{"id":342702,"date":"2024-09-12T07:31:18","date_gmt":"2024-09-12T05:31:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=342702"},"modified":"2024-09-12T07:31:19","modified_gmt":"2024-09-12T05:31:19","slug":"californias-trillion-dollars-floating-wind-fantasy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=342702","title":{"rendered":"California\u2019s trillion dollars floating wind fantasy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By David Wojick<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

California has adopted a target of 25,000 MW of floating offshore wind generation capacity. Of course, the cost is never mentioned, so here is a rough estimate to get the ball rolling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The estimate begins with the huge Dominion Energy (DOM) fixed wind project currently under construction off of Virginia. Because the regulated utility DOM is its own developer, we get some public numbers, so here is a crude derivation. Big numbers are rounded for simplicity and ease of memory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A. DOM says the 2,600 MW facility will cost $10 billion to build, which is about $4 billion\/GW. But financing and profit bump that to $20 billion or $8 billion\/GW, which is called the \u201crevenue requirement\u201d or what rate payers will pay. We will use that number.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

B. DOM brags that they are immune to the big cost spike that has swept the industry because their contracts predate it. The costs have increased an estimated 65% industry-wide. That pushes the fixed bottom cost to $6.6 billion\/GW construction and $13.2 billion\/GW total.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

C. Floating wind is generally estimated to be three times fixed wind because that huge floater costs a huge amount more than the single monopile a fixed tower sits on, plus there is a lot of mooring to the sea floor. Off California, the water is around a half mile deep.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This gives a construction cost of roughly $20 billion\/GW and a total of $40 billion\/GW. It could be a lot more as it has never been done.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

D. Thus, 25 GW of floating capacity comes to $500 billion for construction and an incredible trillion dollars with financing. Note this does not include 20 years\u2019 worth of expensive operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and decommissioning. That makes it well over a trillion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is California\u2019s trillion-dollar floating wind fantasy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, let\u2019s turn this into a possible power purchase agreement (PPA) price. A trillion dollars paid over 20 years is $50,000,000,000 a year. Assuming a 40% capacity factor, that works out to 57 cents a KWh. Given that the average wholesale price of electricity in California is just around 5 cents, this is incredibly expensive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The floating wind startup price is almost 12 times the regular price of electricity. Floating wind is a crazy policy, even by California\u2019s crazy standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which brings us to something happening right now. The U.S. Energy Department\u2019s Grid Deployment Office is asking for information and comments on developing an offshore wind transmission plan for the West Coast. See https:\/\/www.energy.gov\/gdo\/west-coast-offshore-wind-transmission-planning<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is the basic announcement: \u201cThe West Coast Offshore Wind Transmission effort includes a Request for Information to allow individuals and organizations to submit written input about transmission topics, including siting, technology, and policy considerations. The GDO team will consider this input as they prepare West Coast recommendations. Responses must be received by October 3, 2024, and can be sent by emailing OSWTransmission@hq.doe.gov.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DOE says the West Coast plan will be similar to the massive \u201cACTION PLAN FOR OFFSHORE WIND TRANSMISSION DEVELOPMENT IN THE U.S. ATLANTIC REGION\u201c. This Action Plan is from the Energy Department and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), which is actually building the offshore wind monsters. The plan creates a massive undersea grid along the entire Atlantic coast.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Atlantic Action Plan shows specific offshore wind projects in ever-increasing numbers by five-year increments, from 30,000 MW in 2030 to 85,000 MW in 2050. Suppose the West Coast plan is just as big as the East Coast at 85,000 MW. That is a monstrous 3.4 trillion dollars worth of floating wind, a technology that does not even exist at commercial scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I encourage people to send in comments objecting to this monstrous floating wind development effort. America does not need trillions of dollars worth of unreliable electricity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

