{"id":362478,"date":"2025-01-17T13:56:12","date_gmt":"2025-01-17T12:56:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362478"},"modified":"2025-01-17T14:11:22","modified_gmt":"2025-01-17T13:11:22","slug":"jimmy-carter-the-great-deregulator","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362478","title":{"rendered":"<\/font>Jimmy Carter: The Great Deregulator?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

from Econlib<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robert Bradley<\/a><\/h5>\n\n\n\n

Jimmy Carter’s term as U. S. President (1977\u20131981) included major deregulation with airlines, motor carriers, and railroads. Other advances were scored in communications, tax policy, and regulatory budgeting. But the “great deregulator” had a very different approach with energy, which (along with inflation) defined his economic infamy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carter began wellhead deregulation of petroleum and natural gas\u2014but with a Windfall Profit Tax for crude oil and intrastate regulation for gas. Carter\u2019s basic mindset was oriented toward the federal planning of supply and demand, outlined in the National Energy Plan<\/em> of 1977. The visible hand of government, not the invisible hand of markets, was to be controlling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Was the Problem?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The energy crisis in Carter\u2019s time was blamed on the irreversible, worsening depletion of oil and gas. Physical fixity meant an increasing cost of extraction, hence the problems of supply and price. The \u201ceconomics of exhaustible resources\u201d was mainstream fare in the textbooks and journals, spawning a new subdiscipline, energy economics<\/em>. The engineering mind of the 39th President was determined to overcome a perceived limit to growth.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Oil shortages in 1972\u201374, and natural gas curtailments in the winters of 1971\/72 and 1976\/77, had set the stage. To Carter, and his energy czar James Schlesinger, [1] crude oil and natural gas had to be replaced by super-abundant coal, synthetic oil and gas from coal (synfuels), and supplemented by renewable energies. (Nuclear, never embraced, was completely off the table with the Three Mile Island incident in March 1979.) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the demand side, less energy had to be consumed in transportation, industry, and power generation, not to mention in homes and businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Major new legislation\u2014interpreted in many thousands of Federal Register pages\u2014empowered the newborn U.S. Department of Energy (1977). The new laws (in 1978) were the National Energy Conservation Policy Act; Power Plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act; Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act; Energy Tax Act; and Natural Gas Policy Act. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

And in 1980: the U.S. Synthetic Fuels Corporation Act; Biomass Energy and Alcohol Fuels Act; Renewable Energy Resources Act; Solar Energy and Energy Conservation Act; Solar Energy and Energy Conservation Bank Act; Geothermal Energy Act; and Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Act. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Planning, More Planning<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The National Energy Plan<\/em> of 1977 stated, \u201cneither Government policy nor market incentives can improve on nature.\u201d [2] While recognizing the perverse effects of price ceilings on supply and demand, Carter blamed foreign political control by OPEC for his activism (\u201cthere was no free market or effective competitive forces relating to world oil supplies and price,\u201d he stated in his memoirs). [3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These false rationales resulted in a regulatory experience that was frustrating, wasteful, even bizarre. A new term, gapism<\/em>, described the multitude of government programs passed to synthetically increase supply and reduce demand, given \u201cdisequilibrium\u201d under price controls. \u201cOne can only conjecture that many gapologists do not really appreciate the fact that at higher prices consumers really do buy less and producers offer more,\u201d observed Edward J. Mitchell, \u201cor that they believe these tendencies are so weak that only astronomical prices will eliminate gaps.\u201d [4]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Economists Error<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Experts, academics, and planners were all-in with the fixity-depletion premise of Carter energy policy. Forgotten or ignored was Scarcity and Growth: The Economics of Resource Availability<\/em> (1963), which challenged depletionism and credited \u201cman\u2019s ingenuity and wisdom\u201d with \u201cincreasing, not diminishing, returns.\u201d [5]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere has been a certain tendency to regard technological advance as a chancy phenomenon, a bit of luck that is sure to run out sooner or later (with the ever-present implication that it will be sooner),\u201d explained Harold J. Barnett and Chandler Morse. [6] But data suggested otherwise. \u201cEvery cost-reducing innovation opens up possibilities of application in so many new directions that the stock of knowledge, far from being depleted by new developments, may even expand geometrically.