{"id":353093,"date":"2024-12-03T19:11:42","date_gmt":"2024-12-03T18:11:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=353093"},"modified":"2024-12-03T19:11:46","modified_gmt":"2024-12-03T18:11:46","slug":"the-california-offshore-wind-environmental-impact-statement-is-full-of-holes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=353093","title":{"rendered":"The California offshore wind environmental impact statement is full of holes"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By David Wojick<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

BOEM is taking comments on a draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for its five floating wind offshore leases off the California coast. I am doing research prior to commenting, and this is my first report which other commenters might find useful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The comment deadline is February 12 so the final EIS will be under the Trump Administration. This may make comments opposing the Program more important than they have been previously when they were mostly ignored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the PEIS and how to comment see https:\/\/www.boem.gov\/renewable-energy\/state-activities\/california-offshore-wind-programmatic-environmental-impact<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is BOEM\u2019s second offshore wind PEIS. The first was for a set of leases off New York and it was atrocious. This one is still bad, but it has some useful features that are worth pointing out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Note that this is the first one for floating wind turbines which is very different from the fixed turbines being built along the Atlantic coast. Floating wind is still an immature technology with a large number of proposed designs none of which has been tested at commercial utility scale. There are just a handful of small demonstration scale projects in the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are at least two good things about this PEIS. First is a pretty good tutorial on floating wind with a focus on the California case. This is Appendix A and done by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. They rule out a number of design options including the most popular that has been demonstrated. The huge range of options they present shows the immaturity of the technology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Second the PEIS includes an encyclopedic discussion of numerous potential adverse impacts of a huge floating wind project. This is just what is contemplated for each of the five leases so there is already a lot not to like about this Program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is a quick list of some of the biggest flaws found to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By far the biggest is that there is no cumulative multi-lease impact assessment. The whole point of a PEIS is to do such an assessment. Cumulative impact can be much greater than the sum of individual project impacts especially where two or more projects are closely clustered as in this case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In many cases an adverse impact is merely mentioned with no assessment of the potential harm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The systematic harassment of large numbers of endangered and protected species of whales and other animals is not discussed. In fact, the term \u201charassment\u201d only occurs twice in the entire main report. Death due to noise harassment is one of the top adverse impacts of offshore wind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, floating wind introduces a major non-acoustic form of harassment. This is the 3D web of potentially thousands of mooring cables each of which could be up to a mile long. We may be talking about hundreds of square miles of deep ocean literally filled with webs of cables. Harassment is defined as causing behavioral change on a protected animal\u2019s part and these monstrous webs will certainly do that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The PEIS does briefly mention the threat of \u201csecondary entanglement\u201d in the nets, lines and other debris that are caught on the cables over time. The potential adverse effect of this deadly accumulation needs to be assessed in detail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lastly there is an extensive economics section but no mention of cost. Development of these five leases will likely cost ratepayers and taxpayers tens of billions of dollars, possibly hundreds of billions, but these staggering sums are never quantified. Job creation is treated in detail as a benefit when jobs are in fact a cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is just a quick look, but it is already clear that this PEIS is woefully inadequate. In fact, it specifically avoids those issues that justify cancelling the Program. Stay tuned for more findings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

BOEM is taking comments on a draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for its five floating wind offshore leases off the California coast. I am doing research prior to commenting and this is my first report which other commenters might find useful.<\/p>\n

