{"id":335946,"date":"2024-07-09T06:58:47","date_gmt":"2024-07-09T04:58:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=335946"},"modified":"2024-07-09T06:58:49","modified_gmt":"2024-07-09T04:58:49","slug":"energy-business-groups-ask-supreme-court-to-stop-california-from-forcing-evs-on-the-rest-of-america","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=335946","title":{"rendered":"Energy, Business Groups Ask Supreme Court To Stop California From Forcing EVs On the Rest of America"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"407\" data-attachment-id=\"335952\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=335952\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Supreme-Court-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1200,675\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;1&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0Supreme-Court-2\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Supreme-Court-2.jpg?fit=723%2C407&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Supreme-Court-2.jpg?resize=723%2C407&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-335952\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Supreme-Court-2.jpg?resize=1024%2C576&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Supreme-Court-2.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Supreme-Court-2.jpg?resize=768%2C432&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Supreme-Court-2.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2024\/07\/08\/energy-business-groups-ask-supreme-court-to-stop-california-from-forcing-evs-on-the-rest-of-america\/\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"528\" height=\"50\" data-attachment-id=\"335947\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=335947\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/image-174.png?fit=528%2C50&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"528,50\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-174\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/image-174.png?fit=528%2C50&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/image-174.png?resize=528%2C50&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-335947\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/image-174.png?w=528&amp;ssl=1 528w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/image-174.png?resize=300%2C28&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 528px) 100vw, 528px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/author\/Nick+Pope\">Nick Pope<\/a><br><\/strong>Contributor<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Numerous trade associations are asking the Supreme Court to review a lower court\u2019s decision that effectively allowed California to push electric vehicles (EVs) on the rest of the U.S.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The coalition of plaintiffs are asking the highest court in the land to take up a review of the D.C. Circuit\u2019s dismissal of a previous challenge against the Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s (EPA) approval of a California Air Resource Board (CARB) request to pursue tailpipe emissions standards that are more stringent than federal requirements. If the Supreme Court were to take the case and decide favorably for the plaintiffs, the ruling could potentially deal a serious blow to California\u2019s de facto ability to dictate emissions standards and force EVs on the rest of the country, a spokesperson for one of the involved trade associations suggested.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe are asking the Supreme Court to reverse the D.C. Circuit\u2019s erroneous holding that fuel providers lack \u2018standing\u2019 to challenge EPA\u2019s unlawful California waiver, and also to provide long overdue clarity on the authority of EPA and California to mandate electric vehicles,\u201d said Chet Thompson, AFPM\u2019s president and CEO. \u201cCalifornia is not a \u2018super state,\u2019 its Clean Air Act carveout does not give it special privileges to regulate greenhouse gas emissions standards or dictate what types of car and truck powertrains can be sold in this country. Authority of this magnitude rests with Congress.\u201d&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2024\/04\/22\/biden-admin-california-green-trains\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">(RELATED: Biden Admin Weighs California\u2019s Latest Green Gambit That Could Set Off Chain Reaction Of Economic Pain)<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-scribd wp-block-embed-scribd wp-embed-aspect-9-16 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Diamond Alternative v Environmental Protection - Petition for Writ\" class=\"scribd_iframe_embed\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/embeds\/747390366\/content\" data-aspect-ratio=\"0.7729220222793488\" scrolling=\"no\" id=\"747390366\" width=\"723\" height=\"1000\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">          (function() { var scribd = document.createElement(\"script\"); scribd.type = \"text\/javascript\"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = \"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/javascripts\/embed_code\/inject.js\"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName(\"script\")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })()        <\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/document\/747390366\/Diamond-Alternative-v-Environmental-Protection-Petition-for-Writ#from_embed\">Diamond Alternative v Envir\u2026<\/a>&nbsp;by&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/user\/679679430\/Nick-Pope#from_embed\">Nick Pope<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">California is unique in that it can apply for Clean Air Act waivers to issue vehicle emissions rules that are tighter than those of the federal government; a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/ww2.arb.ca.gov\/our-work\/programs\/advanced-clean-cars-program\/states-have-adopted-californias-vehicle-regulations\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">number<\/a>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2024\/06\/05\/virginia-california-electric-vehicle-rules\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">states<\/a>&nbsp;have voluntarily attached themselves to CARB\u2019s standards. However, as policy experts have previously&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2024\/06\/16\/biden-epa-california-carb-waiver-key-policy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">explained<\/a>&nbsp;to the Daily Caller News Foundation, this dynamic is likely to essentially force manufacturers to either produce fleets for CARB-aligned states and non-CARB states, or to simply make their entire fleets CARB-compliant despite the fact that many states do not want to adhere to CARB\u2019s policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAs a concurrent challenge of 17 States explains,&nbsp;there are serious constitutional concerns with a statute&nbsp;that allows only California to act as a junior-varsity EPA,\u201d the filing states. \u201cSimply put, the waiver and authority claimed here are key parts of a coordinated agency strategy to convert theNation from liquid-fuel-powered vehicles to electric vehicles.