{"id":332647,"date":"2024-06-12T10:11:30","date_gmt":"2024-06-12T08:11:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=332647"},"modified":"2024-06-12T10:11:33","modified_gmt":"2024-06-12T08:11:33","slug":"nuclear-power-risk-australia-is-already-part-of-the-nuclear-age","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=332647","title":{"rendered":"Nuclear Power Risk? Australia is Already Part of the Nuclear Age"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Essay by Eric Worrall<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both hotels were near nuclear medicine facilities. The first hotel (peak 0.14 \u00b5Sv \/ hour) was a holiday rental in an apartment complex where lots of doctors live. The second was a popular hotel just over the road from a major Brisbane tourist attraction. Neither pose a risk to health.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The following is a fun video I captured at the first hotel, on the Queensland Sunshine Coast. The detector is sitting on a plastic coffee table in front of the sofa inside the hotel room. All the windows were closed. 12+ counts per second produces an impressive radiation detector video<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite the impressive looking count rate in the video above, none of the radiation levels I measured are anywhere near to being a health hazard. Oregon State University gives the maximum safe exposure level as 0.02 mSV \/ hour<\/a> \u2013 over 140x the maximum level I measured in those hotels. There are plenty of inhabited places where the natural radiation level is higher<\/a> than what I measured in those hotel rooms (using a Radiocode Scintillometer<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The following is from a month ago, but as the nuclear debate just flared up again in Australia<\/a>, I thought it worth mentioning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE FOR AUSTRALIA \u2013 AND NEVER WILL BE<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

10.05.24 BY CLIMATE COUNCIL<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The prospect of nuclear power in Australia has been a topic of public debate since the 1950s. While Australia has never had a nuclear power station, we do have 33% of the world\u2019s uranium deposits and we are the world\u2019s third largest producer of it. Periodically, as with the changing of the seasons, various individuals appear in the media singing the virtues of nuclear energy \u2013 claiming it is the only option for clean and reliable electricity in Australia.

<\/strong>In fact, over one third of Australia\u2019s electricity is already powered by renewables, and new initiatives like the Capacity Investment Scheme are set to push us towards 82% renewable energy by the end of this decade. While the move to clean energy is still not happening fast enough, it is underway and starting to speed up. We do not need distractions like nuclear to derail our progress now, so let\u2019s set the record straight.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Nuclear power poses significant community, environmental, health and economic risks.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Radiation from major nuclear disasters, such as Chernobyl in 1986 and Fukushima in 2011, have impacted hundreds of thousands of people and contaminated vast areas that take decades to clean up. Even when a nuclear power station operates as intended, it creates a long-term and prohibitively expensive legacy of site remediation, fuel processing and radioactive waste storage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. Nuclear power is not renewable, and it is not safe.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Uranium is a finite resource just like coal, oil and gas. It needs to be mined and, just like mining coal, oil and gas, this carries serious safety concerns, including contaminating the environment with radioactive dust, radon gas, water-borne toxins, and increased levels of background radiation.<\/a> On the other hand, energy generated from the sun and wind releases no pollutants into the air and is overwhelmingly considered to be safe.<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026Read more:\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.climatecouncil.org.au\/nuclear-power-stations-are-not-appropriate-for-australia-and-probably-never-will-be\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Critics are right that you can\u2019t have nuclear power without a slight increase in radiation. My point is we already have non-health threatening radiation hotspots scattered around Australian cities<\/strong>, Australia is already part of the nuclear age.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The slight radiation hotspots I measured in those hotels, they could have been nuclear medicine<\/a> patients staying at the hotels, shedding a few radioactive skin cells, or mildly irradiating the plumbing system when they use the bathroom. It could just be the granite facing on the local buildings, contributing a completely natural boost to local background radiation. Or it could be the soil in those locations happened to contain a little more natural radiation than the surrounding areas, the adjacency to the medical facilities could have all been a big coincidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I didn\u2019t deliberately book hotels next to nuclear radiation medical facilities \u2013 the hotels just happened to be convenient for the events I was attending. I only noticed the medical facilities after I started trying to figure out why the radiation levels in the hotels were slightly higher than the background level I measured a few miles away.