{"id":336262,"date":"2024-07-12T14:02:40","date_gmt":"2024-07-12T12:02:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=336262"},"modified":"2024-07-12T14:02:43","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T12:02:43","slug":"noaas-june-2024-climate-data-shows-no-record-high-u-s-maximum-temperature-anomaly-or-absolute-temperatures-occurred-despite-flawed-alarmist-claims-portrayed-in-media-politi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=336262","title":{"rendered":"NOAA\u2019s June 2024 Climate Data Shows No \u201cRecord High\u201d U.S. Maximum Temperature Anomaly or Absolute Temperatures Occurred Despite Flawed Alarmist Claims Portrayed in Media Political Hype"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Guest essay by Larry Hamlin<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A recent ClimateRealism Fact-Check June 2024 article addressed the climate science data unsupported claims by  climate alarmist media that hyped phony temperature \u201crecords\u201d (shown below<\/a>) have occurred in June across the U.S. which the article establishes as being completely false.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA has updated its Contiguous U.S. climate temperature anomaly and absolute temperature measurement data results through June 2024 with these results showing that the temperatures experienced this June were not \u201crecord\u201d high outcomes as falsely portrayed by the climate alarmist media\u2019s phony political campaign hype.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2018s June 2024 Contiguous U.S. USCRN maximum temperature anomaly data (shown below<\/a>) clearly indicates that not only is there no established trend of increasing maximum temperature anomalies during the period starting in 2005 but also the June 2024 anomaly value (2.84 degrees F highlighted in red) is below the prior highest June value of 3.91 degrees F in 2021 as well as far below the highest anomaly value ever recorded during this period of 7.72 degrees F that occurred in March 2012.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Contiguous U.S. maximum absolute temperature measured data for the month of June for the period 1895 through June 2024 (shown below<\/a>) establishes that June 2024 (84.61degrees F highlighted in red) value\u00a0is only the 6th<\/sup>\u00a0highest measured June value with the highest June value occurring in June 1933 of 85.91 degrees F (as shown in the table)<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, NOAA\u2019s Contiguous U.S maximum absolute temperatures measured for\u00a0all months<\/strong>\u00a0between 1895 and June 2024 (shown below<\/a>) establishes that the June 2024 maximum measured absolute temperature\u00a0is only the 1,340th<\/sup>\u00a0highest measured temperature (84.61 degrees F shown in red) out of a total of 1540 measured maximum temperatures with the highest being July 1936 at 90.81 degrees F (as shown in the table)<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Looking at NOAA\u2019s California month of June maximum temperature data (shown below) from 1895 to June 2024 we see that the June 2024 high is only the 5th highest measured maximum temperature (88.8 degrees F shown in red) compared to the highest maximum temperature of 89.8 degrees F in June of 2021 (shown in the table).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, NOAA\u2019s maximum measured temperature data for all 58 counties in California establishes that the June 2024 outcomes did not represent the maximum June temperatures for any of these 58 counties<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, NOAA\u2019s measured data for June 2024 for all 48 Contiguous U.S. states establishes that the June 2024 maximum measured temperatures were not the highest measured June temperatures for any of these 48 states with that also being true for the state of Alaska as well<\/strong>.         <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also, NOAA\u2019s June 2024 temperature data for all 9 of its U.S. climate regions (shown below) establishes that none of these regions experienced a \u201crecord\u201d high June month in year 2024.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Looking at NOAA\u2019s measured California maximum temperatures for\u00a0all months\u00a0<\/strong>from 1895 through 2024\u00a0(<\/strong>shown below<\/a>)\u00a0<\/strong>we find that the June 2024 value (88.8 degrees F shown in red) is\u00a0only the 1382nd<\/sup>\u00a0highest out of a total of 1554 total maximum temperatures with the highest ever measured in July 1931 at 95.6 degrees F as shown in the table<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, NOAA\u2019s June 2024 updated data establishes that record high June temperatures did not occur in the cities of Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco or Sacramento and that record all time high temperatures did not occur for any of NOAA\u2019s 9 tracked California cities during June 2024.      <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The climate alarmist media falsely hyped many dozens of phony \u201crecord\u201d high June 2024 temperature stories across the country while NOAA\u2019s official U.S. national, regional and state measured temperature data clearly established that these \u201crecord\u201d claims are completely phony and represent dishonest and climate science incompetent media driven climate alarmist political propaganda.  <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A recent ClimateRealism Fact-Check June 2024 article addressed the climate science data unsupported claims by climate alarmist media that hyped phony temperature \u201crecords\u201d (shown below) have occurred in June across the U.S. which the article establishes as being completely false.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":336275,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691819743,691821240,691818397],"class_list":{"0":"post-336262","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-propaganda","9":"tag-heatwave","10":"tag-noaa","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0-Santa-Monica.jpeg?fit=3264%2C2448&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1ptA","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":336828,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=336828","url_meta":{"origin":336262,"position":0},"title":"NOAA\u2019s June 2024 Climate Data Shows No \u201cRecord High\u201d U.S. Maximum Temperature Anomaly as Portrayed in Media Hype\u00a0","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"NOAA has updated its Contiguous U.S. climate temperature anomaly and absolute temperature measurement data results through June 2024 with these results showing that the temperatures experienced this June were not \u201crecord\u201d high outcomes as falsely portrayed by the climate alarmist media\u2019s phony political campaign hype.