{"id":348583,"date":"2024-10-23T16:00:58","date_gmt":"2024-10-23T14:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=348583"},"modified":"2024-10-23T16:01:00","modified_gmt":"2024-10-23T14:01:00","slug":"no-the-carbon-sinks-arent-sinking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=348583","title":{"rendered":"No, The Carbon Sinks Aren\u2019t Sinking"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Guest Post by<\/strong><\/em> Willis Eschenbach<\/a> (@WEschenbach on eX-Twitter)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The usual font of misinformation, the Guardian, has an article<\/a> claiming the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

In 2023, the hottest year ever recorded, preliminary findings<\/a> by an international team of researchers show the amount of carbon absorbed by land has temporarily collapsed. The final result was that forest, plants and soil \u2013 as a net category \u2013 absorbed almost no carbon.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Hmmm, sez I as my bad number detector starts ringing \u2026 sounds fishy. Something on the order of 55% of emitted CO2 is sequestered and 45% remains airborne. Of this, some 75% is sequestered on land. So if land sequestration has \u201ccollapsed\u201d, we should see an immediate jump in airborne CO2 of about 75% * 55% \u2248 41%. But I don\u2019t recall seeing that in the data \u2026 hmmm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And indeed, this jump in atmospheric CO2 is what the \u201cpreliminary findings\u201d paper linked above uses as the basis of their claims about the carbon sinks, viz (emphasis mine):<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

In 2023, the CO2 growth rate was 3.37 \u00b1 0.11<\/strong> ppm at Mauna Loa, 86% above the previous year, and hitting a record high since observations began in 1958, while global fossil fuel CO2 emissions only increased by 0.6 \u00b1 0.5%. This implies an unprecedented weakening of land and ocean sinks<\/strong>, and raises the question of where and why this reduction happened.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The CO2 growth rate in the decade 2013-2022 has averaged at 2.42 \u00b1 0.08 ppm yr -1 . In 2023, it increased to a record high value of 3.37 \u00b1 0.11 ppm yr -1<\/strong> at the Mauna Loa station (MLO)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Whoa, biggest jump in the record, which \u201cimplies an unprecedented weakening of land and ocean sinks<\/em>\u201c! EVERYONE PANIC!!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So as is my habit, I went to the Mauna Loa site<\/a> and got the CO2 data. It\u2019s monthly, so I converted it to annual data. Here is the result, showing the growth rate for a given year as the average value for the previous year subtracted from the average value for the given year.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
Figure 1. Annual change in atmospheric CO2<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Hmmm, sez I once again\u2026 the change from 2022 to 2023 looks perfectly average, and at 2.5 ppmv, it\u2019s certainly not the 3.37 ppmv they claim. Why would that be? They can\u2019t be calculating the difference in annual averages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A closer look at what the NOAA folks are doing<\/a> when they calculate what they call the \u201cannual mean rate of growth\u201d <\/em>explains the mystery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The annual mean rate of growth of CO2<\/sub> in a given year is the difference in concentration between the end of December and the start of January of that year. If used as an average for the globe, it would represent the sum of all CO2<\/sub> added to, and removed from, the atmosphere during the year by human activities and by natural processes.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is a small amount of month-to-month variability in the CO2<\/sub> concentration that may be caused by anomalies of the winds or weather systems arriving at Mauna Loa. This variability would not be representative of the underlying trend for the northern hemisphere which Mauna Loa is intended to represent.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Therefore, we finalize our estimate for the annual mean growth rate of the previous year in March, by using the average of the most recent November-February months<\/strong>, corrected for the average seasonal cycle, as the trend value for January 1. Our estimate for the annual mean growth rate (based on the Mauna Loa data) is obtained by subtracting the same four-month average centered on the previous January 1.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Now, that all sounds perfectly legit, but doesn\u2019t explain the large 2023 value. So I looked at the monthly data. Figure 2 below shows the more recent of the four-month November-February periods that they are averaging.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
Figure 2. Year over year difference, monthly CO2 data. Blue bars highlight the periods from November to February used in their calculations<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Following their instructions, I can replicate their calculations exactly. And in Figure 2, we can see why they\u2019ve gotten such a high number\u2014by chance, the data centered on Jan 1, 2024 occurred during a peak time of annual CO2 rise, and the data centered on Jan 1, 2023 occurred during a low time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What difference does that make? Well, they\u2019ve taken a four-month average starting in November, and compared that to the same period of the previous year \u2026 but they could just as easily have started their four-month average in January or June and done the same calculation of annual change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But here\u2019s the thing. If they\u2019d chanced to start their four-month average in January rather than November, instead of the difference from 2022 to 2023 being the largest jump in the record, it would only be the 24th largest out of the 64 years<\/strong>. If they\u2019d started in February, 11th largest<\/strong>. And if they\u2019d started in June, it would be the 7th largest<\/strong> jump in the record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And of course, this means that their claim that the carbon sink \u201cis failing\u201d<\/em> is a totally falsified artifact of their calculation method<\/strong>. It depends entirely on the random choice of the month they\u2019ve used to start their four-month average, and if they\u2019d started in January, they\u2019d have been forced to conclude that there\u2019s nothing unusual going on with the carbon sink in the slightest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Having been caught by confirmation bias more than once, I can only have compassion for the authors. They were looking for a climate disaster, they thought they\u2019d found one, and unfortunately, because that confirmed their preconceptions, they didn\u2019t look any deeper.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However \u2026 they\u2019re still totally wrong. The data doesn\u2019t show any change in the carbon sinks. It\u2019s just an artifact of the odd way that they are calculating the \u201cannual\u201d change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My very best to everyone, I\u2019m going outside to see the moon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