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I did walk inside one of the facilities, see if it got any hotter when I got closer, but I didn\u2019t see any identifiable gradient \u2013 the radiation actually dropped a little when I walked inside the facility. So whatever it was, it was well dispersed. But the radiation did drop away significantly after I travelled more than a mile from the facilities \u2013 so while my evidence is far from conclusive, in my mind it still seems possible that nuclear medicine was the source of the slight uptick in radiation in the places I stayed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is a big difference between a slight uptick in background count, and a globally significant nuclear catastrophe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The other kind of radiation leak, the kind of leak which forces people to abandon their homes, modern reactors have containment buildings<\/a> which keep all the problems inside the plant. The only time I ever heard of this failing was Fukushima, but Fukushima\u2019s plant clearly wasn\u2019t pressure resistant the way modern US style containment buildings are. Chernobyl didn\u2019t have a proper containment building \u2013 which is why they had to build the \u201csarcophagus\u201d<\/a> after the Chernobyl reactor blew its top.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Australia does not have fault zones capable of producing a Fukushima scale Earthquake disaster. Nuclear power, with a proper pressure tested containment facility, is as close to completely safe as anything can be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My main objection to Aussie opposition leader Peter Dutton\u2019s nuclear programme plan<\/a> is I don\u2019t think the proposal on the table makes economic sense. Australia has vast quantities of coal \u2013 we should keep burning cheap coal to keep power bills down. And Dutton\u2019s plan for siting nuclear plants on top of coal seams potentially endangers the value of those coal resources, if a low level release ever makes its way into the coal bed. I do not have any problem with nuclear itself.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

My family stayed in those hotels with me, so I was completely at ease with the safety issue. My kid thought the expression on mum\u2019s face was hilarious when I showed my wife the Scintillometer<\/a> buzzing away on the table, like a scene from the TV series \u201cChernobyl\u201d<\/a>, but everything was fine after I reassured my wife, and presented the yummy chocolate bar I\u2019d been saving for marital emergencies. After the initial surprise, and showing everyone a few radiation hazard sheets, it was all a big joke \u2013 a funny Facebook post which got a few more \u201cwows\u201d than normal from my friends.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The small spike which I labelled \u201cBig solar flare\u201d was a gamma ray spike pretty much everyone on Earth likely experienced during the spectacular Auroras many of us saw a month ago<\/a>. I\u2019m too close to the Equator to experience the full effects of interesting space weather \u2013 near the equator the atmosphere is thicker, and the topography of the Earth\u2019s magnetic field provides more effective shielding. But if anyone was playing with a radiation detector in Antarctica, Southern Chile or Northern Canada, Scandinavia, Greenland, Siberia or Alaska during the big aurora event, I\u2019d love to know what the measured gamma ray excursion was during the solar flare. And if following your high latitude aurora gamma ray exposure you turn green, grow huge muscles, and become one of my favourite superheroes, more power to you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Update(EW): MarkW<\/a> pointed out coal fly ash is quite radioactive. Radioactive Fly ash is used as a concrete filler to improve the durability of the concrete<\/strong>, so radioactive concrete might be the explanation for the radiation anomaly I detected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.fhwa.dot.gov\/pavement\/recycling\/fach03.cfm<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Both hotels were near nuclear medicine facilities. The first hotel (peak 0.14 \u00b5Sv \/ hour) was a holiday rental in an apartment complex where lots of doctors live. The second was a popular hotel just over the road from a major Brisbane tourist attraction. Neither pose a risk to health.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":332650,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818216,691829161,691818206],"class_list":{"0":"post-332647","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-australia","9":"tag-nuclear-medicine","10":"tag-nuclear-power","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0Nuclear-Power-Plant-at-night-ratio-2.jpg?fit=1999%2C1138&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1oxh","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":224220,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=224220","url_meta":{"origin":332647,"position":0},"title":"No Brainer: Safe & Affordable Nuclear Power Provides Perfect Pathway to Clean Energy Future","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/17\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The renewable energy debacle in Germany means that it won\u2019t axe its nuclear plants and is likely to start building more of them, like their French neighbours.