{"id":325525,"date":"2024-05-02T14:07:48","date_gmt":"2024-05-02T12:07:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=325525"},"modified":"2024-05-02T14:07:50","modified_gmt":"2024-05-02T12:07:50","slug":"phd-data-climate-scientist-cant-provide-data-on-extreme-weather-events","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=325525","title":{"rendered":"PhD \u201cData\/Climate Scientist\u201d Can\u2019t Provide Data on Extreme Weather Events"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Master Resource<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Robert Bradley Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBack to Lindsey Gulden, the self-described Data\/Climate Scientist<\/a>. She would\/could not provide a time series example to back up any part of her claim of \u2018global climate to go off the rails\u2019 \u2026 \u2018more extreme events\u2019. I asked her repeatedly for data, and she could only sign-off with \u2018I made no such claim<\/a>\u2018.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

On LinkedIn, Saul Humphrey stated<\/a>: 2023 was the hottest year on record and 2024 is threatening to be hotter still.  Humphrey then quotes from an article in The Independent<\/em>, \u201cDo the People Care About the Climate Crisis? These Voters Say Yes \u2013 but Polls Do Not<\/a>\u201d (April 19, 2024):<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

In the US \"\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8\" wildfires destroyed more than 1.7 million acres in the first three months of 2024, already half of last year\u2019s total, and forecasters expect an unprecedented number of Atlantic hurricanes.

Around 87 per cent of Americans say they have experienced at least one extreme weather event in the past five years \u2014 whether that\u2019s drought, extreme heat, severe storms, wildfires or flooding. Three-quarters of adults believe the science that climate crisis is at least partly to blame, and the same percentage want the federal government to do something about it.

But when it comes to this year\u2019s presidential election, the issue trails inflation, healthcare, immigration and jobs in the list of voter priorities.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Humphrey concludes: \u201cWhat does it take make the climate crisis the priority? Do we need to witness Armageddon before we do what is necessary?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Note the irony of a person telling the rest of us: You are wrong and I am right on climate alarmism<\/em>. And the audacity to use government coercion and taxpayer financing to impose the solution on the unschooled masses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I commented<\/a> on LinkedIn: \u201cFalse causality. That is the real problem. Exaggeration backfires.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some 70 replies followed from a variety of folks, including some plenty smart-and-informed \u201cskeptics\u201d of climate alarm\/forced energy transformation. But one comment stood out. Lindsey Gulden<\/a>, self-described Data Scientist\/Climate Scientist, stated<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Saul Humphrey: you should perhaps take it as a badge of honor that your posts seem to attract frequent input from Atlas Network folks who are paid to promote climate disinformation.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

I answered<\/a>: \u201cFalse causality. Beliefs and the intellectual\/moral high ground explain my passion and those that I know in the movement. Many of us take less pay to be able to challenge the false narrative of the Climate Industrial Complex. Consumers matter. Taxpayers matter. Fiscal sanity in the public sector matters. Freedom among consenting adults matter\u2026.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gulden<\/a>: \u201cComing from a long line of fiscal conservatives, I agree with all of these statements: \u201cConsumers matter. Taxpayers matter. Fiscal sanity in the public sector matters. Freedom among consenting adults matter.\u201d What is bizarre to me is that we seem to be using the exact same values to make diametrically opposite points. It is fiscally irresponsible for any government to continue to use taxpayer dollars to give substantial corporate welfare to an industry that is causing the global climate to go off the rails and, with it, the stability of global markets, political systems, food supplies, etc. It is all in the service of a small group of people whose bank accounts benefit massively from the status quo. I don\u2019t question your sincerity of belief. But I\u2019d suggest those of you taking lower pay ought to demand the same pay as the executives of the industry you are propping up.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bradley<\/a>: \u201cI disagree with your alarmism in the last part of your sentence: \u2018that is causing the global climate to go off the rails and, with it, the stability of global markets, political systems, food supplies, etc.\u2019 Is this statement justified by time series data or climate model projections? The whole point of market wealth is resiliency to extreme weather from any cause\u2013and that is where the advantages of dense, reliable, affordable mass energies come into play.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gulden<\/a>: \u201cThe most problematic component of climate change isn\u2019t that the mean temperature goes up. It\u2019s that there is much more variability and much less predictability. More extreme events (extreme freezes, extreme precipitation, extreme heat). Uncertainty is bad for markets. So if you care about healthy free markets, dismissing climate change out of hand is risky.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bradley<\/a>: \u201cShow me the time series data on that. A reduction in the diurnal cycle does not suggest dire results. Hurricanes are less in theory and data, right? Are you saying that nature is optimal and\/or cooling would reduce extremes? In any case, any extremes need affordable, reliable, plentiful energies\u2013not wind and solar and batteries. And politicians and government failure.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gulden<\/a>: \u201cdata on increasing extreme events are plentiful and from reputable sources. Hurricane frequency and intensity are increasing. For information from a reliable source, see, for example, https:\/\/science.nasa.gov\/climate-change\/extreme-weather\/<\/a>.

