{"id":332218,"date":"2024-06-09T10:56:02","date_gmt":"2024-06-09T08:56:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=332218"},"modified":"2024-06-09T10:56:05","modified_gmt":"2024-06-09T08:56:05","slug":"the-climate-emergency-is-a-myth-says-nobel-prize-winner-john-clauser-heres-why-hes-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=332218","title":{"rendered":"The \u2018Climate Emergency\u2019 is a Myth, Says Nobel Prize Winner John Clauser. Here\u2019s Why He\u2019s Right"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From The Daily Sceptic<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

BY\u00a0DR RUDOLPH KALVEKS<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a recent lecture, Nobel Laureate physicist John Clauser exposed how the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) models and analyses, which are relied upon by politicians and activists to support claims of a \u2018climate crisis\u2019, do not meet basic standards of scientific enquiry. Clauser received his Nobel prize in 2022 for the observational measurement of quantum entanglement and understands well the problem of distinguishing a physical signal from background noise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Clauser shows that, when corrected for the IPCC\u2019s error prone arithmetic and statistics, the observational data do not support the power imbalance claimed to be responsible for global warming. Furthermore, the outputs of climate models are at variance with the observational record. Clauser discusses the roles of convection, clouds and their variability in providing a negative feedback mechanism, and proposes that this acts as a thermostat that stabilises surface temperatures. Clauser\u2019s conclusion is that claims of a \u2018climate crisis\u2019 lack scientific substance and that Net Zero policies are an unnecessary hindrance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the global mean energy budget of the Earth. Numbers indicate best estimates for the magnitudes of the globally averaged energy balance components, together with their uncertainty ranges (5%-95% confidence), representing climate conditions at the beginning of the 21st Century. Note that amounts are expressed in terms of power flux (Watts per square metre or W\/m2<\/sup>), which equals energy per second per unit area (Joules\/s\/m2<\/sup>). (Source: IPCC AR6 WG 1 report p.934)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Clauser\u2019s talk is available on\u00a0YouTube<\/a>. However, there is merit in reviewing the physics arguments that draw on the observational data about atmospheric energy flows to refute the notion of an anthropogenic global warming (AGW) induced climate crisis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n