{"id":361494,"date":"2025-01-11T09:11:31","date_gmt":"2025-01-11T08:11:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=361494"},"modified":"2025-01-11T09:11:33","modified_gmt":"2025-01-11T08:11:33","slug":"patrick-t-brown-on-the-la-fires-and-climate-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=361494","title":{"rendered":"Patrick T. Brown on the LA Fires and Climate Change"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Charles Rotter<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Patrick Brown has crafted\u00a0an insightful and balanced analysis of the Los Angeles wildfires, breaking down the interplay of factors like meteorology, fuel conditions, and human activity.<\/a>\u00a0His post challenges the dominant narratives that overemphasize climate change as the sole culprit, offering a nuanced and data-driven perspective. With clear-eyed attention to practical solutions\u2014like home hardening, fuel management, and ignition prevention\u2014Brown provides a roadmap for mitigating fire risks without resorting to alarmist or impractical global policies. It\u2019s a refreshing, must-read take on an issue too often clouded by ideology. The following is a section by section commentary on his post.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
https:\/\/x.com\/PatrickTBrown31\/status\/1877134442839310573<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Introduction: Setting the Scene<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article begins by situating the reader in the context of ongoing wildfires in Los Angeles, marked by \u201ctragic loss of life and property.\u201d This straightforward acknowledgment underscores the gravity of the situation, setting up the key questions: What drives these events, and how can we mitigate their impact?<\/em> The framing of this inquiry is critical\u2014it moves beyond simplistic explanations, paving the way for a nuanced exploration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article wastes no time highlighting the triad of wildfire factors: meteorology, fuel conditions, and ignition sources. By doing so, it establishes a holistic foundation. This is a welcome break from the overemphasis on climate change often seen in mainstream discussions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meteorological Factors: The Role of Santa Ana Winds<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the strongest sections is the discussion of the Santa Ana winds, described as a \u201cparticularly intense\u201d phenomenon with gusts exceeding 80 mph. The article stresses that these winds are a natural part of the Los Angeles climate, with \u201clittle evidence that climate change will make them worse.\u201d In fact, it cites research predicting that climate change could reduce<\/em> their intensity and frequency\u200b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This point is critical because it disrupts the often-repeated narrative that climate change amplifies every aspect of wildfire behavior. The inclusion of data from a Geophysical Research Letters<\/em> study<\/a> supports this assertion, which projects a decrease in Santa Ana wind activity as climate patterns shift. This adds credibility and moves the discussion from speculation to evidence-based conclusions\u200b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
https:\/\/agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1029\/2018GL080261<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Fuel Conditions: A Critical Variable<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article then addresses fuel conditions, noting that vegetation in the region is \u201cvery dry\u201d due to a lack of rainfall. However, it challenges the assumption that climate change is the primary driver of this dryness, citing long-term precipitation data showing no clear trend attributable to climate change (page 3). Instead, it emphasizes that Southern California\u2019s rainfall variability is a long-standing feature of the region\u200b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article also references the Local Climate Change Snapshot<\/a><\/em> tool, which predicts longer dry spells in some scenarios but acknowledges the region\u2019s inherent variability. The balance here is notable\u2014it doesn\u2019t deny potential climate impacts but carefully refrains from overstating them\u200b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fire Intensity and Warming: A Complex Relationship<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The discussion of warming\u2019s impact on fire intensity is both cautious and data-driven. While the article concedes that the LA area is \u201cabout 3\u00b0C warmer\u201d than pre-industrial levels and that this warming can \u201cdry fuels,\u201d it tempers this with modeling results. Specifically, it shows that the predicted increase in wildfire intensity due to warming (7.2% by mid-century) is modest and would still be outweighed by effective fuel treatments (page 5)\u200b\u200b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This section also critiques the prevailing focus on emissions reductions as a panacea, noting that even aggressive mitigation scenarios only reduce the intensity increase slightly\u2014from 7.2% to 5.5%. This challenges the cost-benefit logic of current climate policies while emphasizing the importance of localized interventions\u200b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Human Ignitions: The Often-Ignored Catalyst<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A standout aspect of the article is its focus on human ignitions, which it rightly identifies as a major driver of fire outbreaks. From sparks caused by equipment to utility-caused fires, the article provides a thorough catalog of ignition sources. Importantly, it discusses practical measures such as public awareness campaigns, vegetation management near power lines, and utility upgrades like burying power lines or de-energizing systems during high-risk periods\u200b\u200b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This section is refreshing for its pragmatism. While global-scale climate policies dominate headlines, simple steps to reduce human ignitions could have an immediate, measurable impact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mitigation