{"id":380078,"date":"2025-05-26T16:16:08","date_gmt":"2025-05-26T14:16:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=380078"},"modified":"2025-05-26T16:16:09","modified_gmt":"2025-05-26T14:16:09","slug":"bbc-complaint-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=380078","title":{"rendered":"BBC Complaint Upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Paul Homewood<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/articles\/czvvqdg8zxno<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The BBC\u2019s Executive Complaint Unit has now upheld my complaint about the above report, which presented computer models as factual.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is their formal response to me:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Thank you for contacting the Executive Complaints Unit and asking it to consider your concerns about the above article<\/a> on the BBC News website. I know you are familiar with the BBC\u2019s complaints process and so I hope I can offer a swift response, particularly in light of the time which has elapsed since you first raised your concerns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The original headline of the article stated there was a link between climate change and the heatwaves in America and Mexico and presented this as a matter of fact rather than indicating it was the finding of an attribution study conducted by a group of climate scientists. The headline therefore failed to meet the requirements for due accuracy which are set out in the BBC\u2019s Editorial Guidelines<\/a>. The subsequent edit to the headline and the addition of a note explaining the change were, however, sufficient for this Unit to consider the matter to have been appropriately resolved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a>I note you have asked for \u201ca formal correction be listed on your complaints site\u201d<\/em> and so I hope you\u2019ll be reassured to know the Executive Complaints Unit publishes the outcome of its investigations every fortnight and a summary of our finding in this case will be published in the complaints section of the BBC website, bbc.co.uk, later today. This ensures the error you identified will be corrected as a matter of public record, over and above the correction now at the foot of the article itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the second point you raised in your correspondence to this Unit, I can also assure you our finding has been discussed with relevant managers and editors in BBC News. This has included the way in which the findings of attribution studies are reported to try to ensure members of the audience are not misled in the future.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The edit to the headline, made after my initial complaint, consisted of putting quotation marks around \u201c35 times more likely\u201d, <\/strong>which was hardly a correction!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But my main reason for taking this up to the ECU  was that \u201ccorrections\u201d made months after publication will be seen by nobody.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They have now confirmed that their next fortnightly complaint report will include this finding:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Climate change made US and Mexico heatwave 35 times more likely, bbc.co.uk.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Complaint<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A reader complained the above headline was published without qualification, suggesting it was an undisputed fact that Climate Change had made heatwaves in US and Mexico 35 times more likely. The ECU considered the complaint against the standards for accuracy set out in the BBC Editorial Guidelines.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Outcome<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The ECU considered the evidence, which came from climate scientists, was put into proper context in the body of the article, with readers informed about its nature and the uncertainty which accompanies the use of computer modelling in this area \u2013 but the original headline presented the precise link between climate change and the heatwaves in America and Mexico as a matter of fact, and failed to meet the requirements for due accuracy in that respect. However, the subsequent edit, with the addition of quotation marks round \u201c35 times more likely\u201d and a note explaining the change, were sufficient for the Unit to consider the matter to have been appropriately resolved.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Resolved<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

My second reason for involving the ECU was to get them to lay down future guidelines for using attribution models, which they have now published here.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It probably will not make much difference to the Justin Rowlatts of the BBC, but at least we now have a precedent laid down if further complaints are made in future. The ECU have made it clear that computer models cannot be treated as factual.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The BBC\u2019s Executive Complaint Unit has now upheld my complaint about the above report, which presented computer models as factual.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":380084,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818389,691820826,691835335,691834206],"class_list":{"0":"post-380078","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-bbc","9":"tag-extreme-temperatures","10":"tag-us-and-mexico","11":"tag-world-weather-attribution-wwa","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/OIG-31.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1ASi","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":261053,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=261053","url_meta":{"origin":380078,"position":0},"title":"BBC upheld just 25 complaints of bias in five\u00a0years","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"I\u2019m surprised it\u2019s as many as 25!!","rel":"","context":"In \"BBC\"","block_context":{"text":"BBC","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bbc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0EDZ2IVNKMSEWTLK4LMUU5K3RMU.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0EDZ2IVNKMSEWTLK4LMUU5K3RMU.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0EDZ2IVNKMSEWTLK4LMUU5K3RMU.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0EDZ2IVNKMSEWTLK4LMUU5K3RMU.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0EDZ2IVNKMSEWTLK4LMUU5K3RMU.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197701,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=197701","url_meta":{"origin":380078,"position":1},"title":"Two Complaints Upheld Against Justin Rowlatt","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/04\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Paul Homewood https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/iplayer\/episode\/m00117h1\/panorama-wild-weather-our-world-under-threat You will no doubt recall that Panorama edition from last November! Justin Rowlatt used the hour long programme to claim that climate change was making the world\u2019s weather much worse. He made two specific claims that were blatant lies: 1) He opened the programme by stating:\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/00image_thumb-96.webp?fit=600%2C391&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/00image_thumb-96.webp?fit=600%2C391&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/00image_thumb-96.webp?fit=600%2C391&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199607,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=199607","url_meta":{"origin":380078,"position":2},"title":"New Statesman Condones BBC Fake News","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/05\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Paul Homewood The New Statesman objects that attention has been drawn to Justin Rowlatt\u2019s misreporting! https:\/\/www.newstatesman.com\/quickfire\/2022\/05\/is-the-bbc-misrepresenting-climate-change According to them: A first complaint was upheld about Rowlatt\u2019s coverage last June, when he described the UK offshore wind industry as \u201cnow virtually subsidy free\u201d. The ECU admitted that he did not\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0image-40.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0image-40.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0image-40.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0image-40.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199267,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=199267","url_meta":{"origin":380078,"position":3},"title":"BBC climate editor made false claims on global warming\u2013Mail","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/05\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Paul Homewood Good to see that the Mail has picked up on the Rowlatt story. I contacted them last week with the tip off. I gather it is also in the Times. A\u00a0BBC\u00a0Panorama documentary about global warming made a number of false claims, an internal investigation by the broadcaster\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/00screenhunter-03.png?fit=503%2C695&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":271888,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=271888","url_meta":{"origin":380078,"position":4},"title":"BBC Admits to Smearing Anti-Ulez Protesters as \u2018Far Right\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/08\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The BBC\u2019s Executive Complaints Unit (ECU) has responded to complaints about its news coverage of an anti-Ulez protest in London\u2019s Trafalgar Square on Saturday, April 15th, 2023.","rel":"","context":"In \"anti-Ulez\"","block_context":{"text":"anti-Ulez","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=anti-ulez"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-200.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-200.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-200.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-200.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-200.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246429,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=246429","url_meta":{"origin":380078,"position":5},"title":"BBC \u201aReality Check\u2018 \u2013 Hoist by its own petard","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"So much for the BBC\u2019s Editorial Standards boast of being \u201c\u2026 open in acknowledging mistakes\u2026\u201d\u00a0 As Paul and many NaLoPKT readers are aware, the challenging part is to get the Beeb to admit its mistakes.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-45.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-45.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-45.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-45.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-45.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380078","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=380078"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380078\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":380085,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380078\/revisions\/380085"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/380084"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=380078"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=380078"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=380078"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}