{"id":375094,"date":"2025-04-15T09:50:27","date_gmt":"2025-04-15T07:50:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=375094"},"modified":"2025-04-15T09:50:29","modified_gmt":"2025-04-15T07:50:29","slug":"offshore-wind-developers-risk-trouble-with-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=375094","title":{"rendered":"Offshore wind developers risk trouble with Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Collister Johnson<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

President Trump is clear about offshore wind. On day one of his second term, he signed an executive order titled \u201cTemporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government\u2019s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The order mandated three outcomes: First, it withdrew all the waters within the Outer Continental Shelf from consideration for wind leasing. Second, it ordered a \u201ccomprehensive review\u201d of the purpose and need for offshore wind to determine whether existing leases should be \u201camended or terminated.\u201d Third, it ordered that relevant federal agency \u201cshall not issue new or renewed approvals of offshore wind projects pending a completion of a comprehensive review of federal wind leasing and permitting practices.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The call for such an all-encompassing re-examination of the purpose, need, and utility of offshore wind (OSW) would cause developers to pause their development plans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

No such luck. The message to Trump appears to be: \u201cGo pound sand.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In New Jersey, the developers of Atlantic Shores Wind proclaimed, \u201cAtlantic Shores intends to continue progressing New Jersey\u2019s first offshore wind project in compliance with our local, state and federal partners under existing leases and relevant permits.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Virginia, Dominion Energy \u201cis determined to defend its offshore wind project in face of Trump threats.\u201d Company executives said in an earnings call that \u201cthe 2.6-gigawatt Virginia wind project is on schedule to begin operating in 2026 despite a flurry of actions by the Trump administration against the wind industry.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In New York, Orsted CEO Rasmus Errboe said, \u201cWe are fully committed to moving forward and delivering on our commitments. We do not expect that the executive order will have any implications on assets under construction.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In New England, the Alliance for Climate Transition boasted that \u201cTrump can\u2019t likely touch permitted wind projects in New England.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite all their bravado, wind developers should be mindful of serious obstacles coming their way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

First, the Department of Interior has clear, unquestionable authority to order a pause in construction for underway wind projects. Every wind developer is bound by the terms of its Construction and Operations Plan (COP) \u2014 a contract they entered into with the Department of Interior, which governs all the terms, conditions, and timing of constructions within the OSW project. Every COP states that \u201cthe Department of Interior reserves the right to amend these conditions or impose additional conditions authorized by law.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This authority was used by the interior to halt construction on the Vineyard Wind project after it experienced a cataclysmic wind turbine failure that spread acres of debris into the waters off Martha\u2019s Vineyard and Nantucket last summer. An order pausing construction in East Coast wind projects, pending completion of the studies mandated by the order, lies perfectly within the contractually binding language of the COPs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OSW developers have another problem. His name is Jefferson Van Drew, a Republican congressman from New Jersey. Van Drew was likely instrumental in crafting the language in the presidential order. He understands the absurdity of offshore wind and is adamantly opposed to further OSW construction until a comprehensive re-examination of its purpose and need has been completed. He is a tenacious, anti-offshore wind bulldog who has the ear of the president.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If wind developers send ships to sea on May 1, as some have said they would do to resume their construction plans, it is unlikely Van Drew will sit by and let them start \u201cclanging and banging\u201d in the whale habitat without a fight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are many reasons the offshore wind industry should be hesitant to resume business as usual. However, none is bigger than this: Does the offshore wind industry really think it is a good idea to thumb its nose at President Trump in opposition to an order that is clearly near and dear to his heart? Do they really like playing Russian roulette with billions at stake? Various Cabinet secretaries, heads of federal agencies, and political opponents have all tried this approach in the past.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It didn\u2019t end well for them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article originally appeared at DC Journal<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