Strategies: A Balanced Perspective<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article\u2019s mitigation proposals are among its strongest elements. It champions \u201chome hardening\u201d\u2014using fire-resistant materials and creating defensible space around properties\u2014as a proven method for reducing structural losses during wildfires. It also highlights the synergistic benefits of widespread adoption within communities, showing how individual actions can amplify collective resilience\u200b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In addressing firefighting resources, the article emphasizes the need for well-funded, well-equipped personnel and infrastructure. This practical focus contrasts sharply with the abstract, long-term goals of many climate policies, demonstrating a clear preference for actionable solutions over ideological posturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fuel Treatment: A Realistic Solution<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Returning to fuel conditions, the article makes a compelling case for mechanical brush removal and prescribed burns. It cites specific examples, such as the protective effect of the Franklin Fire footprint on Malibu, to illustrate the effectiveness of such treatments. Moreover, it quantifies their potential benefits, showing that fuel reduction could offset warming-driven increases in wildfire danger by as much as 15%\u200b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The acknowledgment of trade-offs\u2014such as ecosystem impacts\u2014is equally commendable. This balanced approach lends credibility and avoids the one-sidedness that often plagues environmental debates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Climate Change: An Overstated Influence?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article closes by synthesizing its findings, arguing that while climate change may \u201ccontribute\u201d to fire danger, it is far from the dominant factor. By framing climate change as one variable among many, it avoids the hyperbolic claims that undermine public trust in environmental science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The conclusion also critiques the media\u2019s tendency to give \u201cprimary billing\u201d to climate change, citing the relatively modest impact of emissions reductions on wildfire intensity. This final point underscores the need for a more nuanced discourse\u2014one that prioritizes evidence over ideology\u200b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Overall, climate change may be contributing to the fire danger of this event, but only if the warming\/drying influence outweighs the potential reduction in Santa Ana winds. To me, that means climate change does not deserve primary billing (e.g., https:\/\/x.com\/dwallacewells\/status\/1877030739344081343<\/a>) Fire suppression and the long-term build-up of fuels are not as much of an issue in the Southern California brush environment as they are in the Northern CA Forests, but our machine-learning wildfire intensity model indicates that fuel treatment would still reduce danger substantially. Other than that, the main way these types of events can be mitigated in the future is via reduced human ignitions, potentially increased firefighting resources, and enhanced \u201chome hardening\u201d measures within fire-prone communities.

https:\/\/x.com\/PatrickTBrown31\/status\/1877134442839310573<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion: A Pragmatic Path Forward<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article exemplifies the kind of balanced, evidence-based analysis that is sorely needed in discussions about wildfires and climate policy. By addressing meteorology, fuel conditions, human activity, and mitigation strategies in equal measure, it avoids the reductive narratives that dominate much of the debate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Its practical recommendations\u2014home hardening, fuel treatments, ignition prevention\u2014offer a clear roadmap for reducing wildfire risks without resorting to costly and ineffectual global policies. In doing so, it shifts the focus from abstract climate goals to tangible local solutions, where progress can actually be measured.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For policymakers, the message is clear: stop chasing global unicorns and start addressing the specific, solvable problems in your own backyard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I solidly recommend going to X and reading the original.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patrick Brown has crafted\u00a0an insightful and balanced analysis of the Los Angeles wildfires, breaking down the interplay of factors like meteorology, fuel conditions, and human activity.\u00a0His post challenges the dominant narratives that overemphasize climate change as the sole culprit, offering a nuanced and data-driven perspective. With clear-eyed attention to practical solutions\u2014like home hardening, fuel management, and ignition prevention\u2014Brown provides a roadmap for mitigating fire risks without resorting to alarmist or impractical global policies. It\u2019s a refreshing, must-read take on an issue too often clouded by ideology.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":361500,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691832559,691832558,691822363,691832523,691832560],"class_list":["post-361494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-human-ignitions","tag-los-angeles-wildfires","tag-patrick-brown","tag-santa-ana-winds","tag-wildfire-risks","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0los-angeles-wildfires-cause-mass-evacuations-destruction.webp?