{"id":367908,"date":"2025-02-27T16:30:55","date_gmt":"2025-02-27T15:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=367908"},"modified":"2025-02-27T16:30:57","modified_gmt":"2025-02-27T15:30:57","slug":"factchecking-bbc-verifys-energy-bill-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=367908","title":{"rendered":"Factchecking BBC Verify\u2019s Energy Bill\u00a0Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Paul Homewood<\/p>\n\n\n\n

h\/t Ian Magness<\/p>\n\n\n\n

FACT CHECKING BBC VERIFY!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

 The headline alone gives a hint that the article itself is a pile of misleading rubbish!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A more suitable headline would have been \u201cEnergy bills are going up because there is more green power\u201d.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/articles\/crkep1vx3mro<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The report begins:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Energy bills will rise by more than expected from April, <\/em><\/strong>following an announcement from the regulator Ofgem.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Labour pledged in its manifesto: “We will save families hundreds of pounds on their bills, not just in the short term, but for good.” It also promised bills would come down by “up to \u00a3300 by 2030”.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Responding to the price cap rise, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said it was due to “our reliance on the fossil fuel markets” and added: “We\u2019re acting to bring down bills for everyone with our mission for clean, home-grown power that we control.”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The government wants to remove nearly all fossil fuels from UK electricity production by 2030.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

More power is coming from renewable sources<\/em><\/a> than ever before, so why isn\u2019t this translating into cheaper electricity bills?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It recognises that we have some of the highest electricity prices in the world, and then goes on to say:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The largest, and most variable, component of a UK customer\u2019s electricity bill is the “wholesale” price. This is the cost at which suppliers buy it from the companies that generate it.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Other parts of the bill include “network” costs for operating, maintaining and upgrading the power grid, and “policy” costs, which include government levies to help fund environmental projects.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The main reason for the spikes in electricity bills over the past few years has been changes to wholesale costs. This is linked to an increase in international gas prices.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The main reason why electricity prices are currently high is because the cost of gas \u2013 which is what sets the electricity price \u2013 is also high,” said a spokesperson from the Climate Change Committee, the government\u2019s independent adviser on cutting emissions.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the long term, renewables “will be bringing down overall energy bills, and specifically electricity bills, for the UK,” argues Dr Iain Staffell of Imperial College London.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is an oblique reference to high renewable costs in the past:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Strike prices were expensive, but have fallen considerably, apart from a small rise from 2022-24 linked to global supply chain pressures.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But it is phrased in such a way as to fool readers into thinking that we are no longer paying these prices. There is certainly nowhere in the article that refers to just how much of our high electricity prices is still due to subsidising renewables. Instead they refer to wholesale prices as the largest component of bills, and the CCC\u2019s lie about the cost of gas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The figures as supplied by OFGEM tell a totally different story.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since 2015, wholesale costs, (excluding CfD and Capacity Market subsidies, which OFGEM include), have increased their component of the cap from \u00a3260 to \u00a3399 for a typical household, an increase of 53%. But this is virtually all accounted for by a rise of 52% in RPI.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
Prices as at April to June<\/strong>
https:\/\/www.ofgem.gov.uk\/energy-policy-and-regulation\/policy-and-regulatory-programmes\/energy-price-cap-default-tariff-policy\/energy-price-cap-default-tariff-levels<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Of course there have been ups and downs in wholesale costs, but overall they have changed little in real terms. In fact, in reality they have fallen, as the costs shown by OFGEM include the effect of carbon pricing, which should really be seen as yet another subsidy for renewables.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When we look at all the other costs lumped into the price cap, mostly subsidies and network costs, we see they have doubled from \u00a3325 to \u00a3648. Renewable subsidies alone account for \u00a3210, and most of the extra grid costs are related to intermittent renewable generation in one way or another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sometimes gas prices go up, as they have done in the last few months. And sometimes they go down. But overall wholesale prices have pretty much followed the RPI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is not gas prices or wholesale prices which are responsible for the UK\u2019s sky high electricity prices. It is renewable energy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is astonishing, if unsurprising, that BBC Verify can devote a whole report on the topic, without once even mentioning the fact, never mind quantifying it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The headline alone gives a hint that the article itself is a pile of misleading rubbish!<\/p>\n

