{"id":313956,"date":"2024-03-28T08:35:20","date_gmt":"2024-03-28T07:35:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=313956"},"modified":"2024-03-28T08:35:22","modified_gmt":"2024-03-28T07:35:22","slug":"climate-alarmist-as-exxonmobil-whistleblower","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=313956","title":{"rendered":"Climate Alarmist as ExxonMobil Whistleblower"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
A view of the Exxon Mobil refinery in Baytown, Texas September 15, 2008. A big chunk of U.S. energy production shuttered by Hurricane Ike could recover quickly amid early indications the storm caused only minor to moderate damage to platforms and coastal refineries. REUTERS\/Jessica Rinaldi ( UNITED STATES) – RTR30K4U<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Master Resource<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Robert Bradley Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere is a strong intellectual case against<\/em> the view that ExxonMobil \u2018knew\u2019 that CO2 was a threat to human betterment versus the continuous growth of consumer-desired, taxpayer-neutral oil and natural gas. In fact, Enron, not Exxon, was the bigger culprit in the climate-change-and-business saga.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Geoscientist Lindsey Gulden<\/a> speaks for the Climate Industrial Complex, not the average person who depends on oil and gas every minute of every day, when she portrays herself as a martyr for the cause of climate alarmism\/forced energy transformation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is not easy to get fired by ExxonMobil, but there are underperformers and just bad apples in every batch. Lindsey Gulden appears to be one. On social media<\/a>, she tells of just this experience, invoking climate alarmism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But she does note one thing of interest: the company\u2019s overhyped political play of carbon capture and storage, which is correct. But it is climate exaggeration that has created the political winds to allow ExxonMobil to get its piece of the taxpayer-subsidy pie. Dialing back politics would right-size the very technology she decries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Her Story<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt may not be advisable to talk on LinkedIn about the time I was fired by #ExxonMobil<\/a>,\u201d she begins. \u201cBut here goes.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

I am a #climate<\/a> scientist\u2026. I started out as Ms Rebecca Grekin<\/a>, a climate scientist who earnestly, naively believed that the ExxonMobil of today is a trustworthy actor in the energy transition. I spent more than a decade working for ExxonMobil, occasionally (but not often enough) advocating for combatting #climatechange<\/a> .<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 2020, I was fired\u2014yes, fired\u2014by ExxonMobil<\/a> because I reported what amounted to a $10 billion fraud. To put it mildly, that experience fundamentally altered my opinion of whether present-day ExxonMobil can be considered an honest broker in anything, but most especially in the realm of the energy transition, which is a far-greater-than-$10-billion threat to the Exxon\u2019s bottom line\u2026.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

What is good for oil and gas re ExxonMobil is good for energy consumers worldwide<\/em>. And the less<\/em> climate politics, the better. But Gulden will have none of this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Despite what smooth-talking spokespeople will tell you, ExxonMobil continues to fund and be an active member of organizations that are\u2014today\u2014working to decrease political support for government action to curb climate change and decrease the public\u2019s access to and trust in readily available replacements for #oilandgas<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They fund PhDs and national labs to burnish their reputation and influence what questions researchers address. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Then a very good point is made by Gulden: the rent-seeking and greenwashing of ExxonMobil with carbon capture and storage, a mistake in the making<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

#industry<\/a> lobbyists have convinced large swaths of the public (and most of their own well-meaning employees) that technologies like carbon capture and storage are legitimate recipients of billions of taxpayer dollars earmarked for combatting climate change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those taxpayer dollars are urgently needed for existing, proven, ready-right-now solutions but instead are funding a massive campaign to enhance oil recovery. Carbon capture and storage is, at its core, a technology for producing more oil. It requires more carbon to be expended to inject #co2<\/a> at pressure than it keeps out of the atmosphere. It is not and will not be a viable solution to climate change.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

She blames herself with her half-truth conscience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

ExxonMobil executives can continue this deception in large part because so many useful idiots, myself included, willingly lend their personal reputations to the propping up of a lie. They can continue this deception because they make an example of people like me (I\u2019m not the only one) to ensure that their employees are afraid to truly challenge the ethics of the company line.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

She concludes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

I wish I could tell my younger self that the cynical Mr Yannai Kashtan<\/a> is right. That idealism and\/or a paycheck can lull you into trusting those who say one thing and do another. That we must stop allowing ourselves to be used by a few people who care more about their reserve shares than about doing the right thing. And, most important, that we must, without delay, find the unflinching political will to turn off the #fossilfuels<\/a> tap as fast as we possibly can. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Social injustice and carnage on a global, massive scale, Ms. Gulden? If she is in turmoil about her time at ExxonMobil and the way forward, a fundamental rethink is in order. Whole new ideas to quell \u2018climate anxiety\u2019 as the world\u2019s energy needs continue to be met, increasingly so, by oil, natural gas, and coal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Exxon and ExxonMobil: The Road Not Taken<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

