{"id":324994,"date":"2024-04-30T08:52:52","date_gmt":"2024-04-30T06:52:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=324994"},"modified":"2024-04-30T08:52:55","modified_gmt":"2024-04-30T06:52:55","slug":"l-a-times-editorial-claim-that-the-planet-is-experiencing-a-horrifying-streak-of-record-breaking-heat-is-unsupported-by-noaas-climate-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=324994","title":{"rendered":"L A Times Editorial Claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d is Unsupported by NOAA\u2019s Climate Data"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From ClimateRealism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Guest Essay by Larry Hamlin<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The L A Times published an Editorial<\/a> claiming that the \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record breaking heat\u201d and mandates that  a \u201cclimate emergency\u201d must be declared but then fails to present any data graph or tables in its editorial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The opening L A Times editorial paragraph claims that for California \u201cthe last few months<\/strong> have been more than 2 degrees hotter than average\u201d<\/strong>. This claim is erroneous as demonstrated in the discussion below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s data for the maximum temperatures experienced in California for the month of\u00a0February<\/a>\u00a02024 as well as all February months for years from 1895 to 2023 are shown below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s data shows the\u00a0mean February maximum temperature over its base period interval of 1901 \u2013 2000 is 55.6 degrees F\u00a0<\/strong>compared to California\u2019s February 2024 maximum value of 56.0 degrees F (0.4 degrees F above the mean) as indicated in NOAA\u2019s data table below versus the Times distorted and false claim of \u201c2 degrees hotter than average\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

More importantly, the February 2024 maximum temperature of 56 degrees F in California is only the 62nd highest out of 130 total February recorded highest values<\/strong> with the 2024 temperature clearly not representing \u201ca horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d as falsely hyped by the L A Times editorial<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s data for the maximum temperatures experienced in California for the month of\u00a0March<\/a>\u00a02024 are shown below along with all other March temperatures for the years 1895 through 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s data shows a\u00a0mean March maximum temperature over its base period interval of 1901 \u2013 2000 is 60.0 degrees F<\/strong>\u00a0compared to the states March 2024 maximum value of 59.7 degrees F (-0.3 degrees F below the mean) as indicated in NOAA\u2019s data table below versus the Times distorted and false claim of \u201c2 degrees hotter than average\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

More importantly, the March 2024 maximum temperature of 59.7 degrees F in California is only the 57th highest out of 130 total March recorded highest values<\/strong> with this temperature clearly not representing \u201ca horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d as falsely hyped by the L A Times editorial<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s maximum temperature data for California shows that the temperatures experienced in February and March in 2024 are very close to \u201caverage\u201d for these months (0.4 degrees above and -0.3 degrees below NOAAs base period interval 1901-2000 mean values respectively) representing only the 62nd and 57th maximum temperatures respectively experienced in California for these months out of 130 maximum measured temperatures for each of these two months.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times flawed claim that February and March 2024 (\u201cthe last few months\u201d as noted in their article) are about \u201c2 degrees above average\u201d is based on their misrepresentation of the February and March 2024 monthly temperature outcomes by averaging these months with 9 additional previous months and then erroneously claiming these cherry-picked 10-month long intervals (May through February and June through March) mean values represent the February and March 2024 mean value outcomes which is of course incorrect.   <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times comparison is meaningless in addressing changes occurring in February and March temperatures over time because year 2024 outcomes for these months are being determined for temperatures associated with 10-month-long cherry-picked interval averages <\/strong>instead of averages of NOAAs February and March measured temperature outcomes over its 1895 to 2024 historical tracking period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, it is clearly obvious<\/strong> on inspection of NOAA\u2019s February and March California maximum temperature graphs shown above that nothing remotely resembling \u201ca horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong> is occurring as so ridiculously hyped in the Times article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s monthly maximum temperature graph and data for the\u00a0state of California<\/a>\u00a0for\u00a0all months during the years 1895 through March 2024<\/strong>\u00a0establishes a mean maximum temperature of \u00a070.0 degrees F during this period as shown below with by far the highest maximum temperature experienced in the state being in July 1931 during the \u201cdust bowl\u201d era of the 1930s along with many other year hot July and August months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s California maximum temperature data table (with the highest values shown below) establishes that the February and March 2024 temperatures are far below the mean 70-degree F value while representing only the 312 (56.0 degrees F) and 480 (59.7 degrees F) respectively out of the highest 1551 total data values respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s California maximum temperature data, including February and March 2024, clearly does not support the Times absurd alarmist claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s\u00a0Contiguous U.S. Maximum Temperatures<\/a>\u00a0graph and data table for\u00a0all months during the years 1895 through March 2024<\/strong>\u00a0are shown below with the mean maximum temperature of 64.0 degrees F during this period with the highest ever occurring in July 1936 and 1934 with four of the top ten occurring in the \u201cdust bowl\u201d\u00a01930s era and many other year hot July and August months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Contiguous U.S. maximum temperature data table (with the highest values shown below) establishes that the February and March 2024 temperatures are far below the mean 64-degree F value while representing only the 482nd (52.18 degrees F) and 618th (56.61 degrees F) respectively out of the highest 1551 total data values respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Contiguous U.S. maximum temperature data clearly establishes that the Times alarmist claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d is completely false.