{"id":374002,"date":"2025-04-07T08:22:51","date_gmt":"2025-04-07T06:22:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=374002"},"modified":"2025-04-07T08:22:53","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T06:22:53","slug":"court-delivers-massive-blow-to-famed-climate-scientist-who-sued-critics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=374002","title":{"rendered":"Court Delivers Massive Blow to Famed Climate Scientist Who Sued Critics"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"380\" data-attachment-id=\"374006\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=374006\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0-MM.jpeg?fit=1200%2C630&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1200,630\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0 MM\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0-MM.jpeg?fit=723%2C380&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0-MM.jpeg?resize=723%2C380&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-374006\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0-MM.jpeg?resize=1024%2C538&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0-MM.jpeg?resize=300%2C158&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0-MM.jpeg?resize=768%2C403&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0-MM.jpeg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2025\/04\/05\/court-delivers-massive-blow-to-famed-climate-scientist-who-sued-critics\/\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By <a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2025\/04\/04\/court-delivers-massive-blow-famed-climate-scientist\/\">THE DAILY CALLER<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/author\/Nick+Pope\">Nick Pope<\/a><br><\/strong>Contributor<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A Washington, D.C., court rejected University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael Mann\u2019s bid to postpone his required payment of hundreds of thousands of dollars to National Review on Thursday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Superior Court of the District of Columbia&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2025\/01\/11\/climate-scientist-michael-mann-ruin-national-review-ordered-pay-legal-expenses\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ruled<\/a>&nbsp;in January that Mann owes National Review approximately $530,000 to cover the outlet\u2019s legal fees after spending more than a decade locked in defamation litigation against the organization, and Mann subsequently requested a stay to postpone the payments. On Thursday, the court&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/document\/846251075\/Mann-Filing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">denied<\/a>&nbsp;Mann\u2019s request, meaning that he will likely have to pony up cash to an outlet he once described in emails as a \u201cthreat to our children.\u201d&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2024\/02\/10\/michael-mann-defamation-verdict-science-climate-free-speech\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">(RELATED: DC Jury Found \u2018Hockey Stick\u2019 Critics Defamed Scientist. What Does That Mean For Scientific Discourse Going Forward?)<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/document\/846251075\/Mann-Filing#from_embed\">Mann Filing<\/a>&nbsp;by&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/user\/679679430\/Nick-Pope#from_embed\">Nick Pope<\/a>&nbsp;on Scribd<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-scribd wp-block-embed-scribd wp-embed-aspect-9-16 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Mann Filing\" class=\"scribd_iframe_embed\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/embeds\/846251075\/content\" data-aspect-ratio=\"0.7729220222793488\" scrolling=\"no\" id=\"846251075\" width=\"723\" height=\"1000\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">          (function() { var scribd = document.createElement(\"script\"); scribd.type = \"text\/javascript\"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = \"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/javascripts\/embed_code\/inject.js\"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName(\"script\")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })()        <\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/doc\/846251075\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">View this document on Scribd<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Mann initially sued National Review in 2012, when Canadian conservative&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2024\/02\/19\/tipler-mark-steyn-modern-galileo-climate-science\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Mark Steyn<\/a>&nbsp;knocked Mann and his famed \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2018\/04\/30\/hockey-stick-graph-global-warming\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">hockey stick<\/a>\u201d climate model in a post on National Review\u2019s website. National Review editor Rich Lowry then authored a follow-up post backing Steyn\u2019s, and Mann decided to sue the outlet for defamation along with Steyn and Rand Simberg, a former adjunct for the Competitive Enterprise Institute. While Mann\u2019s lawsuit against Steyn and Simberg prevailed initially, the superior court judge determined in January that Mann would have to pay the $531,000 within 30 days, National Review\u2019s editors&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/2025\/01\/pay-up-mr-mann\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">announced<\/a>&nbsp;at the time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/users\/nickpope\/Downloads\/2012-CA-008263-B%20(4).pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">filing<\/a>&nbsp;opposing National Review\u2019s request for compensation, Mann argued that the move was a \u201cmean-spirited and unjustified request by a powerful organization\u201d intending to intimidate and silence him.