{"id":321771,"date":"2024-04-24T09:50:57","date_gmt":"2024-04-24T07:50:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=321771"},"modified":"2024-04-24T09:51:00","modified_gmt":"2024-04-24T07:51:00","slug":"l-a-times-cherry-picks-misrepresents-noaa-climate-data-to-exaggerate-march-2024-u-s-and-global-temperature-outcomes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=321771","title":{"rendered":"L A Times Cherry Picks & Misrepresents NOAA Climate Data to Exaggerate March 2024 U.S. and Global Temperature Outcomes"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From ClimateRealism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Guest Essay by Larry Hamlin<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The L A Times\u00a0article<\/a>\u00a0and headline shown below exaggerate the March 2024 U.S. and global temperature outcomes by cherry picking and misrepresenting data that mischaracterizes what the data actually shows.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times article makes the following claims regarding the U.S. for the period January through March 2024:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIn the United States, March was the 17th warmest in the 130-year data record, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The average temperature in the contiguous U.S. was 45.1 degrees \u2014 3.6 degrees above average.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times article does not present readily available NOAA measured \u00a0Maximum Contiguous U.S Temperature for the month of March<\/a>\u00a0from 1895 through 2024 as shown below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The NOAA March data clearly shows that maximum temperatures across the contiguous U.S. have been consistently declining since March 2012<\/strong> \u2013 a highly significant point which is unmentioned in the Times article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This NOAA measured historical U.S. March temperature data behavior, as shown above, does not support \u201cthe heat just keeps coming\u201d hype in the Times article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NOAA data shows, as indicated below from NOAA\u2019s website, that the March 2024 temperature is only the 22nd highest temperature measured during this period with the\u00a0highest measurement in March 1910 and many other prior years<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times article claim that March was the \u201c17th warmest in the 130-year data record\u201d is incorrect because that claim it is based on the Average versus Maximum NOAA Temperature data for the Contiguous U.S.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times continues to mischaracterize \u201caverage temperatures\u201d instead of \u201cmaximum temperatures\u201d in claiming \u201cwarmest\u201c and \u201chottest\u201d temperature outcomes as they did regarding their flawed claim that the summer of 2023 was \u201cThe Hottest Summer Ever\u201d as addressed here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The \u201chottest\u201d or \u201cwarmest\u201d temperature in March 2024 was 56.61 degrees F (shown in NOAA\u2019s March temperature data above) versus the \u201caverage temperature\u201d of 45.1 degrees F in March 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times article claim that \u201cJanuary through March marked the fifth-hottest start to the year in the U.S., NOAA said.\u201d is discussed below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s maximum contiguous U.S. temperatures for the period between\u00a0January through March 2024<\/a>\u00a0are shown below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This NOAA data again shows the declining trend in the January through March 2024 Contiguous U.S. temperature period beginning in 2012 <\/strong>\u2013 a highly significant point again unaddressed by the Times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, this NOAA data, as shown below, indicates that the January through March 2024 year are only the 11th highest (49.97 degrees F) in the period 1895 through 2024 and not the 5th highest as noted in the Times article which is again based on average instead of maximum temperature anomaly data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The NOAA January through March 2024 Contiguous U.S. maximum temperature data does not support the Times theme that \u201cthe heat just keeps coming\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore,\u00a0NOAA\u2019s USCRN March 2024 maximum temperature anomaly<\/a>\u00a0data for the Contiguous U.S., shown below, clearly establishes\u00a0there is no increasing maximum temperature anomaly trend during the period 2005 through 2024\u00a0<\/strong>with the\u00a0March 2024 value at 1.28 degrees F far below the year 2012 maximum March peak value of 7.72 degrees F.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Times conceals the clear failure of NOAA\u2019s data to support alarmists claims of increasing maximum temperature anomaly trend outcomes across the contiguous U.S. as readily apparent in the NOAA graph above and unaddressed by the Times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These measured NOAA values of maximum temperature anomaly outcomes in March 2024 do not support the Times theme that \u201cthe heat just keeps coming\u201d.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also, hyping monthly and annual NOAA measurement temperature differences as representing \u201cclimate change\u201d (which is properly evaluated over periods from 30 to 100 years) is politics not science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times article provides NOAA global average temperature anomaly data updated through March 2024 but conceals that the global average temperature anomaly value significantly varies throughout the world.