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, NOAA\u2019s USCRN Contiguous U.S. maximum temperature anomaly\u00a0data shown below<\/a>\u00a0for\u00a0all months from January 2005 through March 2024<\/strong>\u00a0show no established upward trending signature for these monthly temperature anomalies during this period with the\u00a0March 2024 maximum anomaly of 1.28 degrees F far below the March 2012 maximum temperature anomaly peak value of 7.72 degrees F.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times alarmist claims that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d are false and unsupported by valid and relevant analysis of NOAA\u2019s California and Contiguous U.S. measured maximum absolute temperature and maximum temperature anomaly data as provided above.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Global Time Series provides monthly average temperature anomaly data for 16 global regions which demonstrate the trend of these anomaly outcomes for these regions over varying time periods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Shown below are results for 9 of these regions which demonstrate the significantly varied outcomes from these regions establishing the wide divergence of global climate behavior across the world that clearly illustrate global climate cannot be validly characterized by a single global average temperature anomaly value<\/strong> as frequently and erroneously attempted by climate alarmists<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times discusses NOAA global average temperature anomaly data updated through March 2024 but conceals that the global average temperature anomaly data values vary significantly throughout the world\u2019s many differing climate regions.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even though global CO2 levels are ubiquitous in the atmosphere the average temperature anomaly values associated with world are not homogeneous but a highly heterogeneous patchwork across the globe completely contrary to the flawed claim by climate alarmists that the global average temperature anomaly value can be used to characterize all global climate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This patchwork discrepancy clearly demonstrates that multiple nonuniform natural weather and climate causalities dominate the global climate behavior versus the data unsupported hype that man made climate change is dominant \u2013 a highly significant outcome unaddressed by the Times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times editorial concealed significant global average temperature anomaly data differences that are presented and summarized below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Global Land area region average temperature anomaly measured outcome (shown by both graph and table presentations) is shown below for March 2024<\/a> revealing a<\/strong> decline from March 2023<\/strong> (2.09 degrees C versus 2.19 degrees C respectively) with the year 2016<\/strong> (with El Ni\u00f1o event year values of 2.52 and 2.46 degrees C in February and March respectively) remaining the highest measured average temperature anomaly outcomes<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The starting year value for these average temperature anomaly graphs is\u00a0selected as year 2005 so the detail of the monthly changes in the period 2005 through 2024 are clearly visible<\/strong>\u00a0on the graphs so that\u00a0the validity or lack of validity of the L A Times editorial claim<\/strong>\u00a0that the \u201cplanet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d can be readily observed and displayed<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Global Land area region is where Earth\u2019s 8 billion people live. Based on NOAA\u2019s global land area average temperature anomaly data the March 2024 anomaly value is exceeded by the prior February and March year 2016 El Ni\u00f1o driven outcomes which remain the highest global land average temperature anomaly values as clearly shown on the graph and table above.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times editorial flawed claim that the \u201cplanet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong> is falsified by NOAA\u2019s Global Land region temperature data results<\/strong> with the year 2016 highest average temperature anomaly outcome exceeding all years from 1895 through March 2024 as provided in both NOAA graph and table values<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Northern Hemisphere Land area region average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(2.39 degrees C versus 2.62 degrees C respectively) with year 2016 (an El Ni\u00f1o event year values of 3.17 and 3.12 degrees C in February and March respectively)\u00a0remaining the highest measured average temperature anomaly outcomes<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times editorial flawed claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong> is falsified by NOAA\u2019s Northern Hemisphere Land region results<\/strong> with year 2016 highest average temperature anomaly outcomes exceeding all years from 1895 through March 2024 as provided in both NOAA graph and table values<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Asia Land area region average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(2.52 degrees C versus 4.01 degrees C respectively) with year 2020 (4.26 degrees C in February)\u00a0remaining the highest average temperature anomaly measured outcome<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times editorial flawed claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong> is falsified by NOAA\u2019s Asia Land region results<\/strong> with year 2020 highest average temperature anomaly outcome exceeding all years from 1895 through March 2024 as provided in both NOAA graph and table values<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Oceania Land area region average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(0.93 degrees C versus 1.10 degrees C respectively) with year 2019 (2.61 degrees C for December 2019)\u00a0remaining the highest average temperature anomaly measured outcome<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times editorial flawed claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong> is falsified by NOAA\u2019s Oceania Land area region outcomes<\/strong> with year 2019 highest average temperature anomaly results exceeding all years from 1895 through March 2024 as provided in both NOAA graph and table values.