{"id":339543,"date":"2024-08-14T08:14:47","date_gmt":"2024-08-14T06:14:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=339543"},"modified":"2024-08-14T08:14:50","modified_gmt":"2024-08-14T06:14:50","slug":"the-incestuous-green-blob","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=339543","title":{"rendered":"The Incestuous Green Blob"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From The Daily Sceptic<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

by\u00a0David Turver<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Back in March, the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee produced a report<\/a> on long-duration energy storage (LDES). This report urged the Government to \u201cget on with it\u201d. Among its key recommendations were to ask the Government to \u201csupport no-regrets investments for hydrogen\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, some of the members of the committee have significant conflicts of interest and incestuous relationships that call into question the objectivity of the report and the integrity of Government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Did the Lords LDES Report Say?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The Executive Summary of the report talks about \u201ccheap\u201d renewables and insists the prize for investing in storage is that the electricity system will be cheaper. We do not need to rehearse all the arguments against this statement again. It is sufficient to note that all existing renewables, whether funded by Contracts for Difference (CfDs), Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs) or Feed-In-Tariffs (FiTs) are currently more expensive than gas-fired electricity, as most recently discussed here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A grid that is solely or mostly powered by renewables will therefore be more expensive than a gas-fired grid. However, as wind and solar power are intermittent in nature, they require some sort of backup or storage to ensure that the grid can always meet demand. Adding storage adds extra capital costs to the system but does not increase the amount of electricity generated. This extra expenditure must therefore increase the full system costs of electricity. So, the opening premise of their report is wrong, calling into question the rest of their analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They then go on to quote extensively from the Royal Society report on long term storage (dismantled here<\/a>) which farcically suggested the system cost of a renewables plus hydrogen storage grid would be ~\u00a360\/MWh. However, this cost is less than half what we pay for renewables alone today and much lower than the prices being offered in AR6<\/a>. The required electrolysers, storage caverns and generators will not come cheap and will further increase the system cost of electricity. It is likely that the true costs of a renewables plus hydrogen grid<\/a> will be three or four times that suggested.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How Did the Lords Get It So Wrong?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

It is worrying that such an eminent committee should get things so wrong. To understand how and why they made such a glaring error, we need to look at the composition of the committee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Baroness Brown of Cambridge chairs the Lords Science and Technology Committee. Her register of interests<\/a> shows she is also the chair of the Adaptation Sub-Committee of the Committee on Climate Change (CCC). By pure coincidence, Baroness Brown is also a non-executive director of Ceres Power Holdings<\/a>, which describes itself as a leading developer of \u201celectrolysis for the creation of green hydrogen and fuel cells for power generation\u201d. Baroness Brown\u2019s other interests include chairing the Carbon Trust, and she is also a non-executive director of wind farm operator and developer \u00d8rsted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Seen in this context, it becomes easier to see why the LDES report is so enthusiastic about renewables and securing spending on hydrogen storage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, the web of relationships runs even wider. Professor Keith Bell acted as Specialist Advisor to the committee in the production of the LDES report. Professor Bell is also a member of the CCC having taken up the position of power sector specialist<\/a> in 2019 and recently had his contract extended<\/a> to April 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Incestuous Links to Government<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Baroness Brown also has strong links to the new Head of Mission Control<\/a> at DESNZ, Chris Stark. After leaving his position as Chief Executive of the CCC, Stark was appointed as Chief Executive of the Carbon Trust<\/a>, which is chaired by Baroness Brown<\/a>. Mr. Stark is also listed as Baroness Brown\u2019s staffer<\/a> on the House of Lords website.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Chris Stark is Baroness Brown Staffer<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

One wonders if it is appropriate for one of the most senior people responsible for decarbonising the grid by 2030 should be a staffer for a Baroness and have such a close relationship with someone with such obvious vested interests in wind power and hydrogen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We can see that the tentacles of the green blob have extended deep into the heart of the establishment and Government. One might term this situation a two-tier system of ethics. The extensive web of commercial interests and personal relationships makes it difficult to avoid the conclusion that the recommendations of the Lords Science and Technology Committee report on long term energy storage are tainted. It is also difficult to take seriously any recommendations made by the Climate Change Committee and the new Head of Mission Control. It\u2019s so incestuous, seriously someone should check their hands and feet for extra digits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

