{"id":360007,"date":"2025-01-01T16:33:16","date_gmt":"2025-01-01T15:33:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=360007"},"modified":"2025-01-01T16:33:18","modified_gmt":"2025-01-01T15:33:18","slug":"seventh-hell","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=360007","title":{"rendered":"Seventh Hell"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Climate Scepticism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Mark Hodgson<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Things can only get worse<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The prospect of the Climate and Nature Bill being passed into law has prompted discussion of its implications, both at Cliscep (here<\/a> and here<\/a>), and also at Paul Homewood\u2019s site<\/a>. However, grim though the implications of the Bill are, things are quite bad enough already.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Today\u2019s Guardian features an article<\/a> whose title and sub-title alone make it clear that the ongoing effects of the Climate Change Act (CCA) aren\u2019t about to go away, and those effects will include massive changes to our way of life: \u201cStarmer faces test of climate leadership with big decisions on carbon budget \u2013 PM will have to respond to Climate Change Committee\u2019s recommendations on future emissions cuts with drastic changes in many sectors of economy\u201d <\/em>Specifically, it reminds us that the Climate Change Committee (CCC):<\/p>\n\n\n\n

will set out recommendations on the UK\u2019s seventh carbon budget on 26 February. At the core of the budget will be an overall cap on emissions for the years 2038 to 2042, needed to meet the legal obligation of reaching net zero emissions in 2050.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

What\u2019s the urgency, you might ask? Well, the problem is that we in the UK are already slipping behind the targets, and if we are to achieve net zero by 2050, as mandated by the CCA, then policies must be implemented sooner rather than later. The article reminds us that thanks to the Prime Minister\u2019s grandstanding in Baku and the pledge he then made, the UK will need to have reduced emissions from 1990 levels by 81% by 2035. Mind you, given how lightly the PM regards pledges<\/a>, perhaps we shouldn\u2019t worry too much about his world stage posturing. On the other hand, the Cabinet does seem to be stuffed full of climate and net zero zealots (as do the government back benches, if support for the Climate and Nature Bill is any guide), so maybe we should be concerned after all. And it gets worse \u2013 according to the Guardian, the seventh carbon budget, to be issued by the CCC, will need to go further still: \u201cby 2040, emissions should be about a quarter of what they are today.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, the Guardian is all in favour, and rolls out talking heads to tell us there\u2019s nothing here to frighten the horses. According to Ed Matthew, campaigns director at the E3G thinktank<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is the opportunity to put the finishing touches to a project to rewire the UK economy, to make it globally competitive and help nature to flourish. The only question is whether our leaders have the courage to be ambitious and stand up to the vested interests standing in our way.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The only<\/strong> question? I appreciate that we all see the world in our individual ways, but I think there might be a few other questions too \u2013 such as, is this affordable? Is it sensible? Will it achieve anything positive? Is it practicable? Will it damage the economy, our manufacturing sector, our way of life?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even the Guardian acknowledges that it is in fact a big deal. It notes that it will require not only the decarbonisation of the power sector, but also drastic<\/strong> (the Guardian\u2019s word \u2013 not mine, though I agree) changes in many other sectors of the economy. EVs must replace ICE vehicles; a widespread extension of public transport will be required (by which I infer that far fewer people will be allowed to have \u2013 or perhaps be able to afford \u2013 private vehicles); homes must be insulated (despite the issues?<\/a>) and gas boilers exchanged for heat pumps (despite the problems); big changes will be needed to farming practices; new techniques for industry (a casually thrown-out phrase, with massive implications); and tree-planting and nature programmes must \u201crestore carbon sinks<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Guardian rightly observes that both the Prime Minister and Mr Miliband have very prominently, on the world stage, claimed \u201cglobal climate leadership\u201d for the UK, so it will be difficult for them to depart from CCC advice. Worryingly (to me, and I suggest, to anyone who cares about this country\u2019s future) an automaton at the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has been approached for a quote and duly parroted the official mantra:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Britain is back in the business of climate leadership because the only way to protect current generations in the UK is by making Britain a clean energy superpower, and the only way to protect our children and future generations is by leading global climate action. We look forward to receiving the CCC\u2019s expert advice and we will set our seventh carbon budget by June 2026, in line with our statutory duties.