{"id":325648,"date":"2024-05-02T17:48:36","date_gmt":"2024-05-02T15:48:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=325648"},"modified":"2024-05-02T17:48:38","modified_gmt":"2024-05-02T15:48:38","slug":"patrick-brown-the-social-feedback-loops-constraining-climate-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=325648","title":{"rendered":"Patrick Brown: The Social Feedback Loops Constraining Climate Science"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Patrick Brown of the Breakthrough Institute<\/a> has written an excellent article: The Social Feedback Loops That Constrain Climate Science<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

If researchers were perfectly dispassionate reasoners with no motivations other than truth-seeking, their published papers could be taken as a direct, objective view into reality. But as I argued not long ago in an essay in The Free Press<\/em><\/a>, that idealized notion of science is a fantasy. Stemming from a frustration that I felt about not being able to take high-impact climate science at face value, I decided to call out what I see as one problem: The highest-profile research is heavily influenced by cultural forces and career incentives that are not necessarily aligned with the dispassionate pursuit of truth.https:\/\/thebreakthrough.org\/journal\/no-20-spring-2024\/the-social-feedback-loops-that-constrain-climate-science<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

In the realm of climate science, the focus is often on the environmental feedback loops that intensify global warming. However, the social feedback loops influencing the creation and dissemination of climate science are equally potent and far less scrutinized. These social mechanisms significantly shape the research landscape, often prioritizing narratives that align with certain political and social agendas over a balanced and comprehensive understanding of climate issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Allure of High-Impact Publications and Their Consequences<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Brown discusses how research, fundamentally a social endeavor, relies on communication through publications in peer-reviewed journals. The prestige associated with journals like Nature<\/em> and Science<\/em> significantly influences the research they choose to publish. These journals, acting as gatekeepers, preferentially select studies that support prevailing narratives, such as the imperative of limiting global warming to 1.5\u00b0C, as outlined in the Paris Agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This selection bias is not without consequence. It subtly coerces researchers into framing their studies in ways that are likely to be viewed favorably by high-impact journals, often at the expense of a more nuanced or comprehensive approach. For instance, studies might focus on how climate change negatively impacts an environmental phenomenon while neglecting other significant factors. This methodological tunnel vision can lead to a distorted portrayal of climate science in the public sphere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article elaborates on this issue, stating:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cFraming research in a way that at least directionally supports the predominant narrative makes the path to a high-impact publication much less treacherous\u2026 rather than ask, \u2018What is the magnitude of the influence of climate change on the phenomena I am studying relative to all other influences?\u2019 it is more prudent to ask, \u2018How does climate change negatively impact the phenomena I am studying?’\u201dhttps:\/\/thebreakthrough.org\/journal\/no-20-spring-2024\/the-social-feedback-loops-that-constrain-climate-science<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Economic Costs of Climate Policies: An Overlooked Narrative<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Brown notes that one of the most glaring omissions in current climate science literature is a balanced discussion on the economic impacts of climate policies. High-profile journals frequently publish papers that discuss the benefits of stringent climate policies without a corresponding analysis of the costs. For example, a paper might highlight the economic savings from adhering to the 1.5\u00b0C limit without considering the substantial costs of such rapid decarbonization.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This lack of balanced analysis could potentially mislead policymakers and the public about the true costs and benefits of climate policies. Research that does attempt to present a more balanced view often finds it difficult to gain traction in high-impact journals, likely because it challenges the prevailing narrative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article touches on this issue as well, explaining:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cOur study showed that when costs were considered alongside benefits, the conclusion of the benefit-only analysis was overturned: the Paris Agreement targets would impose net harm on the world economy through 2100\u2026 It was the finding of the study, rather than the topic, that was unwelcome.\u201dhttps:\/\/thebreakthrough.org\/journal\/no-20-spring-2024\/the-social-feedback-loops-that-constrain-climate-science<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Role of Political and Editorial Bias in Shaping Climate Science<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Editors and journal policies significantly influence the kind of research that is published. High-profile journals not only reflect but also shape scientific discourse, pushing a narrative that aligns with certain political goals. For instance, endorsements by journal leadership of political figures and policies clearly signal an alignment with specific policy agendas, such as those encapsulated in the Paris Agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This alignment raises questions about the purity of scientific inquiry within these publications. When journals overtly associate with political agendas, they risk compromising their objectivity and the trust of the scientific community and the public.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article critically notes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Leadership at Nature<\/em> and Science<\/em> have made it clear that they endorse the political goals of the Paris Agreement \u2014 to rapidly transition the world\u2019s energy and agricultural economies so that global warming remains below 1.5\u00b0C (or at most 2\u00b0C) above preindustrial levels.https:\/\/thebreakthrough.org\/journal\/no-20-spring-2024\/the-social-feedback-loops-that-constrain-climate-science<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Nature<\/em> as an institution officially endorsed<\/a> Joe Biden in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, citing, among other reasons, his policies in support of the Paris Agreement. Facing some pushback on their explicit embrace of politics, Nature<\/em> subsequently doubled down<\/a> on their political statements. The current editor-in-chief of Science<\/em>, Holden Thorpe, has defended the idea<\/a> of scientific journals endorsing policies and politicians \u2014 implying that the authority of science subsumes the entirety of the climate problem all the way through to the amount of power that the government should yield in dictating a solution.https:\/\/thebreakthrough.org\/journal\/no-20-spring-2024\/the-social-feedback-loops-that-constrain-climate-science<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Breaking the Feedback Loop: Proposals for a More Equitable Scientific Discourse<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Brown offers potential solutions, such as, to counteract the bias introduced by social feedback loops, several structural changes are necessary. One approach could be to alter the publication process to focus more on the research question and methodology rather than the results. This could help mitigate the publication bias where only results that fit the predominant narrative are favored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, increasing transparency in the peer review and editorial decision-making process could help reveal any biases in the publication process. Publishing peer reviews and editorial decision letters, even for rejected manuscripts, could foster a more open and equitable scientific dialogue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The social dynamics within the climate science community significantly impact the research agenda and the resulting literature. A thorough examination of all aspects of climate science can lead to a deeper understanding of the complexities and potential biases within this field. Both the scientific community and the journals that disseminate research must strive for greater neutrality in their approaches to the publication and discussion of scientific research. This is essential for fostering a more comprehensive and critical approach to climate science, enabling a more robust and informed scientific discourse that can serve the diverse needs and concerns of global society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dr Brown\u2019s essay is well worth reading in its entirety.