{"id":360515,"date":"2025-01-05T09:18:57","date_gmt":"2025-01-05T08:18:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=360515"},"modified":"2025-01-05T09:19:00","modified_gmt":"2025-01-05T08:19:00","slug":"new-york-on-the-march-to-climate-utopia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=360515","title":{"rendered":"New York On the March to Climate Utopia"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Manhattan Contrarian<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Francis Menton<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a post a couple of weeks ago on December 21<\/a>, I observed that the country of Germany appeared to have won the race among all countries and states to be the first to hit the \u201cGreen Energy Wall.\u201d Its pursuit of the \u201crenewable\u201d wind and solar electricity fantasy has put it in a spot where regular wind\/sun droughts cause huge electricity price spikes, and major industries have become uncompetitive. It has no solution to its dead end and can go no farther.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If Germany has \u201chit the wall,\u201d what is the appropriate analogy for New York? New York passed its Climate Act with great fanfare in 2019. The Act orders that we are to have a \u201cnet zero\u201d energy system by 2050, with interim deadlines along the way. The first serious deadline arrives in 2030, where the official mandate is 70% of electricity generation from \u201crenewables\u201d (aka \u201c70 x 30\u201d). That deadline is now just five years away. Within the past year, all the efforts to move toward the 70 x 30 goal are falling apart, as anybody who had given the subject any critical thought knew that they inevitably would. But nobody in authority has yet been willing to acknowledge that this has turned into a farce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here\u2019s my analogy: New York is like the cartoon character Wile E. Coyote, who has run off the cliff and is now suspended in mid-air, apparently not knowing what will happen next.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

We know what\u2019s next: shortly, he will crash to earth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consider a few data points:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Off-shore wind procurement<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Scoping Plan developed under the Climate Act calls for some 9000 MW of offshore wind by 2035. People with elementary-school-level arithmetic skills knew that this amount of intermittent generation would not be nearly enough to replace the amounts of dispatchable generation set to close; but maybe this would at least be a serious start. By early 2023, it was reported that some 4300 MW out of the 9000 MW were in \u201cactive development,\u201d with wholesale prices having been agreed to with developers in the range of $100\/MWh.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But then reality started to hit. In this post on October 15, 2023,<\/a> I reported that \u201cessentially all\u201d of the developers of the 4300 MW of offshore wind in \u201cactive development\u201d had backed out and demanded price increases in the range of 30 – 50% to proceed. New York rejected that maneuver but ultimately had no option other than to re-bid the contracts and get bids in the range that the developers were demanding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On February 29, 2024, the State announced<\/a> that it had accepted re-bids for two of the projects in question, for a total of only about 1700 MW and at a price of over $150 per MWh. (This level of price would require retail electricity prices in the range of at least $0.40 per kWh and would be completely uneconomic if it were to become the norm for New York electricity production.).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, the remainder of the offshore wind procurement appears to be in complete disarray. On April 19, E&E News reported that New York had canceled efforts<\/a> on three of its big offshore wind development areas, Attentive Energy, Community Offshore Wind, and Excelsior Wind. These three, had they proceeded, would have totaled about 4000 MW out of the 9000 MW 2035 goal. Excerpt:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

New York canceled power contracts for three offshore wind projects Friday, citing a turbine maker\u2019s plans to scrap its biggest machines. The news is a heavy blow to the U.S. offshore wind industry and a major setback for the climate ambitions of New York \u2014 and President Joe Biden. The three projects would have delivered 4 gigawatts of offshore wind to the state, amounting to almost half of New York\u2019s 2035 goal.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

At this point nobody has any idea how to get large amounts of offshore wind developed around New York at a price anybody is willing to pay. And of course, nobody has a solution to the intermittency problem either.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Green hydrogen<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The New York regulators have recognized that a de-carbonized and predominantly wind\/solar electricity generation system will require something called the \u201cdispatchable emissions-free resource,\u201d or DEFR, to make it work. The best idea that anybody has for the DEFR is so-called \u201cgreen\u201d hydrogen, that is, hydrogen produced by some non-emitting system, like wind, solar, or hydro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Currently, only negligible amounts of green hydrogen are produced in the world, and none in New York. But somehow, New York got the idea that it could make this work. Two green hydrogen facilities have been granted state subsidies and are supposedly under way. One is being developed by a company called Plug Power and is at an industrial park called STAMP west of Rochester; and the other is being developed by Air Products at Massena, on the St. Lawrence River. Both of these facitilities are almost comically small relative to the amounts of hydrogen that would be needed to fully back up New York\u2019s electricity generation in a world of mostly wind and solar generation. But at least they would be something.