{"id":352248,"date":"2024-11-25T14:22:23","date_gmt":"2024-11-25T13:22:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=352248"},"modified":"2024-11-25T14:25:10","modified_gmt":"2024-11-25T13:25:10","slug":"washington-state-goes-one-for-three-on-the-pragmatic-climate-scalemaybe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=352248","title":{"rendered":"Washington State Goes One for Three on the Pragmatic Climate Scale\u2026Maybe"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Paul Fundingsland<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Three climate related initiatives were decided in Washington recently.  Initiative 2066<\/a> was a referendum to repeal laws and regulations that discourage natural gas use and would require current natural gas customers to switch to electric heating.  Initiative 2117<\/a> was another referendum to repeal the state\u2019s commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 95% by 2050 in the Climate Commitment Act<\/a>.  Finally, the Horse Haven Wind, Solar and Battery Complex<\/a> permit was approved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Initiative 2066<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bright spot was the successful passage of Initiative 2066 which ensures access to natural gas in homes and other buildings and repeals a state law requiring plans to transition from the use of natural gas to electricity. The final tally was 52% yes, 48% no. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Washington is basically a one-party blue state \u2013 Kamala Harris won by a lopsided 58% of the presidential vote. Even though only a third of the residents rely on natural gas with the bulk of the populace (58%) using electricity, the \u201cyes\u201d vote prevailed in a surprising outcome given the political demographics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I think there were several reasons for the outcome.  The main issue that resonated with all the gas users was the extreme cost of a switch over from gas appliances to all electric they would be expected to finance almost entirely by themselves.  Since Washingtonians have been using gas with no significant identifiable adverse effects for decades, it was hard to convince them that demonizing the use of gas was now all of a sudden, a threat to their health and wellbeing. There also may have been a fair number of the electric heat users who preferred using gas for cooking and in their fireplaces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The \u201cvote no\u201d people took the main tack that using gas was a pollutant, a health hazard and would prevent the State from achieving its Climate Commitment Act goals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite the result there still is a maybe part of the passage of this initiative.  The \u201cno vote campaign\u201d intends to take this issue to the State Supreme Court. They are claiming it should be voided because it violates the State rule that an initiative should not embrace more than one subject. They have deep pockets to fight this vote of the people.  The sore losers include the Sierra Club, Statewide Poverty Action Network, Front and Centered, plus \u201cunnamed\u201d renewable energy groups (no surprise there).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The \u201cyes\u201d campaign claims the initiative was written very carefully expecting successful passage to be challenged in court. The \u201cno\u201d campaign started putting their challenge together months before the final vote just in case it passed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It will be interesting to see if passage of I-2066 by the voters is brought before the State Supreme Court. Voiding the obvious majority of the people on some sort of technicality could prove problematic in coming elections by raising rational voter ire. That might give the \u201cno\u201d campaign second thoughts as to how this may play out in the long run if they pursue this avenue of opposition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Initiative 2117<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the losing side of the \u201cone for three\u201d pragmatic climate issues was voting down Initiative 2117 which would have essentially ended funding for the State\u2019s Climate Commitment Act (CCA) resulting in lower gas prices at the pump. It really did not have a chance of passage once the big money came rolling in advertising against it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The five biggest donors against passage were all essentially billionaires. They included Steve and Connie Ballmer, Bill Gates, Microsoft (the company) and the 4-billion-dollar Nature Conservancy. Their media ads were very slick, very professional and appeared all over the TV channels at all times of the day and night but especially during the evening news, sports (football, soccer etc.). They were even on the Fox Business News channel. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It really didn\u2019t matter what time of day or what channel you were watching, there would be an ad to defeat this measure that would show up. The amount of money spent to defeat this measure must have been eye-popping.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The main selling point was that voting for I-2117 would cause unclean air, unclean water, worse wildfires, a dirtier environment with worse roads and transportation. Voting it down would mean cleaner air, cleaner water, better wildfire management, a cleaner environment, and even better roads and transportation. There was, of course, no mention of just how much less global warming would result from a no vote. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the ads featured individuals wearing their respective professional garbs advocating voting no (doctor, fireman, construction worker, forest ranger, Tribal member, etc.) An observation was that these are the very same special interest groups who have recently been getting money from the CCA fund so of course they don\u2019t want to see those funds go away.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the ads accused the promoter of this measure (and three of the other measures) of being just a greedy millionaire out for himself. Never mind the billionaires who funded the campaign against it and how or whether they might benefit somehow from it being defeated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was obvious the campaign for passage of I-2117 did not have the requisite funding to successfully get their message across with the necessary effective media advertising. The ads were spread too thinly between several issues. The ads were somewhat rudimentary, lacking a professional look, and they appeared sparsely. They just didn\u2019t have the money and the focus to get their message across.