More fundamentally, Exxon and (after 1997) ExxonMobil abandoned the moral high ground when it substituted appeasement for principle<\/a>, which began around the time of President Obama\u2019s election in 2008.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is a strong intellectual case against<\/em> the view that Exxon \u2013 ExxonMobil \u201cknew\u201d that CO2 was a threat to human betterment. Just the opposite, the company smartly understood that continued growth of consumer-desired, taxpayer-neutral oil and natural gas was good business and morally imperative. (\u201cBig Oil, Exxon Not Guilty as Charged<\/a>\u201d offers a six-part rebuttal to the simplistic, errant arguments of the ExxonKnew<\/a> legal campaign.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In fact, Enron, not Exxon, was th<\/a>e bigger culprit<\/a> in the climate-change-and-business saga. Read and laugh (or cry) at Enron\u2019s Kyoto memo of 1997<\/a> in terms of green-as-in-money.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What about employees at ExxonMobil whose take is opposite of that of Lindsey Gulden? Glen Lyons offers<\/a> an opposite take:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Here\u2019s my two cents on the general concept of \u201cWhat Exxon Knew\u201d as a retired employee with more than 36 years of experience there. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

First, Exxon doesn\u2019t \u201cknow\u201d anything. It\u2019s a collection of people and just like any other organization with many people, there are many views and understandings on almost every topic imaginable. I worked with Republicans, Democrats, Socialists, and Libertarians. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

I worked with people who believed 25 years ago that climate change was a concern and I worked with people who still don\u2019t believe that climate change is a concern. One of the great features about working at ExxonMobil is that it gives employees a fair amount of latitude to think \u201coutside the box\u201d by studying and proposing ideas that their management may not agree with. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

There was always disagreement and tension among talented people. Lyons continues:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

