{"id":340522,"date":"2024-08-24T09:58:51","date_gmt":"2024-08-24T07:58:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=340522"},"modified":"2024-08-24T09:58:53","modified_gmt":"2024-08-24T07:58:53","slug":"leftist-judges-shouldnt-touch-climate-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=340522","title":{"rendered":"Leftist judges shouldn\u2019t touch climate policy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Paul Driessen<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Supreme Court<\/a> may soon decide whether far-left cities or states can circumvent legislative processes and instead use our courts to impose radical environmental agendas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Having failed to garner enough political support to minimize or eliminate carbon-based fuels, nearly three dozen progressive jurisdictions have resorted to having friendly state judges circumvent the Constitution on national issues. They want no debate, no public referendums, no legislative process \u2014 just one like-minded judge penalizing energy companies for \u201ccausing climate change.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is nothing ethical or legal about this crony forum-shopping and backroom dealing, and the plaintiffs know it. That\u2019s why, when the Supreme Court<\/a> recently suggested it may hear these cases, leftists panicked, insisting that state judges litigate the matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Progressives know their laughable political ploy will tumble if the Supreme Court<\/a> reviews the cases. That would be bad for them but good for our system of checks and balances, for common sense, and especially for reliable, affordable energy, jobs, health care, and modern living standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Climate activists blame fossil fuels for heat waves, cold spells, hurricanes, wildfires (including those caused by arsonists, electric companies, and forest mismanagement), floods, droughts, and abusive husbands. Vice President Kamala Harris even blamed human-caused climate change for the millions of immigrants who have crossed our borders illegally since 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As a former Sierra Club activist, I once believed such claims. I eventually realized, however, that the environmental movement often intentionally uses junk science to advance increasingly extreme agendas, especially campaigns to eliminate fossil fuels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More than 80% of our energy still comes from oil, natural gas, and coal. Wind and solar energy are notoriously unreliable, require expensive backup power and need a dozen times as much in raw materials per unit of electricity than natural gas generators. They cannot provide petrochemical products, including clothing, cosmetics, fertilizer, paint, plastics, pharmaceuticals, and wind turbine blades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cRenewable\u201d energy is not clean, green, renewable, or sustainable. Manufacturing batteries for electric vehicles and grid backup involves mining for numerous metals and minerals in energy-intensive and environmentally damaging processes that cause habitat destruction, pollution, and increased greenhouse gas emissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Much of that mining occurs in countries with corrupt governments and desperately poor families, such as the Democratic Republic of Congo and Myanmar, where child and slave labor are the rule, not the exception. Ships haul the materials to China, the world\u2019s largest polluter, which monopolizes the global battery production market and uses coal and more slave labor and pollution-intensive processes to produce materials and parts for these green energy products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The EVs then get marketed as zero-emission vehicles because there is no exhaust and most people don\u2019t know this or realize the electricity to charge their batteries comes mostly from coal- or gas-fired power plants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wind turbines also depend on oil, gas, and coal for the metals and minerals in their towers and generators, fiberglass-and-resin blades, and concrete-and-rebar bases. Solar panels, sprawling many square miles of former cropland and wildlife habitat, have the same impacts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most components of damaged and worn-out batteries, solar panels, and wind turbines cannot be recycled and get dumped in landfills. Many contain hazardous materials that can leach into soils, waterways, and groundwater.