{"id":317437,"date":"2024-04-12T12:44:31","date_gmt":"2024-04-12T10:44:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=317437"},"modified":"2024-04-12T12:44:33","modified_gmt":"2024-04-12T10:44:33","slug":"will-feds-decimate-one-owl-species-to-help-another","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=317437","title":{"rendered":"Will feds decimate one owl species to help another?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Bonner Cohen, Ph. D.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Nearly 500,000 barred owls in northern California, Oregon, and Washington state will soon be under the gun if the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service goes ahead with its latest scheme to save the endangered northern spotted owl.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In November, the Fish and Wildlife Service unveiled its barred owl management proposal, the centerpiece of which is the removal of approximately 500,000 barred owls via<\/em> the shotgun or other forms of euthanasia from the habitat of its smaller cousin, the northern spotted owl.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cBarred owl removal is not something the Service takes lightly,\u201d Jodie Delavan, a spokeswoman for the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Service, told McClatchy News on March 26. \u201cHowever, the Service has a legal and ethical responsibility to do all it can to recover northern spotted owl populations.\u201d A final barred owl \u201cmanagement strategy\u201d and a record of decision is expected later this year, Ms. Delavan told McClatchy News.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since the barred owl is protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, killing them \u2014 in this case, by the hundreds of thousands \u2014 will require a federal permit or regulation. And that is a step the feds appear to be prepared to take.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That the barred owl is covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act is quite appropriate because the bird \u2014 beginning in the early 20th century \u2014 began migrating westward from eastern North America. By the 1980s, it was well established in the Pacific Northwest, where it occupies the same habitat as the smaller northern spotted owl. The two species feed on the same prey, with the more aggressive barred owl outcompeting its cousin, sometimes even killing northern spotted owls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When the problem first garnered public attention in the early 1990s, the preferred explanation from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and environmental groups was that the commercial logging of old-growth forests was responsible for the loss of the northern spotted owl\u2019s habitat and thus was behind the bird\u2019s dwindling numbers. Saving old-growth forests, where Douglas fir and hemlock prevail, was seen by the Clinton administration as the preferred solution, and policies were put in place that restricted logging on federal land in the Pacific Northwest. Those policies succeeded in shutting down many sawmills and destroying timber-dependent communities throughout the region.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Clinton administration even orchestrated an \u201cOwl Summit\u201d at which federal officials and environmentalists congratulated themselves for caring so much about the fate of the northern spotted owl. Those who pointed out that the problem lay not with old-growth forests but with the encroaching barred owl were ignored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Over 30 years after the summit and the bird\u2019s being added to the Endangered Species List, the situation faced by the northern spotted owl has worsened. While ignoring the mistake it made in blaming the loss of old-growth forest for the northern spotted owl\u2019s declining numbers, the feds now acknowledge that the problem lies with the barred owl. Seizing the bull by the horns \u2014 to mix metaphors \u2014 the Fish and Wildlife Service initiated an experiment that involved the killing of 2,485 barred owls with 12-gauge shotguns in five different areas, the Modesto Bee reported March 26.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Having concluded that nonviolent removal of the barred owls was impractical, the feds appear to have settled on a lethal approach. This means showing a preference for one species of owl over another, with the \u201cinvasive\u201d barred owl coming up short. But is the barred owl really an invasive species, or is it simply expanding its territory, as many species of birds and mammals are prone to do?