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Organizations involved in the litigation include the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), the Domestic Energy Producers\u2019 Alliance (DEPA), the National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) and the Energy Marketers of America (EMA). The D.C. Circuit previously dismissed an appeal seeking to block the CARB waiver on the grounds that the plaintiffs lacked standing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously rejected these challenges to clear direction by Congress, which it has repeatedly affirmed in the Clean Air Act over the past 5 decades,\u201d a spokesperson for CARB told the DCNF. \u201cThe petitioners are wrong on the facts and on the law in their challenge to sensible, achievable emission standards that the auto industry fully complies with.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The request to the Supreme Court specifically addresses the Clean Air Act waiver for CARB\u2019s \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/ww2.arb.ca.gov\/our-work\/programs\/advanced-clean-cars-program\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Advanced Clean Cars I<\/a>\u201d rules, which required manufacturers to increase EV and zero-emissions vehicle sales over time. If the Supreme Court takes the review and rules against the regulators, the decision could also have implications for CARB\u2019s \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/ww2.arb.ca.gov\/our-work\/programs\/advanced-clean-cars-program\/advanced-clean-cars-ii\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Advanced Clean Cars II<\/a>\u201d rule, which bans the sale of new gas-powered passenger vehicles in the state starting in 2035, the spokesperson for one of the organizations involved in the litigation suggested.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The EPA did not respond immediately to a request for comment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">California is unique in that it can apply for Clean Air Act waivers to issue vehicle emissions rules that are tighter than those of the federal government; a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/ww2.arb.ca.gov\/our-work\/programs\/advanced-clean-cars-program\/states-have-adopted-californias-vehicle-regulations\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">number<\/a>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2024\/06\/05\/virginia-california-electric-vehicle-rules\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">states<\/a>&nbsp;have voluntarily attached themselves to CARB\u2019s standards. However, as policy experts have previously&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2024\/06\/16\/biden-epa-california-carb-waiver-key-policy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">explained<\/a>&nbsp;to the Daily Caller News Foundation, this dynamic is likely to essentially force manufacturers to either produce fleets for CARB-aligned states and non-CARB states, or to simply make their entire fleets CARB-compliant despite the fact that many states do not want to adhere to CARB\u2019s policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAs a concurrent challenge of 17 States explains,&nbsp;there are serious constitutional concerns with a statute&nbsp;that allows only California to act as a junior-varsity EPA,\u201d the filing states. \u201cSimply put, the waiver and authority claimed here are key parts of a coordinated agency strategy to convert theNation from liquid-fuel-powered vehicles to electric vehicles.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Organizations involved in the litigation include the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), the Domestic Energy Producers\u2019 Alliance (DEPA), the National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) and the Energy Marketers of America (EMA). The D.C. Circuit previously dismissed an appeal seeking to block the CARB waiver on the grounds that the plaintiffs lacked standing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously rejected these challenges to clear direction by Congress, which it has repeatedly affirmed in the Clean Air Act over the past 5 decades,\u201d a spokesperson for CARB told the DCNF. \u201cThe petitioners are wrong on the facts and on the law in their challenge to sensible, achievable emission standards that the auto industry fully complies with.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The request to the Supreme Court specifically addresses the Clean Air Act waiver for CARB\u2019s \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/ww2.arb.ca.gov\/our-work\/programs\/advanced-clean-cars-program\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Advanced Clean Cars I<\/a>\u201d rules, which required manufacturers to increase EV and zero-emissions vehicle sales over time. If the Supreme Court takes the review and rules against the regulators, the decision could also have implications for CARB\u2019s \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/ww2.arb.ca.gov\/our-work\/programs\/advanced-clean-cars-program\/advanced-clean-cars-ii\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Advanced Clean Cars II<\/a>\u201d rule, which bans the sale of new gas-powered passenger vehicles in the state starting in 2035, the spokesperson for one of the organizations involved in the litigation suggested.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The EPA did not respond immediately to a request for comment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Numerous trade associations are asking the Supreme Court to review a lower court\u2019s decision that effectively allowed California to push electric vehicles (EVs) on the rest of the U.S.<\/p>\n<p>The coalition of plaintiffs are asking the highest court in the land to take up a review of the D.C. Circuit\u2019s dismissal of a previous challenge against the Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s (EPA) approval of a California Air Resource Board (CARB) request to pursue tailpipe emissions standards that are more stringent than federal requirements.