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even Guardian journalists have an inkling that this stuff isn\u2019t going to be easy, whatever the spin climate evangelists put on it. The article points out that the first three carbon budgets were relatively easy to meet, as simply shifting from coal to gas and throwing lots of money at \u2013 sorry, investing in \u2013 offshore wind was a quick and easy way to reduce emissions (but never mind the price). But little progress has been made with regard to other emitting sectors of the economy \u2013 transport, industry, buildings and farming. Already, the UK is well off-track to achieve the fourth carbon budget, which runs until 2028. The shift to EVs isn\u2019t exactly going as planned, and the public\u2019s fondness for SUVs isn\u2019t helping either.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Agriculture apparently accounts for around 12% of the UK\u2019s emissions, but the government has picked a fight with farmers, and co-operation might be in short supply. At this point the Guardian trotted off to obtain a quote from another of its favourite organisations \u2013 in this case from Tom Lancaster of the Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit<\/a>. He opined that the farming sector is well off-track and that significant acceleration in this area is needed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Issues such as land use, production and consumption of livestock products and demand-side policies are likely to feature more prominently [in the seventh carbon budget] than in previous carbon budget advice.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I trust I\u2019m not alone in finding references to \u201cdemand-side policies<\/em>\u201d as being more than a little sinister. It sounds like a euphemism for forcing the public to change their ways. Reading on, it appears that my suspicions might be correct. Next up is another old favourite \u2013 Friends of the Earth<\/a>. Mike Childs, head of policy there, is quoted thus:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deeper cuts needed to meet a 2040 goal can be met through more people choosing greener, cheaper and healthier lifestyles,\u201d he said. \u201cAlready people are increasingly opting for meat and dairy alternatives and choosing to walk and cycle. The path to net zero should lead to better quality of life, particularly for those who have been left behind financially over the last decade.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s all there. Deeper cuts \u2013 doesn\u2019t sound like a consumer-friendly option. More people must \u201cchoose<\/em>\u201d lifestyles which he claims (without supporting evidence) will be not only greener, but also cheaper and healthier. Greener and healthier I might accept, but colour me unconvinced on the claim that such options will be cheaper. I\u2019m also unconvinced that what is being referred to as a choice really is just that. More likely we will be hectored and cajoled and ultimately given no choice. The precedent is there already, after all, with regard to official diktats regarding EV and heat pump quotas. As to how healthy it is to cycle or walk several miles to work in the dark, cold and rain or snow in winter, rather than driving there, must be a moot point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The only glimmer of hope is that the Guardian article ends by pointing out that the cross-party \u201cconsensus\u201d regarding these issues is not so strong as it once was.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If Badenoch takes issue with the CCC\u2019s findings, or vows to unravel the carbon budget should the Tories take back power, it would be an unmistakable sign that the crack has become a chasm.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here\u2019s hoping. Happy New Year!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

What\u2019s the urgency, you might ask? Well, the problem is that we in the UK are already slipping behind the targets, and if we are to achieve net zero by 2050, as mandated by the CCA, then policies must be implemented sooner rather than later. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":360010,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691832209,691832377,691819548,691821977,691818154],"class_list":{"0":"post-360007","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-and-nature-bill","9":"tag-climate-change-act-cca","10":"tag-decarbonisation","11":"tag-electric-vehicles-evs","12":"tag-net-zero","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/011059705.webp?fit=1600%2C900&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1vEz","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":338193,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=338193","url_meta":{"origin":360007,"position":0},"title":"No Gov. Inslee, Repeal of Washington State\u2019s Climate Law Won\u2019t Hurt the Climate","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Washington State\u2019s Climate Commitment Act (CCA) faces the possibility of repeal this fall. Governor Jay Inslee and others claim the CCA will reduce pollution and help stop climate change. But the CCA isn\u2019t having the slightest effect on the climate, while boosting the cost of living for Washington residents.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO2)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO2)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/05162562_030119-cc-ap-jay-inslee-img.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/05162562_030119-cc-ap-jay-inslee-img.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/05162562_030119-cc-ap-jay-inslee-img.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/05162562_030119-cc-ap-jay-inslee-img.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/05162562_030119-cc-ap-jay-inslee-img.