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even though global CO2 levels are ubiquitous in the atmosphere the average temperature anomaly values associated with the world are not homogeneous but a highly heterogeneous patchwork across the globe <\/strong>contrary to the flawed claim by climate alarmists that the global average temperature anomaly value can be used alone to characterize global climate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This patchwork discrepancy clearly demonstrates that multiple nonuniform natural weather and climate causalities dominate the global climate behavior<\/strong> versus the data unsupported hype that man made climate change is dominant \u2013 a highly significant outcome unaddressed by the Times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times articles concealed highly significant global average temperature anomaly data regional differences that are presented and summarized below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Global Land area average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing a<\/strong>\u00a0decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(2.09 degrees C versus 2.19 degrees C respectively) with year 2016 (an El Ni\u00f1o event year value of 2.46 degrees C) remaining the highest measured anomaly outcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Global Land area is where Earth\u2019s 8 billion+ people live. Based on NOAA\u2019s measured average global land area temperature anomaly data there is no \u201cthe heat just keeps coming\u201d theme in NOAA\u2019s Global Land regions in March 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Northern Hemisphere Land area average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(2.39 degrees C versus 2.62 degrees C respectively) with year 2016 (an El Ni\u00f1o event year value of 3.12 degrees C) remaining the highest measured outcome. There is no \u201cthe heat just keeps coming\u201d theme in the March 2024 in the Northern Hemisphere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Asia Land area average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(2.52 degrees C versus 4.01 degrees C respectively) with year 2008 (4.20 degrees C) remaining the highest measured outcome. There is no \u201cthe heat just\u00a0keeps coming\u201d theme in Asia in March 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Oceania Land area average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(0.93 degrees C versus 1.10 degrees C respectively) with year 2016 (an El Ni\u00f1o event year value of 1.85 degrees C) remaining the highest measured outcome. There is no \u201cthe heat just keeps coming\u201d theme in Oceania in March 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Gulf of Mexico Land and Ocean area average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(0.95 degrees C versus 1.51 degrees C respectively) with year 2020 (1.63 degrees C) remaining the highest measured outcome. There is no \u201cthe heat just keeps coming\u201d theme in the Gulf of Mexico in March 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Hawaiian Region Land and Ocean area average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(0.31 degrees C versus 0.61 degrees C respectively) with years 1947 and 2017 (1.11 degrees C) remaining the highest measured outcomes. There is no \u201cthe heat just keeps coming\u201d theme in the Hawaiian Region in March 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Arctic Land and Ocean area average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(2.42 degrees C versus 2.85 degrees C respectively) with year 2019 (4.33 degrees C) remaining the highest measured outcomes. There is no \u201cthe heat just keeps coming\u201d theme in the Arctic in March 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s Antarctic Land and Ocean Antarctic area average temperature anomaly measured outcome\u00a0is shown below for March 2024<\/a>\u00a0revealing the decline from March 2023<\/strong>\u00a0(0.24 degrees C versus 0.50\u00a0degrees C respectively) with the year 1966 (1.18 degrees C) remaining the\u00a0highest measured outcome which occurred 58 years ago with a clearly declining trend over this more than five-decade period.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

There is no \u201cthe heat just keeps coming\u201d theme in the Antarctic in March 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These March 2024 U.S. and global average temperature anomaly regional outcomes presented above reflect climate reality based on climate science data versus climate alarmism hype and politics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unfortuanately, California and the U.S. (thanks to Governor Newsom<\/a> and President Biden\u2019s<\/a> climate alarmist polices) electricity prices have exploded upward through the roof, as shown in the graphs below, driven by climate alarmist politically mandated use of highly unreliable and hugely costly renewable energy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The reality of climate alarmism is that the \u201chype (not heat) just keeps coming<\/strong>\u201d resulting in huge and unnecessary increases to California and U.S. electricity costs creating economic hardships for all citizens, businesses, educational, medical, and other necessary organizations that support the creation of economic benefits for our society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The L A Times\u00a0article\u00a0and headline shown below exaggerate the March 2024 U.S. and global temperature outcomes by cherry picking and misrepresenting data that mischaracterizes what the data actually shows.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":321803,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691819743,691818288,691828315,691819218,691828314,691818397,691828316],"class_list":{"0":"post-321771","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-propaganda","9":"tag-global-temperature","10":"tag-hottest-or-warmest","11":"tag-l-a-times","12":"tag-march-data","13":"tag-noaa","14":"tag-u-s-temperature","16":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1984-orwell-big-brother-xl-hd.jpg?fit=2280%2C1282&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1lHR","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":291766,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=291766","url_meta":{"origin":321771,"position":0},"title":"NASA GISS Data Shows 2023 EL Nino Driving Global Temperature Anomaly Increases; NOAA Data Shows U.S. Nov. 2023 Temperature Anomaly Declining","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NASA GISS global average temperature anomaly for November 2023 was released (provided below) which shows an El Ni\u00f1o driven value of 1.44 degrees C (2.592 degrees F) with the November