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":335952,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818424,691829604,691821977,691821520,691818670],"class_list":["post-335946","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-clean-air-act","tag-climate-lawsuits","tag-electric-vehicles-evs","tag-environmental-protection-agencys-epa","tag-supreme-court","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Supreme-Court-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1pou","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":270382,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=270382","url_meta":{"origin":335946,"position":0},"title":"EPA\u2019s power grid assumptions are disconnected from reality","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/30\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The U.S. power grid is already straining under excess regulations, with\u00a0blackouts possible, but now the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed two more rules that promise to cause even more major problems.","rel":"","context":"In \"Blackouts\"","block_context":{"text":"Blackouts","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=blackouts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0Blackout-888.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0Blackout-888.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0Blackout-888.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0Blackout-888.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0Blackout-888.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292313,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292313","url_meta":{"origin":335946,"position":1},"title":"SCOTUS Will Hear Challenge To One Of EPA\u2019s Most Stringent Proposed Climate Regs","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/22\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court announced Wednesday it will hear challenges against one of the Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s (EPA) key regulatory proposals.","rel":"","context":"In \"Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s (EPA)\"","block_context":{"text":"Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s (EPA)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=environmental-protection-agencys-epa"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0iStock-1130974196-1024x683-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0iStock-1130974196-1024x683-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0iStock-1130974196-1024x683-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0iStock-1130974196-1024x683-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":384576,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=384576","url_meta":{"origin":335946,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court Delivers Blow To California Climate Zealots","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/24\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court sided Friday with oil companies seeking to challenge California\u2019s electric vehicle regulations.","rel":"","context":"In \"California\"","block_context":{"text":"California","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=california"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/OIG.bOmv65.joWvmIKM-1.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/OIG.bOmv65.joWvmIKM-1.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/OIG.bOmv65.joWvmIKM-1.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/OIG.bOmv65.joWvmIKM-1.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":426214,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426214","url_meta":{"origin":335946,"position":3},"title":"Trump Administration Ends Obama-Era Climate Finding, Repeals Vehicle GHG Standards","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/14\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under Administrator Lee Zeldin and alongside President Trump, finalized a major rule that revokes the 2009 Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding, a landmark Obama-era determination that greenhouse gases (GHGs) like carbon dioxide endanger public health and welfare. This finding had served\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden and Obama administrations\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden and Obama administrations","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-and-obama-administrations"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259208,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=259208","url_meta":{"origin":335946,"position":4},"title":"SCOTUS KILLS WOTUS: Enormous Setback for Obama Era EPA Power Grab","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/26\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Enormous setback for the fanatics at the EPA who would regulate ever puddle or ditch they could find.","rel":"","context":"In \"EPA\"","block_context":{"text":"EPA","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=epa"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/image-349.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/image-349.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/image-349.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/image-349.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/image-349.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293168,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=293168","url_meta":{"origin":335946,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Tremendously Damaging\u2019: Here\u2019s The Most Aggressive Restrictions Biden\u2019s EPA Pushed On Americans In 2023","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/30\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pushed several aggressive climate regulations in 2023 that could seriously harm the American economy, energy policy experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIP-2-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIP-2-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIP-2-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIP-2-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIP-2-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335946","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=335946"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335946\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":335954,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335946\/revisions\/335954"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/335952"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=335946"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=335946"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=335946"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}