{"id":351127,"date":"2024-11-13T14:49:47","date_gmt":"2024-11-13T13:49:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=351127"},"modified":"2024-11-13T14:49:50","modified_gmt":"2024-11-13T13:49:50","slug":"climate-litigation-the-dutch-case-and-a-pattern-of-vexatious-lawsuits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=351127","title":{"rendered":"Climate Litigation: The Dutch Case and a Pattern of Vexatious Lawsuits"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"407\" data-attachment-id=\"351132\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=351132\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/01622037641795.webp?fit=1600%2C900&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1600,900\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0,1622037641795\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/01622037641795.webp?fit=723%2C407&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/01622037641795.webp?resize=723%2C407&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-351132\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/01622037641795.webp?resize=1024%2C576&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/01622037641795.webp?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/01622037641795.webp?resize=768%2C432&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/01622037641795.webp?resize=1536%2C864&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/01622037641795.webp?resize=1200%2C675&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/01622037641795.webp?w=1600&amp;ssl=1 1600w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/01622037641795.webp?w=1446&amp;ssl=1 1446w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2024\/11\/12\/climate-litigation-the-dutch-case-and-a-pattern-of-vexatious-lawsuits\/\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/author\/jeeztheadmin\/\">Charles Rotter<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A recent Dutch court decision has highlighted yet another chapter in the ongoing saga of climate litigation. These lawsuits, often celebrated by environmental groups as heroic stands against alleged corporate or governmental indifference, more frequently reveal themselves to be little more than vexatious attempts to impose ideological agendas through the legal system. The Dutch case fits squarely into this pattern, raising questions about the validity of such litigation and its broader consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"612\" data-attachment-id=\"351129\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=351129\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-343.png?fit=720%2C612&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,612\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-343.png?fit=720%2C612&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-343.png?resize=720%2C612&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-351129\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-343.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-343.png?resize=300%2C255&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Dutch Case: An Overview<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In this latest instance, a<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/articles\/cx240l9xq2yo\">&nbsp;court in the Netherlands dismissed a climate-related lawsuit brought by activists targeting Shell.<\/a>&nbsp;The suit alleged that the company had not done enough to reduce carbon emissions and protect the environment. Despite the plaintiffs\u2019 claims of moral urgency, the court found the case insufficiently grounded in legal merit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is far from the first instance of activists leveraging the courts to advance their goals, but the Dutch case is emblematic of a deeper trend: the increasing use of climate lawsuits as tools for coercion rather than justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Rise of Vexatious Climate Litigation<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Dutch case is part of a growing global trend of lawsuits aimed at holding corporations or governments \u201caccountable\u201d for climate change. However, many of these cases bear the hallmarks of being frivolous, ideological, or outright manipulative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Strategic Exploitation of Legal Loopholes<\/strong>: Plaintiffs often target corporations in jurisdictions with loose standing rules or sympathetic judges. These cases frequently stretch or redefine legal principles, demanding courts take on the role of policymakers.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Litigation for Show, Not Substance<\/strong>: Such cases often generate massive media coverage, regardless of their legal merits. For activists, winning in the court of public opinion can be more valuable than winning in an actual courtroom.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Undermining Judicial Integrity<\/strong>: By attempting to insert speculative climate models and projections as evidence, these lawsuits place the judiciary in the precarious position of ruling on matters far outside its expertise.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the Dutch case, as in others, the goal appears less about achieving meaningful outcomes and more about harassing companies into compliance with activist demands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>A History of Questionable Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To understand the Dutch ruling in context, it\u2019s worth examining similar lawsuits that have failed to deliver meaningful results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"1\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2024\/05\/12\/even-stupider-than-the-stupidest-litigation-in-the-country\/\"><strong>Juliana v. United States<\/strong>:<\/a>\u00a0Touted as a landmark case, a group of young activists sued the U.S. government, alleging constitutional violations for failing to address climate change. While the case garnered massive media attention, it was ultimately dismissed because the judiciary recognized it lacked authority to mandate sweeping policy changes.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wbur.org\/onpoint\/2016\/12\/01\/exxon-mobil-rockefeller-foundation-climate\"><strong>ExxonMobil and the Rockefeller Funding Nexus<\/strong>:<\/a>\u00a0ExxonMobil has faced numerous lawsuits alleging it misled investors about the risks of climate change. However, investigations revealed these lawsuits were often coordinated by ideologically motivated groups, such as the Rockefeller Family Fund, raising questions about their legitimacy.