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sea-based wind turbines harm or kill wildlife, including endangered whales; land-based turbines kill millions of birds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pleadings and briefs in lawsuits brought in carefully chosen liberal state courts can ignore facts like these, often preventing judges and juries from considering them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They can target a few American oil companies for alleged climate cataclysms while ignoring other oil and coal companies worldwide, as well as China, India, and other countries that emit the vast majority of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These lawsuits essentially and preposterously assert that products sold by these few oil companies are causing unprecedented climate changes. This deliberately ignores multiple ice ages, the Medieval Warm Period (950-1300), the Little Ice Age (1303-1850), and other warm, cold, wet, and dry intervals that lasted tens, hundreds, or even thousands or millions of years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scientists still debate what combinations of powerful natural forces caused these climate changes. And yet lawyers representing the cities and states essentially and absurdly claim fossil-fuel emissions have somehow replaced those natural forces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recent Supreme Court<\/a> decisions reveal why leftists are alarmed about its possible intervention in their scheme. West Virginia v. EPA held that in the absence of clear legislative authority, government agencies cannot unilaterally issue regulations that have \u201cmajor\u201d economic or political significance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Loper Bright Enterprises Inc. v. Raimondo ended the 40-year Chevron deference era, ruling that silent or ambiguous statutory texts do not give administrative agencies unfettered power to interpret laws in ways that give them increasing control over people\u2019s lives and livelihoods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Liberal state court rulings in these climate cases would certainly have monumental consequences for the oil companies and for our environment, economy, and lives in arenas where Congress has never given any state or federal agency \u2014 or court \u2014 any such authority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Supreme Court<\/a> should intervene here to ensure that these complex scientific, economic, and political issues are fully studied, debated, vetted, and voted on \u2014 not relegated to biased courtrooms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article originally appeared in the Washington Times<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The\u00a0Supreme Court\u00a0may soon decide whether far-left cities or states can circumvent legislative processes and instead use our courts to impose radical environmental agendas.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":340524,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818608,691819716,691825076,691830302,691818670],"class_list":{"0":"post-340522","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-activists","9":"tag-climate-policy","10":"tag-constitution","11":"tag-radical-environmental-agendas","12":"tag-supreme-court","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0AdobeStock_292311175-scaled-1.jpeg?fit=2560%2C1704&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1qAi","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222764,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=222764","url_meta":{"origin":340522,"position":0},"title":"Climatism the Real Threat to Democracy","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/07\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Having failed at the ballot box, millennial climate activists will pursue any means to impose their will on society","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-362.png?fit=800%2C515&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-362.png?fit=800%2C515&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-362.png?fit=800%2C515&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-362.png?fit=800%2C515&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":416620,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=416620","url_meta":{"origin":340522,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court should not let climate lawfare set U.S. energy policy","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Climate lawfare is a Big Business. State, county and city lawyers have filed some 30 lawsuits, alleging that oil companies misrepresented the impacts of their products and caused billions of dollars in climate and weather damages.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate and weather\"","block_context":{"text":"climate and weather","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-and-weather-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMZtqwaiiSQZSRAim3i8mBB2mzwhKUp6KZfqOzAO44s6NEHmonIrCSAGvlDjnhHj8AmOfxKbGb5UtkQjPXAL4dr4MWp0dPavdtYNOt6tAexZOlIcXmo8H1lisebISzB.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMZtqwaiiSQZSRAim3i8mBB2mzwhKUp6KZfqOzAO44s6NEHmonIrCSAGvlDjnhHj8AmOfxKbGb5UtkQjPXAL4dr4MWp0dPavdtYNOt6tAexZOlIcXmo8H1lisebISzB.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMZtqwaiiSQZSRAim3i8mBB2mzwhKUp6KZfqOzAO44s6NEHmonIrCSAGvlDjnhHj8AmOfxKbGb5UtkQjPXAL4dr4MWp0dPavdtYNOt6tAexZOlIcXmo8H1lisebISzB.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMZtqwaiiSQZSRAim3i8mBB2mzwhKUp6KZfqOzAO44s6NEHmonIrCSAGvlDjnhHj8AmOfxKbGb5UtkQjPXAL4dr4MWp0dPavdtYNOt6tAexZOlIcXmo8H1lisebISzB.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMZtqwaiiSQZSRAim3i8mBB2mzwhKUp6KZfqOzAO44s6NEHmonIrCSAGvlDjnhHj8AmOfxKbGb5UtkQjPXAL4dr4MWp0dPavdtYNOt6tAexZOlIcXmo8H1lisebISzB.