{"id":303890,"date":"2024-02-23T09:01:59","date_gmt":"2024-02-23T08:01:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=303890"},"modified":"2024-02-23T09:02:02","modified_gmt":"2024-02-23T08:02:02","slug":"starmers-secret-plan-for-energy-prices-is-terrifying","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=303890","title":{"rendered":"Starmer\u2019s secret plan for energy prices is terrifying"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer visits an on-shore wind farm<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Labour is about to plunge Britain into a fresh energy price crisis in the name of Net Zero.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

From <\/a>The Telegraph<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By GORDON HUGHES<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When Sir Keir Starmer<\/a> pulled back from Labour\u2019s commitment to spend \u00a328 billion per year on green projects<\/a>, it was no surprise. The number never made sense given the other pressures on public spending. Unless Labour intended to increase either income tax & National Insurance or VAT by a large amount \u2013 in the region of raising VAT\u2019s standard rate from 20 per cent to 24 per cent \u2013 it would have been extremely difficult to afford.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But there is a catch. There is no indication that Labour intends to step back from its Net Zero commitments<\/a>. So where is the money going to come from? There is no magic money tree and the costs of achieving Net Zero targets appear to be rising rapidly. Even the \u00a328 billion figure would have been little more than a down payment on the long-term costs. It is about 1 per cent of GDP which must have sounded like a convenient round number. However, Michael Kelly, a distinguished engineer who examined the costs of reaching NetZero, concluded that the total cost is likely to exceed 4 per cent of GDP up to 2050.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If not through taxes like VAT, then how does Labour intend to pay for this? Room for borrowing is tightly constrained by the party\u2019s fiscal rules, which leaves only one likely option: stealth taxes on you and I, on all households and businesses in the UK. These may take many forms \u2013 levies on electricity and gas prices, mandatory requirements to buy EVs and heat pumps, constraints on what we can eat or consume, and so on. Our daily life will be more expensive and inconvenient<\/a> than it might have been, with limited or no incentives to use resources more efficiently or to improve our standard of living. For anyone of a certain age this is back to the dreary 1970s with vengeance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sadly, the impact of stealth taxes on daily life is only the beginning of the story. Most of the \u00a328 billion was required to underpin the goal of decarbonising the electricity system by 2030. That is quite probably physically impossible but consider how this might play out. In 2022 the UK consumed an average of 4,060 kWh of electricity per person excluding use in the energy sector. Only 1,425 kWh of that total was used by households with the remainder being consumed by industry, commerce and services. \u00a328 billion per year is equivalent to 10.2p per kWh for all electricity consumption, or 29.1p per kWh for domestic electricity consumption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cost of \u00a328 billion per year on households would exactly double the current price cap of 29p per kWh for domestic customers. Since most people regard the current cost of electricity to be extremely high, imagine how household budgets would look if the price of electricity were doubled. Not much incentive to buy electric vehicles since they would be significantly more expensive to run \u2013 and with no prospect of a reduction in charging costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The situation would be arguably even worse if a levy were raised on all electricity consumption. The UK\u2019s electricity prices for industry are among the highest in Europe at 12.1p per kWh for very large industrial consumers in 2023Q3 and 20.7p per kWh for large industrial consumers. Adding 84 per cent for very large consumers, or 49 per cent for large consumers to electricity costs would hardly improve the UK\u2019s attractiveness to industrial investors. What would the economics of Tata Steel\u2019s new electric arc furnaces in South Wales look like if electricity costs were nearly double their current level?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In any case, putting levies on the electricity prices paid by non-household customers is simply an indirect \u2013 and inefficient \u2013 way of taxing households because the costs would have to be passed on. The inefficiency arises because businesses may close down or the numbers of teachers and nurses may be reduced in order to meet the higher operating costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is no escaping Labour\u2019s dilemma. The party\u2019s Net Zero goals\u00a0are inordinately expensive<\/a>. Abandoning the \u00a328 billion public spending target while maintaining the goals just makes everything worse for households and businesses. Sir Keir should now change the goals \u2013 and then decide how to pay for them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Professor Gordon Hughes is a retired Professor of Economics at the University of Edinburgh, and a former senior adviser on energy and environmental policy at the World Bank<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When Sir\u00a0Keir Starmer\u00a0pulled back from Labour\u2019s commitment to spend\u00a0\u00a328 billion per year on green projects, it was no surprise. There is no indication that Labour intends to step back from its\u00a0Net Zero commitments.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":303895,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"When Sir\u00a0Keir Starmer\u00a0pulled back from Labour\u2019s commitment to spend\u00a0\u00a328 billion per year on green projects, it was no surprise. There is no indication that Labour intends to step back from its\u00a0Net Zero commitments.","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691827111,691821977,691827110,691818198,691818154],"class_list":{"0":"post-303890","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-28-billion-per-year","9":"tag-electric-vehicles-evs","10":"tag-electricity-and-gas-prices","11":"tag-heat-pumps","12":"tag-net-zero","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0472ee2a3b39461e5aec157a3682423c4.jpeg?fit=1242%2C828&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1h3s","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":267194,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=267194","url_meta":{"origin":303890,"position":0},"title":"\u201cI hate tree huggers\u201d: Britain\u2019s Opposition Leader on Net Zero Proposals","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/13\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Britain\u2019s opposition leader is not interested in Net Zero proposals unless they produce lots of green jobs, to replace jobs lost in \u201cold sectors\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In \"Keir Starmer\"","block_context":{"text":"Keir Starmer","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=keir-starmer"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0JCKF1J1CK7NBJTDYF60X.