{"id":349943,"date":"2024-11-02T17:56:03","date_gmt":"2024-11-02T16:56:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=349943"},"modified":"2024-11-02T17:56:05","modified_gmt":"2024-11-02T16:56:05","slug":"alaska-court-climate-change-cant-justify-giant-habitat-for-seals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=349943","title":{"rendered":"Alaska court: Climate change can\u2019t justify giant habitat for seals"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"482\" data-attachment-id=\"349944\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=349944\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?fit=2508%2C1672&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"2508,1672\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0Bearded-seal\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?fit=723%2C482&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?resize=723%2C482&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-349944\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?resize=1024%2C683&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?resize=768%2C512&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?resize=1536%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?resize=2048%2C1365&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?resize=1200%2C800&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?w=1446&amp;ssl=1 1446w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?w=2169&amp;ssl=1 2169w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cfact.org\/2024\/11\/01\/alaska-court-climate-change-cant-justify-giant-habitat-for-seals\/\">CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cfact.org\/author\/bonner5\/\">Bonner Cohen, Ph. D<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Biden-Harris administration\u2019s effort to designate over 324,000 square miles as \u201ccritical habitat\u201d for two species of arctic seals&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.courthousenews.com\/alaska-prevails-in-challenge-to-critical-habitat-designation-for-threatened-seals\/\">has been struck down<\/a>&nbsp;by a federal court in Alaska, which ruled that the designation \u2013 largely based on future impacts of climate change \u2013 was invalid under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In her Sept. 26&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/dcjournal.com\/alaska-court-climate-change-cant-justify-giant-habitat-for-seals\/Alaska%20Court%20Rules%20Climate%20Change%20Cannot%20Justify%20Designation%20of.docx\">decision<\/a>, U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason delivered a stunning setback to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), quashing the agency\u2019s 12-year quest to rope off an area larger than the State of Texas from oil and gas development along with crippling the area\u2019s fishing industry and interfering with commercial shipping lanes. Once an area has been designated as critical habitat under the ESA, strict land- and water-use restrictions come into play that can hamstring commercial development. The critical habitat designation sought by the Biden administration included large swaths of the Bering Sea, Chukchi Sea, and Beaufort Sea.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">First listed as threatened under the ESA by the Obama administration in 2012, the bearded seal and the Arctic ringed seal were granted critical habitat by the Biden administration in 2022. The area set aside for them, however, comprises almost the entire range of the seals\u2019 habitat in the United States, including the coastal waters along the Alaskan North Slope and the adjacent Outer Continental Shelf. The State of Alaska filed suit against the NMFS and the Center for Biological Diversity, which had intervened in the case, in February 2023, arguing that the agency\u2019s vast habitat designation was in violation of the ESA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Biden administration officials attempted to use the ESA to shut down fossil-fuel development and other commercial activity, only to have Judge Gleason cite the NMFS\u2019s own violations of the same statute in handing the State of Alaska a significant legal victory.&nbsp; In justifying such an enormous federally protected habitat for the seals, the NMFS had pointed to the threat of future climate change; oil and gas exploration, development, and production; marine shipping and transportation; and commercial fishing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But the court made quick work of the administration\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">First, the court held that the NMFS failed to explain why the entirety of each designated area is essential to the conservation (i.e., survival and recovery) of the species or why a smaller area would be inadequate for the species\u2019 conservation. The court noted further that the NMFS could not identify where essential sea ice features are located because the sea ice is dynamic and variable, and identifying exactly where ice features are found demands \u201cgreater scientific specificity that the available data could provide.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Second, Judge Gleason held that the NMFS acted improperly by failing to consider the habitat of the two species of seals found outside U.S. territory.&nbsp; While the ESA\u2019s jurisdiction does not extend beyond U.S. borders, and no critical habitat can be designated there, the court concluded that the agency had an obligation to consider conservation efforts of foreign (say Canada or Russia) before determining whether such a large area in the U.S. must be set aside as critical habitat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Third, the court held that the NMWS abused its discretion by failing to consider the exclusion of areas from critical habitat pursuant to ESA Section 4(b)(2).&nbsp; State and local officials had sought such an exclusion along Alaska\u2019s North Slope, hoping to protect fisheries and shipping lanes from the critical habitat designation. The court ruled that the NMFS should have explained why the entire 160-million- plus acres were needed for habitat and weighed the benefits of including and excluding certain areas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cSimply because NMFS is unable to identify a less extensive, specific geographic location for breeding or molting does not explain why the 160-million-plus-acre areas it identified as critical habitat are \u2018necessary\u2019 or \u2018indispensable,\u2019 the Obama-appointed judge wrote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Underscoring her view that the NFWS overreached in its handling of the seals, Judge Gleason added: \u201cAlthough the court acknowledges the challenging nature of designating critical habitat for threatened species that inhabit Arctic waters, the court does not read the ESA to permit the service to designate nearly all of the seals\u2019 occupied habitat within the United States as indispensable to the seals\u2019 conservation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Finally, and in a real slap in the face of administration officials, the court remanded the NMFS\u2019s habitat rule to the agency with vacatur, meaning, Courthouse News Service&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/dcjournal.com\/alaska-court-climate-change-cant-justify-giant-habitat-for-seals\/Alaska%20Court%20Rules%20Climate%20Change%20Cannot%20Justify%20Designation%20of.docx\">points out<\/a>, \u201cthe seals will be left without critical habitat until the agency develops new rules consistent with the order.