Your assertion that \u2018it\u2019s just a decrease in the diurnal cycle\u2019 doesn\u2019t really hold water as an argument for lack of harm, even with just a bit of consideration. Being able to cool down at night is essential for people trying to survive heat waves without A\/C. Regarding \u2018government failure and politicians\u2019: Politicians can at least be voted out of office. Although I\u2019d *like* to vote oil and gas industry executives\u2019 self-interested manipulations of civil society out of our daily life, I can\u2019t.

Renewables are more affordable than oil and gas. Battery storage makes them more reliable. All of the above leads me to the conclusion that Atlas Network should provide member groups with more accurate talking points\u2026although I must admit I do not think \u2018accuracy\u2019 is their goal.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bradley<\/a>: \u201cThe NASA link is not responsive. I asked for time series data over the decades of extreme weather events, not what is supposed to happen under (incomplete) theory or what is predicted to happen from speculative climate models. Take the frequency of hurricanes over the last century or so. What does it show (asking you as a climate scientist).\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gulden<\/a>: \u201cand no, that isn\u2019t my area of expertise\u2014which is why I pointed you to reputable sources on the subject.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As this point,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mark Rohrbacher commented<\/a>: \u201c\u2026 both Lomborg and Alex Epstein (and various weather sites) have researched \u2018increased weather extremes and found them to be unsupported by data. I live in a hurricane area and our area has had a historically low amount of serious hurricanes in the last 30 years.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gulden<\/a>: \u201cAlex Epstein, formerly of the Cato Institute, founder of the Center for Industrial Progress, who does not like to discuss his funding sources, right? Who has no training in research?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bradley<\/a>: \u201cYou lost some credibility by going ad hominem on Alex Epstein, who is merely providing the official statistics on weather extremes from others, as is Lomborg. I follow Alex Epstein and know him personally. He has never worked for Cato. Please show us the graph and link on hurricanes, quantitatively, number and intensity, for the last century. This is your area as a climate scientist, right?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gulden<\/a>: \u201cmy bad\u2026it seem I err in his former employer. Perhaps it is another libertarian think tank. Regardless, I see no way that mentioning his employers, his relevant credentials or lack thereof, and his refusal to disclose funding sources\u2014completely relevant when your topic of writing is climate change and fossil fuels\u2014are \u2018ad hominem\u2019 attacks. But if you wish to frame it in that way, I cannot stop you.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bradley<\/a>: \u201cA person without a high school degree can be right and a PhD expert wrong. (\u2018Expert Failure\u2019 is a fascinating subject covered in a book of this title by Roger Koppl, by the way.) Can you simply provide the time series data on hurricanes or other extreme events to support your general claim of increasing extreme events? Just stick to the arguments and data please.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gulden<\/a>: \u201cI made no such claim. You may judge me as you wish. I\u2019m going to adjourn from this discussion. Good luck.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The entire thread should be read to see a variety of take-downs of the alarmist narrative. Kudos to Mark Rohrbacker, Matt Essex, Chris Matchette-Downes, Ian McCoy, Joseph Toomey, Richard Re, Les McMenzie, Lewis Ludwig, John Basilio, Richard Ericson, and many others. Their level of critical engagement of the alarmist narrative is impressive, indicating how the smart, critical middle is not buying what the Malthusian consensus is selling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Back to Lindsey Gulden, the self-described Data Scientist\/Climate Scientist<\/a>. She would\/could not provide a time series example to back up any part of her claim of \u2018global climate to go off the rails\u2019 \u2026 \u2018more extreme events\u2019. I asked her repeatedly for data, and she could only sign-off with \u2018I made no such claim<\/a>\u2018.\u201d What an embarrassment to herself and her profession.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Appendix<\/strong>
Gulden\u2019s lack of understanding about energy and economics basics is obvious from statements such as: \u201cRenewables are more affordable than oil and gas<\/a>\u201d and \u201crooftop solar panels make good economic sense<\/a>\u201c.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Many other of her statements in the long thread are easily refutable, but I will stick to climate science. Note her silence on the benefits of CO2; the upside of moderate warming with a reduction of the diurnal cycle, the saturation effect of GHG forcing, all arguments against climate alarmism from a physical-science viewpoint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Back to Lindsey Gulden, the self-described Data\/Climate Scientist. She would\/could not provide a time series example to back up any part of her claim of \u2018global climate to go off the rails\u2019 \u2026 \u2018more extreme events\u2019. I asked her repeatedly for data, and she could only sign-off with \u2018I made no such claim\u2018.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":325528,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691819134,691818056,691818514],"class_list":{"0":"post-325525","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-alarmism","9":"tag-climate-change","10":"tag-extreme-weather","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/042bd425fbe7688040d7ab2ef61dc756411aeef91dde5a7c8ddeab931f639.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1mGp","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":425741,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=425741","url_meta":{"origin":325525,"position":0},"title":"Right, New York Times, Scientists Do Disagree on The Polar Vortex","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent article in\u00a0The\u00a0New York Times\u00a0(NYT) \u201cWhat\u2019s Up With This Big Freeze? Some Scientists See Climate Change Link\u201d\u00a0describes different perspectives of climate scientists regarding winter cold extremes. Some scientists are claiming based on climate model projections that global warming is making extreme cold snaps worse, others point out that that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-11-201028.