{"id":332013,"date":"2024-06-07T09:50:53","date_gmt":"2024-06-07T07:50:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=332013"},"modified":"2024-06-07T09:50:56","modified_gmt":"2024-06-07T07:50:56","slug":"industrial-wind-power-a-depleting-resource","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=332013","title":{"rendered":"Industrial Wind Power: A Depleting Resource?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Master Resource<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Robert Bradley Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cGetting wind projects built is getting a lot harder. The low-hanging fruit, the easier access places are gone.\u201d (Sandhya Ganapathy, EDP Renewables North America, quoted below)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The New York Times<\/em> article, \u201cAs Solar Power Surges, U.S. Wind Is in Trouble<\/a>\u201d (June 4, 2024), discussed the problems of wind problems, such as site depletion. But the article has nary a quotation, much less mention, from the legion of critics of the aged, doomed technology for economical, reliable grid power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In order of appearance, the seven chosen by authors Brad Plumer and Nadja Popovich were:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Trevor Houser, Rhodium Group; Sandhya Ganapathy, EDP Renewables North America; Matthew Eisenson, Columbia University; Ben Haley, Evolved Energy Research; Michael Thomas, energy writer; John Hensley, American Clean Power Association; Ryan Jones, Evolved Energy Research.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Where were the real critics on industrial wind\u2019s cost, aesthetics, health, and ecological issues? Conspicuously missing was Robert Bryce, whose renewable rejection database<\/a> bank lists nearly 700 delayed or cancelled wind and solar projects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why not include a perspective from an energy specialist at the Competitive Enterprise Institute or the Institute for Energy Research? Cato\u2019s Travis Fisher?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the grassroots level, why not interview Lisa Linowes, Kevon Martis, or Sherri Lang? What about the North American Platform Against Windpower<\/a> or National Wind Watch<\/a>. Pick just one of fifty wind-opposed organizations that represent grassroots environmentalism, not Big Green. [1]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article talks about cost inflation, but what is the all-in cost of wind and solar versus power generated by a natural gas combined cycle plant? How much is the government subsidy? What are the costs of offshore wind versus onshore? Tell us about the avian mortality problem and the infrasound issue of ill-sited, in-service wind turbines? And what are wind subsidies adding to the federal budget deficit and need to inflate the money supply to pay for it (wind counterfeiting?)?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The gist of the article is that wind is great and Net Zero inviolate\u2013but the industry has run into various issues that have shifted the (government-enabled) energy \u201ctransition\u201d to solar and batteries. More government is needed, the article implies, such as building out (uneconomic) transmission. \u201c\u2026 a growing backlash against new projects in many communities\u201d is mentioned almost as an aside.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some quotations from the article follow:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The country is now adding less wind capacity each year than before the [Inflation Reduction Act] was passed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some factors behind the wind industry\u2019s recent slowdown may be temporary, such as snarled supply chains. But wind power is also more vulnerable than solar power to many of the biggest logistical hurdles that hinder energy projects today: a lack of transmission lines, a lengthy permitting process and a growing backlash against new projects in many communities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If wind power continues to stagnate, that could make the fight against global warming much harder\u2026. A boom in solar power alone, which runs only in daytime, isn\u2019t enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026 wind power is much more sensitive to location. Wind turbines in a gusty area can generate eight times as much electricity<\/a> as turbines in an area with just half the breeze\u2026. That means developers can\u2019t just build wind farms anywhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the United States, the best places for wind tend to be in the blustery Midwest and Great Plains. But many areas are now crowded with turbines and existing electric grids are clogged<\/a>, making it difficult to add more projects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cGetting wind projects built is getting a lot harder,\u201d said Sandhya Ganapathy, chief executive of EDP Renewables North America, a leading wind and solar developer. \u201cThe low-hanging fruit, the easier access places are gone.