{"id":345967,"date":"2024-10-08T15:04:39","date_gmt":"2024-10-08T13:04:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=345967"},"modified":"2024-10-08T15:04:41","modified_gmt":"2024-10-08T13:04:41","slug":"want-to-win-an-election-run-on-cheap-energy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=345967","title":{"rendered":"Want to Win an Election? Run on Cheap Energy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Michael O\u2019Sullivan<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ah, election season. That festive time when politicians suddenly have new ideas about how to make our lives better. This year the limelight shines brightly on our revered American economy, which is presently either good or bad, depending on whom you ask<\/a>. But it\u2019s election season, so voters rule and the experts can take a powder. And that\u2019s why today we have both<\/em> presidential candidates proposing economic policies that make economists wince and voters cheer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The remarkable gap between experts and ordinary people is nicely illustrated in a recent Wall Street Journal poll<\/a> targeting economic policy ideas from both campaigns. The Journal asked 750 registered voters what they think. Then they commissioned the University of Chicago\u2019s Clark Center to get a reading from 39 \u201ctop academic experts.\u201d The policies in question include things like tax-free tips and Social Security income, tariffs on imported goods, penalties for price gouging, free money for first-time homebuyers or parents of newborns, and caps on various drug prices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The experts hate much of this because it runs counter to their preferred economic theories. But regular folks, whose frame of reference comes mainly from the realities of daily living, gave an average 63% thumbs-up. The starkest contrast comes with tax elimination, where voters are nearly 80% for and economists are about 90% against. Makes you wonder if we\u2019re not living in parallel universes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At this point much could be said about economic philosophy and lessons from history. But instead let\u2019s think about this: roughly half of this country votes conservative, which means they typically don\u2019t like big government. But according to this survey, around three quarters of all voters<\/em> favor economic policies that involve more government spending<\/em>. That means something like one half of conservative voters are willing to suspend their principles in the interest of helping people get through tough times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I realize I\u2019m playing fast and loose with the numbers, but it does indeed look like a society in economic distress \u2014 where relatively small numbers become meaningful to many households. Perhaps that\u2019s why nearly 8 of 10 American adults live paycheck to paycheck<\/a> and more than 20 million households are behind on their utility bills<\/a>. This is where even the staunchest Jeffersonian is tempted to look to Uncle Sam for help.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And yet we have that pesky free lunch myth<\/em>. Milton Friedman described<\/a> it as \u201cthe belief that somehow or other government can spend money at no one\u2019s expense.\u201d It doesn\u2019t require higher math to know that more government spending brings relief only at the expense of more problems. The piper always gets paid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But what if there were a way to help people without<\/em> more government spending? What if we could give<\/em> something to some people without first taking<\/em> money from other people? Surely that would bring tears of joy to both the ill-informed voters and the enlightened experts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If 20 million households are in arrears on their utility bills, and so many are living paycheck to paycheck, then there must be many more who are not behind but still struggling to pay. And we know the average cost of electricity in the U.S. has been rising steadily, up nearly 30% since just 2019<\/a>. In a society where a few dollars mean a lot, many people each month must decide between the light bill, the rent, and food.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, here\u2019s an idea: what if we simply bring down the cost of electricity? It helps everyone and it doesn\u2019t require more government (i.e., taxpayer) money. It only requires the government stop forcing a premature \u201ctransition\u201d that has only served to make energy more expensive and less reliable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If we want to get crazy, then Uncle Sam could take some of the big money he throws at wind and solar (which come up short<\/a>) and invest in something with a better pay-off, like responsibly sourced natural gas<\/a>, which is cheap, reliable, and reasonably clean. Or maybe put a few chips on nuclear, which is safer and cleaner<\/a> than you might think. If Uncle Sam were really concerned about return on investment, he\u2019d realign his portfolio. At least that wouldn\u2019t be new<\/em> spending \u2014 and it would bring down energy costs more quickly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Imagine if a presidential candidate stood up and said, \u201cListen folks \u2014 here\u2019s what we\u2019re going to do. We\u2019re going to put a couple hundred bucks in everyone\u2019s pocket. Every month. Forever.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Point me to the nearest voting booth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Michael O\u2019Sullivan is Program Director and COO for <\/em>Blue Energy Nation<\/em><\/a>, a non-profit committed to educating young people on energy realities. He is also a popular podcast host and an advocate for smart energy choices.