{"id":348886,"date":"2024-10-25T18:17:30","date_gmt":"2024-10-25T16:17:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=348886"},"modified":"2024-10-25T18:17:33","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T16:17:33","slug":"rhetoric-and-reality-the-politics-of-climate-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=348886","title":{"rendered":"Rhetoric and Reality – The Politics of Climate Change"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The Heartland Institute<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The whole world seems to be nervously awaiting the outcome of the presidential election, which is just 10 days away \u2014 perhaps no group more than the global climate cabal. Climate and energy policy is a topic barely mentioned on the campaign trail, and in the debates. But voters are going to decide in November whether America keeps spending billions to be a \u201cleader\u201d in global climate action schemes or pull out of the scam altogether … and maybe for good.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Episode #132 of The Climate Realism Show our guest is Steve Milloy, publisher of Junkscience.com, senior fellow at the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, and member of the EPA transition team for the first Trump presidency. The Biden-Harris administration has pledged billions of US tax dollars for \u201cglobal climate action.\u201d Would it be too late to get a refund on that if Trump is elected? Would a second Trump administration get even more aggressive with producing oil and gas? Could he end the taxpayer-subsidized and failing \u201cgreen energy\u201d industry with the stroke of a pen? And what will the next four years of climate policy look like if Kamala Harris wins?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Heartland\u2019s Anthony Watts, H. Sterling Burnett, Linnea Lueken, and Jim Lakely will also cover some of the Crazy Climate News of the week and take your questions in the chat. Join us LIVE at 1 p.m. ET this Friday and every Friday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n