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Notably, Judge Albert Irving&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2025\/03\/12\/climate-scientist-critics-defamation-misled-jury-judge-says\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">wrote<\/a>&nbsp;in March that Mann and his lawyers had presented misleading information to the jury while the defamation case was at trial. Specifically, Mann and his representation misled the jury as to how much grant funding he missed out on due to the actions of the defendants, a key element of his defamation case, with Irving describing the deception as \u201cextraordinary in its scope, extent, and intent.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter\u2019s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact&nbsp;<a href=\"mailto:licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org\">licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Washington, D.C., court rejected University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael Mann\u2019s bid to postpone his required payment of hundreds of thousands of dollars to National Review on Thursday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":374006,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818215,691834302,691833650],"class_list":{"0":"post-374002","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-michael-mann","9":"tag-national-review","10":"tag-superior-court-of-the-district-of-columbia","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0-MM.jpeg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1zii","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":423548,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=423548","url_meta":{"origin":374002,"position":0},"title":"Mann v. Steyn: Finally Ready for Appeal?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/01\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Way back in 2012, climate \u201cscientist\u201d Michael Mann, then at Penn State University, sued four defendants for defamation. The four were commentators Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg, who had written blog posts about Mann, and National Review and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, entities which had respectively hosted the Steyn and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"\u201cClimateGate\u201d emails\"","block_context":{"text":"\u201cClimateGate\u201d emails","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climategate-emails-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0Michael-Mann.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0Michael-Mann.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0Michael-Mann.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0Michael-Mann.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0Michael-Mann.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299240,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=299240","url_meta":{"origin":374002,"position":1},"title":"Steyn v Mann: The Infamous Climate \u2018Hockey Stick\u2019 Goes on Trial","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/02\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Fifteen years on from the\u00a0notorious Climategate scandal, and the widely debunked temperature \u2018hockey stick\u2019 is centre stage in a libel trial in a Washington D.C. court. In the widely-billed climate trial of the century, the\u00a0fake Nobel laureate\u00a0Michael Mann is suing the journalist Mark Steyn for claiming that his infamous hockey\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"cancel culture\"","block_context":{"text":"cancel culture","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=cancel-culture"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/02024-01-31-00_10_22-Mann-vs-Steyn.png-800%C3%97600.jpeg?fit=1200%2C656&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/02024-01-31-00_10_22-Mann-vs-Steyn.png-800%C3%97600.jpeg?fit=1200%2C656&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/02024-01-31-00_10_22-Mann-vs-Steyn.png-800%C3%97600.jpeg?fit=1200%2C656&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/02024-01-31-00_10_22-Mann-vs-Steyn.png-800%C3%97600.jpeg?fit=1200%2C656&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/02024-01-31-00_10_22-Mann-vs-Steyn.png-800%C3%97600.jpeg?fit=1200%2C656&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298536,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=298536","url_meta":{"origin":374002,"position":2},"title":"Mann vs. Steyn: Climate Trial of the Century Continues &#8211; Guest: Phelim McAleer","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the second week of the defamation trial, where serial litigator and special climate snowflake Michael Mann sued Mark Steyn and others for libel, the proceedings featured notable developments and surprising revelations. To discuss, Phelim McAleer, a filmmaker