{"id":376604,"date":"2025-04-27T11:10:24","date_gmt":"2025-04-27T09:10:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=376604"},"modified":"2025-04-27T11:10:27","modified_gmt":"2025-04-27T09:10:27","slug":"the-flawed-icat-hurricane-loss-dataset-a-call-for-scientific-integrity-in-climate-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=376604","title":{"rendered":"The Flawed ICAT Hurricane Loss Dataset: A Call for Scientific Integrity in Climate Research"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Charles Rotter<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

In a compelling study published in the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology (April 2025), Roger Pielke Jr., previously a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder and now a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and professor emeritus, exposes critical flaws in a widely used dataset of U.S. hurricane losses, known as the ICAT dataset. This dataset, originally derived from Pielke\u2019s own peer-reviewed work, was modified without documentation by an insurance company, leading to biased results in peer-reviewed studies and major climate assessments. Pielke\u2019s paper, titled \u201cDo Not Use the ICAT Hurricane Loss \u2018Dataset\u2019: An Opportunity for Course Correction in Climate Science,\u201d <\/a>is a clarion call for the climate science community to uphold rigorous standards and correct these errors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

A fatally flawed time series of U.S. hurricane losses assembled by an insurance company almost a decade ago has found its way into analyses published in the peer-reviewed literature. The flawed time series is based on undocumented modifications to a research-quality dataset that I and my colleagues published almost two decades ago.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Pielke\u2019s study meticulously documents how the ICAT dataset, initially based on his team\u2019s carefully curated hurricane loss data (Pielke et al. 2008; Weinkle et al. 2018), was altered by International Catastrophe Insurance Managers, LLC (ICAT) after a corporate acquisition. These changes, made without transparency or scientific rigor, introduced significant biases, particularly inflating post-1980 loss estimates. The result is a \u201cFrankenstein dataset\u201d that combines incompatible methodologies, rendering it unsuitable for research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The ICAT dataset\u2019s flaws are not trivial. Pielke demonstrates that it includes 61 additional loss events compared to the Weinkle et al. (2018) dataset, with 53 of these occurring in the latter half of the time series, creating an artificial upward trend in losses. Furthermore, post-1980 data were replaced with estimates from NOAA\u2019s \u201cBillion Dollar Disaster\u201d (BDD) database, which uses a different methodology that inflates losses by including factors like government flood insurance and commodity effects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The problem with replacing base damages originally from Pielke et al. (2008) with those from NOAA NCEI (and extending the dataset forward using NCEI data to 2017) is that the methodologies used to develop the hurricane loss estimates in each time series are very different. The loss estimates are simply apples and oranges.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

This methodological mismatch has led to erroneous conclusions in studies like Willoughby et al. (2024) and Grinsted et al. (2019), which reported increasing trends in normalized hurricane losses and attributed them to climate change. Pielke shows that these trends disappear when the Weinkle et al. (2018) dataset is used instead, underscoring the ICAT dataset\u2019s role in driving misleading results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The findings of Willoughby et al. (2024) and Grinsted et al. (2019)\u2014of an upward trend in normalized hurricane losses\u2014are due entirely to the use of the flawed ICAT base damage time series and the Frankenstein extensions.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Pielke\u2019s critique extends beyond data quality to the broader implications for climate science. The ICAT dataset\u2019s use in high-profile reports, including the IPCC\u2019s Sixth Assessment Report and the U.S. National Climate Assessment, risks undermining public trust in climate research. He argues that economic loss data, like hurricane damages, should not be used to detect climate trends, as direct meteorological data (e.g., hurricane landfall frequency) are more appropriate. Notably, studies like Klotzbach et al. (2018) and Vecchi et al. (2021) find no upward trend in U.S. hurricane landfalls since 1900, consistent with NOAA and IPCC assessments that refrain from attributing hurricane changes to greenhouse gas emissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

There is no upward trend in landfall U.S. hurricanes or major hurricanes since 1900, so we should not expect to detect a change in normalized losses resulting from more or more intense landfalls.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Pielke\u2019s paper is a model of scientific self-correction, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability. He calls for the retraction of papers relying on the ICAT dataset, arguing that their errors are \u201cso obvious and significant\u201d that they demand action to prevent further misuse. This stance aligns with the National Academy of Sciences\u2019 guidance on ensuring research data integrity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Science advances knowledge and sustains public trust in part because of the commitment of scientists to self-correction. \u2026 The errors are so obvious and significant that editorial boards from JAMC and PNAS should retract both of these papers to prevent the further misuse of a fatally flawed dataset.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