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because they can reach the height of skyscrapers, wind turbines are more noticeable than solar farms and often attract more intense opposition from local communities. In Idaho, the entire <\/a>State Legislature<\/a> has opposed<\/a> a new wind farm that would be visible from a World War II historic site. A few years ago, hundreds of residents were arrested<\/a> on Oahu, Hawaii, for blocking the construction of a relatively small wind project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Across the country, hundreds of local governments have restricted or banned<\/a> wind or solar projects. If a county blocks a solar array, a developer might be able to move next door. But it\u2019s not always as easy to find a new location for wind farms. [Where is Robert Bryce?]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wind turbines are more visible than solar farms and often attract more intense opposition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The wind industry has also been hampered by soaring equipment costs<\/a> after the pandemic wrecked supply chains and inflation spiked. The cost increases have been devastating for offshore wind projects in the Northeast, where developers have canceled more than half the projects<\/a> they planned to build this decade.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wind isn\u2019t languishing only in the United States. While a record 117 gigawatts of new wind capacity came online last year globally, virtually all of that growth was in China<\/a>. In the rest of the world, developers weren\u2019t installing wind turbines any faster than they were in 2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If wind power can\u2019t expand as quickly as many proponents hope, the United States would need to rely much more heavily on other technologies that can supply carbon-free power throughout the day, such as new nuclear reactors<\/a> or advanced geothermal power<\/a>. But those technologies are still in earlier stages of development and are currently more expensive than wind. [Early stages of development? Just the opposite]<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026some experts argue that the recent slowdown is only a temporary artifact of tax policy. It can take years to develop a wind farm and most companies had raced to finish projects by the end of 2021, which is when the last big federal tax credit for wind power was set to expire<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Many experts say federal legislation is still needed to ease the process of building high-voltage transmission lines. But that\u2019s unlikely to happen in a sharply divided Congress.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Final Comment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Little doubt that authors authors Brad Plumer and Nadja Popovich are under pressure from the New York Times nation to put wind power in the best light possible, while gingerly pointing out its problems. But the fact is that dilute, intermittent, land\/seascape intensive industry wind turbines are bad economics and bad ecology. But the narrative must not be shaken too much, particularly in an election year when \u201cthe earth hangs in the balance.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[1] <\/strong>Allegheny Treasures<\/a>, Keyser, W. Va.; Allegheny Front Alliance, W. Va. & Md.; Allegheny Highlands Alliance<\/a>, W. Va., Va., Pa., Md., & N. Car.; Altamont Landowners Against Rural Mismanagement, Calif.; Aspen\u2019s Horse Ranch Preserve, Cle Elum, Wash.; Barbara Durkin, Mass.; Better Plan, Wisconsin<\/a>; Calhan Wind Fraud, Colo.; Canyon Country Coalition for Responsible Renewable Energy, Ariz.; Citizens Against Wind Turbines in Lake Erie (CAWTILE)<\/a>, N. Y.; Citizens for Clear Skies<\/a>, Ohio; Coalici\u00f3n Pro Bosque Seco Ventanas Verraco<\/a>, Guayanilla, P. R.; Coalition for the Preservation of the Golden Crescent and 1000 Islands Region, N.Y.; Coalition for Rural Property Rights<\/a>, Iowa; Concerned Citizens of Branch County<\/a>, Mich.; Concerned Residents of Hammond, N.Y.; Columbia Gorge Audubon Society, Wash. & Ore.; Cumberland Mountain Preservation Coalition, Tenn.; Deepwater Resistance, R.I.; El Paso County Property Rights Coalition<\/a>, Colo.; Flying M Ranch, Ellensburg, Wash.; Forest Ecology Network<\/a>, Me.; Friends of Beautiful Pendleton County, W. Va.; Friends of Lincoln Lakes, Me.; Friends of Maine\u2019s Mountains<\/a>; Great Lakes Concerned Citizens, N.Y.; Great Lakes Wind Truth<\/a>; Greenwich Neighbors United, Ohio; Health Care Professionals Against Commercial Wind in the Appalachian Mountains<\/a>; The Heart of Henderson, N.Y.; Helderberg Community Watch, N.Y.; Howard County Citizens for Safe Energy, Ind.; Ill Wind, R.I.; Industrial Wind Energy Opposition (AWEO)<\/a>; Indiana Wind Watch; Kansas Wind Alert; Kent Conservation and Preservation Alliance<\/a>, Kent County, Md.; Keepers of the Blue Ridge<\/a>, N. Car.; Know Wind Organization, Ubly, Mich.; Lake Michigan P.O.W.E.R. Coalition, Pentwater, Mich.; Lower Laguna Madre Foundation, Texas; Laurel Mountain Preservation Association, W. Va.; Lucien Rosenbloom<\/a>, N. Car.; Lynn Studebaker, Ind.; Mountain Ridge Protection Act Alliance, N.Car.; National Wind Watch<\/a>; Neighbors Caring About Neighbors, Wis.; New England Wind Turbine Education Center<\/a>, Vt.; No Union Beach Wind Turbine!