{"id":334819,"date":"2024-06-27T16:47:33","date_gmt":"2024-06-27T14:47:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=334819"},"modified":"2024-06-27T16:47:36","modified_gmt":"2024-06-27T14:47:36","slug":"why-do-they-lie-about-extreme-temperature-deaths","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=334819","title":{"rendered":"Why Do They Lie About Extreme Temperature Deaths?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Guest Essay by Kip Hansen \u2014 25 June 2024 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a recent News Brief<\/a> I pointed out that the major climate alarm propaganda cabals [CCNow<\/a>, Inside Climate News<\/a>]  would be flooding the main stream media outlets all around the world with the news that in the Northern Hemisphere, where the majority of humanity lives, it is Summer and summers tend to be hot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the talking points in common usage is this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cHeat is the leading weather-related cause of mortalities in the US, outpacing deaths from hurricanes by a factor of eight to one, and this summer\u2019s record-breaking temperatures, worsened by the human-caused climate crisis, have led to fears a new annual high death toll will be set in 2023.\u201d  <\/em>[The Guardian<\/a>] <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Many mainstream media outlets are pointed to the NOAA data set \u201cWeather Related Fatality and Injury Statistics<\/a>\u201d.   And, there it is, irrefutable proof from a gold-standard source, The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration\u2019s National Weather Service, that heat kills far more than cold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Only, of course, they are not counting what you or I would<\/a> consider \u201cheat deaths\u201d and \u201ccold deaths\u201d, but something else.  (I will expand on this later on.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further, encouraged by the Climate Propaganda Cabals, news outlets rely on a report from world newspaper-of-record like The Guardian [a co-founder of the climate propaganda outlet Covering Climate Now<\/em> \u2013 CCNow<\/em>]:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Extreme temperatures kill 5 million people a year with heat-related deaths rising, study finds <\/em><\/strong>[The Guardian<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Selectively quoting from that piece is common practice, despite the fact that there is a sub-headline that reads:  \u201cMore people died of cold than heat in past 20 years but climate change is shifting the balance.\u201d  <\/em><\/strong>One has to read the piece very carefully to find that it reports on Zhao et al. 2021<\/a>, which did, in fact, find that heat related deaths were rising (as population also rises) and to discover that the gentle warming of the climate is preventing more cold deaths than the increase in heat deaths \u2014  resulting in a net reduction in extreme temperature deaths.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

More exactly:   9.43% of all deaths<\/strong> were related to non-optimum temperatures.  Of the same 5 million, 8.52% were cold-related and 0.91%  were heat-related.  Again, over 8.5 percent of deaths are cold-related and only 0.9 were heat related \u2014 that is almost 10 times as many cold-related deaths than heat related deaths. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Oh, and the shift in death?  That increase in heat-deaths?  Here I quoted the paper\u2019s Findings<\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cFrom 2000\u201303 to 2016\u201319, the global cold-related excess death ratio [defined as \u201cthe ratio between<\/em> annual excess deaths and all deaths of a year\u201d \u2013 kh] changed by \u20130\u00b751 percentage points (95% eCI \u20130\u00b761 to \u20130\u00b742) and the global heat-related excess death ratio increased by 0\u00b721 percentage points (0\u00b713\u20130\u00b731), leading to a net reduction in the overall ratio.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Aside:  There seems to be some statistical chicanery involved in reporting \u201cexcess death ratio\u201d in place of something simpler like \u201cchange in deaths per million\u201d or \u201clives saved by warmer temperatures\u201d.  What I read in this study of deaths from \u201cnon-optimal ambient temperatures\u201d (the subject of this study),  we have a comparison between half a percentage point improvement in a large number of deaths (~471,000 cold deaths) being compared to two-tenths of a percentage points worsening of a much smaller number of deaths (~45,000 heat deaths).  I could well be mistaken, there maybe some Public Health reason for doing this,  so, some smart guy or gal could sort this out for the readers in comments?]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This lying about heat and cold deaths is subject to a pretty good debunking by Joshua Cohen<\/a>  at Forbes, in his July 2023 piece Excessive Heat Can Kill, But Extreme Cold Still Causes Many More Fatalities<\/a>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[quoting below from that Forbes piece \u2013 note the author is writing about Zhao et al. 2021]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cBetween 2000 and 2019, annual deaths from heat exposure increased globally<\/a>. The 20-year period coincided with the earth warmed by about 0.9 degrees Fahrenheit. The heat-related fatalities disproportionately impacted Asia, Africa and Southern parts of Europe and North America.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cInterestingly, during the 2000-2019 period examined in the study, while heat-related deaths rose, deaths from cold exposure fell. And they decreased by a larger amount than the increase in heat-related fatalities. Overall, researchers estimated that approximately 650,000 fewer people worldwide died from temperature exposure during the 2000-2019 period than in the 1980s and 1990s.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bluntly, in the recent twenty years studied, about 650,000 lives were saved by the slow and steady warming of the climate 2000-2019.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

