{"id":331451,"date":"2024-06-04T09:09:38","date_gmt":"2024-06-04T07:09:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=331451"},"modified":"2024-06-04T09:09:40","modified_gmt":"2024-06-04T07:09:40","slug":"all-of-the-above-bad-energy-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=331451","title":{"rendered":"\u201cAll of the Above\u201d \u2014 Bad Energy Policy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Bad Energy Policy – Master Resource<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0<\/em>John Droz, Jr.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cA key problem with the \u2018All of the Above\u2019 policy is that it purposefully bypasses the scientific assessment part. Why? Because lobbyists are acutely aware that their clients\u2019 energy products will fail<\/em> such an evaluation.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The fundamental fight over enacting effective energy policies is between lobbyists<\/strong> and the public<\/strong>. A parallel perspective is that it is a contest between real Science<\/strong> and political science<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists<\/em> are paid to represent their clients\u2019 economic interests or political agendas. The public<\/em> consists of citizens, businesses, and the military.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists are professionals who spend most of their time soliciting legislators on their client\u2019s behalf. (See the The Wolves of K Street: The Secret History of How Big Money Took Over Big Government<\/a>). The obvious question is: Who is balancing out this one-sided influence by competently and aggressively representing the public\u2019s <\/strong>interests on energy policies (and other important issues)<\/em>?  The unfortunate answer is almost no one<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The result of this striking imbalance is that most energy policies are essentially written by lobbyists \u2014 which means they are permeated with benefits for their clients, and then conveyed with carefully orchestrated marketing propaganda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To keep their control, lobbyists full well know that they must maintain the impression<\/em> that their self-serving policies are actually in the public interest \u2014 so they leave no stone unturned to creatively maintain that illusion<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite lobbyists\u2019 carefully massaged messages, it is totally accidental if any<\/em> parts of their policies actually happen to be advantageous to the public. A classic example of this is the well-known \u201cAll of the Above\u201d energy mantra. This is saying that ALL energy sources should not only be allowed on the Grid but should also be supported. On the surface (especially to non-technical parties) it sounds reasonable, as who wouldn\u2019t be in favor of investigating alternative energy options?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, allowing an energy source on the Grid is a privilege<\/strong>, not an entitlement! Sound energy policies (i.e., those that would actually benefit the public) would ensure that the only<\/strong> energy alternatives that are permitted on the Grid would be those that have scientific proof that they are a net<\/strong><\/em> societal benefit<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Phrased another way, that would mean the only<\/em> alternative energy sources that should be approved and supported are those that are: a)<\/strong> reliable, b)<\/strong> low cost, and <\/em>c)<\/strong> environmentally friendly. [Note: Wind and solar are none of these!<\/strong><\/em>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How do we do that?<\/em> Well, it\u2019s certainly not<\/em> by taking a salesperson\u2019s (lobbyist\u2019s) word about their product! We assess the real qualifications of proposed alternative energy sources by conducting a scientific assessment<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A key problem with the \u201cAll of the Above\u201d policy is that it purposefully<\/strong><\/em> bypasses<\/strong><\/em> the scientific assessment part\u2026  Why?  Because lobbyists are acutely aware that their clients\u2019 energy products will fail<\/strong><\/em> such an evaluation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To avoid that expos\u00e9, they devised a clever end-run around the facts: no scientific assessment is needed if all options<\/strong> are pre-approved as acceptable!<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

If we buy the lobbyists\u2019 energy mantra, we accept everything.<\/em> These marketers have cleverly switched the focus from the actual merits<\/strong> of alternative energy sources, to such subjective intangibles as energy \u201cdiversity\u201d and \u201csecurity\u201d\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the surface, the \u201cAll of the Above\u201d slogan sounds innocent enough and even has a ring of reasonableness to it. But, of course, that is the lobbyists\u2019 raison d\u2019etre<\/em>: to subtly get preferential treatment for third-rate energy sources that otherwise would fall by the wayside<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We need to do some critical thinking about lobbyists\u2019 sales pitches. In this example: does an \u201cAll of the Above\u201d policy really make sense?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

#1 \u2013 When we include ALL options, that would mean that unreliable<\/strong> alternative sources of energy would be put on the Grid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#2 \u2013 When we include ALL options, that would mean very expensive<\/strong> alternative sources of energy would be put on the Grid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#3 \u2013 When we include ALL options, that would mean environmentally destructive<\/strong> alternative sources of energy would be put on the Grid.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Do ANY of those make sense? How do we advance our economy and our society, by allowing unreliable, expensive, and environmentally ruinous alternative power sources on the Grid?<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is a 100% predictable result when political science<\/em> replaces real Science<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who benefits from an \u201cAll of the Above\u201d energy policy? It certainly is not taxpayers, ratepayers, most businesses, the military, or the environment. Major beneficiaries would be foreign conglomerates who supply us with inferior energy sources, our enemies who are anxious to see our Grid and economy crippled, plus China to whom we will owe an even larger debt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is a BETTER path, and<\/em> one that is in the public\u2019s best interest\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

An \u201cAll of the Sensible<\/strong>\u201d energy slogan would go a LONG way towards putting some balance in the energy policy fight, plus<\/em> it would send the message that citizens, businesses, and the environment are a top priority for legislators.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

