{"id":310875,"date":"2024-03-20T20:23:31","date_gmt":"2024-03-20T19:23:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=310875"},"modified":"2024-03-20T20:23:33","modified_gmt":"2024-03-20T19:23:33","slug":"the-tories-are-stuck-in-a-net-zero-trap-of-their-own-making","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=310875","title":{"rendered":"The Tories are stuck in a Net Zero trap of their own\u00a0making"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Paul Homewood<\/p>\n\n\n\n

h\/t Philip Bratby<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is by Rupert Darwall in the Spectator:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

With a general election due at some point in the next nine months, Sunak couldn\u2019t resist playing politics too, accusing Labour of taking a \u2018fantasy approach\u2019 to energy security. This accusation was reinforced in a speech on the same day by the Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Claire Coutinho. Without naming Labour, Coutinho argued that pretending \u2018you can do things overnight is a fundamentally dishonest position\u2019, referring to Starmer\u2019s pledge to decarbonise the grid by 2030 rather than by 2035.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Having more onshore wind, as Miliband wants, doesn\u2019t make wind intermittency disappear<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

But there is a fundamental difficulty with Sunak and Coutinho\u2019s attempt to position themselves on the side of realism and honesty on this issue. They too are trapped by their commitment to achieving Net Zero. The Tories\u2019 differences with Labour on this are mainly matters of degree. Both parties are committed to decarbonising the grid in absurdly short time scales, both pledge a massive build out of wind power that will push up energy bills and both have played down the impact of intermittent wind generation on the grid.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fact that wind is an intermittent source of energy means that the grid can do without it, but it can\u2019t do without fossil fuel and nuclear generation. \u2018Without gas backing up renewables, we face the genuine prospect of blackouts,\u2019 Coutinho said in her speech in a welcome statement of the obvious.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Coutinho gets electricity generation back-to-front. Rather than gas providing backup for intermittent wind-generated power, gas-fired capacity provides the backbone of the grid and wind is a high-cost, optional extra. In essence, investing in wind requires having two parallel sets of generating capacity: one that generates electricity only when the wind is blowing and one that can generate electricity 24\/7.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coutinho\u2019s speech last week was billed as a strategy for energy security. Any strategy worth its name includes the means of delivering its objectives, which, in this case, means building more gas-fired capacity. Energy ministers since Sir Ed Davey\u2019s time in David Cameron\u2019s coalition government have identified the need for more gas-fired power stations. In 2012, Sir Ed said that 20 new gas-fired plants would be needed between 2012 and 2030. \u2018I strongly support more gas,\u2019 he told the Guardian at the time.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a 2015 speech, Sir Ed\u2019s successor, Amber Rudd announced the government\u2019s intention to take coal off the grid by 2025. \u2018We\u2019ll only proceed,\u2019 she said though, \u2018if we\u2019re confident that the shift to new gas can be achieved within these timescales.\u2019 Coal has since all but come off the grid, but hardly any new gas-fired power plants came on. In fact, gas-fired generating capacity peaked in 2012 at 37 gigawatts (GW). By the end of 2020, gas-generating capacity had fallen by over 2 GW to 34.9 GW.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Any serious energy strategy must ask why that is the case and then come up with a solution. Huge subsidies for intermittent renewable energy generation capacity mean that power stations are operated less efficiently. Meanwhile, the government\u2019s policy of pushing up the artificial cost of carbon plunged the \u2018Big Six\u2019 energy companies\u2019 thermal generators into loss. In 2014, the Big Six recorded losses of \u00a31.6 billion on their gas and coal-fired power stations. As Rudd observed in 2015, \u2018we now have an electricity system where no form of power generation, not even gas-fired power stations, can be built without government intervention\u2019.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rather than address the fundamental reasons why investors shun gas, Coutinho offered up a mishmash of contradictory soundbites in last week\u2019s speech. Acknowledging that new gas would be permitted to emit carbon dioxide for a \u2018brief window of time\u2019, the Energy Secretary said that as more wind and long-duration storage is built, these new power stations will run less frequently. But this will make it an even steeper climb for investors to recover the capital expenditure sunk into the plants.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, new gas power stations will be required to be \u2018Net Zero ready\u2019 when they\u2019re built. Either they must be able to connect to carbon capture and underground storage (CCUS) or have turbines that can also burn green hydrogen. On CCUS, the government is making a \u00a320 billion bet on what Coutinho calls \u2018this game-changing technology\u2019. CCUS needs costly pipeline and storage infrastructure, not to mention that the post-combustion removal of carbon dioxide incurs an additional energy penalty. Outside the oil and gas industry, where CCUS is used to enhance oil and gas retrieval, the technology has yet to demonstrate commercial viability and quite probably never will. Betting on silver bullets seldom turns out well.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Green hydrogen is another silver bullet that\u2019s colossally expensive. In a 2022 report, policy expert Francis Menton went through the pie-in-the-sky economics of relying on renewable electricity to make hydrogen to burn in a gas-fired power station. To use green hydrogen to produce the same quantities of electricity as gas, you need a turbine capable of producing 288 MW, costing $305 million (\u00a3240 million), plus a supporting 4.7 GW of solar capacity \u2013 more than 16 times the capacity of the gas-fired power station \u2013 to provide electricity directly to the grid and generate sufficient hydrogen to be stored as backup. In total, this would cost $6.6 billion (\u00a35.2 billion). By contrast, natural gas would require just the $305 million gas turbine plus $600 million-worth (\u00a3472 million) of natural gas, making a total cost of around $900m.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