~ ~ ~ ~ ~<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s head back to the first point:  The NOAA and NWS (National Weather Service) graphic of \u201cWeather Fatalities\u201d.  Here again, Forbes\u2019 Joshua Cohen tries to set the record straight:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cMoreover, the two U.S. government agencies that track heat and cold deaths\u2014National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)\u2014are diametrically opposed in their estimates.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Say what?  Aren\u2019t facts, well\u2026.facts?  How can two major U.S. Federal agencies that track weather fatalities and a wider range of deaths be \u201cdiametrically opposed\u201d in numerical estimates?  I mean, dead people are pretty easy to count, they don\u2019t move around and try to hide, do they?  (Note: But, it is tricky:  see my Cause of Death<\/a> and its Follow-up<\/a>.]<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe NOAA\u2019s account of what it calls \u201cweather-related deaths\u201d suggests that during the 30-year period 1988 to 2017, an average of 134 heat-related deaths occurred annually, while 30 per year were cold-related.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cContrary to the NOAA, the CDC\u2019s National Center for Health Statistics Compressed Mortality Database<\/a>, which is based on actual death certificates, indicates that roughly twice as many people die of cold in a given year than of heat.<\/strong>\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[The link is to the CDC Database tool, it is incredibly complicated to use and it is difficult to extract the deaths by heat and cold. \u2013 However, Anna Skinner, at Newsweek, managed to dig out a figure. See Late Additions section below. \u2014 kh]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cohen offers a reasonable and possibly-right explanation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt wouldn\u2019t be the first time that organizations\u2019 estimates of what are seemingly the same observable events are so far apart. Discrepancies in definitions and assumptions around measurement underlie each organization\u2019s calculations of cold- and heat-related deaths.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll things considered, it is very likely in a given year that cold causes more deaths than heat. As the planet heats up, the number of heat exposure deaths increase and fatalities due to cold decrease. The rate of decrease in deaths owing to cold is faster than the rate of increase in deaths due to heat. And so on balance there then appear to be fewer temperature exposure deaths.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read Cohen\u2019s piece<\/a>, he wraps up hedging his bets so he can\u2019t be called a Climate Denier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Then there is the European data on heat deaths vs. cold deaths, in another 2023 Lancet paper: Excess mortality attributed to heat and cold: a health impact assessment study in 854 cities in Europe<\/a> <\/em><\/strong>and its infamous graphic.  On the left is as published<\/strong>, copied directly from the original paper, on the right, with the numerical axes equalized, courtesy of Bjorn Lomborg:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

But like I often do, Cohen wrote too soon.  He should have waited a year until Zhao et al. wrote their most recent (May 2024) paper, specifically on heat-wave deaths,  on :  \u201cGlobal, regional, and national burden of heatwave-related mortality from 1990 to 2019: A three-stage modelling study<\/a><\/em><\/strong>\u201d   Their findings are summarized in this simple statement:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cDuring 1990 to 2019 warm seasons, 153,078 deaths were associated with heatwaves (nearly half in Asia), which accounted for 0.94% of all deaths and equated 236 deaths per 10 million residents. The global heatwave-related excess death rate declined by 7.2% per decade in comparison to the 30-year average<\/strong>.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

# # # # #<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Late additions:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Judith Curry re-tweets (can\u2019t say re-Xs) Andy Revkin<\/a>, who laments the demise of journalistic integrity of The Guardian headline and story featured in this essay \u2014 here<\/a> and here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A story in Newsweek<\/a> reports that \u201cCalifornia Water Temperatures Drop to Dangerous Levels\u201d, 47.3 degrees Fahrenheit (8.5\u00b0C). Included in the piece is the statement: \u201cNational Institutes of Health data revealed that 1,330 people in the U.S. die from cold exposure every year.\u201d<\/em> And that\u2019s only direct cause of death\u2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

# # # # #<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Author\u2019s Comment:<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I know I didn\u2019t answer the question asked in the title: \u201cWhy Do They Lie about Extreme Temperature Deaths?<\/em>\u201d    I don\u2019t answer because I don\u2019t know.  There is overwhelming publicly available data and published in-depth peer-reviewed studies, published even in journals known for their pro-climate-alarmist bias, that establish that cold, low temperature,  even moderate cold<\/a>, kills far many more people than high temperature. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is true in the United States, in the United Kingdom, Europe and the world in general. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But, rank propaganda is based on the simple process of repeating the same lie over and over and over until it is accepted as truth<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here are the links for use in defeating this lie:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Zhao et al. [2021]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Zhao et al. [2024]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Joshua Cohen in Forbes<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Masselot et al. 2023 (European deaths)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thanks for reading.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

