{"id":376713,"date":"2025-04-28T17:37:02","date_gmt":"2025-04-28T15:37:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=376713"},"modified":"2025-04-28T17:37:04","modified_gmt":"2025-04-28T15:37:04","slug":"pac-slam-biomass-sector-for-marking-own-homework","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=376713","title":{"rendered":"PAC Slam Biomass Sector For Marking Own\u00a0Homework"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Paul Homewood<\/p>\n\n\n\n

h\/t Philip Bratby<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has just released a devastating indictment of UK Government policies regarding the burning of wooden pellets at Drax and other biomass plants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is their Press Release:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is biomass sustainably sourced? Risk that sector is marking its own homework, PAC warns<\/em><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

There is a risk that biomass generators are marking their own homework on sustainability. In its report on <\/em>Government support for biomass<\/em><\/u><\/a>, the Public Accounts Committee raises concerns that the certification schemes intended to prove that biomass used in the UK is sustainably sourced may not be strong enough.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some \u00a322bn of government support has been provided to businesses and households using biomass for fuel since 2022, including \u00a36.5bn for biggest single recipient Drax. Biomass is seen by government as a low-carbon alternative to fossil fuels provided it\u2019s sustainably sourced, and when used in combination with carbon capture and storage technology (BECCS*) is seen as essential to the achievement of net zero for the UK. However, questions and concerns have been raised around biomass causing significant environmental harm and whether it can genuinely be considered a low-carbon fuel.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The PAC\u2019s report finds that government has for too long relied on an untested approach to make sure biomass generators are meeting sustainability criteria in return for receiving financial support. Current arrangements rely heavily on self-reporting and third-party schemes, and neither the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) or regulator Ofgem know whether this is effective in ensuring biomass\u2019 sustainability.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The report recommends that, if BECCS is no longer considered to be viable, DESNZ should put in place robust contingency plans setting out how it will achieve the net carbon removals it requires and what the future of biomass will be. BECCS deployment has been repeatedly delayed, despite remaining a key part of decarbonisation plans. Government has yet to settle on a target date for the UK\u2019s first BECCS plant, which will not be achieved by the original target of 2030, and there are no BECCS projects in the first phase of the government\u2019s carbon capture, usage and storage programme.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Government committed in 2023 to strengthening sustainability rules to specify that 100% of woody biomass should be sustainable rather than the current 70% \u2013 but DESNZ has not made clear how this will work in practice. It did acknowledge to the PAC that an increase in resources to monitor compliance may be required, as indicated by <\/em>Ofgem\u2019s recent investigation into Drax<\/em><\/u><\/a>. Significant public concerns were raised in relation to the findings of the KPMG review commissioned by Drax into its Canadian supply chain processes and reporting practices, and the PAC recommends Drax provide it the full report for Parliamentary scrutiny.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Heads of terms for a new support package <\/em>were announced<\/em><\/a>for Drax in February 2025. The report identifies risks that the provisional new deal may not provide good value for money. Under the deal, Drax will only be supported to operate less than half the time it currently is, saving each household an estimated c.\u00a36\/yr. DESNZ expects the agreement to reduce the amount of subsidy that Drax receives each year by \u00a3170 million compared to the alternative of procuring gas and includes a claw-back provision for profits over a certain level. The new agreement also insists on all Drax\u2019s biomass coming from 100% sustainable sources. Under the provisional new deal \u2013 which lacks any element of competition \u2013 Drax will receive a higher unit price than other renewable generators. The report calls for DESNZ to consider how it can update the agreement to prompt Drax to begin transitioning to BECCS.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chair comment<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP, Chair of the Committee, said:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cBillions upon billions of government support has been provided to the biomass sector over the past two decades. Rather than taking it on faith that the woody biomass burnt for energy is a sustainably sourced low-carbon alternative fuel, it is long past time a true assay was made of what taxpayers are getting for their money. Our report also raises further questions around what role will be played by BECCS, long-viewed as crucial for net zero but with no movement visible on the horizon to start to build it into the UK\u2019s infrastructure.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIn light of the continuing concerns raised around biomass highlighted by our written evidence, gaining full confidence around the sector\u2019s supply chains is work that must be carried out if government is to truly satisfy itself that biomass is not a white elephant. All are agreed that further monitoring of the sustainability of biomass will require government to devote more resources to the problem. This was demonstrated by Ofgem\u2019s recent own investigation into Drax. We hope that Drax will agree with the need for Parliamentary scrutiny of the findings of the review into its supply chain and reporting practices, and to supply this review to our Committee.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cUnder current carbon accounting rules, CO2 emissions are accounted for in the current country of origin, not in the country that actually burns the biomass. This is an approach this Committee were extremely critical of in our report on carbon capture, usage and storage, and many members of the public will find this inexplicable.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Their full report is here.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dominic Lawson covers the story in the Sunday Times here.<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

