{"id":377009,"date":"2025-05-01T12:17:09","date_gmt":"2025-05-01T10:17:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=377009"},"modified":"2025-05-01T12:17:11","modified_gmt":"2025-05-01T10:17:11","slug":"climate-anxiety-or-just-another-political-map-masquerading-as-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=377009","title":{"rendered":"Climate Anxiety? Or Just Another Political Map Masquerading as Science?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Anthony Watts<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In their recent article, \u201cAmerica\u2019s Climate Anxiety Map\u201d<\/a>, Axios<\/em> claims that Americans across the country are increasingly distressed about climate change, and that this emotional distress can be neatly visualized in map form. That claim is misleading at best and politically constructed at worst. Why? Because the \u201cclimate anxiety\u201d map itself looks eerily familiar\u2014it mirrors the 2024 presidential voting map, with the most \u201canxious\u201d areas neatly aligning with Democrat strongholds. The data doesn\u2019t suggest a climate emergency; it suggests a partisan psychological phenomenon manufactured by relentless media messaging.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s start with the map Axios<\/em> published. It\u2019s presented as a national heat map of where people feel most \u201canxious\u201d about climate change, based on polling from the American Psychological Association (APA) and The Harris Poll. The darker the color, the more distress reportedly felt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But do a simple hue shift<\/strong> on that image\u2014flipping greens and blues to blues and reds\u2014and something remarkable happens: it starts looking a lot like the 2024 electoral map by county<\/a>. Red counties (which dominate the interior) show lower concern, while blue coastal urban centers light up like warning beacons of existential dread.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
https:\/\/www.axios.com\/local\/san-francisco\/2025\/04\/10\/climate-change-anxiety-attitudes-sf<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

So, what are we really mapping here? Is it climate anxiety\u2014or is it partisanship?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The entire premise of this map is based not on physical reality\u2014no temperature data, no CO\u2082 concentrations, no storm frequencies\u2014but on self-reported feelings<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let that sink in. Axios and the APA are treating emotional distress as a reliable indicator of climate danger. But we know from decades of polling that political orientation has a powerful influence on how people perceive risk, especially on abstract or complex issues like climate. According to Gallup\u2019s long-term tracking<\/a>, Democrats consistently report far more concern about global warming than Republicans or independents. This has remained true even when objective metrics\u2014like hurricane landfall trends or U.S. temperature anomalies\u2014have shown little change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So what this map actually reveals is not<\/em> where the climate is changing the most\u2014but where people have been most influenced by alarmist messaging.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The problem is that media narratives are driving climate perception, not actual events or trends.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you live in New York, San Francisco, or Seattle, you\u2019re inundated daily with headlines predicting everything from the end of snow to boiling oceans. If you believe the mainstream narrative, every heat wave is a sign of the apocalypse. Never mind that these claims often fall apart under scrutiny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, climate models used by the IPCC have repeatedly run too hot compared to observed temperatures\u2014a fact acknowledged in the AR6 report<\/a> itself. Additionally, data from NOAA and the National Hurricane Center shows no upward trend<\/strong> in U.S. hurricane landfalls since records began (link<\/a>). In fact, some categories of extreme weather have shown declines in intensity or frequency. But those facts rarely make it into mainstream coverage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Instead, young people are bombarded with terms like \u201ceco-grief,\u201d \u201cclimate trauma,\u201d and \u201csolastalgia\u201d\u2014psychological disorders supposedly caused by fear of climate change. These are not mental illnesses born from lived experience. They are constructs shaped by repetition and ideology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The American Psychological Association, which co-sponsored this anxiety map project, has increasingly positioned itself not as a neutral observer, but as an active participant<\/strong> in climate activism. Their climate change resource center<\/a> is filled with advocacy language, warning of the devastating psychological impacts of global warming\u2014most of which are based on projections, not measurements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s be clear: there\u2019s no established medical consensus that climate change is causing widespread diagnosable mental illness in the U.S. Instead, people are reporting worry<\/strong>, which the APA then recasts as a psychological crisis. This is classic feedback-loop thinking. The more people are told they should be terrified, the more they are\u2014and the cycle continues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We\u2019ve seen this movie before. During the Cold War, some Americans lived in daily fear of nuclear annihilation. But no one suggested we map national anxiety as if it were proof that war was imminent. Anxiety is a consequence<\/em> of perception, not a measure of external truth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Strangely absent from the Axios article is any mention of actual weather trends where anxiety is supposedly highest. Did New Yorkers suffer a record number of natural disasters in 2024? Was there a heat dome over Boston? Did the Pacific Northwest burn to the ground last year?