{"id":338437,"date":"2024-08-04T08:57:50","date_gmt":"2024-08-04T06:57:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=338437"},"modified":"2024-08-04T08:57:52","modified_gmt":"2024-08-04T06:57:52","slug":"exposing-the-financial-web-clinton-run-organizations-funding-climate-activists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=338437","title":{"rendered":"Exposing the Financial Web: Clinton-Run Organizations Funding Climate Activists"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Charles Rotter<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The climate change narrative has gained significant traction over the past few decades, driven by a coalition of scientists, activists, and political figures. However, beneath the surface of this narrative lies a complex web of financial backing that often goes unnoticed. Recent disclosures have revealed that organizations associated with Hillary Clinton, such as the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), have funneled substantial funds into activist groups like Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion. This financial support prompts a critical examination of the motives and consequences of such alliances, especially considering the often exaggerated claims of an impending climate catastrophe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The financial support provided by Clinton-run organizations to climate activist groups is significant. These funds often flow through intermediaries like the Climate Emergency Fund (CEF), creating a buffer between the donors and the controversial actions of the recipient groups. The CEF, for instance, has been a major donor to Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion, groups known for their disruptive tactics, including road blockages and vandalism. This indirect funding route serves to shield the Clinton-affiliated organizations from direct association with these activities, while still allowing them to influence the climate activism agenda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

A group founded by Mrs Clinton from the ashes of her failed presidential bid<\/a> has donated $500,000 (\u00a3391,500) in the last three years to the protest group\u2019s California-based financiers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

American voters who have bought tote bags decorated with pictures of Mrs Clinton or sweatshirts promoting abortion rights have inadvertently funded disruption in the UK.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Just Stop Oil\u2019s largest financial backer is a controversial Californian non-profit, the Climate Emergency Fund (CEF), which pays for stunts by environmental groups across the world, including Extinction Rebellion<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A paper trail of transparency disclosures, seen by The Telegraph, shows that one of the CEF\u2019s major supporters is Onward Together, a campaign organisation founded by Mrs Clinton in the aftermath of her 2016 presidential campaign against Donald Trump.

https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/us\/news\/2024\/08\/01\/hillary-clinton-funds-just-stop-oil-extinction-rebellion\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The motivations behind such financial support are worth scrutinizing. On the surface, Clinton-run organizations present themselves as champions of climate action. However, a deeper dive suggests that their motives may include maintaining political relevance and consolidating power. By aligning with radical climate activism, these organizations can position themselves as leaders in the fight against climate change, appealing to a specific voter base and securing political influence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, the climate change narrative offers a convenient platform for advancing specific political and economic interests. The push for renewable energy, carbon taxes, and other green policies often benefits certain industries and financial interests aligned with the donor class. Thus, the financial backing of activist groups by these organizations may not be entirely altruistic; it could be a strategic move to shape policy and public opinion in a way that serves their broader objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The CEF was established in 2019 by Aileen Getty, the granddaughter of the oil tycoon J. Paul Getty, and campaigns for governments to adopt climate-friendly policies.

https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/us\/news\/2024\/08\/01\/hillary-clinton-funds-just-stop-oil-extinction-rebellion\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The support from Clinton-run organizations has significant ramifications for the nature of climate activism. Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion have been at the forefront of promoting a sense of urgency and crisis around climate change. However, the methods they employ\u2014such as public disruptions and sensationalist messaging\u2014often do more harm than good. While these tactics generate media attention, they also alienate the public and create divisions. The financial support from well-connected political figures lends an air of legitimacy to these actions, but it also raises questions about the authenticity of the activism itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These groups claim to represent grassroots movements, yet their operations are heavily funded by wealthy donors. This financial backing can lead to a form of controlled opposition, where the activism is steered in a direction that aligns with the interests of its benefactors rather than representing genuine public concern. This reality undermines the credibility of these groups and casts doubt on their purported independence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the primary tools used by climate activists and their supporters to justify radical policies is climate modeling. However, these models are far from reliable. They are based on numerous assumptions and often fail to accurately predict future climate conditions. The inherent uncertainties in climate science make these models more speculative than definitive. Yet, they are frequently presented as incontrovertible evidence of an impending climate crisis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n