\u201d [7]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It would take a contrarian, Julian Simon, to resurrect Barnett-Morse\u2019s \u201cgreat 1963 book\u201d in the Carter era. [8] And in the 1980s, with energy prices decontrolled, the resource optimists would win the debate. Energy economics was just economics, after all. And less dismal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jimmy Carter was apparently well-intentioned in choosing the bureaucratic means to provide reliable and affordable energy for Americans. But he could have ended the energy crisis quickly and simply with an opposite public policy. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carter was under the sway of false theories about what human ingenuity could accomplish in a free market, with or without major negative foreign policy events. Those false ideas had resounding negative consequences. The energy lessons of the 1970s should not be forgotten.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[1]  \u201cSchlesinger\u2019s views on national economic policy were closer to French indicative planning than to the invisible hand \u2026.\u201d James L. Cochrane, \u201cCarter Energy Policy and the Ninety-fifth Congress.\u201d In Energy Policy in Perspective<\/em>, Craufurd D. Goodwin, ed. (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1981), p. 553.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[2] Executive Office of the President, Energy Policy and Planning Office, The National Energy Plan<\/em> (Washington, DC: GPO, 1977), p. xiii.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[3]  Jimmy Carter, Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a President <\/em>(New York: Bantam Books, 1982), p. 94. In a 1977 address to the nation, Carter used the memorable phrase \u201cthe moral equivalent of war\u201d to describe America\u2019s challenge against OPEC and oil imports in general.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[4] Edward J. Mitchell, U.S. Energy Policy: A Primer<\/em> (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1974), pp. 20\u201321.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[5] Harold J. Barnett and Chandler Morse, Scarcity and Growth: The Economics of Natural Resource Availability<\/em> (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, for Resources for the Future, 1963), pp. 3, 8.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[6] Barnett and Morse, Scarcity and Growth<\/em>, p. 235.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[7] Barnett and Morse, Scarcity and Growth<\/em>, p. 236.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jimmy Carter’s term as U. S. President (1977\u20131981) included major deregulation with airlines, motor carriers, and railroads. Other advances were scored in communications, tax policy, and regulatory budgeting. But the “great deregulator” had a very different approach with energy, which (along with inflation) defined his economic infamy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":362479,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818128],"class_list":{"0":"post-362478","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-energy","10":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Pres-telephone-Jimmy-Carter-Oval-Office-November-20-1978.webp?fit=1600%2C1079&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1wiq","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":285435,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=285435","url_meta":{"origin":362478,"position":0},"title":"\u201cBuffer of Stability\u201d (Beware price and allocation controls)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0AP Photo (left photo); AP Photo\/Ashley Landis (right side) The Biden administration faces an oil crisis the likes of which haven\u2019t been seen since the price shocks of the 1970s. What is clear is that the 1970s was a pivot point for energy. Then-President Jimmy Carter listening to former Sen.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"1970s energy crisis\"","block_context":{"text":"1970s energy crisis","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=1970s-energy-crisis"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-777.png?fit=1110%2C739&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-777.png?fit=1110%2C739&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-777.png?fit=1110%2C739&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-777.png?fit=1110%2C739&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-777.png?fit=1110%2C739&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":427181,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=427181","url_meta":{"origin":362478,"position":1},"title":"EPA endangerment finding repeal & Potomac River sewage crisis","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"In Episode 542 of District of Conservation, Gabriella discusses two trending news stories: the repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding and the Trump administration stepping in to resolve the Potomac River sewage crisis that began on January 19th, 2026. Tune in to learn more!","rel":"","context":"In \"Advance Historic Deregulation\u2060\"","block_context":{"text":"Advance Historic Deregulation\u2060","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=advance-historic-deregulation%e2%81%a0"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0CFACT-EPA.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0CFACT-EPA.