The Owl Research Institute, a Montana-based nonprofit focused on owl conservation, is reviewing the government\u2019s proposal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cCentral to this discussion is the determination of whether Barred Owls truly meet the criteria for an invasive species, or if they represent a more adaptable species capable of natural expansion by themselves, as some have suggested,\u201d the institute said in a March 26 statement emailed to McClatchy News.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Fish and Wildlife Service is operating under the 1973 Endangered Species Act, a statute that has fallen woefully short in fulfilling its mission of recovering species at risk. In the case of the northern spotted owl, the law was used in the 1990s to curtail commercial logging in the Pacific Northwest. That was a political goal pursued by environmentalists in and out of government. As is now clear, it did nothing to improve the lot of the northern spotted owl.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Today, federal wildlife managers are seriously considering an avian version of ethnic cleansing to carry out their \u201clegal and ethical responsibility\u201d under the Endangered Species Act. The statute allows bureaucrats to play God, even if their policies turn out to be ungodly. If they go through with their plan and shotguns are trained on hundreds of thousands of owls, the Endangered Species Act will have reached a new level of absurdity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article originally appeared at\u00a0The Washington Times<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Nearly 500,000 barred owls in northern California, Oregon, and Washington state will soon be under the gun if the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service goes ahead with its latest scheme to save the endangered northern spotted owl.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":317441,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691828103,691825678,691828104],"class_list":{"0":"post-317437","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-barred-owls","9":"tag-fish-and-wildlife-service","10":"tag-migratory-bird-treaty-act","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/00a1_1902_16_barred-owl_sandra_rothenberg_kk.jpg?fit=1714%2C1207&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1kzX","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":224089,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=224089","url_meta":{"origin":317437,"position":0},"title":"Two Words Explain California\u2019s Wildfire Woes: Spotted Owl","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/16\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Meanwhile, has anyone seen a spotted owl lately?","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-750.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-750.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-750.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-750.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248508,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=248508","url_meta":{"origin":317437,"position":1},"title":"Best Extinction Prevention Plan?\u00a0 Quit Killing Them","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/19\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The environmental protection world, and the world in general, has been going nuts over the issue of species extinction.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-716.png?fit=1200%2C601&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-716.png?fit=1200%2C601&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-716.png?fit=1200%2C601&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-716.png?fit=1200%2C601&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-716.png?fit=1200%2C601&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292665,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292665","url_meta":{"origin":317437,"position":2},"title":"BONNER COHEN: This Landmark Conservation Bill Has Been An Abject Failure For Fifty Years","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/26\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"December 23, 2023 marks the 50th\u00a0anniversary of the signing of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by President Richard M. Nixon. The statute has put enormous power into the hands of bureaucrats at the two federal agencies that administer it \u2013 the Interior Department\u2019s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Commerce Department\u2019s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)\"","block_context":{"text":"Commerce Department\u2019s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=commerce-departments-national-marine-fisheries-service-nmfs"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-594.png?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-594.png?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-594.png?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-594.png?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-594.png?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221322,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=221322","url_meta":{"origin":317437,"position":3},"title":"Conservation groups condemn Biden administration lead ban on public lands","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/29\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Today\u2019s podcast guests discuss why the Biden administration lead ban will harm public lands access for fishing and hunting.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1406.png?fit=1080%2C718&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1406.png?fit=1080%2C718&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1406.png?fit=1080%2C718&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1406.png?fit=1080%2C718&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1406.png?fit=1080%2C718&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200513,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=200513","url_meta":{"origin":317437,"position":4},"title":"Banning lead on public lands will undermine true conservation","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/19\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPolicies or actions that reduce or limit sportsmen activities necessarily implicate wildlife conservation programs by affecting state agencies\u2019 revenue. Such policies or actions also handcuff wildlife managers by removing a critical conservation tool while needlessly alienating one of our original conservationists, sportsmen. Phasing-out lead ammo and tackle on wildlife refuges\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/00IMG_0575.jpg?fit=1080%2C718&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/00IMG_0575.jpg?fit=1080%2C718&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/00IMG_0575.jpg?fit=1080%2C718&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/00IMG_0575.jpg?fit=1080%2C718&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/00IMG_0575.jpg?fit=1080%2C718&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321941,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=321941","url_meta":{"origin":317437,"position":5},"title":"Make Earth Day conservationist again","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/24\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In Episode 430 of District of Conservation, Gabriella debriefs listeners on her recent Conservation Nation film trip to Washington\/Oregon, her visit to Mt. Rainier National Park, and how to make Earth Day conservationist again.","rel":"","context":"In \"barred owls\"","block_context":{"text":"barred owls","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=barred-owls"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0DSC2222.jpg?fit=1200%2C802&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0DSC2222.jpg?fit=1200%2C802&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0DSC2222.jpg?fit=1200%2C802&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0DSC2222.jpg?fit=1200%2C802&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0DSC2222.jpg?fit=1200%2C802&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317437","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=317437"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317437\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":317443,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317437\/revisions\/317443"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/317441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=317437"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=317437"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=317437"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}