The comment deadline is February 12 so the final EIS will be under the Trump Administration. This may make comments opposing the Program more important than they have been previously when they were mostly ignored.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":353095,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691827989,691831803,691818301,691826856],"class_list":{"0":"post-353093","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-floating-wind-turbines","9":"tag-national-renewable-energy-laboratory","10":"tag-offshore-wind","11":"tag-programmatic-environmental-impact-statement-peis","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/00Offshore-wind-turbines-water-scaled-1.jpg?fit=2560%2C1440&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1tR3","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":366317,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=366317","url_meta":{"origin":353093,"position":0},"title":"CFACT Comments on the California Offshore Wind Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"16\/02\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"BOEM is taking comments on a draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for its five floating wind offshore leases off the California coast. This is BOEM\u2019s second offshore wind PEIS. The first was for a set of leases off New York which featured fixed bottom turbines. This is the first\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"BOEM\"","block_context":{"text":"BOEM","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=boem"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/00Screenshot-2025-02-16-091033.png?fit=1200%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/00Screenshot-2025-02-16-091033.png?fit=1200%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/00Screenshot-2025-02-16-091033.png?fit=1200%2C640&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/00Screenshot-2025-02-16-091033.png?fit=1200%2C640&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/00Screenshot-2025-02-16-091033.png?fit=1200%2C640&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":349117,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=349117","url_meta":{"origin":353093,"position":1},"title":"BOEM Finally Acknowledges the Harm Caused by Offshore Wind Farms","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/10\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In a surprising yet overdue move, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has released its Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for the New York Bight. This document, despite its extensive layers of technical jargon and cautious language, marks a pivotal shift. It appears to be a rare admission\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Biological Impacts\"","block_context":{"text":"Biological Impacts","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biological-impacts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0attachment-wind-whale.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0attachment-wind-whale.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0attachment-wind-whale.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0attachment-wind-whale.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0attachment-wind-whale.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363187,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=363187","url_meta":{"origin":353093,"position":2},"title":"Western offshore wind EIS is MIA","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Last month I analyzed various holes in the draft federal California Programmatic EIS (PEIS) for offshore wind. Now a new report shows that these seemingly big holes are tiny compared to the yawning Programmatic EIS gap created by the Federal Action Plan for West Coast offshore wind development.","rel":"","context":"In \"California Programmatic EIS (PEIS)\"","block_context":{"text":"California Programmatic EIS (PEIS)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=california-programmatic-eis-peis"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0park-wind-farm-3820819_1920-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0park-wind-farm-3820819_1920-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0park-wind-farm-3820819_1920-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0park-wind-farm-3820819_1920-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0park-wind-farm-3820819_1920-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297121,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=297121","url_meta":{"origin":353093,"position":3},"title":"Fed\u2019s first multi-site offshore wind EIS is ridiculous","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"19\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"After numerous requests going back several years, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has finally published a draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for a combination of coming offshore wind projects. Comments are due by February 27.","rel":"","context":"In \"Bureau of Ocean Energy Management\"","block_context":{"text":"Bureau of Ocean Energy Management","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bureau-of-ocean-energy-management"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":434001,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=434001","url_meta":{"origin":353093,"position":4},"title":"Wyoming wind power needs a Programmatic Environmental Impact Assessment","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/03\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A programmatic EIA is a comprehensive analysis of the cumulative impacts of the massive wind development underway in Wyoming. The growing adverse impact on golden eagles and other wildlife is especially disturbing. What can be done to limit the damage is a big part of the assessment.","rel":"","context":"In \"golden eagles\"","block_context":{"text":"golden eagles","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=golden-eagles"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Wyoming-wind-power-needs-a-Programmatic-Environmental-Impact-Assessment.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Wyoming-wind-power-needs-a-Programmatic-Environmental-Impact-Assessment.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Wyoming-wind-power-needs-a-Programmatic-Environmental-Impact-Assessment.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Wyoming-wind-power-needs-a-Programmatic-Environmental-Impact-Assessment.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335346,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=335346","url_meta":{"origin":353093,"position":5},"title":"Feds say \u201cdamn the whales\u201d in the Gulf of Maine","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Biden\u2019s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) proposes to build a huge amount of floating offshore wind in the Gulf of Maine. As required by law, it has published for public comment a draft Environmental Assessment of the area designated for this monster project. But insanely, there is no assessment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM)\"","block_context":{"text":"Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bureau-of-ocean-energy-management-boem"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0North-Atlantic-right-whale-with-calf.-%C2%A9-Brian-J.-Skerry-_-National-Geographic-Stock-_-WWF-scaled-e1596552052698-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0North-Atlantic-right-whale-with-calf.-%C2%A9-Brian-J.-Skerry-_-National-Geographic-Stock-_-WWF-scaled-e1596552052698-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0North-Atlantic-right-whale-with-calf.-%C2%A9-Brian-J.-Skerry-_-National-Geographic-Stock-_-WWF-scaled-e1596552052698-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0North-Atlantic-right-whale-with-calf.-%C2%A9-Brian-J.-Skerry-_-National-Geographic-Stock-_-WWF-scaled-e1596552052698-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0North-Atlantic-right-whale-with-calf.-%C2%A9-Brian-J.-Skerry-_-National-Geographic-Stock-_-WWF-scaled-e1596552052698-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353093","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=353093"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353093\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":353098,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353093\/revisions\/353098"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/353095"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=353093"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=353093"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=353093"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}