{"id":377066,"date":"2025-05-02T12:55:43","date_gmt":"2025-05-02T10:55:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=377066"},"modified":"2025-05-02T12:55:45","modified_gmt":"2025-05-02T10:55:45","slug":"maines-floating-wind-program-takes-another-hit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=377066","title":{"rendered":"Maine\u2019s floating wind program takes another hit"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By David Wojick<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US Energy Department recently suspended a large grant at the University of Maine for research on floating wind technology. The full significance of this suspension will not be known until it plays out, but it is useful to see the context. This research plays a central role in Maine\u2019s massive offshore wind development program, which CFACT has been fighting for some time with sizable success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Maine averages just a mere 1,500 MW of electricity consumption, but they want to have a crazy 3,000 MW of offshore wind. This target assumes complete electrification of cars, trucks, home heat, etc. \u2013 the full transition, which is never going to happen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even worse, given the great offshore depths, this has to be floating wind which costs around three times as much as fixed bottom wind, which is already way too expensive. Floating wind is also environmentally destructive with a vast undersea web of anchoring cables.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It also requires a big factory to make the huge floaters that carry the turbine towers. Maine\u2019s objectionable choice of a factory site is Sears Island, the largest uninhabited and undeveloped island on the East Coast. Maine legislator Reagan Paul\u2019s district includes Sears Island, and she is adamantly against this project. CFACT has worked closely with her in this fight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Central to the Maine plan is the use of floating wind technology being developed by the University of Maine. You can see some of their research work funded under the now stopped grant here: \u201cOptimized Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Substructure Design Trends for 10\u201330 MW Turbines in Low-, Medium-, and High-Severity Wave Environments\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2411-9660\/8\/4\/72<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, the DOE funded research that was just stopped is on the critical path for the Maine plan. In fact, the University researchers were in the process of building, launching, and operating a small-scale version of their floater design. The floater is sitting at a dock waiting for its turbine tower to be erected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, Maine\u2019s entire offshore program has already been stopped, at least for now, which might make the research moot. This stoppage is an event that CFACT likely played a key role in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Sears Island floater factory was going to cost a lot of money, so Maine applied to the US Transportation Department for a roughly half billion dollars grant to pay for most of it. DOT had already given a similar huge grant to California.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CFACT research found that this DOT grant program was intended for projects that improved US freight traffic, which a floater factory certainly does not do. Thus, the grant would be a misallocation of federal funds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So we filed a complaint with GAO\u2019s Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Reporting System. They examined it and sent it to the DOT Inspector General. Not long after that, DOT notified Maine that their grant application would not be funded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is possible that DOT turned Maine down for other reasons, but the timing makes it likely that we blew the telling whistle. Of course DOT did not say the grant would be inappropriate as they had already made one just like it. But President Trump was about to take office, so maybe they decided it was time to abandon Biden\u2019s illegal grant practice once it was pointed out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For more on the foolishness of the Maine program see my report here: http:\/\/www.cfact.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Maines-massive-floating-wind-folly.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Getting back to the DOE research grant stoppage, it would be great if they were joining EPA and Interior in carrying out the President\u2019s policy of stopping offshore wind. EPA and Interior have each recently stopped a major offshore wind project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, as with the DOE research stoppage, all of these actions are temporary, at least on paper. Each says there is an investigation going on, as does the President\u2019s offshore wind executive order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, there is a lot left to be done when it comes to stopping offshore wind. CFACT will be active throughout this process. Stay tuned to see how it all plays out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The US Energy Department recently suspended a large grant at the University of Maine for research on floating wind technology. The full significance of this suspension will not be known until it plays out, but it is useful to see the context. This research plays a central role in Maine\u2019s massive offshore wind development program, which CFACT has been fighting for some time with sizable success.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":377069,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691833292,691829250,691834852,691829253,691834851,691834850],"class_list":{"0":"post-377066","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-epa-environmental-protection-agency","9":"tag-floating-wind","10":"tag-interior","11":"tag-maine","12":"tag-turbine-towers","13":"tag-us-energy-department","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0ef996c57-1c9f-401b-9c64-61031fd40b2d.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1A5I","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":344385,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=344385","url_meta":{"origin":377066,"position":0},"title":"Maine\u2019s massive \u201cfloating wind\u201d folly \u2014 my report","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/24\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"This report examines several fundamental aspects of the State of Maine\u2019s offshore wind development plan. It is divided into two parts. Part 1 examines certain economic issues, such as feasibility, cost, and progress to date. Part 2 explores the proposed development as it relates to the entire Gulf of Maine,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM)\"","block_context":{"text":"Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bureau-of-ocean-energy-management-boem"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":342321,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=342321","url_meta":{"origin":377066,"position":1},"title":"CFACT report exposes Maine\u2019s massive floating wind folly","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Wind turbines are inefficient, intermittent, expensive, carry a heavy environmental footprint, and are not up to the task of powering the future.","rel":"","context":"In \"coast of Maine.\"","block_context":{"text":"coast of Maine.","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=coast-of-maine"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350236,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=350236","url_meta":{"origin":377066,"position":2},"title":"Feds refuse to fund floating offshore wind project in Maine","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/05\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Dealing a stunning financial blow to a controversial renewable energy project off the New England Coast, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Oct. 21 rejected a grant application for $456 million to build offshore wind turbines and install them on floating platforms in the Gulf of Maine.","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden-Harris Administration\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden-Harris Administration","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-harris-administration"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Floating-wind-turbine-portugal-dept-of-energy.jpg?fit=1200%2C822&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334294,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=334294","url_meta":{"origin":377066,"position":3},"title":"Highway funds illegally used for floating wind factories","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/23\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Biden Administration is illegally redirecting hundreds of millions of dollars in highway grant money to fund construction of floating wind manufacturing facilities. The funding mechanism is the INFRA Grant Program in Biden\u2019s Transportation Department. To begin with, here is how the website describes the Program: \u201cWhat is the INFRA\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"INFRA (the Nationally Significant Multimodal Freight & Highway Projects program)\"","block_context":{"text":"INFRA (the Nationally Significant Multimodal Freight & Highway Projects program)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=infra-the-nationally-significant-multimodal-freight-highway-projects-program"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0Electric-vehicle-charging-wind-turbine-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0Electric-vehicle-charging-wind-turbine-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0Electric-vehicle-charging-wind-turbine-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0Electric-vehicle-charging-wind-turbine-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0Electric-vehicle-charging-wind-turbine-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333227,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=333227","url_meta":{"origin":377066,"position":4},"title":"Floating wind madness in Maine","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/17\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Government of Maine has really big plans for floating wind, a floating net zero fantasy, in fact. Since floating wind power is the next big green thing, it is worth taking a close look at this ruinous vision.","rel":"","context":"In \"floating wind\"","block_context":{"text":"floating wind","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=floating-wind"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-384.png?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-384.png?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-384.png?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-384.png?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-384.png?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":382732,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=382732","url_meta":{"origin":377066,"position":5},"title":"DOT asked to terminate illegal floating wind grant","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/11\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"I have the honor and pleasure of co-signing a letter to the U.S. Secretary of Transportation, Sean Duffy, asking him to terminate a half billion-dollar grant made by the Biden administration to the West Coast wind industry. The short story is the grant was illegal.","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden Administration\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden Administration","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-administration"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-241.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-241.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-241.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-241.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/377066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=377066"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/377066\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":377070,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/377066\/revisions\/377070"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/377069"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=377066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=377066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=377066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}