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The answer is no. In fact, U.S. wildfire acreage burned in recent years is well below<\/strong> the peak decades of the 1930s and 1940s, as documented by the National Interagency Fire Center<\/a>. Heat waves, while attention-grabbing, are not more frequent than they were in the early 20th century. And cold extremes still regularly sweep through \u201cclimate-anxious\u201d zones\u2014undermining the simplistic idea that people\u2019s emotions are a rational response to their environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the fear were rooted in actual weather experience, we\u2019d expect rural Texans and Floridians\u2014who live with droughts and hurricanes\u2014to top the list. But they don\u2019t. Instead, we see anxiety clustering in university towns and media hubs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This map also unintentionally reveals how successful climate messaging has become in certain demographics. For years, groups like Climate Central<\/a>, the UN IPCC<\/a>, and the U.S. Global Change Research Program<\/a> have pushed increasingly dire forecasts into the public consciousness. In schools, in newsrooms, and even in mental health training, the message has been: you should be afraid.<\/em> Basically, Climate messaging has become ideological grooming.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And when people\u2014especially younger generations\u2014report that fear, activists point to it as evidence of crisis. But it\u2019s not. It\u2019s evidence of indoctrination<\/strong>. An emotional reaction to a steady drumbeat of narrative, not a scientific appraisal of conditions on the ground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s not forget the tangible consequences of this climate-induced psychological fragility. People who believe the world is ending in 10 years are less likely to invest in their future, more likely to support extreme policy interventions, and increasingly distrustful of dissenting viewpoints. This isn\u2019t just emotional discomfort\u2014it\u2019s a recipe for poor decision-making at every level of society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And the irony? Many of the same people who are emotionally paralyzed over \u201cclimate catastrophe\u201d live in regions with some of the lowest per capita emissions<\/strong> and highest standards of living<\/strong> in the world. They are not suffering from climate change\u2014they are suffering from narrative fatigue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the end, what Axios<\/em> published was not journalism. It was narrative engineering. A psychological temperature chart built not on data, but on feelings\u2014feelings shaped by decades of one-sided storytelling and political ideology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is not a \u201cclimate anxiety map.\u201d It\u2019s a partisan vulnerability map<\/strong>. And The Hill, the APA, and Axios ought to be ashamed of pushing this kind of pseudo-scientific, politically driven drivel onto the public. It is simply bad journalism hiding behind a map.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The job of the press is to inform, not manipulate. But when it comes to climate, lately that line has been blurred beyond recognition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In their recent article,\u00a0\u201cAmerica\u2019s Climate Anxiety Map\u201d,\u00a0Axios\u00a0claims that Americans across the country are increasingly distressed about climate change, and that this emotional distress can be neatly visualized in map form. That claim is misleading at best and politically constructed at worst. Why? Because the \u201cclimate anxiety\u201d map itself looks eerily familiar\u2014it mirrors the 2024 presidential voting map, with the most \u201canxious\u201d areas neatly aligning with Democrat strongholds.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":377014,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691834843,691819872,691828304,691823923,691834845,691834844],"class_list":{"0":"post-377009","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-american-psychological-association-apa","9":"tag-ar6-report","10":"tag-axios","11":"tag-climate-anxiety","12":"tag-no-data","13":"tag-the-harris-poll","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0Climate-Anxiety.webp?fit=1200%2C914&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1A4N","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213028,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=213028","url_meta":{"origin":377009,"position":0},"title":"Claim: Some People are Suffering Debilitating Eco-Anxiety \u2013 But their Fears are Justified \ud83e\udd21\ud83e\udd21\ud83e\udd21","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Maybe people who are suffering climate panic to the point of debilitation are incapable of listening to or evaluating contrary evidence. But\u00a0surely trying to talk them down from their state of debilitating panic has got to be a better plan than reinforcing their delusions, by telling them their fears are\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-374.png?fit=1024%2C716&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-374.png?fit=1024%2C716&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-374.png?fit=1024%2C716&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-374.png?fit=1024%2C716&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246258,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=246258","url_meta":{"origin":377009,"position":1},"title":"No, Axios, Future U.S. Hurricane Damage Losses Will Not be Driven by Climate Change","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The article is misleading. The article cites climate model projections to support its claims, rather than data, because data does not show that the number or intensity of hurricanes have increased during the recent period of modest global warming.