A more suitable headline would have been \u201cEnergy bills are going up because there is more green power\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":367915,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691820338,691822351,691831484,691827928,691820075,691820065,691819094,691819365],"class_list":["post-367908","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-bbc-verify","tag-energy-bill","tag-energy-secretary-ed-miliband","tag-green-power","tag-labour","tag-ofgem","tag-renewable-green-energy","tag-uk-electricity","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1xI0","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":413345,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=413345","url_meta":{"origin":367908,"position":0},"title":"BBC Wishful Thinking","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/15\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The world\u2019s burning of fossil fuels is set to release more planet-warming carbon dioxide than ever before this year, new figures show.","rel":"","context":"In \"BBC\"","block_context":{"text":"BBC","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bbc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/556631961_1370772704407729_1695678834169652883_n.jpg?fit=1200%2C1078&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/556631961_1370772704407729_1695678834169652883_n.jpg?fit=1200%2C1078&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/556631961_1370772704407729_1695678834169652883_n.jpg?fit=1200%2C1078&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/556631961_1370772704407729_1695678834169652883_n.jpg?fit=1200%2C1078&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/556631961_1370772704407729_1695678834169652883_n.jpg?fit=1200%2C1078&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":406230,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406230","url_meta":{"origin":367908,"position":1},"title":"Energy price rises prompt call for more help with\u00a0bills","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/02\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A rise in gas and electricity prices has prompted energy suppliers to call for \"enduring\" targeted support for those in financial difficulty.","rel":"","context":"In \"\u201crenewable energy subsidies\u201d\"","block_context":{"text":"\u201crenewable energy subsidies\u201d","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=renewable-energy-subsidies-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPSr2GJm3aAvH_dRruSVc1v6lRTKbaJ4jvPa1I51PV4Aq33r235M_baq5MhC7Yj5fAFJbxri9Vg6ixKE6GSepLMgcTriHTf9r8FajlyVx3XdxU79KrI_BjmfdXEQAU.png?fit=675%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPSr2GJm3aAvH_dRruSVc1v6lRTKbaJ4jvPa1I51PV4Aq33r235M_baq5MhC7Yj5fAFJbxri9Vg6ixKE6GSepLMgcTriHTf9r8FajlyVx3XdxU79KrI_BjmfdXEQAU.png?fit=675%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPSr2GJm3aAvH_dRruSVc1v6lRTKbaJ4jvPa1I51PV4Aq33r235M_baq5MhC7Yj5fAFJbxri9Vg6ixKE6GSepLMgcTriHTf9r8FajlyVx3XdxU79KrI_BjmfdXEQAU.png?fit=675%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293713,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=293713","url_meta":{"origin":367908,"position":2},"title":"Building offshore wind farms can permanently deafen porpoises, but it\u2019s OK now with Bubble Walls","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The BBC is happy to report it now there are good results from a study, but apparently they weren\u2019t too enthused in 2013 about telling us how pile -driving during construction can permanently destroy hearing in marine mammals.","rel":"","context":"In \"BBC propaganda team\"","block_context":{"text":"BBC propaganda team","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bbc-propaganda-team"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/00BubbleCurtain.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/00BubbleCurtain.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/00BubbleCurtain.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/00BubbleCurtain.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/00BubbleCurtain.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274447,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=274447","url_meta":{"origin":367908,"position":3},"title":"L A Times Exposes the L A Times Maui Wildfire Climate Alarmist Propaganda Incompetence","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/19\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The L A Times embarrassed itself with a clear display of its\u00a0politically contrived \u201cclimate emergency\u201d alarmism propaganda\u00a0agenda regarding the horrific wildfires on Maui with the misleading, misrepresented and reality flawed August 11, 2023 headline and article shown below authored by their \u201cCultural Columnists and Critic\u201d (apparently climate and energy issues\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/00fake-news.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/00fake-news.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/00fake-news.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/00fake-news.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/00fake-news.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256272,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=256272","url_meta":{"origin":367908,"position":4},"title":"Carbon capture: a net emitter of CO2 ?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A BBC article headline asked: \u2018Carbon capture: What is it and how does it fight climate change?\u2019 But a report last year found a Shell Oil project\u00a0output more CO2 than it captured. The amount of CO2 such sites can capture is negligible anyway, and they\u2019re relying on \u2018hopium\u2019 to bring\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00562fb485-c523-4d6f-b6a5-6798810a2bc5.webp?fit=1200%2C890&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00562fb485-c523-4d6f-b6a5-6798810a2bc5.webp?fit=1200%2C890&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00562fb485-c523-4d6f-b6a5-6798810a2bc5.webp?fit=1200%2C890&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00562fb485-c523-4d6f-b6a5-6798810a2bc5.webp?fit=1200%2C890&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00562fb485-c523-4d6f-b6a5-6798810a2bc5.webp?fit=1200%2C890&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":437064,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=437064","url_meta":{"origin":367908,"position":5},"title":"Trump\u2019s \u2018billion-dollar giveaway\u2019 actually a refund to free us from costly offshore wind","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/03\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Headlines last week (NY Times, NPR, CNN) screamed that President Donald Trump was handing nearly a billion dollars to a French energy giant to cancel building offshore wind farms. The coverage was classic gotcha journalism \u2014 misleading, incomplete, and designed to fit a tired narrative. The real story is far\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Act\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Act","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-act"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0bbc-verify.jpeg?fit=1600%2C900&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=367908"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367908\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":367917,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367908\/revisions\/367917"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/367915"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=367908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=367908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=367908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}