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-11-201028.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-11-201028.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-11-201028.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-11-201028.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":425227,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=425227","url_meta":{"origin":325525,"position":1},"title":"False, New York Times, Climate Change Doesn\u2019t Cause Both Extreme Heat and Extreme Cold","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The recent New York Times (NYT) article \u201cClimate Change Is Fueling Extremes, Both Hot and Cold\u201d by David Gelles claims that global warming is simultaneously driving \u201ccolder colds\u201d and \u201chotter hots,\u201d presenting recent U.S. weather as confirmation of a long-warned scientific expectation. That claim is patently false, built on a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQO3dO3vt9IE0MDl_jD7q9PYtJniiyWItO-KVDzlMj-X1nphghTBPCNCI1Ygygax1Ec31aZGxStMceC_KSwbufJVBd31PAAeE9XrI0JdITZ0aZ0lrQVMZ6qDyd84yjdQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C680&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQO3dO3vt9IE0MDl_jD7q9PYtJniiyWItO-KVDzlMj-X1nphghTBPCNCI1Ygygax1Ec31aZGxStMceC_KSwbufJVBd31PAAeE9XrI0JdITZ0aZ0lrQVMZ6qDyd84yjdQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C680&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQO3dO3vt9IE0MDl_jD7q9PYtJniiyWItO-KVDzlMj-X1nphghTBPCNCI1Ygygax1Ec31aZGxStMceC_KSwbufJVBd31PAAeE9XrI0JdITZ0aZ0lrQVMZ6qDyd84yjdQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C680&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQO3dO3vt9IE0MDl_jD7q9PYtJniiyWItO-KVDzlMj-X1nphghTBPCNCI1Ygygax1Ec31aZGxStMceC_KSwbufJVBd31PAAeE9XrI0JdITZ0aZ0lrQVMZ6qDyd84yjdQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C680&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQO3dO3vt9IE0MDl_jD7q9PYtJniiyWItO-KVDzlMj-X1nphghTBPCNCI1Ygygax1Ec31aZGxStMceC_KSwbufJVBd31PAAeE9XrI0JdITZ0aZ0lrQVMZ6qDyd84yjdQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C680&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263384,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=263384","url_meta":{"origin":325525,"position":2},"title":"Wrong, CNN, Attribution Groups Prove Nothing About Extreme Weather and Climate Change","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"22\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent article on CNN relies on the opinion of climate attribution groups, claiming that these groups are able to calculate exactly how much impact climate change has had on various weather events. These claims are always false. Attribution claims are unverifiable, untestable, and rely on the presupposition that climate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0fake-news-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0fake-news-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0fake-news-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0fake-news-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0fake-news-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241244,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=241244","url_meta":{"origin":325525,"position":3},"title":"Thanks, Los Angeles Times and The Seattle Times, for Admitting Recent California Weather is Not Unusual","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/01\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Unfortunately, amidst the factual reporting, the paper could not resist asserting extreme weather events will become more common or worse in the future due to climate change. Trend data does not support such claims.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-1030.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-1030.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-1030.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-1030.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-1030.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214027,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=214027","url_meta":{"origin":325525,"position":4},"title":"Yahoo and AP are Wrong About Northeastern Drought","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"An Associated Press (AP) story picked up by Yahoo News that claims that climate change is causing a trend towards hotter, drier summers and drought in the Northeastern United States. This is false.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-667.png?fit=1200%2C806&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-667.png?fit=1200%2C806&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-667.png?fit=1200%2C806&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-667.png?fit=1200%2C806&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-667.png?fit=1200%2C806&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202543,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=202543","url_meta":{"origin":325525,"position":5},"title":"Wrong, LiveScience, Global Weather Not Worsening","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/06\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Near the top of the search results on Google news for the term \u201cclimate change\u201d is a story from LiveScience claiming that climate change is causing worsening weather events globally, for example, flooding and drought, hurricanes, and cold snaps. These claims are false. Data show there is no measurable worsening\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/0major-landfall-harricanes.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/0major-landfall-harricanes.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/0major-landfall-harricanes.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=325525"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325525\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":325530,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325525\/revisions\/325530"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/325528"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=325525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=325525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=325525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}