What are our \u201csensible\u201d energy choices? Well, that is exactly the conversation we should be having. I would posit that \u201csensible\u201d alternative electrical energy sources are those that are proven to have a net societal benefit<\/strong> \u2014 so let the discussion begin!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This post originally appeared at Critically Thinking About Select Societal Issues<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The fundamental fight over enacting effective energy policies is between lobbyists and the public. A parallel perspective is that it is a contest between real Science and political science.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":331453,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691821564,691822297,691819142,691825071,691828965],"class_list":{"0":"post-331451","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-control","9":"tag-energy-grid","10":"tag-energy-policy","11":"tag-lobbyists","12":"tag-political-science","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/OIG-83.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1odZ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":338045,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=338045","url_meta":{"origin":331451,"position":0},"title":"Green Energy Fail: Bottom Lines from a Participant\/Observer","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"31\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The current green agenda is flawed. I say this as not as a policy wonk or a political partisan but as someone with industry experience as an engineer, management consultant, and interim CTO for a solar company.","rel":"","context":"In \"cost of energy\"","block_context":{"text":"cost of energy","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=cost-of-energy"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/greenhouse-gases-wind-tur-014.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/greenhouse-gases-wind-tur-014.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/greenhouse-gases-wind-tur-014.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/greenhouse-gases-wind-tur-014.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/greenhouse-gases-wind-tur-014.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":386163,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=386163","url_meta":{"origin":331451,"position":1},"title":"Seeing Oil Barons in Every Closet: The Climate Movement\u2019s Desperate Cry","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/07\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Here comes the latest act in the grand theatre of climate melodrama: a chorus of self-appointed guardians, convinced they are on the losing side of the argument, now clutching at every conspiracy theory that drifts across their newsfeeds. They thunder about \u201cdark money\u201d behind every dissenting tweet, accuse shadowy forces\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Big Oil\"","block_context":{"text":"Big Oil","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=big-oil"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-16.-Mai-2025-10_12_17.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-16.-Mai-2025-10_12_17.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-16.-Mai-2025-10_12_17.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-16.-Mai-2025-10_12_17.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246117,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=246117","url_meta":{"origin":331451,"position":2},"title":"Climate Geoengineering: New Area for the Climate Industrial Complex?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/02\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is hard, contradictory, and hypocritical to be \u201cgreen\u201d as conventionally defined.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-967.png?fit=1200%2C669&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-967.png?fit=1200%2C669&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-967.png?fit=1200%2C669&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-967.png?fit=1200%2C669&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-967.png?fit=1200%2C669&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225658,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=225658","url_meta":{"origin":331451,"position":3},"title":"A Typical Exchange with a Climate Alarmist\/Forced Energy Transformationist","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"25\/10\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"CO2 is not a pollutant destroying the world.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/0diagram-showing-process-of-photosynthesis-in-plant-free-vector.jpg?fit=1200%2C1167&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/0diagram-showing-process-of-photosynthesis-in-plant-free-vector.jpg?fit=1200%2C1167&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/0diagram-showing-process-of-photosynthesis-in-plant-free-vector.jpg?fit=1200%2C1167&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/0diagram-showing-process-of-photosynthesis-in-plant-free-vector.jpg?fit=1200%2C1167&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/0diagram-showing-process-of-photosynthesis-in-plant-free-vector.jpg?fit=1200%2C1167&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":388693,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=388693","url_meta":{"origin":331451,"position":4},"title":"Green Lobby\u2019s Dishonest Crusade for Solar and Wind","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"14\/07\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"You wake up to an alarm, flick on the light, brew coffee, and drive to work. Every step requires energy \u2013 the stuff that shares the coin of physical reality with matter, the E in E = MC2. \u00a0It keeps homes warm, food fresh and economies running.","rel":"","context":"In \"\u201cgreen\u201d lobbyists\"","block_context":{"text":"\u201cgreen\u201d lobbyists","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=green-lobbyists-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/mfrack_realistic_photo_of_solar_energy_market_75b1638c-1ab3-402a-8600-63cc6da72bc5.webp?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/mfrack_realistic_photo_of_solar_energy_market_75b1638c-1ab3-402a-8600-63cc6da72bc5.webp?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/mfrack_realistic_photo_of_solar_energy_market_75b1638c-1ab3-402a-8600-63cc6da72bc5.webp?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/mfrack_realistic_photo_of_solar_energy_market_75b1638c-1ab3-402a-8600-63cc6da72bc5.webp?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/mfrack_realistic_photo_of_solar_energy_market_75b1638c-1ab3-402a-8600-63cc6da72bc5.webp?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":383930,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=383930","url_meta":{"origin":331451,"position":5},"title":"Ed Miliband is Losing the Fight for Net Zero","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/06\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"According to various reports of an offshore wind industry conference this week, Ed Miliband has claimed confidence in \u201cwinning the fight on Net Zero\u201d against his critics. His main weapon, says the Guardian, is jobs. Billions of pounds of \u201cinvestment\u201d, reports the newspaper, will \u201cusher in a \u2018green industrial revolution\u2019\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Energy Secretary Ed Miliband\"","block_context":{"text":"Energy Secretary Ed Miliband","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=energy-secretary-ed-miliband"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Screenshot-2024-10-31-173244.jpeg?fit=1200%2C827&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Screenshot-2024-10-31-173244.jpeg?fit=1200%2C827&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Screenshot-2024-10-31-173244.jpeg?fit=1200%2C827&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Screenshot-2024-10-31-173244.jpeg?fit=1200%2C827&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Screenshot-2024-10-31-173244.jpeg?fit=1200%2C827&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331451","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=331451"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331451\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":331455,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331451\/revisions\/331455"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/331453"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=331451"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=331451"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=331451"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}