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s East N Pacific Land and Ocean area region average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(0.87 degrees C versus 0.35 degrees C respectively) with year 2015 (1.76 degrees C in October)\u00a0remaining the highest average temperature anomaly measured outcome<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times editorial flawed claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong> is falsified by NOAA\u2019s East N Pacific Land and Ocean area region results<\/strong> with year 2015 highest average temperature anomaly outcome exceeding all years from 1895 through March 2024 as provided in both NOAA graph and table values.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Gulf of Mexico Land and Ocean area region average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(0.95 degrees C versus 1.51 degrees C respectively) with year 2020 (1.73 degrees C in April)\u00a0remaining the highest measured average temperature anomaly outcome<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times editorial flawed claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong> is falsified by NOAA\u2019s East N Pacific Land and Ocean area region results<\/strong> with year 2015 highest average temperature anomaly outcome exceeding all years from 1895 through March 2024 as provided in both NOAA graph and table values.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Gulf of Mexico Land and Ocean area region average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(0.95 degrees C versus 1.51 degrees C respectively) with year 2020 (1.73 degrees C in April)\u00a0remaining the highest measured average temperature anomaly outcome<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times editorial flawed claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong> is falsified by NOAA\u2019s Gulf of Mexico Land and Ocean area region results<\/strong> with year 2020 highest average temperature anomaly outcome exceeding year all years from 1895 through March 2024 as provided in both NOAA graph and table values.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Hawaiian Region Land and Ocean area region average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(0.31 degrees C versus 0.61 degrees C respectively) with year 2015 (1.85 degrees C in September)\u00a0remaining the highest measured average temperature anomaly outcome<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times editorial flawed claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong> is falsified by NOAA\u2019s Hawaiian Land and Ocean area region results<\/strong> with year 2015 highest average temperature anomaly outcome exceeding all years from 1895 through March 2024 as provided in both NOAA graph and table values.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Arctic Land and Ocean area region average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(2.42 degrees C versus 2.85 degrees C respectively) with year 2016 (an El Ni\u00f1o year 4.99 degrees C)\u00a0remaining the highest measured average temperature anomaly outcome<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times editorial flawed claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong> is falsified by NOAA\u2019s Arctic Land and Ocean area region results<\/strong> with the El Ni\u00f1o year 2016 highest average temperature anomaly outcome exceeding all years from 1895 through March 2024 as provided in both NOAA graph and table values.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Antarctic Land and Ocean region area average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(0.24 degrees C versus 0.50\u00a0degrees C respectively) with the year 1996 (2.23 degrees C \u2013 not shown the graph time line below) remaining the\u00a0highest measured average temperature anomaly outcome.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times editorial flawed claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d<\/strong> is falsified by NOAA\u2019s Antarctic Land and Ocean area region results<\/strong> with the year 1996 highest average temperature anomaly outcome (some 28 years ago) exceeding all years from 1895 through March 2024 as provided in both NOAA graph and table values.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s graphs and tables presenting its average temperature anomaly data outcomes over the 129+ year long period from 1895 through March 2024 demonstrate that the \u201cplanets\u201d Global Land region, Northern Hemisphere Land region, Asia Land region, Oceania Land region, East N Pacific Land and Ocean region, Gulf of Mexico Land and Ocean region, Hawaiian Land and Ocean region, Arctic Land and Ocean region and Antarctic Land and Ocean region are not experiencing \u201ca horrifying streak of record breaking heat\u201d outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These NOAA global regions highest ever measured average temperature anomaly results are in years 2016, 2020, 2019, 2019, 2015, 2020, 2015, 2016 and 1996 respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Therefore, NOAA\u2019s Global absolute temperature and average temperature anomaly measured data establishes that the planet is NOT \u201cexperiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This L A Times hyped claim of global \u201chorrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d is falsified by NOAA\u2019s 129+ yearlong measured climate data outcomes as measured over 9 of 16 NOAA\u2019s global climate regions, the Contiguous U.S. and California as presented in detail in the analysis provided above.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The L A Times published an Editorial claiming that the \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record breaking heat\u201d and mandates that a \u201cclimate emergency\u201d must be declared but then fails to present any data graph or tables in its editorial.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":325035,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818068,691819218,691828408,691828407],"class_list":{"0":"post-324994","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-california","9":"tag-l-a-times","10":"tag-noaas-climate-data","11":"tag-record-breaking-heat","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1mxQ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":327807,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=327807","url_meta":{"origin":324994,"position":0},"title":"Climate Fact-Check April 2024 Edition","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/05\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"As usual, we warn that these and other \u201caverage temperatures\u201d are highly uncertain guesstimates that have no physical meaning and were exclusively invented for the global warming con. Our take on the apparent slight warming that has occurred since 1980 is that it has been driven by the natural phenomena\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"April 2024\"","block_context":{"text":"April 2024","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=april-2024"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/00Thicker-Destroy.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/00Thicker-Destroy.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/00Thicker-Destroy.