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On October 18, the Batavian reported<\/a> that the Plug Power hydrogen facility was \u201con pause.\u201d Excerpt:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris Suozzi, VP for business and workforce development at the Genesee County Economic Development Center, reportedly told a Washington, D.C.-based commercial real estate firm that Plug Power’s STAMP project is on hold. . .. \u201cThey\u2019re not ready to go,” Suozzi reportedly said. “They\u2019re on pause. We don\u2019t know what\u2019s going to happen with them at this point.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The pausing or cancellation of a green hydrogen project should surprise no one. The past year has seen major cancellations of much larger such projects by big players like Australia\u2019s Fortescue and Origin. The fact is that the cost of producing green hydrogen is a large multiple of the cost of getting natural gas out of the ground for the same energy content, besides which natural gas is a much superior fuel in every way (higher energy density, easier to handle, less corrosive, less subject to leaks, far less dangerous and explosive, etc.). Meanwhile, the developer of the STAMP green hydrogen project, Plug Power, reported as its results for the third quarter of 2024<\/a> a loss of $211 million on revenues of $174 million. They are hoping for a loan from the federal Department of Energy to keep themselves going. I wonder what Chris Wright is going to think about that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Air Products facility in Massena plans to use hydro power from a dam on the St. Lawrence to produce its hydrogen. Excuse me? The hydro power is already dispatchable. How can it possibly make any sense to use dispatchable electricity to produce hydrogen whose purpose is to make dispatchable electricity? At least about 40% of the energy is going to get lost on the round trip from electricity to hydrogen and back to electricity. It simply has to be that there is a better use for the St. Lawrence River hydro power than turning it into hydrogen and then using the hydrogen. But nothing here makes any sense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Clean Path Transmission Line<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another key facility to make renewable energy work for New York was supposed to be the Clean Path transmission line. This is a proposed 175-mile high-capacity (4 GW) transmission line to bring to New York City and the downstate region power generated at various new \u201crenewable\u201d (wind and solar) facilities being developed in the northern and western parts of the state. The stated cost of this major project was to be $11 billion.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

On November 27, the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority informed the Public Service Commission that the Clean Path project had been canceled. Here is a copy of the NYSERDA letter<\/a>. Here is a piece from Utility Dive on December 3 <\/a>about the cancellation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I don\u2019t find any discussion about the reasons for the cancellation, but it has to be that the developers figured out the the economics did not work. Here\u2019s the problem: because wind and solar generators only work about 20-40% of the time, this enormously expensive transmission line would not be operated at anywhere near its capacity. Likely, it would only average about one-third of capacity. That means, compared to a line that operates at or near 100% of capacity, its charges for transmission would be about triple.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cancellation of this line has only occurred within the past month, and I haven\u2019t seen anything about plans for a re-bid or an alternative strategy. So far, nobody is saying \u201cthis can\u2019t possibly work.\u201d But no matter how you approach the problem, the cost of transmitting intermittent wind and solar power from far upstate to New York City is going to be around triple the cost of transmitting power from a natural gas plant that runs nearly all the time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So here we are, suspended up in the air, and nobody seems to realize that we will shortly crash to earth. Everybody involved is trying to milk the last dollars out of the taxpayers before the crash hits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a post a couple of weeks ago on December 21, I observed that the country of Germany appeared to have won the race among all countries and states to be the first to hit the \u201cGreen Energy Wall.\u201d Its pursuit of the \u201crenewable\u201d wind and solar electricity fantasy has put it in a spot where regular wind\/sun droughts cause huge electricity price spikes, and major industries have become uncompetitive. It has no solution to its dead end and can go no farther.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":360521,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691823454,691828645,691819849,691818301,691832438,691818728],"class_list":{"0":"post-360515","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-act","9":"tag-green-energy-wall","10":"tag-green-hydrogen","11":"tag-offshore-wind","12":"tag-u-s-offshore-wind-industry","13":"tag-wind-and-solar","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/01af8028c-a0cb-49c8-b0bd-6aad9a37bfb6-2100_Dystopian_Utopia_158-159.webp?fit=3200%2C1804&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1vML","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":254801,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=254801","url_meta":{"origin":360515,"position":0},"title":"South Africa And The Green Energy Wall","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/26\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s obvious to any person with the faculty of critical thinking that intermittent renewable \u201cgreen\u201d energy will never work to power a modern economy.","rel":"","context":"In \"Green Energy\"","block_context":{"text":"Green