California has adopted a target of 25,000 MW of floating offshore wind generation capacity. Of course, the cost is never mentioned, so here is a rough estimate to get the ball rolling.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":342704,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818068,691830555,691825582],"class_list":{"0":"post-342702","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-california","9":"tag-dominion-energy-dom","10":"tag-floating-offshore-wind","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/0WindFloat-Atlantic_Principle-Power.jpg?fit=2048%2C1150&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1r9s","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":278758,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=278758","url_meta":{"origin":342702,"position":0},"title":"Keep Virginia\u2019s lights on! CFACT submission on natural gas generating plants","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"14\/09\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Wind and solar are wholly inadequate to Virginia\u2019s energy needs.\u00a0 CFACT explains the hard math that explains Virginia\u2019s need to generate abundant, efficient electricity.","rel":"","context":"In \"efficient electricity\"","block_context":{"text":"efficient electricity","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=efficient-electricity"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/02021-10-25T143423Z_2_LYNXMPEH9O0MA_RTROPTP_4_USA-WINDPOWER-DOMINION-INC-PIX.jpeg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/02021-10-25T143423Z_2_LYNXMPEH9O0MA_RTROPTP_4_USA-WINDPOWER-DOMINION-INC-PIX.jpeg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/02021-10-25T143423Z_2_LYNXMPEH9O0MA_RTROPTP_4_USA-WINDPOWER-DOMINION-INC-PIX.jpeg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/02021-10-25T143423Z_2_LYNXMPEH9O0MA_RTROPTP_4_USA-WINDPOWER-DOMINION-INC-PIX.jpeg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/02021-10-25T143423Z_2_LYNXMPEH9O0MA_RTROPTP_4_USA-WINDPOWER-DOMINION-INC-PIX.jpeg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287521,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=287521","url_meta":{"origin":342702,"position":1},"title":"CFACT blasts Fed\u2019s \u201cfloating wind\u201d fantasy","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"From \u00a0CFACT CFACT President Craig Rucker has blown the whistle on Federal plans to put hundreds of floating wind generators off the Oregon coast. Floating wind is the latest green energy fantasy, taking its place along with hydrogen, EVs, battery storage, and net zero. The idea is that where the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"BOEM\"","block_context":{"text":"BOEM","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=boem"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0WindFloatAtlantic_edpr_ii_web.jpg?fit=1200%2C650&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0WindFloatAtlantic_edpr_ii_web.jpg?fit=1200%2C650&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0WindFloatAtlantic_edpr_ii_web.jpg?fit=1200%2C650&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0WindFloatAtlantic_edpr_ii_web.jpg?fit=1200%2C650&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0WindFloatAtlantic_edpr_ii_web.jpg?fit=1200%2C650&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336908,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=336908","url_meta":{"origin":342702,"position":2},"title":"The Titanic scale of floating wind turbines quantified","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"My regular readers know that I have often referred to the huge size of floating wind turbine assemblies. They are much bigger than fixed offshore wind turbine assemblies because there is a big float attached. This makes floating wind far more expensive than fixed wind, which is already far more\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Floating Wind Turbines\"","block_context":{"text":"Floating Wind Turbines","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=floating-wind-turbines"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0WindFloatAtlantic_edpr_ii_web.jpg?fit=1200%2C650&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0WindFloatAtlantic_edpr_ii_web.jpg?fit=1200%2C650&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0WindFloatAtlantic_edpr_ii_web.jpg?fit=1200%2C650&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0WindFloatAtlantic_edpr_ii_web.jpg?fit=1200%2C650&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0WindFloatAtlantic_edpr_ii_web.jpg?fit=1200%2C650&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216285,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=216285","url_meta":{"origin":342702,"position":3},"title":"Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind: Risks Aplenty ($21 billion could jump)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Hearings on the nine-year-old proposed project have revealed numerous high-risk issues, any one of which could make costs skyrocket for customers.\u00a0","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1357.png?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1357.png?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1357.png?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1357.png?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1357.png?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333227,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=333227","url_meta":{"origin":342702,"position":4},"title":"Floating wind madness in Maine","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/06\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Government of Maine has really big plans for floating wind, a floating net zero fantasy, in fact. Since floating wind power is the next big green thing, it is worth taking a close look at this ruinous vision.","rel":"","context":"In \"floating wind\"","block_context":{"text":"floating wind","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=floating-wind"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-384.png?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-384.png?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-384.png?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-384.png?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-384.png?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257654,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=257654","url_meta":{"origin":342702,"position":5},"title":"The Left thinks offshore wind costs are benefits","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"16\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The climate Left is touting all the jobs that will be created by offshore wind development. They never mention that those fine jobs will all be paid for by those who use electricity, including the low income ratepayers.","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00191204_CPPA.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00191204_CPPA.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00191204_CPPA.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00191204_CPPA.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00191204_CPPA.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342702","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=342702"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342702\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":342706,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342702\/revisions\/342706"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/342704"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=342702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=342702"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=342702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}