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/00Thicker-Destroy.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/00Thicker-Destroy.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240760,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=240760","url_meta":{"origin":324994,"position":1},"title":"LA Times Flawed Year 2022 Climate Alarmist Propaganda Editorial","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"21\/01\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Times claimed that \u201cdata highlight the immense disconnect between the symptoms our overheating planet is showing and what we are doing about the problem\u201d but presented no data and in fact concealed highly relevant climate science measured data from public view in its editorial with that hidden data unsupportive\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-912.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-912.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-912.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-912.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-912.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333473,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=333473","url_meta":{"origin":324994,"position":2},"title":"No, ScienceNews, Your \u201cOcean\u2019s Record-Breaking Hot Streak\u201d Claims Are False","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"21\/06\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent ScienceNews (SN) article claims that ocean temperatures are out of control in a year-long record-breaking hot streak. This is false. Numerous ocean temperature data sets show no such record-breaking values and the source SN cited to support its claims was thoroughly discredited when it made similar \u201crecord breaking\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Reanalyzer\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Reanalyzer","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-reanalyzer"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0fake-news.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0fake-news.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0fake-news.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0fake-news.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0fake-news.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331694,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=331694","url_meta":{"origin":324994,"position":3},"title":"L A Times Editorial Hypes Massive \u201cClimate Recovery Act\u201d Penalties on Fossil Fuel Energy Suppliers that Account for 70% of California\u2019s Annual GDP","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/06\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A ridiculous L A Times editorial hypes imposing massive \u201cClimate Recovery Act\u201d cost penalties on fossil fuel suppliers that account for 70% of the energy that the state consumes to achieve its annual GDP.","rel":"","context":"In \"California\"","block_context":{"text":"California","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=california"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/00heatwave-hot-sun-climate-change-global-warming-2022-01-26-23-34-31-utc-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/00heatwave-hot-sun-climate-change-global-warming-2022-01-26-23-34-31-utc-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/00heatwave-hot-sun-climate-change-global-warming-2022-01-26-23-34-31-utc-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/00heatwave-hot-sun-climate-change-global-warming-2022-01-26-23-34-31-utc-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/00heatwave-hot-sun-climate-change-global-warming-2022-01-26-23-34-31-utc-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330744,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=330744","url_meta":{"origin":324994,"position":4},"title":"L A Times Editorial Hypes Massive \u201cClimate Recovery Act\u201d Penalties on Fossil Fuel Energy Suppliers that Account for 70% of California\u2019s Annual GDP","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/06\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A ridiculous L A Times editorial hypes imposing massive \u201cClimate Recovery Act\u201d cost penalties on fossil fuel suppliers that account for 70% of the energy that the state consumes to achieve its annual GDP.","rel":"","context":"In \"Bad Science\"","block_context":{"text":"Bad Science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bad-science"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/00climate_and_weather_pillars.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/00climate_and_weather_pillars.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/00climate_and_weather_pillars.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/00climate_and_weather_pillars.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/00climate_and_weather_pillars.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362552,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362552","url_meta":{"origin":324994,"position":5},"title":"No, CNN and BBC, 2024 Wasn’t the ‘Hottest Year on Record’ When ALL of the Available Evidence Is Considered","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A number of mainstream media outlets have uncritically echoed the proclamation of 2024 being the \"hottest year on record,\" such as, CNN with a story titled, \"2024 Confirmed as World's Hottest Year on Record\", and the BBC with a headline that declared, \"2024 Confirmed as Hottest Year Ever Recorded.\" When\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"2024\"","block_context":{"text":"2024","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=2024"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/02024-earth-s-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2023-in-a-decade-of-record-breaking-heat-1736855882720_1024.webp?fit=1024%2C715&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/02024-earth-s-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2023-in-a-decade-of-record-breaking-heat-1736855882720_1024.webp?fit=1024%2C715&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/02024-earth-s-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2023-in-a-decade-of-record-breaking-heat-1736855882720_1024.webp?fit=1024%2C715&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/02024-earth-s-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2023-in-a-decade-of-record-breaking-heat-1736855882720_1024.webp?fit=1024%2C715&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=324994"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324994\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":325036,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324994\/revisions\/325036"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/325035"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=324994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=324994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=324994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}