{"id":366417,"date":"2025-02-16T16:08:53","date_gmt":"2025-02-16T15:08:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=366417"},"modified":"2025-02-16T16:08:55","modified_gmt":"2025-02-16T15:08:55","slug":"were-all-doomed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=366417","title":{"rendered":"We\u2019re all Doomed!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Climate Scepticism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Jit<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

So says the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Every year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Every year \u2013 at least for the last three, I haven\u2019t looked further back \u2013 they produce a report that is a glossy, broad-brush, almost unreadable, partisan, hysterical fantasy tale of present and future climate-related risks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This year: Planetary Solvency \u2013 finding our balance with nature<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thesis: The risk of Planetary Insolvency looms unless we act decisively. Without immediate policy action to change course, catastrophic or extreme impacts are eminently plausible, which could threaten future prosperity.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last year: Climate Scorpion \u2013 the sting is in the tail<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thesis: The actuarial approach can be used for climate change. It begins by outlining how actuaries deal with extreme, ruinous risks, what this means for climate change, what we do and don\u2019t know about the physical impacts, tipping points and social knock-on effects of climate change, and what actions we can take to manage the risk.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

2023: The Emperor\u2019s New Climate Scenarios<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thesis: Climate tipping points are a growing threat, and the solution to climate change has to be equally discontinuous. We need to \u201coperationalise\u201d positive tipping points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

All three are a fricassee of pretty diagrams and alarmist nonsense. You might expect actuarial science to be as dry as old bones, for numbers to be crunched unemotionally, rigorously, for data to tell all, and fantasy to tell nothing. Well, the things they put in their shop window show otherwise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Take this comment from \u201cPlanetary Insolvency\u201d:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

For example, in The Emperor\u2019s New Climate Scenarios a methodology based on a technique known as reverse stress testing suggests to \u2018expect 50% GDP destruction \u2013 somewhere between 2070 and 2090\u2019.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Does anybody seriously expect >50% GDP destruction? It is a ludicrous suggestion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The source they refer to, their own Emperor\u2019s New Climate Scenarios<\/em>, says:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Put another way, at what point do we expect 50% GDP destruction \u2013 somewhere between 2070 and 2090 depending on how you parameterise the distribution.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Parameterise? Distribution?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the relevant figure from\u00a0Emperor\u2019s<\/em>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Not, in fact, used by permission.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Where do these lines come from you ask? Here is their explanation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

A relatively simple log damage function could be used that assumes 100% GDP loss at a certain level of warming, say 6\u02daC, 5\u02daC, or 4\u02daC, although some may argue that even 3\u02daC would be extremely challenging to adapt to, and certainly sensitivities should be undertaken at all of these. Figure 9 above, adapted from analysis undertaken by Carbon Tracker, illustrates this, as well as comparing the output with the current quadratic damage function used by economists.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

So, the answer is: you create a logistic function that hits 100% at 4C and then use that to show that in 2070 the world should expect a 50% GDP destruction. The curve itself has no basis in anything: it is a line plucked unceremoniously from an unmentionable orifice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why logistic? Why not exponential? I fear our actuarial alarmists are missing a trick here. Why should the damage slope start to level off after it reaches 50%?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yes, Jit,<\/em> I hear you say in your most soothing voice, desperately trying to gently calm the agitated patient. But this is just an illustration<\/em>. It\u2019s a scenario<\/em>, just put there to facilitate discussion. It\u2019s not an actual attempt to model anything. No-one really believes <\/em>it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Except the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries do, as they made clear in the press release<\/a> accompanying this year\u2019s dose of claptrap:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The global economy could face a 50% loss in GDP between 2070 and 2090, unless immediate policy action on risks posed by the climate crisis is taken.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

I\u2019m not going to dwell on these reports \u2013 I don\u2019t think they deserve it. But I will pull out a few things from the most recent. Ya know, things that caught my eye as I skimmed down the page, waiting for it to get better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Word of the report: \u201cpolycrisis,\u201d which has four uses, apparently none of them ironic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Their Figure 9 shows that under a tipping point of AMOC collapse and 2.5C of warming, the Antarctic Peninsula will be suitable for growing wheat:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

However, it looks as if nowhere else in the world will be. The magic of tipping points! Crank up that alarm, go on. Ah, but it\u2019s just a scenario<\/em>. Just an illustration<\/em>. No-one really believes it might happen. But they do, as the report makes clear:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Some scientists estimate there is a 45% chance of a collapse in key ocean current circulations, possibly as early as 2040, which is \u2018unignorably high\u2019. Impacts would include significant reductions in the northern hemisphere in staple crop-growing capability.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

