{"id":327642,"date":"2024-05-10T08:39:55","date_gmt":"2024-05-10T06:39:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=327642"},"modified":"2024-05-10T08:39:57","modified_gmt":"2024-05-10T06:39:57","slug":"the-fibbing-five-of-the-climate-agenda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=327642","title":{"rendered":"The \u201cfibbing five\u201d of the climate agenda"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Joe Bastardi<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why does no one in the mainstream media ask the hard questions of these people?  Why do they not vet not only their extreme claims, but what they have said in the past?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Al Gore<\/strong>: His idea that Net 0 would mean warming would stop is absurd. You can\u2019t say its a lie, because it is a future event, but what possible proof does he have of that? I can say the sun is coming up tomorrow and back it up with the idea of persistence and science. Or water will freeze at 32. But from the man who can\u2019t understand (along with, it seems like, all these people) that if the Arctic is not warming in the summer and the mean summer temp is not far from 32, the ice cap not only won\u2019t melt but can\u2019t, is yet another example of his utter ignorance. It is breathtaking<\/p>\n\n\n\n

John Kerry <\/strong>is going after our food supply. Kerry wants to wreck farming because it contributes to greenhouse gases and warming. Let me get this straight. Of the .042%of the atmosphere that is CO2,  man has contributed about 5%. Of that 5%, agriculture is a tiny fraction perhaps 10%. Now let us take a country like Denmark, where farmers may be forced to shut down farming. What does Denmark contribute to the planet\u2019s CO2?.  SO LITTLE IT APPROACHES ZERO. Yet Starving people and sending food prices through the roof is fine with Kerry. No wonder he got a D in Geology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Then we have Bill Gates<\/strong>, who says planting trees won\u2019t help. Since many countries are already Carbon negative because they have enough trees to offset emissions, apparently Mr Gates does not understand that trees get rid of 50 lbs of CO2 each.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s do the math.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A new Yale-led study estimates that there are more than 3 trillion trees on Earth, about seven and a half times more than some previous estimates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That means about 150 trillion pounds of CO2 is gobbled up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Humans produce 36.3 gigatons of CO2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

36.3 trillion gigatons is only 80 trillion pounds. Of course, the rest of the planet is emitting more CO2. But the point is that of course, a global marshal plan of planting trees (let us say another trillion) with Nuclear power and point of combustion Carbon capture would solve this problem much more economically. Not that it is a problem as more CO2 is better. But if it was, there is a much easier fix. Just simply adapt and move on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But my point is how does Gates get off on saying planting trees won\u2019t help? Heck, he is for chopping them down and replacing them with God knows what. And people buy into it and just smile and nod. He claims global warming will lead to crop disasters, directly opposite of what is going on. We have never produced more food globally. Wait a minute I thought John Kerry wants to get rid of farming. Can these people please get their stories straight?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Then there is Kerry\u2019s daughter, Vanessa Kerry,<\/strong> whom near as I can tell, has no reason to be in any position of authority except John has likely left her in charge of spreading the same kind of D in Geology nonsense he has been spreading for the past few decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Look at this pearl of wisdom from her.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201c2023 was an apocalyptic year in terms of extreme weather events. That is about to get worse.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What the heck is she talking about?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is from Dr Roger Piellke jr ( who believes CO2 does have a warming effect, but is demonized for telling the truth about the results).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You can read it all here<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The IPCC has concluded that a signal of climate change has not yet emerged<\/em> beyond natural variability for the following phenomena:<\/p>\n\n\n\n