{"id":318481,"date":"2024-04-17T07:54:51","date_gmt":"2024-04-17T05:54:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=318481"},"modified":"2024-04-17T07:54:53","modified_gmt":"2024-04-17T05:54:53","slug":"facebook-censorship-due-to-a-science-feedback-fact-check","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=318481","title":{"rendered":"Facebook Censorship due to a Science Feedback \u201cFact Check\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Andy May<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Facebook\u2019s censorship is totally out of hand, and their \u201cindependent and nonpartisan fact checks\u201d are anything but. Now they are censoring \u201cClimate: The Movie<\/a>.\u201d The supposed \u201cfact checks\u201d provided by Science Feedback and Climate Feedback (they are two branches of the same organization) have been shown many times to be both partisan and ideologically driven. The \u201cfact check\u201d of Steve Koonin\u2019s bestselling book Unsettled<\/em><\/a> done by Climate Feedback was blisteringly criticized by the Wall Street Journal<\/em> (WSJ) in a lead editorial<\/a> by the WSJ editorial staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The editorial includes the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cMr. Koonin, whose careful book draws extensively on existing scholarship, may respond on the merits in a different forum. Suffice it to say here that many of the \u2018fact check\u2019 claims relied on by Facebook don\u2019t contradict the underlying material, but instead argue with its perceived implications.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fact-check attacks Mr. Koonin\u2019s book for saying the \u201cnet economic impact of human-induced climate change will be minimal through at least the end of this century.\u201d Minimal is in the eyes of the beholder, but the U.S. National Climate Assessment predicted America\u2019s climate costs in 2090 at about $500 billion per year\u2014a fraction of the recent Covid stimulus in an economy that could be four times as large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fact-check on the statement that \u2018global crop yields are rising, not falling\u2019 retorts that \u2018while global crop yields are rising, this does not constitute evidence that climate change is not adversely affecting agriculture.\u2019 OK, but that\u2019s an argument, not a fact-check. \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Climate Feedback\u2019s comment on a line from the review about \u2018the number and severity of droughts\u2019 does not identify any falsehood, but instead claims, \u201cit doesn\u2019t really make sense to make blanket statements regarding overall global drought trends.\u2019 Maybe it doesn\u2019t make sense for Facebook to restrict the reach of legitimate scientific argument and competing interpretations of data<\/em>.\u201dWSJ, May 7, 2021.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Steve Koonin\u2019s rebuttals of the Climate Feedback post are here<\/a> and here<\/a>. I\u2019ve also written about the erroneous Climate Feedback post here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other words, fact checks should check facts, not a difference of opinion between two scientists. \u201cFact checks\u201d today are too often thinly disguised and very biased editorials, often confusing very left-wing interpretations of ambiguous data with facts. Then these supposedly \u201cindependent and nonpartisan fact checks\u201d are used by Facebook, and sometimes by Linkedin, as excuses to censor legitimate and well-documented posts and movies. Documentation and references of the facts and interpretations presented in Climate: The Movie<\/em><\/a> can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further reading on the blatant bias and misinformation found the Science Feedback and Climate Feedback websites:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Climate Feedback\u2019s fraudulent and misleading fact check of a famous and well-respected peer-reviewed article by Ronan Connolly, Willie Soon, and 21 well qualified co-authors is refuted\u00a0here<\/a>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Climate feedback also gets a fact check of the CO2<\/sub>\u00a0Coalition completely wrong, as described\u00a0here<\/a>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Finally in their fact check of Gregory Wrightstone of the CO2<\/sub>\u00a0Coalition they make 13 wildly incorrect (lies?) about Wrightstone, as described\u00a0here<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    In summary, the Science Feedback and Climate Feedback website are both unreliable and misleading. Why Facebook and Linkedin put their trust in such a biased organization is unknown, unless they are also pushing an ideologically biased narrative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Their overly long (4,700 words!!) critique of Climate: The Movie<\/em><\/a> is fully debunked in my annotated bibliography<\/a> of the main points made in the movie, but I can hit the main points here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The first clearly false claim is that recent climate change is being driven by CO2<\/sub> exclusively with no input since 1750AD from changes in the Sun or nature at large. This is an unsupported claim by the IPCC (AR6, p 5) that is frequently disputed in the peer reviewed literature [For example: (Soon, Implications of the Secondary Role of Carbon Dioxide and Methane Forcing in Climate Change: Past, Present, and Future, 2007), (Davidson, Stephenson, & Turasie, 2016), (Koutsoyiannis, Onof, Kundzewicz, & Christofides, 2023), and (Liu, et al., 2014)].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Second, there are very serious and well-documented problems with current measurements of global warming at Earth\u2019s surface. These problems are discussed in the movie. Science Feedback attempts, in far too many words to be believable, that the measurements are accurate. The problems are all well documented in the peer-reviewed literature [For example: (Connolly, et al., 2023) and (Soon, et al., 2023)].