{"id":382931,"date":"2025-06-12T08:45:37","date_gmt":"2025-06-12T06:45:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=382931"},"modified":"2025-06-12T08:45:38","modified_gmt":"2025-06-12T06:45:38","slug":"skipping-the-rules-offshore-winds-legal-issue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=382931","title":{"rendered":"Skipping the Rules: Offshore Wind\u2019s Legal Issue"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Master Resource<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0<\/em>Lisa Linowes<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe law remains clear: the Department of the Interior must ensure that offshore projects prevent unreasonable interference before approval \u2014 not simply allow harm and hope payouts will quiet objections.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

With offshore wind, a lethal tort issue lurks beneath the waves: Is it enough to pay off harmed ocean users after the fact, or does the law demand the government prevent harm in the first place? Under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA)<\/a>, a clear answer is being dangerously overlooked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OCSLA, originally passed in 1953 and amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, governs energy development on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). Section 8(p)(4)(I) imposes a specific duty on the Department of the Interior: before approving offshore activities like wind development, the Secretary must ensure the project \u201cprovides for the prevention of interference with reasonable uses\u201d of the ocean \u2014 including fishing, recreation, and navigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is not just bureaucratic language. It\u2019s a binding legal duty. The government must prevent offshore projects, like wind farms, from unreasonably interfering with existing ocean uses, such as commercial fishing, recreation, and navigation. The law does not say the government can simply let interference happen and pay those harmed later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The legal framework is well established. The Department\u2019s own Solicitor, in Opinion M-37059<\/a>, makes this clear. The statute applies a reasonableness standard: if a project causes unreasonable interference, it cannot go forward; if the interference is minimal (de minimis) or reasonable, it may proceed. But crucially, offering financial compensation to harmed parties does not satisfy this duty. In fact, the very creation of a compensation scheme presumes that interference exists \u2014 it doesn\u2019t erase it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Workaround?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

So why, then, are developers setting up compensation funds for displaced fishermen? The answer lies in a legal workaround. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has leaned on the National Environmental Policy Act <\/a>(NEPA), which has its own framework for \u201cmitigation.\u201d NEPA\u2019s regulations allow agencies to consider a range of mitigation options, including avoiding, minimizing, repairing, reducing, or compensating for environmental impacts. BOEM has treated developer-funded compensation programs as valid mitigation under NEPA, using them to support positive approval decisions for offshore wind projects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But NEPA is only procedural \u2014 it cannot override or substitute for the substantive requirements of OCSLA. While NEPA allows agencies to consider compensation, OCSLA demands prevention when interference crosses the threshold of unreasonableness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, BOEM itself has acknowledged the legal limits of these compensation efforts. In its Guidelines for Providing Information for Mitigating Impacts to Commercial and For-Hire Recreational Fisheries on the Outer Continental Shelf Pursuant to 30 CFR Part 585<\/em><\/a>, BOEM explicitly states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

There are no existing Federal regulations that require compensation for economic loss from displacement attributed to offshore wind energy installations.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

This distinction matters. While OCSLA Section 302 (43 U.S.C. \u00a7\u202f1846) provides a statutory process to compensate fishermen for physical gear losses caused by oil and gas activities, there is no similar federal law covering lost revenue or displacement from offshore wind. Payments for lost income or access are voluntary, not legally required, and they do not fulfill the government\u2019s statutory obligation under OCSLA \u00a7\u202f8(p)(4)(I).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Biden Trouble Should Not be Trump\u2019s<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Biden administration\u2019s BOEM systematically ignored the law \u2014 approving offshore wind projects by relying on compensation schemes rather than fulfilling its duty to prevent interference. Now, President Trump, in greenlighting the Empire Wind project off New York<\/a> as part of a broader effort to secure a new gas pipeline, risks making the same mistake. [1]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

No deal, no matter how politically or economically tempting, gives the federal government the right to bypass OCSLA\u2019s mandates. The law remains clear: the Department of the Interior must ensure that offshore projects prevent unreasonable interference before approval \u2014 not simply allow harm and hope payouts will quiet objections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

President Trump and his team should not follow the Biden administration down this flawed path. Upholding the law is not optional. Anything less would betray the public trust \u2014 and President Trump should seize the chance to do what the Biden administration did not: uphold the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[1]<\/strong> For greater detail on the Trump Administration\u2019s deal with New York Governor Kathy Hochul to okay Empire Wind in return for certification of natural gas pipelines in the state, see here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

This analysis. slightly edited, was first published by Save Right Whales Coalition<\/a><\/em> and WindAction<\/a>. Lisa Linowes\u2019s previous posts at MasterResource can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