outcome hyped in an\u00a0L A Times article\u00a0as being \u201ca new monthly record for heat\u201d and the \u201chottest November\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Alarmists\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Alarmists","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmists"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296653,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=296653","url_meta":{"origin":321771,"position":1},"title":"2023 \u201cEarth\u2019s Hottest Year on Record\u201d Claims Fail","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Alarmists further exaggerate global \u201caverage temperature anomaly\u201d outcomes by claiming they represent a \u201cglobal climate emergency\u201d where \u201ctemperatures during 2023 likely exceed those of any period in the last 100,000 years\u201d with all this ridiculous climate alarmist propaganda based on an increased 2023 global \u201caverage temperature anomaly\u201d difference of 0.15\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"2023\"","block_context":{"text":"2023","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=2023"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/OIG.xIbeO_.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/OIG.xIbeO_.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/OIG.xIbeO_.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/OIG.xIbeO_.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324994,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=324994","url_meta":{"origin":321771,"position":2},"title":"L A Times Editorial Claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d is Unsupported by NOAA\u2019s Climate Data","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The L A Times published an Editorial claiming that the \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record breaking heat\u201d and mandates that a \u201cclimate emergency\u201d must be declared but then fails to present any data graph or tables in its editorial.","rel":"","context":"In \"California\"","block_context":{"text":"California","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=california"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298577,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=298577","url_meta":{"origin":321771,"position":3},"title":"NOAA\u2019s Year 2023 \u201cSelected Significant Climate Anomalies and Events\u201d Diagram Misrepresents both Anomalies and Events","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"NOAA concocted an array of \u201cSelected Significant Climate Anomalies and Events\u201d for year 2023 that are shown below as prominently featured in their Annual 2023 Global Climate Report.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmist\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmist","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmist"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0NOAA-Selected-Anomalies-2023-original-aspect.webp?fit=1200%2C876&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0NOAA-Selected-Anomalies-2023-original-aspect.webp?fit=1200%2C876&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0NOAA-Selected-Anomalies-2023-original-aspect.webp?fit=1200%2C876&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0NOAA-Selected-Anomalies-2023-original-aspect.webp?fit=1200%2C876&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0NOAA-Selected-Anomalies-2023-original-aspect.webp?fit=1200%2C876&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328492,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=328492","url_meta":{"origin":321771,"position":4},"title":"NOAA\u2019s Latest Temperature Climate Data Establishes There is NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/05\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"NOAA has updated its Contiguous U.S. National Temperature Index Temperature Anomaly data and its National, Statewide, County and City Time Series temperature data (as well as other climate data parameters) through the April 2024 period. NOAA\u2019s National Time Series USCRN maximum temperature anomaly dataset for the Contiguous U.S. is shown\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmist hype\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmist hype","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmist-hype"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0535818.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0535818.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0535818.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0535818.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0535818.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283619,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=283619","url_meta":{"origin":321771,"position":5},"title":"Major Climate Alarmist Fail: \u201cThe Hottest Summer Ever\u201d that Never Was","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The \u201chottest summer ever\u201d is a failure by climate alarmist and the climate boogeyman media. Use your mind and don\u00b4t follow the climate propaganda. From Watts Up With That? Guest essay by Larry Hamlin A recent WUWT\u00a0article\u00a0addresses the failure by climate alarmist media and scientists to utilize NOAA\u2019s July through\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmist\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmist","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmist"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-433.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-433.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-433.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-433.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321771","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=321771"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321771\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":321804,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321771\/revisions\/321804"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/321803"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=321771"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=321771"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=321771"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}