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0CFACT-EPA.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0CFACT-EPA.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0CFACT-EPA.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276191,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=276191","url_meta":{"origin":362478,"position":2},"title":"The Wounded Texas Grid: Who\u2019s On First?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/08\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The\u00a0Texas Electric Utility Restructuring Act of 1999\u00a0is approaching a quarter-century. And what a mess has resulted from the misnomer \u201celectricity deregulation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"ERCOT\"","block_context":{"text":"ERCOT","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=ercot"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-1061.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-1061.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-1061.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-1061.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-1061.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206785,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=206785","url_meta":{"origin":362478,"position":3},"title":"The Biden Administration hits peak energy absurdity","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/07\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"BY ANNE BRADBURY: Methane Fee, Windfall Profits Taxes, Repealing IDCs, calls for FTC investigations into price gouging, and now a federal gasoline tax suspension.\u00a0 The Administration\u2019s energy policy is disjointed and often counterproductive. Rather than flailing attacks on the oil and natural gas industry, leaders in Washington need a serious\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Biden-Lower-Gas-Prices.jpg?fit=843%2C790&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Biden-Lower-Gas-Prices.jpg?fit=843%2C790&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Biden-Lower-Gas-Prices.jpg?fit=843%2C790&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Biden-Lower-Gas-Prices.jpg?fit=843%2C790&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":394943,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=394943","url_meta":{"origin":362478,"position":4},"title":"Catastrophic Climate Change? (1977 memo to Carter in retrospect)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cGood thing that Jimmy Carter\u2019s Administration did not act on this to join their other sins, from price control to conservationism to creating the Department of Energy to synthetic fuel.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQOqAfTzKpIiZNSyk9r2ADS5ULz-3ub6AMxu0Sr88iRIzrgGU0DAM7CVm8hj8BmFnNtxWURvbfG9vvHD7AILBxyUcoT7UHD4LHhaIOYaxqf34f72sYmI9FPrCyqW05_wO08EnpuRxP2u6drrRLhVMzzcnHydkA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQOqAfTzKpIiZNSyk9r2ADS5ULz-3ub6AMxu0Sr88iRIzrgGU0DAM7CVm8hj8BmFnNtxWURvbfG9vvHD7AILBxyUcoT7UHD4LHhaIOYaxqf34f72sYmI9FPrCyqW05_wO08EnpuRxP2u6drrRLhVMzzcnHydkA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQOqAfTzKpIiZNSyk9r2ADS5ULz-3ub6AMxu0Sr88iRIzrgGU0DAM7CVm8hj8BmFnNtxWURvbfG9vvHD7AILBxyUcoT7UHD4LHhaIOYaxqf34f72sYmI9FPrCyqW05_wO08EnpuRxP2u6drrRLhVMzzcnHydkA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQOqAfTzKpIiZNSyk9r2ADS5ULz-3ub6AMxu0Sr88iRIzrgGU0DAM7CVm8hj8BmFnNtxWURvbfG9vvHD7AILBxyUcoT7UHD4LHhaIOYaxqf34f72sYmI9FPrCyqW05_wO08EnpuRxP2u6drrRLhVMzzcnHydkA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQOqAfTzKpIiZNSyk9r2ADS5ULz-3ub6AMxu0Sr88iRIzrgGU0DAM7CVm8hj8BmFnNtxWURvbfG9vvHD7AILBxyUcoT7UHD4LHhaIOYaxqf34f72sYmI9FPrCyqW05_wO08EnpuRxP2u6drrRLhVMzzcnHydkA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":419897,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=419897","url_meta":{"origin":362478,"position":5},"title":"Trump Shook Up Energy Policy In 2025. Disaster Could Still Strike In 2026","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/01\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"In 2025, President Trump's second term brought major shifts to U.S. energy policy through executive orders and deregulatory actions signed from day one. These prioritized fossil fuels, nuclear power, and rapid permitting while scaling back renewables and climate-focused regulations.","rel":"","context":"In \"AI (artificial intelligence\"","block_context":{"text":"AI (artificial intelligence","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=ai-artificial-intelligence"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/00-Blackout-33.jpeg?fit=1200%2C648&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/00-Blackout-33.jpeg?fit=1200%2C648&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/00-Blackout-33.jpeg?fit=1200%2C648&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/00-Blackout-33.jpeg?fit=1200%2C648&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/00-Blackout-33.jpeg?fit=1200%2C648&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=362478"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362478\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":362484,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362478\/revisions\/362484"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/362479"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=362478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=362478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=362478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}