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1w2y","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":277539,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=277539","url_meta":{"origin":361494,"position":0},"title":"Climate scientist whistleblower Patrick Brown reveals how the media\u2019s obsession with global warming manipulates the truth about wildfires \u2013 80% are ignited by humans","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Much reporting of the wildfires in Maui has said climate change contributed to the disaster by contributing to conditions that helped the fires to spark and spread quickly. The fires, which killed at least 115 people, are believed to have been\u00a0started by a downed electricity line, but observers have said\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Global warming\"","block_context":{"text":"Global warming","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=global-warming"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0ap-maui-fires.jpg?fit=1024%2C742&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0ap-maui-fires.jpg?fit=1024%2C742&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0ap-maui-fires.jpg?fit=1024%2C742&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0ap-maui-fires.jpg?fit=1024%2C742&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277596,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=277596","url_meta":{"origin":361494,"position":1},"title":"Wrong, LA Times, There is No Evidence \u2018Climate Change Boosts Risk of Explosive Wildfire Growth in California\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"An article in\u00a0The Los Angeles Times\u00a0(LA Times)\u00a0published on September 4, 2023 makes the claim\u00a0that a study by a Berkeley think tank proves \u201cClimate change has ratcheted up the risk of explosive wildfire growth in California by 25%.\u201d This is false.","rel":"","context":"In \"California\"","block_context":{"text":"California","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=california"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0TEDSIXR5IRCAVCYBE7F5PNINAI.webp?fit=1024%2C641&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0TEDSIXR5IRCAVCYBE7F5PNINAI.webp?fit=1024%2C641&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0TEDSIXR5IRCAVCYBE7F5PNINAI.webp?fit=1024%2C641&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0TEDSIXR5IRCAVCYBE7F5PNINAI.webp?fit=1024%2C641&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278421,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=278421","url_meta":{"origin":361494,"position":2},"title":"The Times view on scientific journals and editorial bias: Climate\u00a0Change","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The physicist Alan Sokal pulled off one of the most damning scholarly hoaxes of recent decades when, in 1996, he persuaded a literary journal to accept a wilfully nonsensical paper. The Sokal Affair, as it became known, was designed to expose the lax standards in the less rigorous publications, where\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"arsonists\"","block_context":{"text":"arsonists","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=arsonists"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0PHOTO-Climate-Collage-Diagonal-Design-NOAA-Communications-080621.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0PHOTO-Climate-Collage-Diagonal-Design-NOAA-Communications-080621.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0PHOTO-Climate-Collage-Diagonal-Design-NOAA-Communications-080621.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0PHOTO-Climate-Collage-Diagonal-Design-NOAA-Communications-080621.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0PHOTO-Climate-Collage-Diagonal-Design-NOAA-Communications-080621.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282036,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282036","url_meta":{"origin":361494,"position":3},"title":"Let No Lying Dog\u00a0Sleep","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Angry dog From Climate Scepticism BY\u00a0JOHN RIDGWAY The Grantham Institute barks You may recall that last month climate scientist Professor Patrick T. Brown of the Breakthrough Institute caused a bit of a\u00a0furore\u00a0by pointing out how extreme weather event attribution studies invariably restrict their quantification to climatic causation only, thereby excluding\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Carbon Brief\"","block_context":{"text":"Carbon Brief","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-brief"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":442363,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=442363","url_meta":{"origin":361494,"position":4},"title":"Sorry, Los Angeles Times, Climate Change Isn\u2019t Driving Georgia\u2019s Wildfires","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent article at the Los Angeles Times (LAT) titled, \u201cGeorgia blaze shows how climate change has led to more wildfires in the East,\u201d claims that the Eastern United States is suffering from more extreme and frequent wildfires due to climate change. This is false. Data show no trend in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/00Screenshot-2026-05-02-194204.png?fit=1200%2C669&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/00Screenshot-2026-05-02-194204.png?fit=1200%2C669&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/00Screenshot-2026-05-02-194204.png?fit=1200%2C669&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/00Screenshot-2026-05-02-194204.png?fit=1200%2C669&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/00Screenshot-2026-05-02-194204.png?fit=1200%2C669&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278142,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=278142","url_meta":{"origin":361494,"position":5},"title":"Burn the Witch!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is a long-established principle of scientific enquiry that if you want to understand the structure of something, then just give it a bang and see how it rattles. It is a technique that crops up in a number of different guises from seismography and spectrography to magnetic resonance imaging;\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=361494"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361494\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":361502,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361494\/revisions\/361502"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/361500"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=361494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=361494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=361494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}