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221808,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=221808","url_meta":{"origin":340522,"position":2},"title":"untitled","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/02\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"At the end of the day, it is likely not a question of if the Supreme Court will hear these cases, but when.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-71.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-71.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-71.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-71.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-71.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":437531,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=437531","url_meta":{"origin":340522,"position":3},"title":"Environmentalists are fighting our living standards in court","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/06\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Environmental groups and climate-obsessed local governments are waging aggressive climate lawfare across America \u2014 using lawsuits to bypass Congress, the U.N.\u2019s stalled global schemes, Trump administration policies, and Supreme Court rulings. They are determined to impose their anti-fossil-fuel agenda on the rest of us and hammer our living standards.","rel":"","context":"In \"\u201cexistential threat\u201d\"","block_context":{"text":"\u201cexistential threat\u201d","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=existential-threat-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQM0SspDECHjjNqF5UQrL7NonKoWyKhxNrtMZnqDVMBQRa3Wf4WcOHCwJ_kmphwXgEBOlA0_j1kZ-gPAOtMwrrg7rEY1Vejvcd9pxjQwol68gLgpm7EdrlLQheYWYLOr8KbtLRBXl9v6WN3VkU-IlAWR6_zmPA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQM0SspDECHjjNqF5UQrL7NonKoWyKhxNrtMZnqDVMBQRa3Wf4WcOHCwJ_kmphwXgEBOlA0_j1kZ-gPAOtMwrrg7rEY1Vejvcd9pxjQwol68gLgpm7EdrlLQheYWYLOr8KbtLRBXl9v6WN3VkU-IlAWR6_zmPA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQM0SspDECHjjNqF5UQrL7NonKoWyKhxNrtMZnqDVMBQRa3Wf4WcOHCwJ_kmphwXgEBOlA0_j1kZ-gPAOtMwrrg7rEY1Vejvcd9pxjQwol68gLgpm7EdrlLQheYWYLOr8KbtLRBXl9v6WN3VkU-IlAWR6_zmPA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQM0SspDECHjjNqF5UQrL7NonKoWyKhxNrtMZnqDVMBQRa3Wf4WcOHCwJ_kmphwXgEBOlA0_j1kZ-gPAOtMwrrg7rEY1Vejvcd9pxjQwol68gLgpm7EdrlLQheYWYLOr8KbtLRBXl9v6WN3VkU-IlAWR6_zmPA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQM0SspDECHjjNqF5UQrL7NonKoWyKhxNrtMZnqDVMBQRa3Wf4WcOHCwJ_kmphwXgEBOlA0_j1kZ-gPAOtMwrrg7rEY1Vejvcd9pxjQwol68gLgpm7EdrlLQheYWYLOr8KbtLRBXl9v6WN3VkU-IlAWR6_zmPA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":432871,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=432871","url_meta":{"origin":340522,"position":4},"title":"SCOTUS to Hear Colorado Climate Case, What\u2019s at\u00a0Stake","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/21\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"On February 23, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments in the City and County of Boulder\u2019s climate lawsuit against two major energy companies. This offers the first real opportunity to rein in the nationally-coordinated climate litigation campaign that has sought to force policy outcomes through the courts\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Carbon Tax\"","block_context":{"text":"Carbon Tax","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-tax"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-A-Turning-Point-for-Litigation-Campaig-SCOTUS-Takes-Up-Boulder-Climate-Lawsuit.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-A-Turning-Point-for-Litigation-Campaig-SCOTUS-Takes-Up-Boulder-Climate-Lawsuit.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-A-Turning-Point-for-Litigation-Campaig-SCOTUS-Takes-Up-Boulder-Climate-Lawsuit.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-A-Turning-Point-for-Litigation-Campaig-SCOTUS-Takes-Up-Boulder-Climate-Lawsuit.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217290,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=217290","url_meta":{"origin":340522,"position":5},"title":"Biden Energy Policies: Incoherent, Incompetent, Intolerable","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/04\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"They raise energy prices, hurt living standards, and impair our future as a law-abiding nation","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-223.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-223.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-223.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-223.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=340522"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340522\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":340526,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340522\/revisions\/340526"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/340524"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=340522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=340522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=340522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}