{"id":362791,"date":"2025-01-20T16:36:33","date_gmt":"2025-01-20T15:36:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362791"},"modified":"2025-01-20T16:36:35","modified_gmt":"2025-01-20T15:36:35","slug":"the-energy-storage-fiasco-how-soon-will-it-be-abandoned","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362791","title":{"rendered":"The Energy Storage Fiasco — How Soon Will It Be Abandoned?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Manhattan Contrarian<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Francis Menton<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Energy from the wind and the sun \u2014 they\u2019re clean and green and free. OK, there\u2019s the small problem of intermittency. But clearly the intermittency problem can easily be solved with a few batteries to store some power for the occasional calm nights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Or is that solution really so easy? Regular readers here will know that I wrote an energy storage Report, titled \u201cThe Energy Storage Conundrum,\u201d<\/a> published by the GWPF back in December 2022. After some straightforward calculations based on elementary-school-level arithmetic, that Report concluded that the amount of storage needed was so large, and the costs so completely unaffordable, that energy storage was totally infeasible as a way to make wind and solar work as the main power sources for an electricity grid. Calculations set forth in that Report concluded that the amount of energy storage needed to enable a predominantly wind\/solar grid to get through a year without hitting a blackout was in the range of 500 to 1000 hours of average electricity usage. Keep that range in mind for the rest of this post.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Paying no attention whatsoever to my warnings, and not troubling themselves to do any simple arithmetic of their own, the states of New York and California have chosen to forge ahead with plans for predominantly wind\/solar grids backed up by batteries. Multiple years into the project, neither state is anywhere near to building 1% of the energy storage that would be needed to make their fantasy systems work. But even in these very early stages, they have both blundered into an additional and unanticipated problem: catastrophic fires.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lithium-ion batteries have an unfortunate downside that they occasionally catch fire spontaneously. This can be a notable problem for your cell phone or computer, and a bigger problem for your electric bicycle or car. But the batteries for those things, even the electric car, are tiny compared to the huge batteries needed to back up the electrical grid. Grid-scale batteries must store thousands of megawatt-hours of electricity, compared to maybe 100 kWh for an EV. It seems that the frequency of these spontaneous fires increases with the size of the battery. Can this problem be solved? I have no idea. But it certainly has not been solved yet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In March 2024, I had a post titled \u201cNew York and California Getting Totally Lost With Energy Storage,\u201d<\/a> reporting on the efforts of those two states to build gigantic battery farms to back up their planned wind\/solar adventures. At a stage of having built only a fraction of one percent of the amount of batteries that would be needed to support the project, both had run into a situation of repeated huge and catastrophic spontaneous fires in their newly-built battery farms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

New York (State) has average electricity demand of about 17,000 MW, meaning that the storage capacity it would need for the predominantly wind\/solar system of the future would be 500 to 1000 hours of that, or 8,500 to 17,000 GWh. Governor Hochul has set a (ridiculous) goal of 24 GWh of energy storage for the State by 2030, and my March 2024 post reported that by August 2023 all of 1.2 GWh of that had been built. And yet, between May and July 2023, New York had had three large fires at the grid battery storage facilities built up to that time:<\/p>\n\n\n\n