He concludes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Actually, Drax has Miliband over a barrel: because of the government\u2019s hubristic plans to make the electricity grid fossil-fuel-free by 2030, the system on which our existence depends will be far more exposed to intermittent energy (depending on whether the sun is shining and the wind is blowing). And since nuclear has been scandalously neglected by successive governments, Drax will become ever more crucial in avoiding catastrophic grid failure and keeping the lights on in our homes, hospitals and businesses.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a>So the great subsidised tree-burning boondoggle will continue. It makes a mockery of that phrase in King Charles\u2019s message: \u201cwell managed\u201d. There are other terms for it, few of them printable.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The scandal continues to grow. Now inhabitants of Gloster, Mississippi are complaining that Drax\u2019s wood pellet plant there is damaging their health. The Mail report:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has been accused by US activists of being complicit in the pollution of a town in Mississippi by handing billions in taxpayer cash to a UK power firm that they claim is harming the health of residents.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Drax Group operates a power plant in Selby, North Yorkshire, that generates electricity by burning wood pellets. Many of these are sourced from forests in the US and shipped to the UK.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Activists from Gloster in Mississippi, where Drax runs a wood pellet factory, say pollution from its plant has caused health issues for people nearby, including heart disease, cancer and respiratory problems.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Campaigner Katherine Egland said: \u2018Poor, mostly communities of colour \u2013 as the descendants of slaves \u2013 in the south-eastern US, are being subjected to toxic levels of emissions in the Drax manufacturing of wood pellets.\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.thisismoney.co.uk\/money\/markets\/article-14650335\/Energy-Secretary-embroiled-new-Drax-greenwashing-row.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The whole biomass business has been a giant green scam since the start.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Burning trees in plants like Drax emits carbon dioxide instantaneously into the atmosphere, and in much greater amounts than burning coal would. Even if those trees were replaced, and there is no evidence that they are, it would take decades to recapture that CO2. Surely we are supposed to be cutting emissions now, not in a hundred years time?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And, of course, felling vast areas of natural forest is hugely damaging from an environmental point of view.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither is Drax\u2019s argument that they only use offcuts and diseased trees, which has anyway been thoroughly debunked. But even using this wood means it is not available for pulp or sawdust, meaning more trees need to be cut down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The only reason biomass has been and awarded obscene subsidies is that it ticks the Net Zero box, according to EU rules which say you can ignore its emissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And we are now so desperate for reliable, dispatchable power that Ed Miliband will continue to turn a blind eye to the environmental devastation wrought and the very real carbon dioxide emissions resulting from Drax\u2019s operations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has just released a devastating indictment of UK Government policies regarding the burning of wooden pellets at Drax and other biomass plants.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":376718,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818659,691829997,691828828,691821577,691831484,691818154,691834785,691818299],"class_list":{"0":"post-376713","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-biomass","9":"tag-carbon-dioxide-co","10":"tag-department-for-energy-security-and-net-zero-desnz","11":"tag-drax","12":"tag-energy-secretary-ed-miliband","13":"tag-net-zero","14":"tag-public-accounts-committee-pac","15":"tag-subsidies","17":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Ed-Miliband-vor-dem-Feuer.png?fit=1024%2C1536&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1A01","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":221969,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=221969","url_meta":{"origin":376713,"position":0},"title":"The Beast of Selby","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/10\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"To paraphrase Voltaire for another century,\u00a0is this the price we have to pay to keep the lights on in Europe?","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-113.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-113.