For Climate, the risk matrix they provide gives a \u201chighly likely\u201d chance of \u201climited\u201d to \u201csevere\u201d impacts in 2025 \u2013 i.e., now.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Highly likely means >90% chance; as to the impacts themselves, see their risk matrix:<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

So, it\u2019s terrible now. But by 2050, we\u2019re into >50% mortality fantasy apocalypse land. I know! I exaggerated in the title. We\u2019re not all doomed. Only half of us are.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And finally, especially for our resident Black Swan aficionado John R, I present a figure (from 2024\u2019s \u201cScorpion\u201d) that seems to imply that the tails of a parametric distribution are Black Swans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Featured image<\/strong>: the webcam at Longyearbyen Harbour this morning. The\u00a0BBC were today telling us<\/a>\u00a0how worried they were that Svalbard has been so unseasonably warm this early February. [In a story about record-low sea ice extent globally.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

So says the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":366430,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691829872,691818056,691818272,691833330,691820106],"class_list":{"0":"post-366417","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-black-swan","9":"tag-climate-change","10":"tag-climate-hysteria","11":"tag-policy-action","12":"tag-tipping-points","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/01003885-climate-change-g22d1e89521280.jpg?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1xjX","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":248674,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=248674","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":0},"title":"Senate Budget Committee Hearing","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"19\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"I hear through the grapevine that this is a tough Committee to testify before.\u00a0 Should be interesting.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-778.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-778.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-778.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-778.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-778.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261117,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=261117","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":1},"title":"Ep93: Prof. Roger Pielke Jr. “The Inconvenient Truth about Climate Science”","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Roger Pielke, Jr. has been on the faculty of the University of Colorado Boulder since 2001, where he teaches and writes on a diverse range of policy and governance issues related to science, technology, environment, innovation and sports. Roger is a professor in the Environmental Studies Program. Roger is currently\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00Screenshot-2023-06-07-184427.png?fit=898%2C506&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00Screenshot-2023-06-07-184427.png?fit=898%2C506&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00Screenshot-2023-06-07-184427.png?fit=898%2C506&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00Screenshot-2023-06-07-184427.png?fit=898%2C506&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294497,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=294497","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":2},"title":"Free Climate Speech is Freedom Litmus\u00a0Test","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In chemistry, a litmus test is a strip of paper that turns red or blue when dipped into a liquid. Red shows the liquid is acid, while blue shows it is alkaline. The analogy in this context: Being able to openly discuss and challenge climate claims shows how healthy or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249552,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=249552","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":3},"title":"Greta Thunberg:\u00a0 Doctor of Theology","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"25\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"As for Greta, I too did a lot of foolish things as a child, as a teenager, and during my college-age years.\u00a0 Maybe Greta will come around to be something, to be someone, and not just a propaganda tool or an income source for her parents.\u00a0","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1070.png?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1070.png?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1070.png?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1070.png?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1070.png?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":426384,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426384","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":4},"title":"Kings College London: UK Climate Action Support Plummeting","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"15\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent study from King's College London (KCL) highlights a notable decline in the UK's public sense of urgency around climate action and net zero targets, though overall support for the 2050 net zero goal remains relatively solid. The research, conducted by the Policy Institute at King's College London, in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"BBC\"","block_context":{"text":"BBC","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bbc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-260.png?fit=1188%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-260.png?fit=1188%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-260.png?fit=1188%2C799&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-260.png?fit=1188%2C799&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-260.png?fit=1188%2C799&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241549,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=241549","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":5},"title":"Extraordinary Resignation by a Geology Professor: \u2018I feel the profession\u2026is no longer worthy of my efforts\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"25\/01\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"On Twitter, there is a openly raw admission of why academia has decended into little more than intellectual tribalism, with \u2018climate change\u2019 being at the center of the issue. Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki has decided to leave the University of Alabama, citing personal reasons, as well as the clear rise\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2023-01-25-205204.png?fit=935%2C529&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2023-01-25-205204.png?fit=935%2C529&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2023-01-25-205204.png?fit=935%2C529&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2023-01-25-205204.png?fit=935%2C529&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=366417"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366417\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":366432,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366417\/revisions\/366432"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/366430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=366417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=366417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=366417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}