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My personal opinion is that had the \u201cyes\u201d ads concentrated on the fact that no matter how much you were paying for a gallon of gas (whether a high price or low one) $10 would be going to the state for every 20 gallons of gas they bought. I think that would have made a much bigger impact on the voters by helping them understand just how much they were sending to the State every time they filled up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sadly the billionaires won this one. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is a chance this issue could be brought up for a statewide vote again at a later date, perhaps when Washington surpasses California for the cost of gas at the pump which may not be all that far off. If it is brought up again, the people behind it now know what they are up against and will have to adjust accordingly, being a lot more clever with their focus and their financing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Horse Haven Wind, Solar, and Battery Complex<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The other one of the three climate-related issues is our Governor\u2019s final approval of the \u201cHorse Haven Wind, Solar and Battery Complex<\/a>\u201d in Eastern Washington. It\u2019s a huge complex stretching 24 scenic miles long and 8 miles wide covering 72,000 acres with 5,000 of those farmland acres surfaced with solar panels. The final proposal is to have either 172 five-hundred-foot towers or 113 six hundred seventy foot tall towers. The battery complex is yet to be determined as to size and placement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A valiant opposition movement (here<\/a>) of Benton County residences, tribal members and wildlife advocates has been so far unsuccessful in stopping this monstrosity from happening. The Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council confirmed the Governor\u2019s approval in a 4-3 vote. There is now only one more avenue to pause or stop the building of this grotesque complex\u2026the court system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And that is exactly what has just happened. Benton county has filed suit<\/a> against the state over this project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One other long shot outside possibility that might stop this atrocious wind project from being built could be when the new national administration takes office in January. Indications are that the new administration intends to terminate subsidies for wind and solar projects. If that does happen, it is likely the Horse Haven Wind Farm may become unprofitable to build. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Washington prides itself on being an enlightened, leading energy progressive state. This wind\/solar\/battery complex is anything but progressive. It is an exorbitantly expensive energy system at $1.7 billion (2021 estimate and counting) for the amount of intermittent power it can produce. It regressively degrades and seriously threatens the reliability of the existing electric grid by providing only non-dispatchable erratic weather dependent electricity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A leading enlightened progressive State would be planning on installing a small modular nuclear system such as NuScale\u2019s<\/a> Voygr-12 module complex of SMRs. The NuScale SMR system was developed in Oregon and is the only one so far to receive design approval by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Or the State could support the expansion or duplication of Amazon and Energy Northwest\u2019s<\/a> planned Central Washington installation of X-energy\u2019s 12 module system<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ironically, Energy Northwest is headquartered in Richland Washington. Their potential SMR site is a mere 50 miles from the planned wind farm next to the Columbia Nuclear Generating station (Washington\u2019s only functioning nuclear plant). This gives their planned site close, easy access to the electrical grid. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both SMR systems can deliver dispatchable electricity under all weather conditions 24\/7\/365. They are CO2 free and can generate approximately 924 MWe (roughly equivalent to the wind farm). Their respective footprints use only a miserly 0.06 square miles of land in contrast to the wind farm\u2019s approximately 100 square miles. So their environmental footprint is small, scenically unobtrusive and non threatening to birds of prey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both SMR products have a passive safety system so they can not melt down or blow up. Each one of the 12 SMRs composing either company\u2019s modular complex are built in a factory and can be delivered by truck, rail or barge in three sections. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is a serious disconnect between the \u201cEnergy Magical Thinking\u201d flowing from the Capitol in Olympia versus pragmatic, modern, non-invasive solutions available. This is especially disconcerting considering Portland Oregon (the headquarters of NuScale) is only 114 miles away from the capitol building in Olympia. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the Washington boarder to the east, the state of Idaho is embracing and promoting nuclear with it\u2019s Idaho National Laboratory Frontiers Initiative. <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In their words: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cEight states are developing economic development plans focused on advanced nuclear energy deployment with the help from Idaho National Laboratory\u2019s (INL) Frontiers Initiative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Frontiers was established in 2021 to help stakeholders identify and capitalize on key economic  opportunities afforded by early adoption of advanced nuclear energy. The initiative also helps stakeholders leverage advanced nuclear to capture emerging global market opportunities in low-emission industries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 2024 Frontiers Initiative Impacts Report, released today, (Oct. 24) highlights the initiative\u2019s impacts on first-mover states identified as actively pursuing advanced nuclear energy to encourage economic development.