# # # # #<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a recent News Brief I pointed out that the major climate alarm propaganda cabals [CCNow, Inside Climate News] would be flooding the main stream media outlets all around the world with the news that in the Northern Hemisphere, where the majority of humanity lives, it is Summer and summers tend to be hot.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":334824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691829422,691829420,691821107,691829421],"class_list":["post-334819","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-cold-deaths","tag-extreme-temperature-deaths","tag-heat-deaths","tag-main-stream-media","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0-Why-Do-They-Lie.jpeg?fit=1910%2C1000&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1p6j","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":277477,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=277477","url_meta":{"origin":334819,"position":0},"title":"Why Your Local Newspaper and TV Station Get Climate Facts Wrong","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Besides, even using the scientifically (technically) suspect present-day measures of tropospheric warming, such as all the Global Average Surface Temperature metrics, \u00a0Earth is\u00a0not overheating. In fact, the global average surface temperature for 2022 was 1.90 \u02daF (1.06 \u02daC) warmer than the pre-industrial period (1880-1900). [\u00a0climate.gov\u00a0] The pre-industrial average temperature was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0yTTaXqVEGkU.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0yTTaXqVEGkU.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0yTTaXqVEGkU.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0yTTaXqVEGkU.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0yTTaXqVEGkU.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333482,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=333482","url_meta":{"origin":334819,"position":1},"title":"Climate Propaganda Cabals Ramp Up the Heat for Summer","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/21\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Covering Climate Now [CCNow], the Columbia University-based climate propaganda outfit, which claims the ability to reach over 2 billion people worldwide with its ready-to-use, ready-to-share and content-directed climate alarm stories, is ramping up and issuing directives to climate journalists around the world.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarm stories\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarm stories","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarm-stories"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0heatwave-illo.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0heatwave-illo.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0heatwave-illo.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0heatwave-illo.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0heatwave-illo.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273372,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=273372","url_meta":{"origin":334819,"position":2},"title":"EM-DAT:\u00a0 The International Disaster Database","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/14\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Note that Deaths are often not\u00a0fully\u00a0reported for months and even years after a major event, thus the EM-DAT data on deaths lags by a year or so. Data before 2000 is unreliable for exact numbers, especially for smaller disasters, but for major events killing thousands, can be considered comparable for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate propaganda\"","block_context":{"text":"climate propaganda","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-propaganda"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0slide3-l.jpg?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0slide3-l.jpg?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0slide3-l.jpg?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0slide3-l.jpg?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":432974,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=432974","url_meta":{"origin":334819,"position":3},"title":"The \u201cSpiral of Silence\u201d is Concealing Majority Support for Climate Action","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/21\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s not that nobody cares, its just people worried about the imminent end of the world are too shy to speak up.","rel":"","context":"In \"Big Oil\"","block_context":{"text":"Big Oil","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=big-oil"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-The-Spiral-of-Silence-is-Concealing-Majority-Support-for-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-The-Spiral-of-Silence-is-Concealing-Majority-Support-for-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-The-Spiral-of-Silence-is-Concealing-Majority-Support-for-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-The-Spiral-of-Silence-is-Concealing-Majority-Support-for-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259246,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=259246","url_meta":{"origin":334819,"position":4},"title":"Talk for\u00a0Tom A Nelson podcast, 24 May\u00a02023","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/26\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"I appreciate that Australia\u2019s not the centre of world affairs, but keep in mind that more than 60 Australian scientists helped write the latest IPCC report.","rel":"","context":"In \"Australia\"","block_context":{"text":"Australia","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=australia"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-26-182426.png?fit=895%2C506&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-26-182426.png?fit=895%2C506&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-26-182426.png?fit=895%2C506&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-26-182426.png?fit=895%2C506&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347777,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=347777","url_meta":{"origin":334819,"position":5},"title":"Covering Climate Now","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/20\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"They were set up to influence journalism worldwide, in order to push the alarmist agenda","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0ccnow-windmill-1536x590-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C461&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0ccnow-windmill-1536x590-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C461&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0ccnow-windmill-1536x590-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C461&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0ccnow-windmill-1536x590-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C461&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0ccnow-windmill-1536x590-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C461&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334819","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=334819"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334819\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":334825,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334819\/revisions\/334825"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/334824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=334819"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=334819"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=334819"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}