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court\u2019s rebuke of the Biden administration\u2019s attempt to use the ESA to curtail fossil-fuel development in Alaska could set the stage for developing this hydrocarbon-rich area under a new administration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>This article originally appeared at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/dcjournal.com\/alaska-court-climate-change-cant-justify-giant-habitat-for-seals\/\">DC Journal<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Biden-Harris administration\u2019s effort to designate over 324,000 square miles as \u201ccritical habitat\u201d for two species of arctic seals has been struck down by a federal court in Alaska, which ruled that the designation \u2013 largely based on future impacts of climate change \u2013 was invalid under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":349944,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818602,691820710,691818056,691822681,691822155],"class_list":{"0":"post-349943","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-alaska","9":"tag-biden-harris-administration","10":"tag-climate-change","11":"tag-endangered-species-act-esa","12":"tag-national-marine-fisheries-service-nmfs","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Bearded-seal.jpg?fit=2508%2C1672&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1t2f","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":317627,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=317627","url_meta":{"origin":349943,"position":0},"title":"Biden Administration tightens endangered species regs","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"14\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Landowners harboring threatened or endangered species on their property will soon be facing stricter scrutiny and the possibility of tougher land-use restrictions under new Endangered Species Act (ESA) regulations released by the Biden administration April 5.","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-environmental-protection-agency-epa"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/2ecf0ce2f-c452-453d-bccf-221bba20d74c.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/2ecf0ce2f-c452-453d-bccf-221bba20d74c.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/2ecf0ce2f-c452-453d-bccf-221bba20d74c.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/2ecf0ce2f-c452-453d-bccf-221bba20d74c.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/2ecf0ce2f-c452-453d-bccf-221bba20d74c.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":361081,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=361081","url_meta":{"origin":349943,"position":1},"title":"The US needs to stop using climate model predictions in ESA species\u00a0assessments","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"There are a lot of things wrong with the\u00a0Endangered Species Act\u00a0(ESA) \u2013 including that constitutionally, the power to regulate fish and wildlife lies with the states, not the federal government \u2013 but a worrying trend has developed where outputs of predictive climate change models (based on an assumption that human-caused\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Arctic species\"","block_context":{"text":"Arctic species","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=arctic-species"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0esactimage.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0esactimage.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0esactimage.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0esactimage.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0esactimage.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292090,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292090","url_meta":{"origin":349943,"position":2},"title":"Biden admin wants to give climate resilient wolverines ESA protections","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In Episode 399 of District of Conservation, Gabriella discusses her recent ALEC Summit speech on natural asset companies, fishing in Arizona\u2019s Salt River, previews CSF NASC podcast interviews, and discusses the USFWS\u2019s proposed rule to list the Lower-48 wolverine on the Endangered Species Act with threatened protections on climate change,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden Administration\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden Administration","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-administration"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00Climate-Resilient-Wolverines.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00Climate-Resilient-Wolverines.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00Climate-Resilient-Wolverines.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00Climate-Resilient-Wolverines.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00Climate-Resilient-Wolverines.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268261,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=268261","url_meta":{"origin":349943,"position":3},"title":"Could Federal courts roll back climate regulatory overreach?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"19\/07\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has recently decided two cases which indicate that federal district courts are prepared to roll back the relentless onslaught of regulatory overreach advanced by the Biden Administration.","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden Administration\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden Administration","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-administration"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-572.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-572.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-572.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-572.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-572.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310391,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=310391","url_meta":{"origin":349943,"position":4},"title":"Coalition sues to block Virginia offshore wind project to protect the Right Whale","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"19\/03\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A coalition of public interest groups today is filing a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against Biden administration officials and agencies seeking\u00a0to overturn their approval of a massive wind turbine project off the shore of Virginia.","rel":"","context":"In \"Dominion Energy\"","block_context":{"text":"Dominion Energy","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=dominion-energy"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0rightwhale_breaching_georgiadnr_permit15488.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0rightwhale_breaching_georgiadnr_permit15488.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0rightwhale_breaching_georgiadnr_permit15488.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0rightwhale_breaching_georgiadnr_permit15488.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0rightwhale_breaching_georgiadnr_permit15488.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298395,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=298395","url_meta":{"origin":349943,"position":5},"title":"Environmental Laws That Impeded Pipelines For Years Could Trip Up Biden\u2019s Sprint Toward Offshore Wind","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"25\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Environmental rules and regulations that activists have used for years to drown disfavored infrastructure projects in litigation are now threatening a key pillar of President Joe Biden\u2019s massive climate agenda.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate agenda\"","block_context":{"text":"climate agenda","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-agenda"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Biden_Offshore_Wind_65504-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Biden_Offshore_Wind_65504-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Biden_Offshore_Wind_65504-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Biden_Offshore_Wind_65504-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Biden_Offshore_Wind_65504-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/349943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=349943"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/349943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":349947,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/349943\/revisions\/349947"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/349944"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=349943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=349943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=349943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}