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Third, the movie explains that temperatures today are within the normal range of temperatures seen in Earth\u2019s recent and longer-term history and they are not unusual or unprecedented. This fact is very well documented in the peer reviewed literature [ (Kaufman & Broadman, 2023) and (Scotese, Song, Mills, & Meer, 2021)]. The Science Feedback critique first complains about this statement and then later agrees with it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Then they go on to say that \u201cwarming trends\u201d are unusual over the instrumental era (past 140 years or so) compared to ancient temperature trends, based upon uncertain climate proxies. The climate proxies used in the latest IPCC report (AR6) have a median temporal resolution (time between temperatures) of 164 years (Kaufman, McKay, & Routson, 2020). So how can they know whether the proxy trends are more or less than today? See here<\/a> and here<\/a> for the details. Also see this excellent post<\/a> by Renee Hannon on the impact of comparing daily thermometer readings to climate proxies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    They make many other incorrect and misleading claims. They claim there is no evidence that polar bear populations are increasing, they are (Crockford, 2022). They claim that the Great Barrier Reef has not recently reached a record size, when it has according to Peter Ridd<\/a> and the Australian Institute of Marine Science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    They make many other claims that statements from the movie are misleading, including claims that the IPCC\/CMIP climate models are accurate, but the IPCC itself admits they are flawed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n

    \u201cHence, we assess with medium confidence<\/em> that CMIP5 and CMIP6 models continue to overestimate observed warming in the upper tropical troposphere over the 1979\u20132014 period by at least 0.1\u00b0C per decade, in part because of an overestimate of the tropical SST trend pattern over this period.\u201c(AR6 WGI, page 444).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

    In short, the Science Feedback post is clearly incorrect in its claims that the movie is misleading. Science Feedback looks at the same data and facts that the movie examines and draws different conclusions than the eminent scientists in the movie. They have a different opinion than the experts in the movie. That does not mean the scientists in the movie are factually incorrect. Look at the data yourself, support for all 70 serious scientific claims made in the movie can be found here<\/a> for those that want to see more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Download the bibliography\u00a0here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Facebook\u2019s censorship is totally out of hand, and their \u201cindependent and nonpartisan fact checks\u201d are anything but. Now they are censoring \u201cClimate: The Movie.\u201d The supposed \u201cfact checks\u201d provided by Science Feedback and Climate Feedback (they are two branches of the same organization) have been shown many times to be both partisan and ideologically driven. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":318485,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818951,691828185,691826435,691821755],"class_list":{"0":"post-318481","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-censorship","9":"tag-climate-the-movie-2","10":"tag-facebook","11":"tag-fact-check","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sutherland-Invasion-Body-Snatchers-1978-Solofilm-1-1.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1kQN","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":363520,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=363520","url_meta":{"origin":318481,"position":0},"title":"Facebook \u201cFact Checks\u201d Prof. Will Happer","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"26\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The only way to combat censorship is to shine a light on it whenever we see it. In censoring material that contradicts the popular \u2013 though increasingly feeble \u2013 fiction of a climate crisis, Facebook is quick to discount the credentials of one of the world\u2019s leading scientists while honoring\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0NHvnAk3vVFEZWr453irT.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0NHvnAk3vVFEZWr453irT.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0NHvnAk3vVFEZWr453irT.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0NHvnAk3vVFEZWr453irT.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0NHvnAk3vVFEZWr453irT.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219600,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=219600","url_meta":{"origin":318481,"position":1},"title":"\u201ctruth and community\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/09\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Apparently, Facebook censorship and fake fact checking isn\u2019t enough to make some people happy.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-935.png?fit=748%2C565&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-935.png?fit=748%2C565&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-935.png?fit=748%2C565&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-935.png?fit=748%2C565&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293182,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=293182","url_meta":{"origin":318481,"position":2},"title":"Measuring Censorship in Science Is Challenging. Stopping it Is Harder Still","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a\u00a0new paper\u00a0for the\u00a0Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, we, alongside colleagues from a diverse range of fields, investigate the prevalence and extent of censorship and self-censorship in science.","rel":"","context":"In \"censorship in science\"","block_context":{"text":"censorship in science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=censorship-in-science"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/ministery-of-truth-1984.