demands clarity, accountability, and restraint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As America grapples to ensure grid reliability, there is a cautionary tale here. The path to a reliable energy future lies not in top-down mandates, but in innovation, cooperation, and respect for the institutions that safeguard our freedoms. Administrator Zeldin should be congratulated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Diana Furchtgott-Roth is director of the Center for Energy, Climate, and Environment at The Heritage Foundation.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the\u00a0proposed repeal\u00a0of the Biden-era\u2019s Clean Power Plan 2.0, which ruled that coal-fired and many new natural gas power plants must capture and store over 90% of their carbon emissions by the 2030s\u2014or shut down by 2040. It\u2019s a costly mandate, resting on shaky legal and technical foundations. Americans would be fortunate to have it repealed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":375103,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691835834,691829997,691820781,691819691,691821520,691833091],"class_list":["post-383346","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-biden-eras-clean-power-plan-2-0","tag-carbon-dioxide-co","tag-electricity-grid","tag-electricity-prices","tag-environmental-protection-agencys-epa","tag-epa-administrator-lee-zeldin","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0LeeZeldin.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1BJ0","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":411256,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=411256","url_meta":{"origin":383346,"position":0},"title":"Lee Zeldin Says It\u2019s \u2018Very Telling\u2019 China Wants to Keep \u2018Biden EPA Rule in Place\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin told reporters Tuesday that it is \u201cvery telling\u201d that China would want to keep a \u201cBiden EPA rule in place.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"China\"","block_context":{"text":"China","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=china"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-01-201027.png?fit=1200%2C687&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-01-201027.png?fit=1200%2C687&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-01-201027.png?fit=1200%2C687&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-01-201027.png?fit=1200%2C687&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-01-201027.png?fit=1200%2C687&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":405947,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=405947","url_meta":{"origin":383346,"position":1},"title":"Funding for green groups soared after 2009 endangerment finding, nonprofit finds","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/30\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Fed grants to organizations increased from $350 million in 2009 to nearly $1.4 billion in 2023, analysis finds.","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden Administration\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden Administration","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-administration"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQN6D-9fMJBJdhAXTKCJGLqNAEfmfXCtWGnpFRwLn9Q1_OcDGgZpdeFUbva_plDAqWOnj1L8G7omlz5Y4Ss8-zyhkdu7YHhvO7UdXm5tEskk5zeBzGsU8Bi9HcM33AAlQt69z0p8RhllRitu-pa5HBbcL0P2ig.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQN6D-9fMJBJdhAXTKCJGLqNAEfmfXCtWGnpFRwLn9Q1_OcDGgZpdeFUbva_plDAqWOnj1L8G7omlz5Y4Ss8-zyhkdu7YHhvO7UdXm5tEskk5zeBzGsU8Bi9HcM33AAlQt69z0p8RhllRitu-pa5HBbcL0P2ig.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQN6D-9fMJBJdhAXTKCJGLqNAEfmfXCtWGnpFRwLn9Q1_OcDGgZpdeFUbva_plDAqWOnj1L8G7omlz5Y4Ss8-zyhkdu7YHhvO7UdXm5tEskk5zeBzGsU8Bi9HcM33AAlQt69z0p8RhllRitu-pa5HBbcL0P2ig.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQN6D-9fMJBJdhAXTKCJGLqNAEfmfXCtWGnpFRwLn9Q1_OcDGgZpdeFUbva_plDAqWOnj1L8G7omlz5Y4Ss8-zyhkdu7YHhvO7UdXm5tEskk5zeBzGsU8Bi9HcM33AAlQt69z0p8RhllRitu-pa5HBbcL0P2ig.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQN6D-9fMJBJdhAXTKCJGLqNAEfmfXCtWGnpFRwLn9Q1_OcDGgZpdeFUbva_plDAqWOnj1L8G7omlz5Y4Ss8-zyhkdu7YHhvO7UdXm5tEskk5zeBzGsU8Bi9HcM33AAlQt69z0p8RhllRitu-pa5HBbcL0P2ig.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":400524,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=400524","url_meta":{"origin":383346,"position":2},"title":"Reverse Uno: Calculating the Savings from Trump\u2019s Repeal of Biden\u2019s Greenhouse Gas Regulations on Power Plants","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/06\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Our analysis, which was prepared for the Prime Mover Institute (PMI), spanned 50 pages and detailed how the Trump Administration\u2019s deregulatory agenda would save Americans living in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) region $314.6 billion through 2055, with the repeal of Biden and Obama era regulations saving much more\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden administration\u2019s final greenhouse gas rules\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden