{"id":371577,"date":"2025-03-24T09:01:15","date_gmt":"2025-03-24T08:01:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=371577"},"modified":"2025-03-24T09:01:17","modified_gmt":"2025-03-24T08:01:17","slug":"beware-flawed-energy-assumptions-incite-delusional-scenarios","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=371577","title":{"rendered":"Beware: Flawed Energy Assumptions Incite Delusional\u00a0Scenarios"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Science Matters<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Ron Clutz<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Mark P. Mills and Neil Atkinson blow the whistle on projections written in International Energy Agency\u2019s (IEA) latest report, the World Energy Outlook.  Below is the announcement of the report findings, key exhibits and Executive summary, excerpts in italics with my bolds and added images. Link to full study at the end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Overview<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Industry players consider the International Energy Agency\u2019s signature annual report, the World Energy Outlook, to contain highly credible analyses. However, a new critique<\/strong> from the National Center of Energy Analytics experts finds the IEA\u2019s latest scenarios on future oil demand to be problematic and potentially, dangerously wrong. <\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWhen it comes to policy or investment planning, there is a distinction with a critical difference when it comes to what constitutes a \u201cforecast\u201d (what is likely to happen) versus a \u201cscenario\u201d (a possibility based on assumptions).<\/strong> The challenge is not in determining whether the scenarios are completely factual per se, but instead whether they are factually complete,\u201d wrote the authors in their report.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The most widely reported WEO scenario<\/strong> is that the world will see peak oil demand by the early 2030s.<\/strong> NCEA co-authors Mark P. Mills and Neil Atkinson believe that this conclusion is a prima facie case; minimally, the IEA should include business as usual (BAU) scenarios, not those based on all \u201chigh cases\u201d or unrealistic possibilities.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Mills and Atkinson pinpoint 23 flawed assumptions used in the WEO scenarios to predict future oil demand, including:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n