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020.webp?fit=1024%2C545&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020.webp?fit=1024%2C545&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020.webp?fit=1024%2C545&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020.webp?fit=1024%2C545&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292183,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292183","url_meta":{"origin":332647,"position":1},"title":"Time to Bring Nuclear Energy Into the 21st Century","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/21\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"There is no question that these proposed reforms are a major departure from the status quo, but they are reasonable, not radical. They would foster good governance and economic progress in the industry. As COP28 representatives discuss how to reduce carbon while raising global living standards, nuclear energy should be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act\"","block_context":{"text":"1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=1982-nuclear-waste-policy-act"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2fd4d8bc5e545a7c41ae93fe88a4abde.jpeg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2fd4d8bc5e545a7c41ae93fe88a4abde.jpeg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2fd4d8bc5e545a7c41ae93fe88a4abde.jpeg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2fd4d8bc5e545a7c41ae93fe88a4abde.jpeg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2fd4d8bc5e545a7c41ae93fe88a4abde.jpeg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291727,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=291727","url_meta":{"origin":332647,"position":2},"title":"Time to Bring Nuclear Energy Into the 21st Century","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/18\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The silver lining of this month\u2019s United Nations COP28 global warming conference is the\u00a0growing consensus that nuclear energy\u00a0is critical to meeting national carbon dioxide reduction goals.","rel":"","context":"In \"COP28\"","block_context":{"text":"COP28","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=cop28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Nuclear-Power-Plant-at-night-ratio-2-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Nuclear-Power-Plant-at-night-ratio-2-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Nuclear-Power-Plant-at-night-ratio-2-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Nuclear-Power-Plant-at-night-ratio-2-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Nuclear-Power-Plant-at-night-ratio-2-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287377,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=287377","url_meta":{"origin":332647,"position":3},"title":"New paper reveals sorry state of GB\u00a0nuclear","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The UK Government\u2019s commitment to nuclear power has strengthened significantly in recent years as concerns over energy security have risen, due to the uncertainty created by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and a growing realisation of the risks posed by a reliance on renewable generation. Nuclear power has no carbon\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Great British Nuclear\"","block_context":{"text":"Great British Nuclear","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=great-british-nuclear"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0SMR-Model-1-scaled-e1661789959351.webp?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0SMR-Model-1-scaled-e1661789959351.webp?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0SMR-Model-1-scaled-e1661789959351.webp?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0SMR-Model-1-scaled-e1661789959351.webp?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0SMR-Model-1-scaled-e1661789959351.webp?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209764,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=209764","url_meta":{"origin":332647,"position":4},"title":"French Method: China & Japan Follow French Lead on Nuclear Power Generation Renaissance","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/23\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Nuclear power generation is back with a vengeance for two reasons: the evident nonsense of relying upon sunshine and breezes for reliable power; and the political desire to reduce carbon oxide gas emissions. True it is that even Germany\u2019s Greens have dropped their CO2 emission reduction ambitions, but here in\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0d2410dc7e2412f3799e80c9efc5c3dfe.jpg?fit=1123%2C877&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0d2410dc7e2412f3799e80c9efc5c3dfe.jpg?fit=1123%2C877&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0d2410dc7e2412f3799e80c9efc5c3dfe.jpg?fit=1123%2C877&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0d2410dc7e2412f3799e80c9efc5c3dfe.jpg?fit=1123%2C877&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0d2410dc7e2412f3799e80c9efc5c3dfe.jpg?fit=1123%2C877&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279019,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=279019","url_meta":{"origin":332647,"position":5},"title":"Simply Irresistible: Why Plugging Into Small Modular Reactors Makes Perfect Sense","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/16\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Listen to the wind and sun cult and you\u2019d think that Small Modular Nuclear Reactors are a work of far-fetched Science Fiction. The reality is that some 200 small nuclear reactors are presently powering\u00a0160 ships and submarines\u00a0all around the world, and have been for decades.","rel":"","context":"In \"Australia\"","block_context":{"text":"Australia","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=australia"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020-1.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020-1.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020-1.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020-1.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020-1.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332647","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=332647"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332647\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":332651,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332647\/revisions\/332651"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/332650"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=332647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=332647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=332647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}