and journalist who is attending the trial in a federal court in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Screenshot-2024-01-27-155617.png?fit=1200%2C632&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Screenshot-2024-01-27-155617.png?fit=1200%2C632&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Screenshot-2024-01-27-155617.png?fit=1200%2C632&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Screenshot-2024-01-27-155617.png?fit=1200%2C632&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Screenshot-2024-01-27-155617.png?fit=1200%2C632&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297472,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=297472","url_meta":{"origin":374002,"position":3},"title":"Climate Trial of the Century: Mann vs Steyn \u2013 Climate Change Roundtable #94","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"19\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"After 12 years of delays, the defamation lawsuit brought by climate scientist Michael Mann and writer Mark Steyn finally began this week. Mann sued Steyn and others in 2012 claiming they libeled him when they mocked his infamous \u201chockey stick\u201d graph that has been the lynchpin of climate alarmism for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"12 years of delays\"","block_context":{"text":"12 years of delays","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=12-years-of-delays"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Screenshot-2024-01-19-184739.png?fit=1200%2C660&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Screenshot-2024-01-19-184739.png?fit=1200%2C660&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Screenshot-2024-01-19-184739.png?fit=1200%2C660&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Screenshot-2024-01-19-184739.png?fit=1200%2C660&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Screenshot-2024-01-19-184739.png?fit=1200%2C660&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299888,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=299888","url_meta":{"origin":374002,"position":4},"title":"Trial Of Mann v. Steyn, Part III: More On Damages; Simberg And Steyn&#8217;s First Witness","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/02\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Readers seem to be enjoying my posts on the Mann v. Steyn trial, so I\u2019m going to continue with one more today. Meanwhile, the court does not hold trials on Fridays, so the proceeding has recessed for the weekend, to resume Monday morning.","rel":"","context":"In \"Mann\u2019s Hockey Stick\"","block_context":{"text":"Mann\u2019s Hockey Stick","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=manns-hockey-stick"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-Mann-vs-Steyn.jpeg?fit=1200%2C747&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-Mann-vs-Steyn.jpeg?fit=1200%2C747&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-Mann-vs-Steyn.jpeg?fit=1200%2C747&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-Mann-vs-Steyn.jpeg?fit=1200%2C747&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-Mann-vs-Steyn.jpeg?fit=1200%2C747&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":415399,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=415399","url_meta":{"origin":374002,"position":5},"title":"\u201cThe Climategate Whitewash Continues\u201d (scandal of a scandal)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/11\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"On the 16th anniversary of Climategate, an editorial from 2010 by the late\u00a0Patrick J. Michaels, is as timely as ever. Michaels, the most trenchant climate scientist against the alarmist consensus, would be pleased with the demise of the Paris Agreement and \u2018Net Zero\u2019 at this year\u2019s COP30. His\u00a0editorial\u00a0published in the\u00a0Wall\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"alarmist consensus\"","block_context":{"text":"alarmist consensus","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=alarmist-consensus"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQNT0_H_Qt4jcVFidHWvVzTh-YJaAqc1Omqmqa87Mfw-nc64BMYkWcQIQ0Lch0eHH2l96llnI0ovijdIiWqAMCWYYHjq8CRbmoHrOYxRdHhCmjL9vfCNQRgY-7SZiLdx.jpeg?fit=1026%2C941&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQNT0_H_Qt4jcVFidHWvVzTh-YJaAqc1Omqmqa87Mfw-nc64BMYkWcQIQ0Lch0eHH2l96llnI0ovijdIiWqAMCWYYHjq8CRbmoHrOYxRdHhCmjL9vfCNQRgY-7SZiLdx.jpeg?fit=1026%2C941&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQNT0_H_Qt4jcVFidHWvVzTh-YJaAqc1Omqmqa87Mfw-nc64BMYkWcQIQ0Lch0eHH2l96llnI0ovijdIiWqAMCWYYHjq8CRbmoHrOYxRdHhCmjL9vfCNQRgY-7SZiLdx.jpeg?fit=1026%2C941&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQNT0_H_Qt4jcVFidHWvVzTh-YJaAqc1Omqmqa87Mfw-nc64BMYkWcQIQ0Lch0eHH2l96llnI0ovijdIiWqAMCWYYHjq8CRbmoHrOYxRdHhCmjL9vfCNQRgY-7SZiLdx.jpeg?fit=1026%2C941&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374002","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=374002"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374002\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":374007,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374002\/revisions\/374007"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/374006"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=374002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=374002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=374002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}