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/ministery-of-truth-1984.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/ministery-of-truth-1984.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/ministery-of-truth-1984.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/ministery-of-truth-1984.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258823,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=258823","url_meta":{"origin":318481,"position":3},"title":"Regime Climate Censorship Enforcer NewsGuard: The tragic case of Zack Fishman","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"I know that many of you have experienced censorship of climate information at some level. Whether it is on Facebook, Twitter, WordPress, YouTube, Google search, or other platforms, there has been an almost a universal effort to reduce what our Mann-inspired Climate Information Overlords deem \u201cmisinfomation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Censorship\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Censorship","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-censorship"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00-1984-MoT.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00-1984-MoT.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00-1984-MoT.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00-1984-MoT.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00-1984-MoT.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":419710,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=419710","url_meta":{"origin":318481,"position":4},"title":"Welcome To 2026: Europe Laying Groundwork for Climate Science Censorship!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/01\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"EU overreach amid failing climate policies, accusing leaders of using censorship to silence opposition rather than address economic fallout (e.g., high energy costs, farmer protests). As of January 2026, climate disinformation is not explicitly classified as a DSA systemic risk. Enforcement focuses on illegal content, elections, and general misinformation; no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"authoritarian control\"","block_context":{"text":"authoritarian control","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=authoritarian-control"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQMxNoFHNtCdqWunHZ_FYOb0lwSCV_IbhyAG2s63Q2nNP9zi_gyZji0ZzZCRRfEQz_x1uV3LlnmNLEUFF27CDBdcrGuz1xGUpVTF8xsnu1NDP5hwEnn0lLcvT7b48sI8-1.jpeg?fit=1175%2C925&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQMxNoFHNtCdqWunHZ_FYOb0lwSCV_IbhyAG2s63Q2nNP9zi_gyZji0ZzZCRRfEQz_x1uV3LlnmNLEUFF27CDBdcrGuz1xGUpVTF8xsnu1NDP5hwEnn0lLcvT7b48sI8-1.jpeg?fit=1175%2C925&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQMxNoFHNtCdqWunHZ_FYOb0lwSCV_IbhyAG2s63Q2nNP9zi_gyZji0ZzZCRRfEQz_x1uV3LlnmNLEUFF27CDBdcrGuz1xGUpVTF8xsnu1NDP5hwEnn0lLcvT7b48sI8-1.jpeg?fit=1175%2C925&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQMxNoFHNtCdqWunHZ_FYOb0lwSCV_IbhyAG2s63Q2nNP9zi_gyZji0ZzZCRRfEQz_x1uV3LlnmNLEUFF27CDBdcrGuz1xGUpVTF8xsnu1NDP5hwEnn0lLcvT7b48sI8-1.jpeg?fit=1175%2C925&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQMxNoFHNtCdqWunHZ_FYOb0lwSCV_IbhyAG2s63Q2nNP9zi_gyZji0ZzZCRRfEQz_x1uV3LlnmNLEUFF27CDBdcrGuz1xGUpVTF8xsnu1NDP5hwEnn0lLcvT7b48sI8-1.jpeg?fit=1175%2C925&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":419295,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=419295","url_meta":{"origin":318481,"position":5},"title":"The Misinformation Inquisition: How Censorship Shields Approved Narratives from Scrutiny","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"31\/12\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"As the year draws to a close, the guardians of climate orthodoxy have once again unleashed their ritualistic howls of indignation at the actions of the Trump administration. Last week\u2019s op-ed in The Guardian, Bob Ward and Michael Mann\u2014attack dogs of the alarmist establishment\u2014likened the US government\u2019s decision to dismantle\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Bob Ward\"","block_context":{"text":"Bob Ward","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bob-ward"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQN7_5YirC2_wOg0JyM5RAu4rRFuXJfrVwGhqZl1yvMJ8upLHATg4uS-146si6Qvod4aEYXuRAEuJQxH03BIrmBk-3jBd4IwymfLn0A9iRhmPPoXf75HYCTBijZnaL_.jpeg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQN7_5YirC2_wOg0JyM5RAu4rRFuXJfrVwGhqZl1yvMJ8upLHATg4uS-146si6Qvod4aEYXuRAEuJQxH03BIrmBk-3jBd4IwymfLn0A9iRhmPPoXf75HYCTBijZnaL_.jpeg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQN7_5YirC2_wOg0JyM5RAu4rRFuXJfrVwGhqZl1yvMJ8upLHATg4uS-146si6Qvod4aEYXuRAEuJQxH03BIrmBk-3jBd4IwymfLn0A9iRhmPPoXf75HYCTBijZnaL_.jpeg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQN7_5YirC2_wOg0JyM5RAu4rRFuXJfrVwGhqZl1yvMJ8upLHATg4uS-146si6Qvod4aEYXuRAEuJQxH03BIrmBk-3jBd4IwymfLn0A9iRhmPPoXf75HYCTBijZnaL_.jpeg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQN7_5YirC2_wOg0JyM5RAu4rRFuXJfrVwGhqZl1yvMJ8upLHATg4uS-146si6Qvod4aEYXuRAEuJQxH03BIrmBk-3jBd4IwymfLn0A9iRhmPPoXf75HYCTBijZnaL_.jpeg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=318481"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318481\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":318487,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318481\/revisions\/318487"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/318485"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=318481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=318481"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=318481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}