These numbers illustrate why the costs of Net Zero are off the charts. Yet Coutinho says the government will stand with potential investors if they avoid \u2018hiking bills for families\u2019. Similarly, the Prime Minister promises to deliver Net Zero \u2018but not by piling thousands of pounds worth of costs onto households\u2019. Both are being less than honest in their denial of a trade-off between decarbonisation and the cost of energy. Coutinho boasts that the newest auction round for low carbon energy has \u2018the largest ever pot for renewables\u2019. The word she left out is \u2018subsidy\u2019, as in \u2018subsidy pot\u2019, which is funded by painfully high and rising levies on consumer bills.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this month\u2019s Budget, the Chancellor has quadrupled the annual subsidy available to renewable investors after the industry complained that last year\u2019s subsidy was not enough. Thanks to the Climate Change Act (2008) imposing on the government a legal duty to pursue Net Zero, the wind industry has ministers over a barrel. The government has \u2018listened to the energy industry\u2019, Emma Pinchbeck, chief executive of trade group Energy UK, told the FT, and Jeremy Hunt\u2019s boost to the renewables budget had sent an \u2018important signal\u2019 to investors.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Shadow energy secretary Ed Miliband, who drove the Climate Change Act through parliament, said Coutinho was attempting to open up a culture war. Energy policy isn\u2019t a form of wish-fulfilment. Having more onshore wind, as Miliband wants, doesn\u2019t make wind intermittency disappear. This isn\u2019t a dispute about culture: it\u2019s the hard reality of intermittency that Miliband prefers to ignore.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ironically, Miliband\u2019s plan for a state-owned Great British Energy company presents Britain\u2019s only realistic option to invest in new gas. Even if private investors could make the numbers add up to invest in gas, regulatory risk would have them run a mile. The government is the source of regulatory risk and is therefore better positioned to manage it than private investors. If Starmer wants to keep the lights on, the first call on Labour\u2019s \u00a323.7 billion green prosperity fund should be investing in a fleet of new gas-fired power stations. As Coutinho rightly says, \u2018there are no easy solutions in energy.\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.spectator.co.uk\/article\/why-britain-needs-new-gas-fired-power-stations\/#comments-container<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

