{"id":330464,"date":"2024-05-29T16:27:06","date_gmt":"2024-05-29T14:27:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=330464"},"modified":"2024-05-29T16:27:09","modified_gmt":"2024-05-29T14:27:09","slug":"good-and-bad-climate-models-simply-put","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=330464","title":{"rendered":"Good and Bad Climate Models Simply\u00a0Put"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"407\" data-attachment-id=\"330472\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=330472\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?fit=2560%2C1440&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"2560,1440\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?fit=723%2C407&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?resize=723%2C407&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-330472\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?resize=1024%2C576&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?resize=768%2C432&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?resize=1536%2C864&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?resize=2048%2C1152&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?resize=1200%2C675&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?w=1446&amp;ssl=1 1446w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?w=2169&amp;ssl=1 2169w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/rclutz.com\/2024\/05\/28\/good-and-bad-climate-models-simply-put\/\">Science Matters <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/rclutz.com\/author\/ronaldrc\/\">Ron Clutz<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"youtube-player\" width=\"723\" height=\"407\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/5OubfvWAJ4c?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en-US&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" style=\"border:0;\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox\"><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Thanks to John Shewchuk of ClimateCraze for explaining simply how climate models are evaluated and why most are untrustworthy in the above video. He also explains why worst performing model was prized rather than the one closest to the truth.\u00a0 Below is a synopsis of a discussion by Patrick Michaels on the same point.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"540\" height=\"512\" data-attachment-id=\"330466\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=330466\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-621.png?fit=540%2C512&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"540,512\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-621\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-621.png?fit=540%2C512&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-621.png?resize=540%2C512&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-330466\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-621.png?w=540&amp;ssl=1 540w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-621.png?resize=300%2C284&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Background:&nbsp; Nobel Prize for Worst Climate Model<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Patrick J. Michaels reports at Real Clear Policy&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.realclearpolicy.com\/articles\/2021\/10\/26\/nobel_prize_awarded_for_the_worst_climate_model_800542.html\"><strong>Nobel Prize Awarded for the Worst Climate Model.<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/a>Excerpts in italics with my bolds and added images.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Given the persistent headlines about climate change over the years, it\u2019s surprising&nbsp;<strong>how long it took the Nobel Committee to award the Physics prize to a climate modeler,<\/strong>&nbsp;which finally occurred earlier this month.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Indeed,&nbsp;<strong>Syukuro Manabe<\/strong>&nbsp;has been a pioneer in the development of so-called general circulation climate models (GCMs) and more comprehensive Earth System Models (ESMs). According to the Committee, Manabe was awarded the prize&nbsp;<strong>\u201cFor the physical modelling of the earth\u2019s climate, quantifying variability, and reliably predicting global warming.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong>What Manabe did was to modify early global weather forecasting models<\/strong>, adapting them to long-term increases in human emissions of carbon dioxide that alter the atmosphere\u2019s internal energy balance,&nbsp;<strong>resulting in a general warming of surface temperatures<\/strong>, along with a much&nbsp;<strong>larger warming of temperatures above the surface over the earth\u2019s vast tropics.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong>Unlike<\/strong>&nbsp;some climate modelers, like<strong>&nbsp;NASA\u2019s James Hansen<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2014 who lit the bonfire of the greenhouse vanities in 1988,&nbsp;<strong>Manabe is hardly a publicity hound.<\/strong>&nbsp;And while politics clearly influences it (see Al Gore\u2019s 2007 Prize), the Nobel Committee also respects primacy, as&nbsp;<strong>Manabe\u2019s model was the first comprehensive GCM<\/strong>. He produced it at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration\u2019s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) in Princeton NJ. The seminal papers were published in 1975 and 1980.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong><mark style=\"background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);color:#e81515\" class=\"has-inline-color\">And, after many modifications and renditions, it is also the most incorrect of all the world\u2019s GCMs at altitude over the vast tropics of the planet.<\/mark><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong>Getting the tropical temperatures right is critical.<\/strong>&nbsp;The vast majority of life-giving moisture that falls over the worlds productive midlatitude agrosystems originates as evaporation from the tropical oceans.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>The&nbsp;<strong>major determinant of how much moisture is wafted into our region<\/strong>&nbsp;is the vertical distribution of tropical temperature. When the contrast is great, with cold temperatures aloft compared to the normally hot surface, that surface air is buoyant and ascends, ultimately transferring moisture to the temperate zones. When the contrast is less, the opposite occurs, and less moisture enters the atmosphere.