Energy","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=green-energy"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0-Cape-Town.jpeg?fit=1200%2C765&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0-Cape-Town.jpeg?fit=1200%2C765&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0-Cape-Town.jpeg?fit=1200%2C765&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0-Cape-Town.jpeg?fit=1200%2C765&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0-Cape-Town.jpeg?fit=1200%2C765&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288633,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=288633","url_meta":{"origin":360515,"position":1},"title":"The Green Energy Wall Gradually Coming Into Focus","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/26\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"From MANHATTAN CONTRARIAN Francis Menton It\u2019s been obvious for many years that electricity generation from the intermittent wind and sun would never work to power a modern economy. But how would the infeasibility of the proposed energy transition finally manifest itself to put an end to the madness? A couple\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Argentina\"","block_context":{"text":"Argentina","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=argentina"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-545.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-545.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-545.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-545.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206636,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=206636","url_meta":{"origin":360515,"position":2},"title":"And The Winner Is, Germany!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/01\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"From the MANHATTAN CONTRARIAN Francis Menton Just over six months ago, in December 2021, I asked the question that was on the tip of the tongue of everybody who follows the subject of the ongoing massive \u201cgreen\u201d transition to fossil-fuel-free energy. Actually, that\u2019s a lie. The question I asked was\u00a0not\u00a0on\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-1.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-1.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-1.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-1.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209965,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=209965","url_meta":{"origin":360515,"position":3},"title":"Skyrocketing Power Prices & Power Rationing: Germany First to Hit the Wind & Solar Wall","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/24\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Germans are in the midst of a power pricing and supply disaster thanks to the world\u2019s most idiotic energy policy, centred on an unhinged obsession with chaotically intermittent wind and solar. Already suffering Europe\u2019s highest power prices, consumers are bracing for even worse to come. Vladimir Putin\u2019s Ukrainian adventure has\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-291.png?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-291.png?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-291.png?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-291.png?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-291.png?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261073,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=261073","url_meta":{"origin":360515,"position":4},"title":"Sir Keir Starmer\u2019s Plans to Turn Britain into a \u2018Green Energy Superpower\u2019 will Bankrupt Households and Cripple the Economy","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/07\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"What effect will Sir Keir Starmer\u2019s ambition to turn Britain into a \u201cclean energy superpower\u201d and ban any further oil and gas exploration have on the price we will pay for our electricity, assuming he becomes our next Prime Minister?","rel":"","context":"In \"Bankrupt Households\"","block_context":{"text":"Bankrupt Households","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bankrupt-households"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Net-Zero-Infographic-1.6.jpg?fit=1200%2C626&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Net-Zero-Infographic-1.6.jpg?fit=1200%2C626&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Net-Zero-Infographic-1.6.jpg?fit=1200%2C626&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Net-Zero-Infographic-1.6.jpg?fit=1200%2C626&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Net-Zero-Infographic-1.6.jpg?fit=1200%2C626&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":229357,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=229357","url_meta":{"origin":360515,"position":5},"title":"German offshore wind is not an example to follow","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/15\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Biden administration is hot to trot to install giant, industrial-scale wind facilities along the U.S. East Coast.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/00windeurope_20190524.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/00windeurope_20190524.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/00windeurope_20190524.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/00windeurope_20190524.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/00windeurope_20190524.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360515","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=360515"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360515\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":360522,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360515\/revisions\/360522"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/360521"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=360515"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=360515"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=360515"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}