With a general election due at some point in the next nine months, Sunak couldn\u2019t resist playing politics too, accusing Labour of taking a \u2018fantasy approach\u2019 to energy security. This accusation was reinforced in a speech on the same day by the Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Claire Coutinho. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":310877,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818557,691818076,691827728,691821808,691818154],"class_list":{"0":"post-310875","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-change-act","9":"tag-co2","10":"tag-decarbonising-the-grid","11":"tag-energy-security","12":"tag-net-zero","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Net-Zero-Infographic-1.6.jpg?fit=2070%2C1080&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1iS7","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":271996,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=271996","url_meta":{"origin":310875,"position":0},"title":"The beginning of the end of Net Zero?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/08\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Climate Wars are not ending yet though. If the open battle ends, as long as believers believe, the science is corrupted, and the Big Bankers meet for Skiing Trips in Davos, the climate battles will just go underground, or morph into a slightly different version of Grifter-Gravy. It has\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Wars\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Wars","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-wars"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-231.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-231.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-231.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-231.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":426648,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426648","url_meta":{"origin":310875,"position":1},"title":"Starmer surrenders to EU net zero\u00a0rules","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"16\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The story reflects deep ideological divides: The Telegraph views any post-Brexit alignment as regression, while the government frames it as forward-looking pragmatism. As of mid-February 2026, it's a live political flashpoint but not yet a signed agreement. Social media (e.g., Facebook, X): Users and commentators called it a \"disaster for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate and energy policy\"","block_context":{"text":"climate and energy policy","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-and-energy-policy"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNFZuP2gRgYcc3NoO3WKwYuy153aaKdzOa5AI0Gf0B_UgLRwT1Yshy99hIOYFICj7bbPygqi3fnz_fD_L66u8zH2eiGA2GN-C7DPvL7bDBkuYDf7UQoab-ZJtdz0jTA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C748&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNFZuP2gRgYcc3NoO3WKwYuy153aaKdzOa5AI0Gf0B_UgLRwT1Yshy99hIOYFICj7bbPygqi3fnz_fD_L66u8zH2eiGA2GN-C7DPvL7bDBkuYDf7UQoab-ZJtdz0jTA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C748&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNFZuP2gRgYcc3NoO3WKwYuy153aaKdzOa5AI0Gf0B_UgLRwT1Yshy99hIOYFICj7bbPygqi3fnz_fD_L66u8zH2eiGA2GN-C7DPvL7bDBkuYDf7UQoab-ZJtdz0jTA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C748&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNFZuP2gRgYcc3NoO3WKwYuy153aaKdzOa5AI0Gf0B_UgLRwT1Yshy99hIOYFICj7bbPygqi3fnz_fD_L66u8zH2eiGA2GN-C7DPvL7bDBkuYDf7UQoab-ZJtdz0jTA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C748&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNFZuP2gRgYcc3NoO3WKwYuy153aaKdzOa5AI0Gf0B_UgLRwT1Yshy99hIOYFICj7bbPygqi3fnz_fD_L66u8zH2eiGA2GN-C7DPvL7bDBkuYDf7UQoab-ZJtdz0jTA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C748&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294162,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=294162","url_meta":{"origin":310875,"position":2},"title":"Chris Skidmore quits to leave Rishi Sunak facing another by-election","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A former energy minister has quit over Rishi Sunak\u2019s plans to boost\u00a0oil and gas fields in the North Sea, ahead of a major Commons battle next week.","rel":"","context":"In \"Chris Skidmore\"","block_context":{"text":"Chris Skidmore","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=chris-skidmore"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Chris-Skidmore.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Chris-Skidmore.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Chris-Skidmore.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Chris-Skidmore.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Chris-Skidmore.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279723,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=279723","url_meta":{"origin":310875,"position":3},"title":"Rishi Sunak Waters Down Net Zero\u00a0Pledges","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"21\/09\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"But the PM has at last recognised the huge costs to ordinary people, and has decided to go for their vote.","rel":"","context":"In \"1% of global emissions\"","block_context":{"text":"1% of global emissions","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=1-of-global-emissions"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Screenshot-2023-09-21-101605.png?fit=1200%2C625&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Screenshot-2023-09-21-101605.png?fit=1200%2C625&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Screenshot-2023-09-21-101605.png?fit=1200%2C625&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Screenshot-2023-09-21-101605.png?fit=1200%2C625&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Screenshot-2023-09-21-101605.png?fit=1200%2C625&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264116,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=264116","url_meta":{"origin":310875,"position":4},"title":"Rishi Sunak to Hit Households With \u00a3170 Net Zero Levy Within Days","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Households will pay a \u00a3170-a-year Net Zero levy on energy bills in the coming days, with Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt accused of \u201cslyly\u201d shifting costs back to consumers. The\u00a0Telegraph\u00a0has the story.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00eilmeldung-rishi-sunak-ist-geset.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00eilmeldung-rishi-sunak-ist-geset.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00eilmeldung-rishi-sunak-ist-geset.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00eilmeldung-rishi-sunak-ist-geset.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00eilmeldung-rishi-sunak-ist-geset.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280239,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=280239","url_meta":{"origin":310875,"position":5},"title":"Rishi Sunak speaks sense on Net Zero","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/09\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Britain\u2019s prime minister Rishi Sunak was denounced before he\u2019d uttered a word on net zero ahead of his short\u00a0remarks\u00a0on Wednesday. Lord Deben, the recently departed chair of the statutory Climate Change Committee, took to the airwaves to\u00a0accuse\u00a0the government of stupidity. Lord Zac Goldsmith, son of the billionaire Sir James Goldsmith\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0net-zero_cities.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0net-zero_cities.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0net-zero_cities.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0net-zero_cities.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0net-zero_cities.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310875","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=310875"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310875\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":310879,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310875\/revisions\/310879"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/310877"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=310875"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=310875"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=310875"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}