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.menziesrc.org\/latest-reports-and-submissions\/open-lawfare\"><strong>Australian Lawfare<\/strong>:<\/a>\u00a0In Australia, environmental groups have used legal challenges to delay mining and infrastructure projects. While framed as environmental justice, these lawsuits have cost billions in economic losses, without significantly advancing environmental goals.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Each of these cases reveals a troubling pattern: lawsuits designed to weaponize the legal system, not to solve problems, but to impose a particular worldview.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Broader Consequences of Vexatious Lawsuits<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These cases are not harmless. They impose significant costs\u2014financial, social, and institutional:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Economic Costs<\/strong>: Businesses targeted by these lawsuits face steep legal fees and reputational damage, even when cases are ultimately dismissed. These costs are inevitably passed on to consumers, raising prices and stifling innovation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Judicial Backlog<\/strong>: Vexatious lawsuits clog court systems, diverting resources from legitimate cases. Courts are not designed to function as substitute legislatures or scientific bodies, yet these cases demand precisely that.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Chilling Effects on Business<\/strong>: The constant threat of litigation discourages investment and innovation, particularly in industries already grappling with tight margins and regulatory uncertainty.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Erosion of Trust in the Legal System<\/strong>: When the courts are used as a political tool, public confidence in judicial impartiality declines.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Dutch case adds yet another log to this growing fire, illustrating how legal systems can be exploited for ideological gain rather than justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Climate Activism as Legal Harassment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The rise of these lawsuits reflects a broader trend in modern climate activism: the use of coercive tactics to impose compliance. Whether through public shaming, regulatory lobbying, or vexatious litigation, the goal is the same\u2014to bypass democratic processes and enforce top-down mandates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The courts, however, are ill-suited to play this role. Climate models, policy trade-offs, and societal priorities are matters for public debate and legislative decision-making, not judicial fiat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Conclusion: Time to Push Back<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Dutch court\u2019s decision to dismiss this latest climate case should be welcomed as a step in the right direction. It serves as a reminder that the courts cannot and should not be hijacked to serve ideological agendas. However, it is not enough to celebrate isolated victories. Broader reforms are needed to prevent the legal system from being used as a weapon against economic freedom, innovation, and rational governance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Climate lawsuits like the Dutch case reveal the folly of allowing ideologues to dictate policy through legal harassment. If left unchecked, this trend will do far more harm than good\u2014eroding institutions, stifling progress, and undermining trust in the very systems that activists claim to protect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">H\/T&nbsp;<strong>charlie<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A recent Dutch court decision has highlighted yet another chapter in the ongoing saga of climate litigation. These lawsuits, often celebrated by environmental groups as heroic stands against alleged corporate or governmental indifference, more frequently reveal themselves to be little more than vexatious attempts to impose ideological agendas through the legal system. The Dutch case fits squarely into this pattern, raising questions about the validity of such litigation and its broader consequences.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":351133,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691819255,691818056,691829604,691818153,691831458,691819831],"class_list":{"0":"post-351127","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-activism","9":"tag-climate-change","10":"tag-climate-lawsuits","11":"tag-climate-models","12":"tag-dutch-court","13":"tag-shell","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/01622037641795-1.webp?fit=1600%2C900&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1tll","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":407770,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=407770","url_meta":{"origin":351127,"position":0},"title":"Climate Lawfare Circus\u00a0Update","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/10\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In 2025, climate activists experienced several major litigation defeats in the United States, especially in their attempts to challenge President Trump\u2019s climate and energy policies at the federal level and to anchor climate protection as a constitutional right.