With offshore wind, a lethal tort issue lurks beneath the waves: Is it enough to pay off harmed ocean users after the fact, or does the law demand the government prevent harm in the first place? Under the\u00a0Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), a clear answer is being dangerously overlooked.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":382933,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818336,691820979,691835775,691823546,691818301,691835776,691835774],"class_list":{"0":"post-382931","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-biden-administration","9":"tag-bureau-of-ocean-energy-management-boem","10":"tag-energy-policy-act-of-2005","11":"tag-national-environmental-policy-act-nepa","12":"tag-offshore-wind","13":"tag-opinion-m-37059","14":"tag-outer-continental-shelf-lands-act-ocsla","16":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/ChatGPT-Image-2.-Mai-2025-12_52_05-1.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1BCj","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":397868,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=397868","url_meta":{"origin":382931,"position":0},"title":"U.S. Offshore Wind: Politics Giveth, Taketh","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"26\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Last Friday, the Daily Caller News Foundation broke an exclusive story that the U.S. had ordered a halt to construction on the offshore Revolution Wind Farm project. The article, \u201cTrump Admin Kills Massive Offshore Wind Project,\u201d\u00a0announced the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (Department of Interior).","rel":"","context":"In \"\u00d8rsted\"","block_context":{"text":"\u00d8rsted","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=orsted-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM5aSHyJfhzclTlrdvD6K6IX4BnDZpdMrRDE2wS524G23iw74cmiMR1eJjNAwKH7AA8Fxr5Y060cCoDCB0gjsAluaBzLP-UMnv0YWBjImaefr3_urSomKJpAHBuB3l1bnGKA2FkjjdciWqS5JwBuegwncaxjA-2.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM5aSHyJfhzclTlrdvD6K6IX4BnDZpdMrRDE2wS524G23iw74cmiMR1eJjNAwKH7AA8Fxr5Y060cCoDCB0gjsAluaBzLP-UMnv0YWBjImaefr3_urSomKJpAHBuB3l1bnGKA2FkjjdciWqS5JwBuegwncaxjA-2.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM5aSHyJfhzclTlrdvD6K6IX4BnDZpdMrRDE2wS524G23iw74cmiMR1eJjNAwKH7AA8Fxr5Y060cCoDCB0gjsAluaBzLP-UMnv0YWBjImaefr3_urSomKJpAHBuB3l1bnGKA2FkjjdciWqS5JwBuegwncaxjA-2.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM5aSHyJfhzclTlrdvD6K6IX4BnDZpdMrRDE2wS524G23iw74cmiMR1eJjNAwKH7AA8Fxr5Y060cCoDCB0gjsAluaBzLP-UMnv0YWBjImaefr3_urSomKJpAHBuB3l1bnGKA2FkjjdciWqS5JwBuegwncaxjA-2.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM5aSHyJfhzclTlrdvD6K6IX4BnDZpdMrRDE2wS524G23iw74cmiMR1eJjNAwKH7AA8Fxr5Y060cCoDCB0gjsAluaBzLP-UMnv0YWBjImaefr3_urSomKJpAHBuB3l1bnGKA2FkjjdciWqS5JwBuegwncaxjA-2.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362987,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362987","url_meta":{"origin":382931,"position":1},"title":"EO: Temporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"22\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. You are authorized and directed to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Energy Costs\"","block_context":{"text":"Energy Costs","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=energy-costs"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Moorea-Whale-Watching5-2000x1200_76336_84466.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Moorea-Whale-Watching5-2000x1200_76336_84466.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Moorea-Whale-Watching5-2000x1200_76336_84466.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Moorea-Whale-Watching5-2000x1200_76336_84466.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Moorea-Whale-Watching5-2000x1200_76336_84466.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367760,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=367760","url_meta":{"origin":382931,"position":2},"title":"The Gulf of America is now officially open for business!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"26\/02\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The\u00a0Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA)\u00a0gives BOEM the authority to manage the OCS and the requirement to provide environmental oversight. The Gulf continues to be the nation\u2019s primary offshore source of\u00a0oil and gas, generating about 97% of all U.S. OCS oil and gas production. OCS activities generate substantial revenues from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Gulf of America\"","block_context":{"text":"Gulf of America","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=gulf-of-america"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0Gulf-of-America-map-1200x953-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C953&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0Gulf-of-America-map-1200x953-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C953&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0Gulf-of-America-map-1200x953-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C953&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0Gulf-of-America-map-1200x953-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C953&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0Gulf-of-America-map-1200x953-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C953&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362450,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362450","url_meta":{"origin":382931,"position":3},"title":"Last Gasp for Offshore Wind: “Reinvesting in Shoreline Economies and Ecosystems Act”","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\"So the U.S. is about one percent, with six years to go, toward meeting the Biden\/Harris goal for offshore wind of 30 GW. Just another rank exaggeration, another energy fantasy, in the undoing.\"","rel":"","context":"In \"offshore wind\"","block_context":{"text":"offshore wind","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=offshore-wind"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Floating-Offshore-Wind-scaled-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Floating-Offshore-Wind-scaled-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Floating-Offshore-Wind-scaled-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Floating-Offshore-Wind-scaled-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Floating-Offshore-Wind-scaled-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256996,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=256996","url_meta":{"origin":382931,"position":4},"title":"SI KINSELLA vs. SOUTH FORK WIND, BOEM, et al.","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Si Kinsella is a resident of\u00a0Suffolk County New York, a seaside community that is a staging area for\u00a0South\u00a0Fork Wind, a 132 MW, 15-turbine project located 35 miles offshore.\u00a0He is representing himself on behalf of his neighbors.","rel":"","context":"In \"Bureau of Ocean Energy Management\"","block_context":{"text":"Bureau of Ocean Energy Management","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bureau-of-ocean-energy-management"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0SFW-Substation-Redering.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0SFW-Substation-Redering.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0SFW-Substation-Redering.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0SFW-Substation-Redering.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0SFW-Substation-Redering.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375094,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=375094","url_meta":{"origin":382931,"position":5},"title":"Offshore wind developers risk trouble with Trump","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"15\/04\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"President Trump is clear about offshore wind. On day one of his second term, he signed an executive order titled \u201cTemporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government\u2019s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"Atlantic Shores Wind\"","block_context":{"text":"Atlantic Shores Wind","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atlantic-shores-wind"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Screenshot-2025-04-15-094751.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Screenshot-2025-04-15-094751.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Screenshot-2025-04-15-094751.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Screenshot-2025-04-15-094751.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Screenshot-2025-04-15-094751.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=382931"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382931\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":382935,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382931\/revisions\/382935"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/382933"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=382931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=382931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=382931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}