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong>Every GCM or ESM predicts that several miles above the tropical surface should be a \u201chot spot,\u201d<\/strong>&nbsp;where there is much more warming caused by carbon dioxide emissions than at the surface. If this is&nbsp;<strong>improperly forecast<\/strong>, then subsequent&nbsp;<strong>forecasts of rainfall over the world\u2019s major agricultural regions will be unreliable.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>That&nbsp;<strong>in turn will affect forecasts of surface temperature.<\/strong>&nbsp;Everyone knows a wet surface heats up (and cools down) slower than a dry one (see: deserts), so getting the moisture input right is critical.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong><mark style=\"background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);color:#e81515\" class=\"has-inline-color\">Following Manabe, vast numbers of modelling centers popped up, mushrooms fertilized by public \u2014 and only public \u2014 money.<\/mark><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong>Every six years or so,<\/strong>&nbsp;the U.S. Department of Energy collects all of these models, aggregating them into what they call&nbsp;<strong>Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects (CMIPs)<\/strong>. These serve as the bases for the various \u201cscientific assessments\u201d of climate change produced by the U.N.\u2019s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) or the U.S. \u201cNational Assessments\u201d of climate.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"436\" data-attachment-id=\"330468\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=330468\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-622.png?fit=951%2C573&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"951,573\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-622\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-622.png?fit=723%2C436&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-622.png?resize=723%2C436&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-330468\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-622.png?w=951&amp;ssl=1 951w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-622.png?resize=300%2C181&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-622.png?resize=768%2C463&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><strong>Figure 8: Warming in the tropical troposphere according to the CMIP6 models. Trends 1979\u20132014 (except the rightmost model, which is to 2007), for 20\u00b0N\u201320\u00b0S, 300\u2013200 hPa. John Christy (2019)<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong>In 2017<\/strong>, University of Alabama\u2019s John Christy, along with Richard McNider, published a paper that, among other things, examined the&nbsp;<strong>25 applicable families of CMIP-5 models, comparing their performance to what\u2019s been observed in the three-dimensional global tropics.<\/strong>&nbsp;Take a close look at Figure 3 from the paper, in the Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, and you\u2019ll see that the model GFDL-CM3 is so bad that it is literally off the scale of the graph. [See&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/rclutz.com\/2020\/01\/26\/climate-models-good-bad-and-ugly\/\"><strong>Climate Models: Good, Bad and Ugly<\/strong><\/a>]<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>At its worst, the&nbsp;<strong>GFDL model is predicting approximately five times as much warming as has been observed<\/strong>&nbsp;since the upper-atmospheric data became comprehensive in 1979. This is the most evolved version of the model that won Manabe the Nobel.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"446\" height=\"321\" data-attachment-id=\"330470\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=330470\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-623.png?fit=446%2C321&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"446,321\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-623\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-623.png?fit=446%2C321&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-623.png?resize=446%2C321&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-330470\" style=\"width:552px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-623.png?w=446&amp;ssl=1 446w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-623.png?resize=300%2C216&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 446px) 100vw, 446px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>In the CMIP-5 model suite, there is&nbsp;<strong>one, and only one, that works. It is the model INM-CM4<\/strong>&nbsp;from the Russian Institute for Numerical Modelling, and the lead author is Evgeny Volodin. It seems that Volodin would be much more deserving of the Nobel for, in the words of the committee \u201creliably predicting global warming.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong><mark style=\"background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);color:#e81515\" class=\"has-inline-color\">Might this have something to do with the fact that INM-CM4 and its successor models have less predicted warming than all of the other models?<\/mark><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Patrick J. Michaels is a senior fellow working on energy and environment issues at the Competitive Enterprise Institute and author of \u201cScientocracy: The Tangled Web of Public Science and Public Policy.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thanks to John Shewchuk of ClimateCraze for explaining simply how climate models are evaluated and why most are untrustworthy in the above video. He also explains why worst performing model was prized rather than the one closest to the truth.\u00a0 Below is a synopsis of a discussion by Patrick Michaels on the same point.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":330472,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818153,691828848,691818087,691828847],"class_list":{"0":"post-330464","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-models","9":"tag-earth-system-models-esms","10":"tag-global-warming","11":"tag-nobel-committee","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0ICCC13-DC-Spencer-25-July-2019-Tropical-LT-scaled-1.jpg?fit=2560%2C1440&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1nY4","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":321739,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=321739","url_meta":{"origin":330464,"position":0},"title":"There\u2019s Nothing \u201cScientific\u201d About Climate Models","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"On Sunday\u2019s\u00a0BBC Politics, Luke Johnson asked for evidence that the recent Dubai flooding was due to climate change. Chris Packham glibly responded: \u201cIt comes from something called science.