This study is a timely reminder of the need for rigorous data provenance in science. By exposing the ICAT dataset\u2019s flaws, Pielke not only protects the integrity of hurricane loss research but also offers a path forward for the scientific community to correct course. His work underscores the importance of grounding science, including \u201cclimate\u201d science, in robust, transparent data to ensure that policy and public understanding are based on sound evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a compelling study published in the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology (April 2025), Roger Pielke Jr., previously a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder and now a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and professor emeritus, exposes critical flaws in a widely used dataset of U.S. hurricane losses, known as the ICAT dataset. This dataset, originally derived from Pielke\u2019s own peer-reviewed work, was modified without documentation by an insurance company, leading to biased results in peer-reviewed studies and major climate assessments. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":376609,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691834746,691834747,691834745,691818397,691834748],"class_list":{"0":"post-376604","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-icat-dataset","9":"tag-international-catastrophe-insurance-managers","10":"tag-journal-of-applied-meteorology-and-climatology","11":"tag-noaa","12":"tag-u-s-hurricanes","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Eye-Of-A-Hurricane-header.jpg?fit=2560%2C1707&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1zYg","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":358443,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=358443","url_meta":{"origin":376604,"position":0},"title":"Frankenstein Datasets and the Crisis in Climate Science Integrity","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/12\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Frankenstein dataset, born from undocumented modifications to a rigorous, peer-reviewed dataset, highlights a crisis in scientific integrity. Its story is not just a cautionary tale about bad data but a case study in how the scientific process can fail when institutional accountability is lacking. Let\u2019s unpack how this dataset\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate science\"","block_context":{"text":"climate science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-science"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0image-asset.jpeg?fit=1200%2C762&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0image-asset.jpeg?fit=1200%2C762&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0image-asset.jpeg?fit=1200%2C762&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0image-asset.jpeg?fit=1200%2C762&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0image-asset.jpeg?fit=1200%2C762&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339568,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=339568","url_meta":{"origin":376604,"position":1},"title":"Roger Pielke Jr. details \u2018The Top Five Climate Science Scandals\u2019: Study claiming no \u2018climate crisis\u2019 retracted \u2018for not for being wrong\u2026but instead for expressing views that are politically unhelpful\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"14\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The science community has shown a willingness to retract a climate science paper \u2014 in this case not for being wrong in any substantive way, but instead for expressing views that are politically unhelpful. In 2022, a group of Italian scientists published a paper that summarized the IPCC\u2019s conclusions on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-14-152601.png?fit=1200%2C699&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-14-152601.png?fit=1200%2C699&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-14-152601.png?fit=1200%2C699&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-14-152601.png?fit=1200%2C699&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-14-152601.png?fit=1200%2C699&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331491,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=331491","url_meta":{"origin":376604,"position":2},"title":"Scientific integrity and U.S. \u201cBillion Dollar Disasters\u201d-Roger Pielke","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/06\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Roger Pielke Jr has long challenged the fraudulent \u201cbillion dollar\u201d disaster disinformation campaign.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate change indicator\"","block_context":{"text":"climate change indicator","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change-indicator"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2GCX_Fu9XYAATBdF.jpeg?fit=1200%2C686&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2GCX_Fu9XYAATBdF.jpeg?fit=1200%2C686&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2GCX_Fu9XYAATBdF.jpeg?fit=1200%2C686&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2GCX_Fu9XYAATBdF.jpeg?fit=1200%2C686&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2GCX_Fu9XYAATBdF.jpeg?fit=1200%2C686&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378577,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=378577","url_meta":{"origin":376604,"position":3},"title":"Our Urban Heat Island Paper Has Been Published","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"16\/05\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"It took the better part of two years to satisfy the reviewers, but finally our paper\u00a0Urban Heat Island Effects in U.S. Summer Surface Temperature Data, 1895\u20132023\u00a0has been published in the AMS\u00a0Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology.","rel":"","context":"In \"GHCN stations\"","block_context":{"text":"GHCN stations","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=ghcn-stations"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00glo-urban-heat-island-effect.webp?fit=1200%2C690&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00glo-urban-heat-island-effect.webp?fit=1200%2C690&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00glo-urban-heat-island-effect.webp?fit=1200%2C690&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00glo-urban-heat-island-effect.webp?fit=1200%2C690&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00glo-urban-heat-island-effect.webp?fit=1200%2C690&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294439,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=294439","url_meta":{"origin":376604,"position":4},"title":"Major U.S. Disaster Database That Was Quoted by President Biden as Proof of Climate Change is Slammed as an \u201cEgregious Failure of Scientific Inquiry\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The findings from this database have fuelled climate alarm for decades, and it is widely quoted by scientific journals, media and politicians.","rel":"","context":"In \"Attribution studies\"","block_context":{"text":"Attribution studies","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=attribution-studies"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/00tornado-supercell-evening-stock.jpg?fit=1200%2C847&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/00tornado-supercell-evening-stock.jpg?fit=1200%2C847&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/00tornado-supercell-evening-stock.jpg?fit=1200%2C847&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/00tornado-supercell-evening-stock.jpg?fit=1200%2C847&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/00tornado-supercell-evening-stock.jpg?fit=1200%2C847&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316944,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=316944","url_meta":{"origin":376604,"position":5},"title":"EXCLUSIVE: \u2018Blatant Violations\u2019: Watchdog Challenges Key Data Used By Biden Admin To Push Sweeping Climate Agenda","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A government watchdog group has filed a complaint\u00a0with the Biden administration over its use of a dataset frequently used to push its climate agenda.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0-Biden-imrs.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0-Biden-imrs.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0-Biden-imrs.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0-Biden-imrs.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0-Biden-imrs.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376604","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=376604"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376604\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":376611,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376604\/revisions\/376611"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/376609"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=376604"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=376604"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=376604"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}