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate activists\"","block_context":{"text":"climate activists","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-activists"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQOr5-QZ2RnwGNlbJ-NXSZvWsOa_i1XEtmIyPqKTyjtQgVdoVVCoz0kQw1xaUPdf7iHHyT2m4t4Egvk9ukunDK96HP0XX4Xhq6UITnP3FiqQL7iTMWphRnBmJS9AOLiS-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQOr5-QZ2RnwGNlbJ-NXSZvWsOa_i1XEtmIyPqKTyjtQgVdoVVCoz0kQw1xaUPdf7iHHyT2m4t4Egvk9ukunDK96HP0XX4Xhq6UITnP3FiqQL7iTMWphRnBmJS9AOLiS-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQOr5-QZ2RnwGNlbJ-NXSZvWsOa_i1XEtmIyPqKTyjtQgVdoVVCoz0kQw1xaUPdf7iHHyT2m4t4Egvk9ukunDK96HP0XX4Xhq6UITnP3FiqQL7iTMWphRnBmJS9AOLiS-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQOr5-QZ2RnwGNlbJ-NXSZvWsOa_i1XEtmIyPqKTyjtQgVdoVVCoz0kQw1xaUPdf7iHHyT2m4t4Egvk9ukunDK96HP0XX4Xhq6UITnP3FiqQL7iTMWphRnBmJS9AOLiS-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQOr5-QZ2RnwGNlbJ-NXSZvWsOa_i1XEtmIyPqKTyjtQgVdoVVCoz0kQw1xaUPdf7iHHyT2m4t4Egvk9ukunDK96HP0XX4Xhq6UITnP3FiqQL7iTMWphRnBmJS9AOLiS-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234892,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=234892","url_meta":{"origin":351127,"position":1},"title":"Clintel\u2019 s intervention in the Friends of the Earth \u2013 Shell Lawsuit","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/12\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Friends of the Earth (Netherlands) sued Royal Dutch Shell, using The Netherlands law that allows non-governmental organizations to sue over environmental or social issues that affect all citizens.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0Cartoon-David-tegen-2x-Goliath.webp?fit=1200%2C978&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0Cartoon-David-tegen-2x-Goliath.webp?fit=1200%2C978&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0Cartoon-David-tegen-2x-Goliath.webp?fit=1200%2C978&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0Cartoon-David-tegen-2x-Goliath.webp?fit=1200%2C978&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0Cartoon-David-tegen-2x-Goliath.webp?fit=1200%2C978&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292359,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292359","url_meta":{"origin":351127,"position":2},"title":"Fisherman\u2019s Association Drops \u201cClimate Deception\u201d Lawsuit","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a recent development that should hardly surprise those who follow the climate litigation theater, the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen\u2019s Associations (PCFFA) has withdrawn its climate lawsuit.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate deception\"","block_context":{"text":"climate deception","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-deception"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-539.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-539.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-539.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-539.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-539.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235830,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=235830","url_meta":{"origin":351127,"position":3},"title":"Skeptic Group Clientel Intervenes On Friends Of The Earth Lawsuit Forcing Shell To Cut CO2 Emissions","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/12\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Ruling forcing Shell to cut CO2 emissions did not take all the side of the science into account\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-748.png?fit=1200%2C978&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-748.png?fit=1200%2C978&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-748.png?fit=1200%2C978&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-748.png?fit=1200%2C978&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-748.png?fit=1200%2C978&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214593,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=214593","url_meta":{"origin":351127,"position":4},"title":"Emails, Wayback Machine Gem Confirms: DiCaprio, Other Private Funders of Governmental Climate Litigation Paid Millions to \u201cClimate\u201d Lawyers Via Pass-through Charity","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"New revelations solve mystery whether wealthy donors are actually paying millions for lawyers to file massive \u201cclimate\u201d lawsuits, despite contracts with taxpayer-clients set to pay same lawyers scores of millions as \u201ccontingency fee\u201d out of clients\u2019 alleged damages.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-841.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-841.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-841.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-841.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":430017,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=430017","url_meta":{"origin":351127,"position":5},"title":"Ghostwriters for the Courts: The Climate Litigation Network Behind a Withdrawn Judicial Manual","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/03\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Late last year the federal judiciary quietly released a document that almost nobody outside legal circles normally notices: the fourth edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. Within weeks one section of that manual vanished. The reason it vanished reveals something deeply troubling about how climate science, academic institutions,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQOtPlj-twVkVNbjMFxg1FfGA2qhjRHqHhEv1jkG_xP2c3_Q-pJlBktiaHEfpipmIiMwHUIqTP_zFBNrxftyKPXc_AXVTtgjjcEcgwOylKHQSRMrkZg9UjlFnntzFx5aUuNQdF0qrxWoVMEYa8D25eVwetWT.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQOtPlj-twVkVNbjMFxg1FfGA2qhjRHqHhEv1jkG_xP2c3_Q-pJlBktiaHEfpipmIiMwHUIqTP_zFBNrxftyKPXc_AXVTtgjjcEcgwOylKHQSRMrkZg9UjlFnntzFx5aUuNQdF0qrxWoVMEYa8D25eVwetWT.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQOtPlj-twVkVNbjMFxg1FfGA2qhjRHqHhEv1jkG_xP2c3_Q-pJlBktiaHEfpipmIiMwHUIqTP_zFBNrxftyKPXc_AXVTtgjjcEcgwOylKHQSRMrkZg9UjlFnntzFx5aUuNQdF0qrxWoVMEYa8D25eVwetWT.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQOtPlj-twVkVNbjMFxg1FfGA2qhjRHqHhEv1jkG_xP2c3_Q-pJlBktiaHEfpipmIiMwHUIqTP_zFBNrxftyKPXc_AXVTtgjjcEcgwOylKHQSRMrkZg9UjlFnntzFx5aUuNQdF0qrxWoVMEYa8D25eVwetWT.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQOtPlj-twVkVNbjMFxg1FfGA2qhjRHqHhEv1jkG_xP2c3_Q-pJlBktiaHEfpipmIiMwHUIqTP_zFBNrxftyKPXc_AXVTtgjjcEcgwOylKHQSRMrkZg9UjlFnntzFx5aUuNQdF0qrxWoVMEYa8D25eVwetWT.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351127","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=351127"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351127\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":351134,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351127\/revisions\/351134"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/351133"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=351127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=351127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=351127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}