w.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As Usual:<\/strong> When you comment, I ask that you quote the exact words you\u2019re discussing<\/strong> \u2026 it avoids endless misunderstandings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The usual font of misinformation, the Guardian, has an article claiming the following:<\/p>\n

In 2023, the hottest year ever recorded, preliminary findings by an international team of researchers show the amount of carbon absorbed by land has temporarily collapsed. The final result was that forest, plants and soil \u2013 as a net category \u2013 absorbed almost no carbon.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":348589,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691827130,691831075,691820528,691818262],"class_list":{"0":"post-348583","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-carbon-dioxide-co2","9":"tag-mauna-loa-station-mlo","10":"tag-misinformation","11":"tag-the-guardian","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0MLO-Aerial-103123-crop.jpeg?fit=2025%2C1112&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1sGj","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":240961,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=240961","url_meta":{"origin":348583,"position":0},"title":"Claim: 90% of Verra Carbon Credits are worthless \u201cPhantom Credits\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"22\/01\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Guardian has accused\u00a0Verra Carbon, which sells credits to climate champions like Disney, Shell and Gucci, of not being worth the paper they are printed on.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-955.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-955.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-955.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-955.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-955.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213329,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=213329","url_meta":{"origin":348583,"position":1},"title":"Thanks, Guardian, For Questioning the Virtues of Biomass","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"This is especially true in the case of wood pellet biomass power plants in the UK, where the majority of pellets are shipped across the Atlantic from the United States and Canada.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-451.png?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-451.png?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-451.png?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-451.png?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-451.png?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353341,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=353341","url_meta":{"origin":348583,"position":2},"title":"Why Are BBC Verify Spreading Disinformation About\u00a0Methane?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/12\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Some UK social media users have been pouring milk down their sinks and toilets in protest at the trial of a new feed additive that claims to significantly reduce the emission of methane gas in dairy cows","rel":"","context":"In \"Arla Foods\"","block_context":{"text":"Arla Foods","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=arla-foods"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0-BBC-Verify.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0-BBC-Verify.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0-BBC-Verify.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0-BBC-Verify.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0-BBC-Verify.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301588,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=301588","url_meta":{"origin":348583,"position":3},"title":"More misinformation\u2026","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/02\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A few days ago both the Guardian and the BBC (the usual suspects, in other words) published articles on their websites about a recent\u00a0Report\u00a0by the Environment and Climate Change Committee of the House of Lords (its first Report of the 2023\/24 session).","rel":"","context":"In \"BBC\"","block_context":{"text":"BBC","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bbc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Interaction-Toolkit.png?fit=1200%2C563&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Interaction-Toolkit.png?fit=1200%2C563&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Interaction-Toolkit.png?fit=1200%2C563&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Interaction-Toolkit.png?fit=1200%2C563&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Interaction-Toolkit.png?fit=1200%2C563&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289427,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=289427","url_meta":{"origin":348583,"position":4},"title":"Un-refutable Evidence of the Ocean Acidification Scam in 3 Easy Lessons","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"By Jim Steele 1. The Undisputed Science: The upper panel of the attached illustration shows how CO2 breaks down into 3 different molecules when CO2 combines with water, collectively called Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC). First one of water\u2019s H+ ion pops off to form Bicarbonate ions. Bicarbonate ions now contribute\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Bicarbonate ions\"","block_context":{"text":"Bicarbonate ions","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bicarbonate-ions"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00GAISF0PagAA1KEj.jpeg?fit=718%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00GAISF0PagAA1KEj.jpeg?fit=718%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00GAISF0PagAA1KEj.jpeg?fit=718%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00GAISF0PagAA1KEj.jpeg?fit=718%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369282,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=369282","url_meta":{"origin":348583,"position":5},"title":"Carbon Budget Misinformation","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/03\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Climate Change Committee (CCC) recently released the\u00a07th\u00a0Carbon Budget, setting out what the UK\u2019s greenhouse gas emissions have to be in the period 2038-2042. Their report mentioned \u201cmisinformation\u201d or \u201cmisinformed\u201d on five occasions in the context of low-carbon technologies in general and EVs and heat pumps in particular. But, as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon capture and storage (CCS)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon capture and storage (CCS)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-capture-and-storage-ccs"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Untitled-design-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Untitled-design-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Untitled-design-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Untitled-design-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Untitled-design-3.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=348583"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348583\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":348590,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348583\/revisions\/348590"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/348589"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=348583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=348583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=348583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}