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the realm of climate science, the focus is often on the environmental feedback loops that intensify global warming. However, the social feedback loops influencing the creation and dissemination of climate science are equally potent and far less scrutinized. These social mechanisms significantly shape the research landscape, often prioritizing narratives that align with certain political and social agendas over a balanced and comprehensive understanding of climate issues.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":325650,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691819140,691822338,691818087,691820492,691827037],"class_list":{"0":"post-325648","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-science","9":"tag-economic-costs","10":"tag-global-warming","11":"tag-paris-agreement","12":"tag-peer-review","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0-Climate-Science.jpeg?fit=1921%2C1080&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1mIo","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":306580,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=306580","url_meta":{"origin":325648,"position":0},"title":"Patrick Brown: When science journals become\u00a0activists","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Spinning climate data to fit a policy agenda undermines public faith in science.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0-going-to-die.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0-going-to-die.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0-going-to-die.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0-going-to-die.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0-going-to-die.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":349548,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=349548","url_meta":{"origin":325648,"position":1},"title":"Oops, Science Was \u201cSettled\u201d\u2014Until It Wasn\u2019t: Plants Absorb 31% More CO\u2082 Than We Thought","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/30\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A new study reveals that plants have been absorbing 31% more CO\u2082 than previously believed. Yes, 31%\u2014a glaring error that casts serious doubt on climate models, emissions scenarios, and policy prescriptions like Net Zero. For years, we were told that the \u201cscience was settled,\u201d and that urgent action was needed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO2)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO2)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0100363520735-web-tete-1024x576.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0100363520735-web-tete-1024x576.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0100363520735-web-tete-1024x576.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0100363520735-web-tete-1024x576.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372682,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=372682","url_meta":{"origin":325648,"position":2},"title":"Wrong, Daily Mail, Global Warming is Not Spiraling Out of Control","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/29\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent article by the\u00a0Daily Mail, titled \u201cGlobal warming is spiralling out of control: Earth could warm by a whopping 7\u00b0C by 2200, scientists predict \u2013 leading to flooding, famine, and catastrophic heatwaves,\u201d presents this alarming claim based on a computer model. The scientists who developed the model as well\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0climate-change-neutrinos-an-unlikely-hero-in-the-battle-against-global-warming.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0climate-change-neutrinos-an-unlikely-hero-in-the-battle-against-global-warming.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0climate-change-neutrinos-an-unlikely-hero-in-the-battle-against-global-warming.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0climate-change-neutrinos-an-unlikely-hero-in-the-battle-against-global-warming.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0climate-change-neutrinos-an-unlikely-hero-in-the-battle-against-global-warming.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350175,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=350175","url_meta":{"origin":325648,"position":3},"title":"AI knows it is biased on climate change","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/05\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Okay it is chatbots that know they are biased, not all of AI. But these days the headlines are all about \u201cAI\u201d and they really just mean these chatbots that emulate reading to an amazing degree, so I go with the flow. Nor do these chatters know anything as they\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"AI (artificial intelligence)\"","block_context":{"text":"AI (artificial intelligence)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=ai-artificial-intelligence-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Artificial-Intelligence-Hand-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Artificial-Intelligence-Hand-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Artificial-Intelligence-Hand-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Artificial-Intelligence-Hand-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Artificial-Intelligence-Hand-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":388635,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=388635","url_meta":{"origin":325648,"position":4},"title":"Voodoo-science strikes again: Climate change is awakening volcanoes","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/14\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"If ever you have doubts that we are merely 3 genes away* from being mammoth hunting tribes of prophets and bone pointing shamen, look no further than modern captive science. These nice geochemists haven\u2019t even published a paper yet, but five minutes after giving a speech at a conference, it\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-1.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-1.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-1.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-1.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326342,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=326342","url_meta":{"origin":325648,"position":5},"title":"Newsflash: Science Not Settled on How Water\u00a0Freezes","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/05\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Here\u2019s a great short video for those who like to think science is settled on global warming\/climate change, as only one example of hubris despite our limited understanding of natural phenomena.\u00a0 Further on is a discussion of the climate system we see as chaotic, another way of saying its behavior\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0An-opened-bottle-of-water-placed-on-top-of-ice-cubes.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0An-opened-bottle-of-water-placed-on-top-of-ice-cubes.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0An-opened-bottle-of-water-placed-on-top-of-ice-cubes.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0An-opened-bottle-of-water-placed-on-top-of-ice-cubes.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0An-opened-bottle-of-water-placed-on-top-of-ice-cubes.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=325648"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325648\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":325652,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325648\/revisions\/325652"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/325650"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=325648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=325648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=325648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}