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-113.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-113.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-113.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339337,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=339337","url_meta":{"origin":376713,"position":1},"title":"Biomass power station produced four times emissions of UK coal plant, says\u00a0report","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Guardian have finally caught up with reality!!!","rel":"","context":"In \"Biomass power station\"","block_context":{"text":"Biomass power station","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biomass-power-station"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0-Biomass-power-station-Drax.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0-Biomass-power-station-Drax.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0-Biomass-power-station-Drax.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0-Biomass-power-station-Drax.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0-Biomass-power-station-Drax.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213329,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=213329","url_meta":{"origin":376713,"position":2},"title":"Thanks, Guardian, For Questioning the Virtues of Biomass","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"This is especially true in the case of wood pellet biomass power plants in the UK, where the majority of pellets are shipped across the Atlantic from the United States and Canada.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-451.png?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-451.png?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-451.png?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-451.png?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-451.png?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297043,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=297043","url_meta":{"origin":376713,"position":3},"title":"Drax gets go-ahead for carbon capture project at estimated \u00a340bn cost to bill-payers","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Scheme to convert biomass units could become one of world\u2019s most expensive energy projects, experts say","rel":"","context":"In \"Claire Coutinho\"","block_context":{"text":"Claire Coutinho","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=claire-coutinho"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0CCUS-1-1920x1200-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0CCUS-1-1920x1200-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0CCUS-1-1920x1200-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0CCUS-1-1920x1200-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0CCUS-1-1920x1200-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":398736,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=398736","url_meta":{"origin":376713,"position":4},"title":"UK\u2019s biggest power station faces investigation over greenwashing claims","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The owner of Britain\u2019s biggest renewable power station is being investigated by the City watchdog\u00a0following claims of greenwashing.","rel":"","context":"In \"clean energy\"","block_context":{"text":"clean energy","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=clean-energy"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQN_I-6Sct-gQiRpErjde6516wNJl6a3ZhNPbd50I0EsL8KKa7uPG43HkrEMZompBjsb-5Resjx8pLK72a8q1Kj64e4B0aQzor6-HpsGdv7uJ2YkG_9usc1JrOhs9wgcT0H4rQJ8EHr-zoffy23Jfl_x3zzAYQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQN_I-6Sct-gQiRpErjde6516wNJl6a3ZhNPbd50I0EsL8KKa7uPG43HkrEMZompBjsb-5Resjx8pLK72a8q1Kj64e4B0aQzor6-HpsGdv7uJ2YkG_9usc1JrOhs9wgcT0H4rQJ8EHr-zoffy23Jfl_x3zzAYQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQN_I-6Sct-gQiRpErjde6516wNJl6a3ZhNPbd50I0EsL8KKa7uPG43HkrEMZompBjsb-5Resjx8pLK72a8q1Kj64e4B0aQzor6-HpsGdv7uJ2YkG_9usc1JrOhs9wgcT0H4rQJ8EHr-zoffy23Jfl_x3zzAYQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQN_I-6Sct-gQiRpErjde6516wNJl6a3ZhNPbd50I0EsL8KKa7uPG43HkrEMZompBjsb-5Resjx8pLK72a8q1Kj64e4B0aQzor6-HpsGdv7uJ2YkG_9usc1JrOhs9wgcT0H4rQJ8EHr-zoffy23Jfl_x3zzAYQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQN_I-6Sct-gQiRpErjde6516wNJl6a3ZhNPbd50I0EsL8KKa7uPG43HkrEMZompBjsb-5Resjx8pLK72a8q1Kj64e4B0aQzor6-HpsGdv7uJ2YkG_9usc1JrOhs9wgcT0H4rQJ8EHr-zoffy23Jfl_x3zzAYQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213086,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=213086","url_meta":{"origin":376713,"position":5},"title":"Burning imported wood in Drax power plant \u2018doesn\u2019t make sense\u2019, says Kwarteng","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"One MP at the meeting told Kwarteng: \u201cIt can take 100 years to grow a tree but 100 seconds to combust it. So, unless we actually have a measure of how much CO2\u00a0is being released in the same period of time as is being sequestered by new growth, it seems\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-383.png?fit=1024%2C598&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-383.png?fit=1024%2C598&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-383.png?fit=1024%2C598&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-383.png?fit=1024%2C598&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376713","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=376713"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376713\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":376719,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376713\/revisions\/376719"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/376718"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=376713"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=376713"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=376713"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}