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate propaganda\"","block_context":{"text":"climate propaganda","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-propaganda"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0224.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0224.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0224.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0224.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0224.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269489,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=269489","url_meta":{"origin":336262,"position":1},"title":"Alarmist Media Push \u201cOpinion Survey\u201d as Basis for CA Climate Policy vs Using Energy & Science Data","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"26\/07\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Southern California News Group (SCNG) conglomerate\u00a0published a ridiculous article\u00a0(shown below) hyping the results of a public opinion survey that clueless climate alarmist media\u00a0are trying to use to justify California\u2019s flawed, ineffective and costly climate and energy laws and regulations.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmist\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmist","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmist"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-782.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-782.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-782.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-782.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240760,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=240760","url_meta":{"origin":336262,"position":2},"title":"LA Times Flawed Year 2022 Climate Alarmist Propaganda Editorial","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"21\/01\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Times claimed that \u201cdata highlight the immense disconnect between the symptoms our overheating planet is showing and what we are doing about the problem\u201d but presented no data and in fact concealed highly relevant climate science measured data from public view in its editorial with that hidden data unsupportive\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-912.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-912.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-912.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-912.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-912.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291766,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=291766","url_meta":{"origin":336262,"position":3},"title":"NASA GISS Data Shows 2023 EL Nino Driving Global Temperature Anomaly Increases; NOAA Data Shows U.S. Nov. 2023 Temperature Anomaly Declining","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NASA GISS global average temperature anomaly for November 2023 was released (provided below) which shows an El Ni\u00f1o driven value of 1.44 degrees C (2.592 degrees F) with the November outcome hyped in an\u00a0L A Times article\u00a0as being \u201ca new monthly record for heat\u201d and the \u201chottest November\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Alarmists\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Alarmists","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmists"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288521,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=288521","url_meta":{"origin":336262,"position":4},"title":"Media Ignores Reality \u2013 Goes Bonkers Over the Fifth National Climate Assessment Report","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Editors Note:\u00a0The White House released their Fifth National Climate Assessment Report\u00a0 this week, and predictably, the media uncritically parroted some of the wild claims made in the report. For example: CNN claims no place is safe;No place in the US is safe from the climate crisis, but a new report\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/NCA5-propaganda.jpg?fit=1095%2C737&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/NCA5-propaganda.jpg?fit=1095%2C737&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/NCA5-propaganda.jpg?fit=1095%2C737&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/NCA5-propaganda.jpg?fit=1095%2C737&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/NCA5-propaganda.jpg?fit=1095%2C737&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285664,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=285664","url_meta":{"origin":336262,"position":5},"title":"Los Angeles Times Misrepresents California Central Valley \u201cWeather\u201d as \u201cClimate\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Weather is only temporary. For example, a blizzard can turn into a flood after just a few warm spring days. Climate, on the other hand, is more than just a few warm or cool days. Climate describes the typical weather conditions in an entire region for a very long time\u2014\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"California\u2019s Central Valley\"","block_context":{"text":"California\u2019s Central Valley","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=californias-central-valley"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0sacramento_river_bend_bob_wick_blm_header.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0sacramento_river_bend_bob_wick_blm_header.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0sacramento_river_bend_bob_wick_blm_header.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0sacramento_river_bend_bob_wick_blm_header.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0sacramento_river_bend_bob_wick_blm_header.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/336262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=336262"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/336262\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":336277,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/336262\/revisions\/336277"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/336275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=336262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=336262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=336262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}