<\/em>, N.J.; No Wind Farm, New Castle, Ind.; Open Water, West Olive, Mich.; Partnership for the Preservation of the Downeast Lakes Watershed, Me.; People Against the Lake Michigan Wind Farm<\/a>, Mich.; People\u2019s Task Force on Wind Power, Me.; Porter Quarter Horses<\/a>, King City, Mo.; Preserve the Sandhills<\/a>, Neb.; Protect Our Lakes, Me.; Saint Francis Arboreal and Wildlife Association, Fla.; Save God\u2019s Country, Pa.; Save Coteau Prairie Landscape, N. Dak.; Save Our Allegheny Ridges<\/a>, Pa.; Save Our Seashore, Mass.; Save Our Sherman, Mich.; Save Our Tehachapi Mountains<\/a>, Calif.; Save Western Ohio; Save the Prairie, Woodward, Okla.; Savoy Neighbors, Mass.; Selman Ranch<\/a>, Okla.; Seneca Anti-Wind Union<\/a>, Ohio; Stearns Wind Truth, Minn.; Stop Ill Wind, Md.; Swanton Wind<\/a>, Vt.; Vermonters With Vision<\/a>; Whitley County Concerned Citizens, Ind.; Wind Energy \u2013 Concerns About Rural Environment (WE-CARE), N. Dak.; Wind Energy Is a Scam!<\/em>, Wis.; Wind Power Ethics Group, Cape Vincent, N.Y.; Wind Turbine Syndrome<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The New York Times article, \u201cAs Solar Power Surges, U.S. Wind Is in Trouble\u201d (June 4, 2024), discussed the problems of wind problems, such as site depletion. But the article has nary a quotation, much less mention, from the legion of critics of the aged, doomed technology for economical, reliable grid power.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":332015,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691829043,691829042,691820260],"class_list":{"0":"post-332013","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-grid-power","9":"tag-industrial-wind-power","10":"tag-robert-bryce","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/zScreenshot-2023-11-03-111148-1024x611-2.webp?fit=1024%2C611&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1on3","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":365625,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=365625","url_meta":{"origin":332013,"position":0},"title":"Wind Blowing Somewhere Does Not Solve the Intermittency Problem","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/02\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In October 2023 an\u00a0article of mine\u00a0was published here that addressed the wind is always blowing somewhere fallacy used by green energy proponents to argue that large amounts of storage and any new dispatchable emissions-free resources are not necessary in a future electric system that relies on wind and solar generating\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Electric Grid Monitor\"","block_context":{"text":"Electric Grid Monitor","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=electric-grid-monitor"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0Solar-panels-in-the-rain-cloudy-1280px-shutterstock-153683459.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0Solar-panels-in-the-rain-cloudy-1280px-shutterstock-153683459.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0Solar-panels-in-the-rain-cloudy-1280px-shutterstock-153683459.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0Solar-panels-in-the-rain-cloudy-1280px-shutterstock-153683459.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0Solar-panels-in-the-rain-cloudy-1280px-shutterstock-153683459.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277453,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=277453","url_meta":{"origin":332013,"position":1},"title":"U.S. Grid Wind Power: Free Market Failure (1940-45)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/09\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The quest to make electricity from wind attracted entrepreneurs well before government mandates and subsidies got involved in the 1970s. As grid power, wind turbines were\u00a0concept-proven in the 1880s\u00a0(as were\u00a0solar panels).","rel":"","context":"In \"Federal Power Commission (now FERC)\"","block_context":{"text":"Federal Power Commission (now FERC)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=federal-power-commission-now-ferc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00Screenshot-2023-09-06-121128.png?fit=835%2C862&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00Screenshot-2023-09-06-121128.png?fit=835%2C862&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00Screenshot-2023-09-06-121128.png?fit=835%2C862&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00Screenshot-2023-09-06-121128.png?fit=835%2C862&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278699,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=278699","url_meta":{"origin":332013,"position":2},"title":"Grid Wind Power: More Pre-history (1979 DOE bust)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"14\/09\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cI was in Boone, North Carolina, from 1977 through May 1983 at Appalachian State and, trust me, we got many laughs out of this windmill.