David Turver writes the <\/em>Eigen Values<\/a> Substack page, where this article first appeared<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Back in March, the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee produced a report on long-duration energy storage (LDES). This report urged the Government to \u201cget on with it\u201d. Among its key recommendations were to ask the Government to \u201csupport no-regrets investments for hydrogen\u201d.<\/p>\n

However, some of the members of the committee have significant conflicts of interest and incestuous relationships that call into question the objectivity of the report and the integrity of Government.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":339545,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691823159,691821242,691822002,691830139],"class_list":{"0":"post-339543","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-change-committee-ccc","9":"tag-corruption","10":"tag-green-blob","11":"tag-science-and-technology-committee","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Untitled-design.jpg?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1qkv","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":235195,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=235195","url_meta":{"origin":339543,"position":0},"title":"Hydrogen Not The Answer, Say MPs","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/12\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Some of us have been highlighting this for years!","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-616.png?fit=1200%2C913&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-616.png?fit=1200%2C913&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-616.png?fit=1200%2C913&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-616.png?fit=1200%2C913&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-616.png?fit=1200%2C913&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":435490,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=435490","url_meta":{"origin":339543,"position":1},"title":"Aussie Select Committee on Information Integrity on Climate Change and Energy Delivers their Final Report","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/03\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Campaigners, I mean senators, are horrified that people don\u2019t believe government climate warnings, and blame a conspiracy of big oil interests for this lack of trust in Green claims.","rel":"","context":"In \"Australia\"","block_context":{"text":"Australia","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=australia"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Aussie-Select-Committee-on-Information-Integrity-on-Climate-Change-and-Energy-Delivers-their-Final-Report.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Aussie-Select-Committee-on-Information-Integrity-on-Climate-Change-and-Energy-Delivers-their-Final-Report.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Aussie-Select-Committee-on-Information-Integrity-on-Climate-Change-and-Energy-Delivers-their-Final-Report.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Aussie-Select-Committee-on-Information-Integrity-on-Climate-Change-and-Energy-Delivers-their-Final-Report.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202018,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=202018","url_meta":{"origin":339543,"position":2},"title":"MIT Weighs in On Energy Storage","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/05\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"From the MANHATTAN CONTRARIAN Francis Menton As I\u2019ve been pointing out now for a couple of years, the obvious gap in the plans of our betters for a carbon-free \u201cnet zero\u201d energy future is the problem of massive-scale energy storage. How exactly is New York City (for example) going to\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/image-65.png?fit=1000%2C500&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/image-65.png?fit=1000%2C500&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/image-65.png?fit=1000%2C500&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/image-65.png?fit=1000%2C500&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266754,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=266754","url_meta":{"origin":339543,"position":3},"title":"There\u2019s No Accounting For\u00a0It","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/07\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"One wonders if any of them have bothered to read the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee\u00a0report on Decarbonising the Power Sector\u00a0published just a couple of weeks earlier.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-313.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-313.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-313.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-313.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297866,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=297866","url_meta":{"origin":339543,"position":4},"title":"Climate chiefs admitted net zero plan based on insufficient data, leading physicist says","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"22\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Key committee only looked at \u2018a single year of data\u2019 when making controversial green energy claims","rel":"","context":"In \"Chris Stark\"","block_context":{"text":"Chris Stark","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=chris-stark"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0net-zero-istock-1190148959-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C761&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0net-zero-istock-1190148959-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C761&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0net-zero-istock-1190148959-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C761&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0net-zero-istock-1190148959-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C761&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0net-zero-istock-1190148959-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C761&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206496,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=206496","url_meta":{"origin":339543,"position":5},"title":"Storage Stories: Why Giant Batteries Can\u2019t Solve Wind & Solar Power\u2019s Natural Intermittency","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/06\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"It only takes a moment\u2019s reckoning to appreciate that the grid-scale storage electricity generated by wind or solar is a perfect nonsense. It hasn\u2019t occurred anywhere in the world; nor will it. The combined capacity of all of the batteries on Earth would store a trivial 10 minute\u2019s worth of\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/010-minutes.webp?fit=896%2C313&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/010-minutes.webp?fit=896%2C313&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/010-minutes.webp?fit=896%2C313&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/010-minutes.webp?fit=896%2C313&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339543","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=339543"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339543\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":339549,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339543\/revisions\/339549"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/339545"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=339543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=339543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=339543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}