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246858,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=246858","url_meta":{"origin":360007,"position":1},"title":"Official Censors Misinform on Covid, Climate","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/04\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"State-sponsored \u2018experts\u2019 on \u2018misinformation\u2019 are typically the worst offenders","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-184.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-184.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-184.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-184.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-184.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338503,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=338503","url_meta":{"origin":360007,"position":2},"title":"Repeal of Washington State\u2019s Climate Commitment Act won\u2019t hurt the climate","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Climate Commitment Act will have a negligible effect on the climate, but if not repealed, it will continue to significantly raise fuel, food, and utility prices in Washington State.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO2)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO2)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Washington-Mount-Rainier.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Washington-Mount-Rainier.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Washington-Mount-Rainier.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Washington-Mount-Rainier.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Washington-Mount-Rainier.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339436,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=339436","url_meta":{"origin":360007,"position":3},"title":"Washington State Voters Confront Their Climate Commitment Act","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/13\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Many in Washington State feel our legislature has gone \u201coff the rails\u201d creating and putting into law the \u201cClimate Commitment Act\u201d (CCA). It has thousands of obscure moving parts including: the \u201cCap and Invest\u201d scheme of forced participation by \u201cclassified\u201d businesses in a carbon emissions allowances auction contrivance adversely affecting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Commitment Act\u201d (CCA)\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Commitment Act\u201d (CCA)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-commitment-act-cca-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01840523.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01840523.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01840523.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01840523.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01840523.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259138,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=259138","url_meta":{"origin":360007,"position":4},"title":"Fault Lines at the CBC: Deconstructing taxpayer-funded climate propaganda","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/25\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"How about if CBC and CCA just advocated for open, civil debate and full cost benefit analysis on climate and energy policies, as we do?\u00a0","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00Screenshot-2023-05-25-210152.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00Screenshot-2023-05-25-210152.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00Screenshot-2023-05-25-210152.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00Screenshot-2023-05-25-210152.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00Screenshot-2023-05-25-210152.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":406793,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406793","url_meta":{"origin":360007,"position":5},"title":"Will The Green Tory Blob Allow Kemi To Cancel Net\u00a0Zero?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/06\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Kemi Badenoch has now confirmed that she will scrap the Climate Change Act, along with its Net Zero targets.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Change Act (CCA)\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Change Act (CCA)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change-act-cca"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPyqNseivru1kyEp3n2OJD8m0-vHi0AS4SpprfOtjViQMBP6dO2WtDV_OVo_iswsPHFNPxtY3B6_fBhCW7u9z2EzNVLW0CBdP0H5u35l71rlD2nFsbG4SEeuFtEcRHF.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPyqNseivru1kyEp3n2OJD8m0-vHi0AS4SpprfOtjViQMBP6dO2WtDV_OVo_iswsPHFNPxtY3B6_fBhCW7u9z2EzNVLW0CBdP0H5u35l71rlD2nFsbG4SEeuFtEcRHF.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPyqNseivru1kyEp3n2OJD8m0-vHi0AS4SpprfOtjViQMBP6dO2WtDV_OVo_iswsPHFNPxtY3B6_fBhCW7u9z2EzNVLW0CBdP0H5u35l71rlD2nFsbG4SEeuFtEcRHF.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPyqNseivru1kyEp3n2OJD8m0-vHi0AS4SpprfOtjViQMBP6dO2WtDV_OVo_iswsPHFNPxtY3B6_fBhCW7u9z2EzNVLW0CBdP0H5u35l71rlD2nFsbG4SEeuFtEcRHF.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPyqNseivru1kyEp3n2OJD8m0-vHi0AS4SpprfOtjViQMBP6dO2WtDV_OVo_iswsPHFNPxtY3B6_fBhCW7u9z2EzNVLW0CBdP0H5u35l71rlD2nFsbG4SEeuFtEcRHF.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=360007"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360007\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":360012,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360007\/revisions\/360012"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/360010"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=360007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=360007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=360007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}