President Trump is clear about offshore wind. On day one of his second term, he signed an executive order titled \u201cTemporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government\u2019s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":375097,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691834506,691834508,691826984,691819914,691818430,691818301,691833487,691834507],"class_list":{"0":"post-375094","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-atlantic-shores-wind","9":"tag-climate-transition","10":"tag-marthas-vineyard","11":"tag-new-england","12":"tag-new-jersey","13":"tag-offshore-wind","14":"tag-us-president-donald-j-trump","15":"tag-virginia-wind-project","17":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Screenshot-2025-04-15-094751.png?fit=1470%2C882&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1zzU","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":413097,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=413097","url_meta":{"origin":375094,"position":0},"title":"Federal Judge Clears Trump Administration to Revoke MA Offshore Wind Project Approval","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/11\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"President Donald Trump clearly has the climate cultists and green grifters among his top targets during his very busy second term, which began with his\u00a0signing an executive order\u00a0in January to halt new or renewed offshore wind leases.","rel":"","context":"In \"construction and operations plan (COP)\"","block_context":{"text":"construction and operations plan (COP)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=construction-and-operations-plan-cop"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQM1lxesy3_WQKys0FnfVFM8ZfOuxxWQRRR2HGsQkJFR8XSNb58kGhLAe2ZufXiaBbr3tc0WeNNcpxrUEjnIZgKlE5-JScy072SHXI3f_Gz1xPQLpsAAJd_XQQrhMGJn.jpeg?fit=1200%2C771&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQM1lxesy3_WQKys0FnfVFM8ZfOuxxWQRRR2HGsQkJFR8XSNb58kGhLAe2ZufXiaBbr3tc0WeNNcpxrUEjnIZgKlE5-JScy072SHXI3f_Gz1xPQLpsAAJd_XQQrhMGJn.jpeg?fit=1200%2C771&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQM1lxesy3_WQKys0FnfVFM8ZfOuxxWQRRR2HGsQkJFR8XSNb58kGhLAe2ZufXiaBbr3tc0WeNNcpxrUEjnIZgKlE5-JScy072SHXI3f_Gz1xPQLpsAAJd_XQQrhMGJn.jpeg?fit=1200%2C771&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQM1lxesy3_WQKys0FnfVFM8ZfOuxxWQRRR2HGsQkJFR8XSNb58kGhLAe2ZufXiaBbr3tc0WeNNcpxrUEjnIZgKlE5-JScy072SHXI3f_Gz1xPQLpsAAJd_XQQrhMGJn.jpeg?fit=1200%2C771&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQM1lxesy3_WQKys0FnfVFM8ZfOuxxWQRRR2HGsQkJFR8XSNb58kGhLAe2ZufXiaBbr3tc0WeNNcpxrUEjnIZgKlE5-JScy072SHXI3f_Gz1xPQLpsAAJd_XQQrhMGJn.jpeg?fit=1200%2C771&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":401959,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=401959","url_meta":{"origin":375094,"position":1},"title":"Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said offshore wind farms have no future in the U.S. under Trump administration","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/09\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Department of the Interior is \u201ctaking a deep look\u201d at five offshore wind farms that are under construction in the U.S., Burgum said Wednesday without naming the projects.","rel":"","context":"In \"CNBC\"","block_context":{"text":"CNBC","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=cnbc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMKsuaxrduVHdJL5uLNKDXVLQLGgxH0cilE-ahkMpOZ-lVsxiTg29A80SFYD44_Qa26aAoMP8ClYsmcdMwlfrETpx_Fv_t-Etb_i4VDXW5lUPmTGfDbV6g9r2oneNev-4gU6HnXnUwSMH56dv2nYh-nH36iYg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMKsuaxrduVHdJL5uLNKDXVLQLGgxH0cilE-ahkMpOZ-lVsxiTg29A80SFYD44_Qa26aAoMP8ClYsmcdMwlfrETpx_Fv_t-Etb_i4VDXW5lUPmTGfDbV6g9r2oneNev-4gU6HnXnUwSMH56dv2nYh-nH36iYg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMKsuaxrduVHdJL5uLNKDXVLQLGgxH0cilE-ahkMpOZ-lVsxiTg29A80SFYD44_Qa26aAoMP8ClYsmcdMwlfrETpx_Fv_t-Etb_i4VDXW5lUPmTGfDbV6g9r2oneNev-4gU6HnXnUwSMH56dv2nYh-nH36iYg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMKsuaxrduVHdJL5uLNKDXVLQLGgxH0cilE-ahkMpOZ-lVsxiTg29A80SFYD44_Qa26aAoMP8ClYsmcdMwlfrETpx_Fv_t-Etb_i4VDXW5lUPmTGfDbV6g9r2oneNev-4gU6HnXnUwSMH56dv2nYh-nH36iYg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMKsuaxrduVHdJL5uLNKDXVLQLGgxH0cilE-ahkMpOZ-lVsxiTg29A80SFYD44_Qa26aAoMP8ClYsmcdMwlfrETpx_Fv_t-Etb_i4VDXW5lUPmTGfDbV6g9r2oneNev-4gU6HnXnUwSMH56dv2nYh-nH36iYg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362987,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362987","url_meta":{"origin":375094,"position":2},"title":"EO: Temporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"22\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. You are authorized and directed to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Energy Costs\"","block_context":{"text":"Energy Costs","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=energy-costs"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Moorea-Whale-Watching5-2000x1200_76336_84466.