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We have strengthened our partnerships with stakeholders in first-mover states \u2013 Idaho, Utah, Wyoming and Alaska \u2013 while adding engagements where increasing interest in advanced<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nuclear energy intersects industry needs, including in Louisiana, Montana, North Dakota and South Carolina,\u201d said Steven Aumeier, senior advisor at INL.\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Discussion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For all the rhetoric coming out of the Capitol in Olympia about being a leader in a clean energy transition, shamefully Washington State is not among these \u201cfirst-mover states\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If Washington was serious about being a modern enlightened energy progressive state, they also might want to look at what is happening in Tennessee<\/a>. Their General Assembly created a $60 million fund (The Tennessee Nuclear Energy Fund) that has attracted four projects in the last six months headed by Orono USA, a company specializing in:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cUranium. Mining\/conversion\/enrichment, used nuclear fuel management and recycling, decommissioning shutdown nuclear energy facilities, federal site cleanup and closure and developing nuclear medicines to fight cancer\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Oak Ridge is determined to become \u201cthe place the nation is looking for to lead the next nuclear race\u201d.<\/em> Oak Ridge and Knoxville are now home to some 154 nuclear companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Oregon, Idaho and Tennessee have blown past Washington in the enlightened pragmatic electric energy transition. It leaves our state in the dustbin of yesterday\u2019s expensive, environmentally invasive, dysfunctional grid threatening Wind\/Solar\/Battery energy systems. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The jury is still out on whether Washington residents can hold on to their current right to use the energy of their choice for heating\/cooking. And whether an out-of-date, environmentally destructive dysfunctional grid threatening Wind\/Solar\/Battery system gets installed against the wishes of the impacted citizens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The state seems most focused on keeping money from it\u2019s CCA (Climate Commitment Act) flowing from the hike in gas prices at the pump this act has caused. The state needs the money given that it was just announced it is currently around $10 billion in debt<\/a>. My cynical side wonders just how much of that CCA money is going to end up being diverted towards reducing that debt rather than \u201cfighting \u201cClimate Change\u201d as it was advertised to be used for. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Washington state has many enlightened social programs to be proud of. There is a rational, pragmatic program supporting parents (both wife and husband) of newborns with a generous paid leave time so they can tend to their new child. A State sponsored long term care program has just been enacted designed for those elderly who do not have such means helping them towards the end off their days.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But when it comes to the State\u2019s energy policy, it\u2019s a whole different story. \u201cMagical Thinking\u201d prevails forcing rationality and pragmatism to go right out through the ozone hole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So much for Washington leading the nation with a modern, clean, reliable, environmentally friendly electrical energy transition path. It\u2019s much more enlightening to watch what states like Idaho and Tennessee are doing to find out where the future of rational, pragmatic energy systems are going.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Paul describes himself as a \u201cFree Lance writer with a two decade long obsession with all things climate change.\u201d  Although he is a retired professor, he has no scientific or other degrees specific to these kinds of issues that can be cited as offering personal official expertise or credibility. What he does have is a two-decade-old avid, enthusiastic, obsession with all things Climate Change related. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Three climate related initiatives were decided in Washington recently.\u00a0\u00a0Initiative 2066\u00a0was a referendum to repeal laws and regulations that discourage natural gas use and would require current natural gas customers to switch to electric heating.\u00a0\u00a0Initiative 2117\u00a0was another referendum to repeal the state\u2019s commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 95% by 2050 in the\u00a0Climate Commitment Act.\u00a0 Finally, the\u00a0Horse Haven Wind, Solar and Battery Complex\u00a0permit was approved.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":352250,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818056,691831661,691829935,691818656,691818181,691823139],"class_list":{"0":"post-352248","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-change","9":"tag-climate-commitment-act","10":"tag-climate-commitment-act-cca","11":"tag-electricity","12":"tag-renewable-energy","13":"tag-washington-state","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Banner_rachael-jones-media_aerial-destination-photos-24_3.jpg?fit=1600%2C678&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1tDq","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":350035,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=350035","url_meta":{"origin":352248,"position":0},"title":"Washington State Revolt Against \u201cElectrify Everything\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/11\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Environmentalists have waged a campaign against natural gas,\u00a0but users of this efficient, low-emission fuel are fighting back.\u00a0A wide range of industry groups are backing Washington state\u2019s Initiative 2066 to protect the right to choose natural gas.","rel":"","context":"In \"Carbon Emissions\"","block_context":{"text":"Carbon Emissions","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-emissions"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0gas-stove.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0gas-stove.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0gas-stove.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0gas-stove.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0gas-stove.