{"id":330046,"date":"2024-05-25T10:25:40","date_gmt":"2024-05-25T08:25:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=330046"},"modified":"2024-05-25T10:25:43","modified_gmt":"2024-05-25T08:25:43","slug":"evs-twice-as-likely-to-kill-pedestrians-and-who-knows-how-many-cats-dogs-ducks-and-wombats","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=330046","title":{"rendered":"EVs twice as likely to kill pedestrians (and who knows how many cats, dogs, ducks and wombats?)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From JoNova <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Jo Nova<\/a><\/h4>\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Saving the world with silent killers<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A new study shows electric cars are twice as likely to hit pedestrians compared to petrol and diesel cars. Presumably this is because EVs are so quiet. Though it\u2019s also possible the dash interfaces are hideous, and some menu options are more deadly and distracting than others. Or perhaps EV drivers are more stressed or feeling nauseous<\/a>? The study didn\u2019t investigate that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Amazingly the data was from six to ten years ago in the UK, so countless people have died in the interim, and if it is just a noise issue, it could have been fixed, or at least investigated. Where is the precautionary principle when you need it?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And if electric cars are killing more people in cities, we would presume that Fido and Spot would be a part of the carnage too. But who would know what the car-pet-kill tally was? Well, manufacturers might \u2014 they own the camera footage<\/a>, but no one is even asking that question. Animals have rights you know, but they don\u2019t donate to Greenpeace<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Greens are rushing headlong to roll out the auto-weather-saving-machines across the countryside, and they might be killing wallabies and spotted quolls too but who cares, right? It\u2019s not like anyone has done that study, or the Greens are worried about flattening a few rare endangered animals on their road to redemption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apparently, it makes sense if a few extra people and pets die now to save someone else who might suffer in one hundred years, maybe, if the computer models are right, and if EVs  reduce emissions<\/a>, and if emissions matter in the first place. All of which is unlikely. But rush, sprint, hurry to force those EVs onto the road. Even if they kidnap people<\/a>, or kill children, it\u2019s all for a good cause.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Electric Cars Twice As Likely To Hit Pedestrians, According to New Study<\/a><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Scitech Daily<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Study reveals a higher risk of accidents in urban areas across Great Britain from 2013 to 2017. Researchers call for measures to mitigate this risk as fossil-fuel vehicles are phased out.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A study has found that pedestrians are twice as likely to be hit by electric or hybrid vehicles compared to those powered by petrol or diesel. The research, which was published on May 21, 2024, in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health<\/em>, examined casualty rates in Great Britain from 2013 to 2017.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The risk is greater in urban areas, and governments must take steps to mitigate this safety hazard as they proceed to phase out fossil-fueled vehicles to improve air quality and curb climate change, urge the researchers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death for children and young people, and 1 in 4 road traffic deaths are of pedestrians, they note. Amid the ongoing shift to electric and hybrid cars, concerns have been raised that these vehicles may pose more of a safety hazard to pedestrians than fossil-fuelled cars because they are quieter, particularly in urban areas where background ambient noise levels are higher.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

the researchers calculate that between 2013 and 2017, the average annual casualty rates of pedestrians per 100 million miles of road travel were 5.16 for electric and hybrid vehicles and 2.40 for petrol and diesel vehicles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Perhaps it\u2019s really the fault of all those young inexperienced drivers?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And younger, less experienced drivers are more likely to be involved in a road traffic collision and are also more likely to own an electric car<\/strong>, possibly accounting for some of the observed heightened risk associated with these vehicles, they suggest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sure. These are the same careless teenagers who were \u201cmore likely\u201d to splash $100 K on a Tesla Model S in 2016, right<\/a>? What are these researchers thinking?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The only thing we know for sure is that the rush to force EVs on us has nothing to do with morality or compassion. It\u2019s not about saving lives or protecting fluffy mammals. The Greens don\u2019t care about those lives now, let alone the people of the future.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

______________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More tales from the EV files:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n