I did plenty of that during my career, and sometimes it was well received by my management and sometimes not. Just because I made a presentation on a particular topic of my choosing doesn\u2019t mean that my management was fully aligned on the front end or after the fact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One thing is very true about ExxonMobil \u2013 the company has a long history of hiring brilliant people who are original and creative thinkers. Sometimes the output of these people finds broad support among management and sometimes it doesn\u2019t. No one who knows ExxonMobil is surprised to learn that some employees were studying the link between CO2 emissions and global temperatures. However, that does NOT mean that his\/her management agreed with the findings.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Perhaps, just perhaps, Glen Lyons has a maturity and open-mindedness that a Lindsey Gulden does not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Geoscientist\u00a0Lindsey Gulden\u00a0speaks for the Climate Industrial Complex, not the average person who depends on oil and gas every minute of every day, when she portrays herself as a martyr for the cause of climate alarmism\/forced energy transformation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":313959,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691819134,691818056,691818076,691819231,691819194,691827905],"class_list":{"0":"post-313956","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-alarmism","9":"tag-climate-change","10":"tag-co2","11":"tag-energy-transformation","12":"tag-exxonmobil","13":"tag-geoscientist-lindsey-gulden","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/00exxon-rtr30k4u.jpg?fit=2200%2C1596&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1jFO","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":212981,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=212981","url_meta":{"origin":313956,"position":0},"title":"ExxonMobil Joins Left\u2019s Climate\/Energy Agenda (H.R. 5376)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"It is a sad day when ExxonMobil, once a bastion of climate and energy realism and good business, goes all-in with the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. The transformation began when it surrendered the high ground on climate\/energy early in Obama\u2019s first term by embracing the CO2-is-bad narrative of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-367.png?fit=1024%2C685&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-367.png?fit=1024%2C685&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-367.png?fit=1024%2C685&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-367.png?fit=1024%2C685&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219936,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=219936","url_meta":{"origin":313956,"position":1},"title":"\u201cBig Oil vs The World\u201d: BBC Expos\u00e9 Fails (Episode II)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"21\/09\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"I\u2019m disappointed, I\u2019m angry, I\u2019m disenchanted at the duplicity exhibited by ExxonMobil to say one thing internally and to say a different thing with a much different consequence in the political arena.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1026.png?fit=1024%2C685&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1026.png?fit=1024%2C685&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1026.png?fit=1024%2C685&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1026.png?fit=1024%2C685&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":428719,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=428719","url_meta":{"origin":313956,"position":2},"title":"ExxonMobil Strikes Back: Judge Greenlights Defamation Suit Against California AG Over Recycling Claims","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"California, under Attorney General Rob Bonta (and previously in broader actions with Governor Gavin Newsom), has pursued aggressive legal actions against \"Big Oil\" companies like ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, BP, and ConocoPhillips.","rel":"","context":"In \"Big Oil\"","block_context":{"text":"Big Oil","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=big-oil"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQMvE5XTSRWNApdEUejRh39zoNMUkvvwibxE9eVujuLo2H9R4_IdrfUSElOCoFMQMyX6CEdRqnnl9qTkzRnI594sZPno8fUbAHJfrbIV3C_QBEOy-29G_mMc9YYPsaRYhsqpLuJDpDtwFUhz3HOQm2HR7ntS8A.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQMvE5XTSRWNApdEUejRh39zoNMUkvvwibxE9eVujuLo2H9R4_IdrfUSElOCoFMQMyX6CEdRqnnl9qTkzRnI594sZPno8fUbAHJfrbIV3C_QBEOy-29G_mMc9YYPsaRYhsqpLuJDpDtwFUhz3HOQm2HR7ntS8A.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQMvE5XTSRWNApdEUejRh39zoNMUkvvwibxE9eVujuLo2H9R4_IdrfUSElOCoFMQMyX6CEdRqnnl9qTkzRnI594sZPno8fUbAHJfrbIV3C_QBEOy-29G_mMc9YYPsaRYhsqpLuJDpDtwFUhz3HOQm2HR7ntS8A.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQMvE5XTSRWNApdEUejRh39zoNMUkvvwibxE9eVujuLo2H9R4_IdrfUSElOCoFMQMyX6CEdRqnnl9qTkzRnI594sZPno8fUbAHJfrbIV3C_QBEOy-29G_mMc9YYPsaRYhsqpLuJDpDtwFUhz3HOQm2HR7ntS8A.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQMvE5XTSRWNApdEUejRh39zoNMUkvvwibxE9eVujuLo2H9R4_IdrfUSElOCoFMQMyX6CEdRqnnl9qTkzRnI594sZPno8fUbAHJfrbIV3C_QBEOy-29G_mMc9YYPsaRYhsqpLuJDpDtwFUhz3HOQm2HR7ntS8A.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325525,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=325525","url_meta":{"origin":313956,"position":3},"title":"PhD \u201cData\/Climate Scientist\u201d Can\u2019t Provide Data on Extreme Weather Events","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/05\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Back to Lindsey Gulden, the self-described Data\/Climate Scientist. She would\/could not provide a time series example to back up any part of her claim of \u2018global climate to go off the rails\u2019 \u2026 \u2018more extreme events\u2019. I asked her repeatedly for data, and she could only sign-off with \u2018I made\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/042bd425fbe7688040d7ab2ef61dc756411aeef91dde5a7c8ddeab931f639.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/042bd425fbe7688040d7ab2ef61dc756411aeef91dde5a7c8ddeab931f639.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/042bd425fbe7688040d7ab2ef61dc756411aeef91dde5a7c8ddeab931f639.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/042bd425fbe7688040d7ab2ef61dc756411aeef91dde5a7c8ddeab931f639.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/042bd425fbe7688040d7ab2ef61dc756411aeef91dde5a7c8ddeab931f639.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255305,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=255305","url_meta":{"origin":313956,"position":4},"title":"No Supreme Ruling on Deadbeat Cities\u2018 Climate Lawsuits","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/04\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The United State\u00a0Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a lawsuit\u00a0Boulder and two other local governments filed against oil refiners Suncor Energy and ExxonMobil and deemed similar climate change-related lawsuits matters for state courts.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0supremecourt_science_GettyImages-1252001023.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0supremecourt_science_GettyImages-1252001023.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0supremecourt_science_GettyImages-1252001023.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0supremecourt_science_GettyImages-1252001023.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0supremecourt_science_GettyImages-1252001023.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299834,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=299834","url_meta":{"origin":313956,"position":5},"title":"DAVID BLACKMON: ExxonMobil Just Set The Climate Alarm Lobby On Fire Again","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/02\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"ExxonMobil set the climate alarm lobby afire last week when it filed a lawsuit against a pair of activist investor groups challenging manifestly frivolous shareholder initiatives which they hope to bring up at the company\u2019s impending annual meeting in May. The suit was filed in a Texas court January 21\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Alarm Lobby\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Alarm Lobby","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarm-lobby"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00ExxonMobil.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00ExxonMobil.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00ExxonMobil.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00ExxonMobil.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00ExxonMobil.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313956","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=313956"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313956\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":313961,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313956\/revisions\/313961"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/313959"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=313956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=313956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=313956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}