{"id":318987,"date":"2024-04-19T10:30:38","date_gmt":"2024-04-19T08:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=318987"},"modified":"2024-04-19T10:30:40","modified_gmt":"2024-04-19T08:30:40","slug":"climate-change-is-class-warfare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=318987","title":{"rendered":"Climate Change is Class Warfare"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From The Daily Sceptic<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

BY\u00a0MARTIN DURKIN<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The climate is up the spout and we\u2019re to blame. The planet is boiling like a pan of porridge. We face the possible extinction of all life on earth. \u2018Science\u2019 says so. Anyone who questions it is a demonic scoundrel. The climate catastrophe is a 100% solid-gold, slam-dunk irrefutable fact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hmm. And yet, it is clear to anyone who has paid the slightest attention, that the tired, hysterical predictions of the climate alarmists (made repeatedly over four decades and based on their hypothetical computer-models) have proved to be spectacularly wrong, again and again and again. It does not take much digging (we have the internet these days) to discover that the outlandish claims of climate alarmists are flatly contradicted by lots and lots of perfectly good scientific evidence and data. We\u2019re not talking here about fringe science put about by whackos. We\u2019re talking about official data \u2013 mainstream science, published in respected journals. (Some of it is featured in my \u2018climate-denier\u2019 film, Climate: The Movie<\/a><\/em>, available for free online).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The world is not boiling. We are, as any geologist will tell you, in an ice age \u2013 one of the coldest periods in the last 500 million years. The level of CO2<\/sub> in the atmosphere is not unnaturally or frighteningly high. Compared to the last half billion years of earth\u2019s history it is extremely low. And there is no evidence that changing levels of atmospheric CO2<\/sub> (it has changed radically many times in the past) has ever \u2018driven climate change\u2019. If there had been, Al Gore would have said so in his silly film, but he didn\u2019t. Hurricane activity is not increasing, nor are the number of wildfires, nor are the number of droughts, and so on and so on. This is what the official data say. You can look it up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course this is all a bit embarrassing for the science establishment. The climate alarm is worth billions to them in climate-related funding. A lot of jobs depend on it. A lot of reputations are at stake. And it\u2019s deeply awkward for the renewables industry, which turns over around a trillion dollars a year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The climate alarm is not supported by scientific evidence. It is supported by bullying, intimidation and the censorship of anyone who dares to question it. Climate catastrophism is politics, shamelessly dressed up as science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The climate scare was the invention of the environmentalist movement, which stands opposed to vulgar, dirty, free-market capitalism. They say there are too many people, consuming too much. We must be restrained and contained, for the sake of Gaia. The solution to the global, existential climate problem is higher taxes and more regulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At any social gathering, you can pretty confidently predict who will think what about climate, by asking them about taxes and regulation. People who love the Big State can\u2019t get enough of climate chaos. People who want lower taxes and less regulation will roll their eyes and say rude things about little Greta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Across the Western world, the state has grown enormously over the last century, vastly increasing the number of people whose livelihoods depend on state-spending, and whose jobs are related, directly or indirectly, to government control. In the U.K. and U.S. both, more than twice as many people now work in government as work in manufacturing. And this does not include all those (in the third sector etc.) who rely indirectly on government largesse. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

These people depend on government. They are paid for out of taxation. In such circles to proclaim the joys of a small state, lower taxes and less government is a breach of social etiquette. You have crossed a moral line. You will be suspected of liking Donald Trump, of voting Brexit, of hating lockdown and compulsory vaccination, of defending the Second Amendment, of being a climate denier<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And indeed all this may well be true. These views tend to hang together. As do the views of those on the other side. To repeat, the climate alarm is in fact politics dressed up as science. We are, as more people are beginning to realise, engaged in a class war. On one side, the tax-consuming regulating class that feeds from taxation and bosses us about. On the other, the rest of us in the private sector, who rather resent paying taxes and being told what to do and how to live our lives.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the real basis for the consensus on climate change. The consensus exists among our sprawling, tax-consuming establishment. This is not a small group of people. It is an entire class. It is, if you will, the ruling class. It controls our civil service, our schools and universities, large parts of our arts and science establishments and much of the media. It is an intolerant class, deeply aware of its own interests. The taboo that surrounds climate scepticism is a reflection of its power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It would be nice to think that politely pointing to the actual scientific data might put an end to all the climate chaos nonsense.\u00a0 Sadly it won\u2019t. Because this ain\u2019t about science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n