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Moorea-Whale-Watching5-2000x1200_76336_84466.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Moorea-Whale-Watching5-2000x1200_76336_84466.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Moorea-Whale-Watching5-2000x1200_76336_84466.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Moorea-Whale-Watching5-2000x1200_76336_84466.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":437064,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=437064","url_meta":{"origin":375094,"position":3},"title":"Trump\u2019s \u2018billion-dollar giveaway\u2019 actually a refund to free us from costly offshore wind","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/04\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Headlines last week (NY Times, NPR, CNN) screamed that President Donald Trump was handing nearly a billion dollars to a French energy giant to cancel building offshore wind farms. The coverage was classic gotcha journalism \u2014 misleading, incomplete, and designed to fit a tired narrative. The real story is far\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Act\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Act","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-act"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":419948,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=419948","url_meta":{"origin":375094,"position":4},"title":"The story behind Trump\u2019s order halting Virginia offshore wind","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/01\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"On December 22, 2025, the Trump administration's Department of the Interior announced an immediate suspension of federal leases for all large-scale offshore wind projects under construction in U.S. waters, explicitly including the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) project developed by Dominion Energy. This 2.6 GW farm off Virginia Beach\u2014poised to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"\"America First\" security\"","block_context":{"text":"\"America First\" security","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=america-first-security"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQNrd3AttMvqbrSAEoIyFedZma86fX43FX7lfc6u4NFT_pQt5L4mPiyNYQ2QJKnXi6dp9mRdsC95Fy0iEL9vSz_eCW5l7kAmGO_sLLGp3mdeGmyyrfe8o8dIiTno690-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C603&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQNrd3AttMvqbrSAEoIyFedZma86fX43FX7lfc6u4NFT_pQt5L4mPiyNYQ2QJKnXi6dp9mRdsC95Fy0iEL9vSz_eCW5l7kAmGO_sLLGp3mdeGmyyrfe8o8dIiTno690-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C603&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQNrd3AttMvqbrSAEoIyFedZma86fX43FX7lfc6u4NFT_pQt5L4mPiyNYQ2QJKnXi6dp9mRdsC95Fy0iEL9vSz_eCW5l7kAmGO_sLLGp3mdeGmyyrfe8o8dIiTno690-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C603&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQNrd3AttMvqbrSAEoIyFedZma86fX43FX7lfc6u4NFT_pQt5L4mPiyNYQ2QJKnXi6dp9mRdsC95Fy0iEL9vSz_eCW5l7kAmGO_sLLGp3mdeGmyyrfe8o8dIiTno690-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C603&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQNrd3AttMvqbrSAEoIyFedZma86fX43FX7lfc6u4NFT_pQt5L4mPiyNYQ2QJKnXi6dp9mRdsC95Fy0iEL9vSz_eCW5l7kAmGO_sLLGp3mdeGmyyrfe8o8dIiTno690-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C603&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362450,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362450","url_meta":{"origin":375094,"position":5},"title":"Last Gasp for Offshore Wind: “Reinvesting in Shoreline Economies and Ecosystems Act”","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\"So the U.S. is about one percent, with six years to go, toward meeting the Biden\/Harris goal for offshore wind of 30 GW. Just another rank exaggeration, another energy fantasy, in the undoing.\"","rel":"","context":"In \"offshore wind\"","block_context":{"text":"offshore wind","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=offshore-wind"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Floating-Offshore-Wind-scaled-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Floating-Offshore-Wind-scaled-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Floating-Offshore-Wind-scaled-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Floating-Offshore-Wind-scaled-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Floating-Offshore-Wind-scaled-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=375094"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375094\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":375099,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375094\/revisions\/375099"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/375097"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=375094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=375094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=375094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}