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ah, election season. That festive time when politicians suddenly have new ideas about how to make our lives better. This year the limelight shines brightly on our revered American economy, which is presently either good or bad,\u00a0depending on whom you ask. But it\u2019s election season, so voters rule and the experts can take a powder. And that\u2019s why today we have\u00a0both\u00a0presidential candidates proposing economic policies that make economists wince and voters cheer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":345969,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691822969,691830847,691821666],"class_list":{"0":"post-345967","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-cheap-energy","9":"tag-election-season","10":"tag-wall-street-journal","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0wecalculated.jpg?fit=1344%2C768&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1s07","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273297,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=273297","url_meta":{"origin":345967,"position":0},"title":"Green Tasmania, the \u201cBattery of Australia\u201d, Runs Out of Electricity","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/08\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Sadly the moribund Australian political establishment is utterly fixated on renewables. They will continue to inflict their ignorant energy fantasies on ordinary people, and make excuses for their failures, until voters wake up and elect politicians who can implement common sense solutions to people\u2019s problems.","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-535.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-535.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-535.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-535.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-535.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269905,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=269905","url_meta":{"origin":345967,"position":1},"title":"Climate Shock: An anti ULEZ Candidate Just Won a London Election","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/07\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"But obvious green cost of living hits like ULEZ cannot be hidden behind the Ukraine war smokescreen, so are fair game for courageous politicians who are prepared to take a few risks.","rel":"","context":"In \"BBC\"","block_context":{"text":"BBC","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bbc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/001H02V4SMY1P7DKP2WH43RT0FJ.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/001H02V4SMY1P7DKP2WH43RT0FJ.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/001H02V4SMY1P7DKP2WH43RT0FJ.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/001H02V4SMY1P7DKP2WH43RT0FJ.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/001H02V4SMY1P7DKP2WH43RT0FJ.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213347,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=213347","url_meta":{"origin":345967,"position":2},"title":"Finally, WI State Supremes Rule on the Merits of Election Law","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"However much or little\u00a0voter fraud\u00a0takes place in absolute terms, it is\u00a0clearly sometimes enough to alter the outcome\u00a0of a close election.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-455.png?fit=620%2C434&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-455.png?fit=620%2C434&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-455.png?fit=620%2C434&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209746,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=209746","url_meta":{"origin":345967,"position":3},"title":"Stopping Phantom Voters Deciding US Elections","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"22\/07\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jay Valentine reports what is known about the phantom voting industry and those fighting it for the sake of US election integrity.\u00a0 His American Thinker article is\u00a0Election Heroes Are Stopping Fraudulent Voting\u2026Right Now.\u00a0\u00a0Excerpts in italics with my bolds and added images. The soul of phantom voter fraud is the occasional,\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0election-dam.png?fit=620%2C434&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0election-dam.png?fit=620%2C434&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0election-dam.png?fit=620%2C434&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":411988,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=411988","url_meta":{"origin":345967,"position":4},"title":"Climate, Energy, and the Election\u2014 The Climate Realism Show\u00a0#181","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/11\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"On Episode #181 of The Climate Realism Show, we\u2019ll drill into that. The Heartland Institute\u2019s Jim Lakely, Anthony Watts, Sterling Burnett, and Linnea Lueken will also cover some of the Crazy Climate News of the Week, including giving up your pets to save the climate, whether we should be concerned\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"\u201cclimate target\u201d\"","block_context":{"text":"\u201cclimate target\u201d","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-target"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-07-162717.png?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-07-162717.png?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-07-162717.png?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-07-162717.png?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-07-162717.png?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209922,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=209922","url_meta":{"origin":345967,"position":5},"title":"US Feds Directing Big Tech Censorship? Discovery Begins.","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/07\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Adam Mill explains in his American Greatness article Is the Government Directing Big Tech Censorship? Excerpts in italics with my bolds and added images. Details in a case filed in a federal district court suggest government-directed censorship on social media and the most comprehensive interference in a domestic election in\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0lisa_benson_current_cartoon_2019-05-08_5_.jpg?fit=600%2C424&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0lisa_benson_current_cartoon_2019-05-08_5_.jpg?fit=600%2C424&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0lisa_benson_current_cartoon_2019-05-08_5_.jpg?fit=600%2C424&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345967","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=345967"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345967\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":345971,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345967\/revisions\/345971"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/345969"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=345967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=345967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=345967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}