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"Attribution studies\"","block_context":{"text":"Attribution studies","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=attribution-studies"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0Figure-19-hi.jpg?fit=1200%2C902&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0Figure-19-hi.jpg?fit=1200%2C902&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0Figure-19-hi.jpg?fit=1200%2C902&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0Figure-19-hi.jpg?fit=1200%2C902&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0Figure-19-hi.jpg?fit=1200%2C902&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":230908,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=230908","url_meta":{"origin":330464,"position":1},"title":"New analysis attempts to reconcile differences between satellites and climate models","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/11\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"An academic attempt to gloss over some glaring discrepancies between results from theory-based climate models and observed data.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/0new-satellite-data-confirm-real-world-temperature-cooler-than-climate-models-2-800x533-1.jpg?fit=800%2C533&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/0new-satellite-data-confirm-real-world-temperature-cooler-than-climate-models-2-800x533-1.jpg?fit=800%2C533&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/0new-satellite-data-confirm-real-world-temperature-cooler-than-climate-models-2-800x533-1.jpg?fit=800%2C533&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/0new-satellite-data-confirm-real-world-temperature-cooler-than-climate-models-2-800x533-1.jpg?fit=800%2C533&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222184,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=222184","url_meta":{"origin":330464,"position":2},"title":"No, Climatologists Did Not \u201cForget the Sun Was Shining\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/10\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Climate model feedbacks are not prescribed; they are diagnosed After the model is run from model output.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00Screenshot-2022-10-04-191143.png?fit=882%2C342&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00Screenshot-2022-10-04-191143.png?fit=882%2C342&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00Screenshot-2022-10-04-191143.png?fit=882%2C342&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00Screenshot-2022-10-04-191143.png?fit=882%2C342&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264549,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=264549","url_meta":{"origin":330464,"position":3},"title":"Climate models behind Net Zero policies are \u2018thoroughly\u00a0flawed\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Crude corrections\u00a0hide unrealistic physics.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate models\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate models","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-models"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0-Climate-models-45.jpeg?fit=1200%2C814&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0-Climate-models-45.jpeg?fit=1200%2C814&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0-Climate-models-45.jpeg?fit=1200%2C814&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0-Climate-models-45.jpeg?fit=1200%2C814&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0-Climate-models-45.jpeg?fit=1200%2C814&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291181,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=291181","url_meta":{"origin":330464,"position":4},"title":"Climate Realism by Paul Burgess","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Here we explain the science demonstrating that the world needs more CO2 and that even doubling it will only be beneficial.","rel":"","context":"In \"alarmist models\"","block_context":{"text":"alarmist models","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=alarmist-models"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Screenshot-2023-12-13-183652.png?fit=980%2C574&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Screenshot-2023-12-13-183652.png?fit=980%2C574&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Screenshot-2023-12-13-183652.png?fit=980%2C574&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Screenshot-2023-12-13-183652.png?fit=980%2C574&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372682,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=372682","url_meta":{"origin":330464,"position":5},"title":"Wrong, Daily Mail, Global Warming is Not Spiraling Out of Control","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/03\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent article by the\u00a0Daily Mail, titled \u201cGlobal warming is spiralling out of control: Earth could warm by a whopping 7\u00b0C by 2200, scientists predict \u2013 leading to flooding, famine, and catastrophic heatwaves,\u201d presents this alarming claim based on a computer model. The scientists who developed the model as well\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0climate-change-neutrinos-an-unlikely-hero-in-the-battle-against-global-warming.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0climate-change-neutrinos-an-unlikely-hero-in-the-battle-against-global-warming.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0climate-change-neutrinos-an-unlikely-hero-in-the-battle-against-global-warming.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0climate-change-neutrinos-an-unlikely-hero-in-the-battle-against-global-warming.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0climate-change-neutrinos-an-unlikely-hero-in-the-battle-against-global-warming.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330464","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=330464"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330464\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":330473,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330464\/revisions\/330473"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/330472"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=330464"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=330464"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=330464"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}