\u00a0Especially how it generated one MW of reliable electricity and, somehow, did so without the blades ever turning.\u201d\u00a0 \u00a0\u2013 Victor Culpepper","rel":"","context":"In \"Grid Wind Power\"","block_context":{"text":"Grid Wind Power","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=grid-wind-power"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1067200.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1067200.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1067200.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1067200.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1067200.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285066,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=285066","url_meta":{"origin":332013,"position":3},"title":"The Wind is Always Blowing Somewhere Fallacy","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"25\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Scene off Norfolk coast ** Note: Slight graininess, best at smaller sizes New York has set a goal for its electricity to be 70% powered by clean energy by 2030. This latest investment means the state is going to beat that goal because it will have enough operating, contracted, and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"New York\"","block_context":{"text":"New York","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=new-york"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/00fb45893d788216aa001fda50ebd4f20.webp?fit=1200%2C778&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/00fb45893d788216aa001fda50ebd4f20.webp?fit=1200%2C778&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/00fb45893d788216aa001fda50ebd4f20.webp?fit=1200%2C778&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/00fb45893d788216aa001fda50ebd4f20.webp?fit=1200%2C778&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/00fb45893d788216aa001fda50ebd4f20.webp?fit=1200%2C778&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":231378,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=231378","url_meta":{"origin":332013,"position":4},"title":"All At Sea: America\u2019s Offshore Wind Industry Cans Projects Deemed No Longer Viable","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/11\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Offshore wind power outfits are struggling to get their projects off the ground, notwithstanding the massive subsidies they\u2019ve been able to gouge out of America\u2019s taxpayers.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/image-961.png?fit=1200%2C796&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/image-961.png?fit=1200%2C796&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/image-961.png?fit=1200%2C796&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/image-961.png?fit=1200%2C796&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/image-961.png?fit=1200%2C796&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211778,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=211778","url_meta":{"origin":332013,"position":5},"title":"Excusing Wind in Texas? (ICN in spin mode)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Robert Bradley Jr.\u00a0 \u201cOn Monday, wind was functioning at 8 percent, which is not unheard of,\u201d so it was weird to be called out in the press release, because it\u2019s something that we know happens so we should be ready for that sort of thing.\u201d \u2013 Joshua Rhodes, Webber\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/0Wind_Solar_24956215852_5ca6c01d93_o_AquaMechanicalFlickr.jpg?fit=1200%2C884&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/0Wind_Solar_24956215852_5ca6c01d93_o_AquaMechanicalFlickr.jpg?fit=1200%2C884&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/0Wind_Solar_24956215852_5ca6c01d93_o_AquaMechanicalFlickr.jpg?fit=1200%2C884&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/0Wind_Solar_24956215852_5ca6c01d93_o_AquaMechanicalFlickr.jpg?fit=1200%2C884&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/0Wind_Solar_24956215852_5ca6c01d93_o_AquaMechanicalFlickr.jpg?fit=1200%2C884&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=332013"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332013\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":332017,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332013\/revisions\/332017"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/332015"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=332013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=332013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=332013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}