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339436,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=339436","url_meta":{"origin":352248,"position":1},"title":"Washington State Voters Confront Their Climate Commitment Act","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Many in Washington State feel our legislature has gone \u201coff the rails\u201d creating and putting into law the \u201cClimate Commitment Act\u201d (CCA). It has thousands of obscure moving parts including: the \u201cCap and Invest\u201d scheme of forced participation by \u201cclassified\u201d businesses in a carbon emissions allowances auction contrivance adversely affecting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Commitment Act\u201d (CCA)\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Commitment Act\u201d (CCA)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-commitment-act-cca-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01840523.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01840523.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01840523.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01840523.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01840523.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338503,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=338503","url_meta":{"origin":352248,"position":2},"title":"Repeal of Washington State\u2019s Climate Commitment Act won\u2019t hurt the climate","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Climate Commitment Act will have a negligible effect on the climate, but if not repealed, it will continue to significantly raise fuel, food, and utility prices in Washington State.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO2)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO2)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Washington-Mount-Rainier.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Washington-Mount-Rainier.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Washington-Mount-Rainier.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Washington-Mount-Rainier.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Washington-Mount-Rainier.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338193,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=338193","url_meta":{"origin":352248,"position":3},"title":"No Gov. Inslee, Repeal of Washington State\u2019s Climate Law Won\u2019t Hurt the Climate","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Washington State\u2019s Climate Commitment Act (CCA) faces the possibility of repeal this fall. Governor Jay Inslee and others claim the CCA will reduce pollution and help stop climate change. But the CCA isn\u2019t having the slightest effect on the climate, while boosting the cost of living for Washington residents.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO2)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO2)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/05162562_030119-cc-ap-jay-inslee-img.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/05162562_030119-cc-ap-jay-inslee-img.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/05162562_030119-cc-ap-jay-inslee-img.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/05162562_030119-cc-ap-jay-inslee-img.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/05162562_030119-cc-ap-jay-inslee-img.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368206,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=368206","url_meta":{"origin":352248,"position":4},"title":"Congress Overturns Biden\u2019s Natural Gas Tax: A Victory for Energy Independence","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/03\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In a decisive move, the\u00a0U.S. Congress has repealed the Biden administration\u2019s natural gas tax,\u00a0marking a significant shift in the nation\u2019s energy policy. This action underscores a commitment to bolstering American energy independence and alleviating financial burdens on consumers.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Natural-Gas-11.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Natural-Gas-11.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Natural-Gas-11.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Natural-Gas-11.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Natural-Gas-11.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":408303,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=408303","url_meta":{"origin":352248,"position":5},"title":"Climate lunatics in Hamburg pass referendum committing Germany’s leading industrial city to deindustrialise completely in 15 years","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"15\/10\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Hamburg is German\u2019s leading industrial city. Its companies add 20 billion Euros in gross value every year. Much of this economic output is related to Hamburg\u2019s happy location on the Elbe and the fact that the city is home to Europe\u2019s third-largest port.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQNULWVWh9DKoWok_rVNITa0O6xzp4KnBNCEJxuNs396g-on-UDL4rog9WuYs1F61nz-XmDVfVzYaOmv8QzKZJ9uI7PAiAu_ehDsTtN7ycNMmRKH_VQ5KpNQCuBDdTKY-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C756&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQNULWVWh9DKoWok_rVNITa0O6xzp4KnBNCEJxuNs396g-on-UDL4rog9WuYs1F61nz-XmDVfVzYaOmv8QzKZJ9uI7PAiAu_ehDsTtN7ycNMmRKH_VQ5KpNQCuBDdTKY-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C756&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQNULWVWh9DKoWok_rVNITa0O6xzp4KnBNCEJxuNs396g-on-UDL4rog9WuYs1F61nz-XmDVfVzYaOmv8QzKZJ9uI7PAiAu_ehDsTtN7ycNMmRKH_VQ5KpNQCuBDdTKY-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C756&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQNULWVWh9DKoWok_rVNITa0O6xzp4KnBNCEJxuNs396g-on-UDL4rog9WuYs1F61nz-XmDVfVzYaOmv8QzKZJ9uI7PAiAu_ehDsTtN7ycNMmRKH_VQ5KpNQCuBDdTKY-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C756&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQNULWVWh9DKoWok_rVNITa0O6xzp4KnBNCEJxuNs396g-on-UDL4rog9WuYs1F61nz-XmDVfVzYaOmv8QzKZJ9uI7PAiAu_ehDsTtN7ycNMmRKH_VQ5KpNQCuBDdTKY-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C756&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352248","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=352248"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352248\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":352254,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352248\/revisions\/352254"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/352250"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=352248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=352248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=352248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}