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-4.png?fit=833%2C647&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-4.png?fit=833%2C647&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-4.png?fit=833%2C647&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-4.png?fit=833%2C647&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215379,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=215379","url_meta":{"origin":377009,"position":2},"title":"WEF: Teach Compulsory Climate Change Studies to Alleviate Youth Anxiety","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"25\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The UN is calling for climate education to become compulsory in schools from 2025 to better equip children to cope with global warming\u00a0in the future.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1044.png?fit=711%2C397&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1044.png?fit=711%2C397&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1044.png?fit=711%2C397&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1044.png?fit=711%2C397&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":381613,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=381613","url_meta":{"origin":377009,"position":3},"title":"Warmer Summers? Not So Fast AXIOS: Nighttime Lows Drive the Heat, Not Daytime Highs","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/06\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In their recent article,\u00a0\u201cAmerica\u2019s summers keep getting warmer,\u201d\u00a0Axios claims that hotter summers across the U.S. are \u201cone of the clearest ways we experience climate change.\u201d That statement is misleading. The article focuses exclusively on \u201caverage summer temperatures\u201d while ignoring crucial underlying details \u2014 specifically, the difference between daytime highs and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"average summer temperatures\"","block_context":{"text":"average summer temperatures","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=average-summer-temperatures"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0Urban-Heat-Island-Effect-A162104504.jpg?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0Urban-Heat-Island-Effect-A162104504.jpg?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0Urban-Heat-Island-Effect-A162104504.jpg?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0Urban-Heat-Island-Effect-A162104504.jpg?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0Urban-Heat-Island-Effect-A162104504.jpg?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226955,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=226955","url_meta":{"origin":377009,"position":4},"title":"Students suffering \u201agrief\u2018 over climate change offered support sessions","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/11\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Somehow earlier generations of students at the UEA managed to cope with all of that without feelings of grief and distress!","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/00image-4.png?fit=702%2C602&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/00image-4.png?fit=702%2C602&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/00image-4.png?fit=702%2C602&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/00image-4.png?fit=702%2C602&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261628,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=261628","url_meta":{"origin":377009,"position":5},"title":"Climate Anxiety: Doomsday Cult or Mental Illness?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The fact is\u00a0there is zero evidence global warming would reduce the survival prospects of humanity, quite the opposite.","rel":"","context":"In \"doomed\"","block_context":{"text":"doomed","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=doomed"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00Doomsday-Still-e3-1920x1080-1.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00Doomsday-Still-e3-1920x1080-1.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00Doomsday-Still-e3-1920x1080-1.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00Doomsday-Still-e3-1920x1080-1.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00Doomsday-Still-e3-1920x1080-1.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/377009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=377009"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/377009\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":377016,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/377009\/revisions\/377016"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/377014"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=377009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=377009"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=377009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}