administration\u2019s final greenhouse gas rules","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-administrations-final-greenhouse-gas-rules"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/07253162b-1111-4a19-ad5b-afc42ac81c91_1285x722.jpg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/07253162b-1111-4a19-ad5b-afc42ac81c91_1285x722.jpg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/07253162b-1111-4a19-ad5b-afc42ac81c91_1285x722.jpg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/07253162b-1111-4a19-ad5b-afc42ac81c91_1285x722.jpg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/07253162b-1111-4a19-ad5b-afc42ac81c91_1285x722.jpg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":426214,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426214","url_meta":{"origin":383346,"position":3},"title":"Trump Administration Ends Obama-Era Climate Finding, Repeals Vehicle GHG Standards","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/14\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under Administrator Lee Zeldin and alongside President Trump, finalized a major rule that revokes the 2009 Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding, a landmark Obama-era determination that greenhouse gases (GHGs) like carbon dioxide endanger public health and welfare. This finding had served\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden and Obama administrations\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden and Obama administrations","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-and-obama-administrations"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":425995,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=425995","url_meta":{"origin":383346,"position":4},"title":"Trump and Zeldin Deliver Single Largest Deregulatory Action in U.S. History","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/13\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"On February 12, 2026, President Donald Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced what they described as the single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history. This occurred during an event in the White House Roosevelt Room. The core of the action is the EPA's final rule repealing the 2009 Greenhouse\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"American dream\"","block_context":{"text":"American dream","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=american-dream"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0AQN0KhAmYkjSkAWpPLnH2R5K_gRWQqHTkycKyB7IWN58whr3XAQiPIsaYYmy-wd0-RKF3dLXpuzrDFKe5EgG8Fyoa5fyVLiEZ5zM6CotN7PsOLjZ3xujIDJ7zRDkhCXQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C723&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0AQN0KhAmYkjSkAWpPLnH2R5K_gRWQqHTkycKyB7IWN58whr3XAQiPIsaYYmy-wd0-RKF3dLXpuzrDFKe5EgG8Fyoa5fyVLiEZ5zM6CotN7PsOLjZ3xujIDJ7zRDkhCXQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C723&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0AQN0KhAmYkjSkAWpPLnH2R5K_gRWQqHTkycKyB7IWN58whr3XAQiPIsaYYmy-wd0-RKF3dLXpuzrDFKe5EgG8Fyoa5fyVLiEZ5zM6CotN7PsOLjZ3xujIDJ7zRDkhCXQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C723&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0AQN0KhAmYkjSkAWpPLnH2R5K_gRWQqHTkycKyB7IWN58whr3XAQiPIsaYYmy-wd0-RKF3dLXpuzrDFKe5EgG8Fyoa5fyVLiEZ5zM6CotN7PsOLjZ3xujIDJ7zRDkhCXQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C723&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0AQN0KhAmYkjSkAWpPLnH2R5K_gRWQqHTkycKyB7IWN58whr3XAQiPIsaYYmy-wd0-RKF3dLXpuzrDFKe5EgG8Fyoa5fyVLiEZ5zM6CotN7PsOLjZ3xujIDJ7zRDkhCXQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C723&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":402324,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=402324","url_meta":{"origin":383346,"position":5},"title":"Trump Admin Moves To Blow Up Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/15\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Trump administration is moving to scrap an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) program projected to save American businesses up to $2.4 billion in regulatory costs, according to the agency.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0EPA-Building-Plaque.jpg?fit=1200%2C803&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0EPA-Building-Plaque.jpg?fit=1200%2C803&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0EPA-Building-Plaque.jpg?fit=1200%2C803&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0EPA-Building-Plaque.jpg?fit=1200%2C803&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0EPA-Building-Plaque.jpg?fit=1200%2C803&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=383346"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383346\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":383349,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383346\/revisions\/383349"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/375103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=383346"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=383346"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=383346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}