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0JCKF1J1CK7NBJTDYF60X.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0JCKF1J1CK7NBJTDYF60X.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0JCKF1J1CK7NBJTDYF60X.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0JCKF1J1CK7NBJTDYF60X.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220650,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=220650","url_meta":{"origin":303890,"position":1},"title":"Race To the Bottom","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/25\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Maybe one of these days, somebody could explain why the media still take Keir Starmer seriously?","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1224.png?fit=645%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1224.png?fit=645%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1224.png?fit=645%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240660,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=240660","url_meta":{"origin":303890,"position":2},"title":"Labour will end North Sea oil investment","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/20\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Sir Keir Starmer has vowed to stop investing in new British oil and gas fields if Labour wins the next election. Quite how his mad plan will bring down energy costs, as he claims, is beyond me. Does this moron not understand the laws of supply and demand?","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-880.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-880.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-880.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-880.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-880.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":438520,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=438520","url_meta":{"origin":303890,"position":3},"title":"Red Ed Strikes Again \u2013 OpenAI Abandons \u00a331bn UK AI Push Over Miliband’s Energy Nightmare","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/10\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"OpenAI has officially paused its Stargate UK data centre project \u2013 part of the \u00a331 billion US tech investment package announced last September with partners like Nvidia and Nscale \u2013 citing high energy costs and regulatory uncertainty as the deal-breakers.","rel":"","context":"In \"AI (artificial intelligence)\"","block_context":{"text":"AI (artificial intelligence)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=ai-artificial-intelligence-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Red-Ed-Strikes-Again-%E2%80%93-OpenAI-Abandons-31bn-UK-AI-Push-Over-Milibands-Energy-Nightmare.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Red-Ed-Strikes-Again-%E2%80%93-OpenAI-Abandons-31bn-UK-AI-Push-Over-Milibands-Energy-Nightmare.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Red-Ed-Strikes-Again-%E2%80%93-OpenAI-Abandons-31bn-UK-AI-Push-Over-Milibands-Energy-Nightmare.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Red-Ed-Strikes-Again-%E2%80%93-OpenAI-Abandons-31bn-UK-AI-Push-Over-Milibands-Energy-Nightmare.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":426648,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426648","url_meta":{"origin":303890,"position":4},"title":"Starmer surrenders to EU net zero\u00a0rules","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/16\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The story reflects deep ideological divides: The Telegraph views any post-Brexit alignment as regression, while the government frames it as forward-looking pragmatism. As of mid-February 2026, it's a live political flashpoint but not yet a signed agreement. Social media (e.g., Facebook, X): Users and commentators called it a \"disaster for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate and energy policy\"","block_context":{"text":"climate and energy policy","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-and-energy-policy"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNFZuP2gRgYcc3NoO3WKwYuy153aaKdzOa5AI0Gf0B_UgLRwT1Yshy99hIOYFICj7bbPygqi3fnz_fD_L66u8zH2eiGA2GN-C7DPvL7bDBkuYDf7UQoab-ZJtdz0jTA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C748&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNFZuP2gRgYcc3NoO3WKwYuy153aaKdzOa5AI0Gf0B_UgLRwT1Yshy99hIOYFICj7bbPygqi3fnz_fD_L66u8zH2eiGA2GN-C7DPvL7bDBkuYDf7UQoab-ZJtdz0jTA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C748&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNFZuP2gRgYcc3NoO3WKwYuy153aaKdzOa5AI0Gf0B_UgLRwT1Yshy99hIOYFICj7bbPygqi3fnz_fD_L66u8zH2eiGA2GN-C7DPvL7bDBkuYDf7UQoab-ZJtdz0jTA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C748&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNFZuP2gRgYcc3NoO3WKwYuy153aaKdzOa5AI0Gf0B_UgLRwT1Yshy99hIOYFICj7bbPygqi3fnz_fD_L66u8zH2eiGA2GN-C7DPvL7bDBkuYDf7UQoab-ZJtdz0jTA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C748&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNFZuP2gRgYcc3NoO3WKwYuy153aaKdzOa5AI0Gf0B_UgLRwT1Yshy99hIOYFICj7bbPygqi3fnz_fD_L66u8zH2eiGA2GN-C7DPvL7bDBkuYDf7UQoab-ZJtdz0jTA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C748&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":413211,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=413211","url_meta":{"origin":303890,"position":5},"title":"Daily Express: Starmer\u2019s Climate Policies are Making you Poorer","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/14\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cKeir Starmer just backed making you poorer \u2013 while rest of world laughed at him\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"Carbon reduction\"","block_context":{"text":"Carbon reduction","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-reduction"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQMncnDOD9uhG33Bc_ugPvPVENTcC9Zqu6qghBlCWc_5aO8BsDxxySSj61SZF3_KWzFPqbhacdn891EWFW4NVhvRcAiV-tD7ve8PUS0wuuh7sqS_6IN4fm87SNKz1PSO-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQMncnDOD9uhG33Bc_ugPvPVENTcC9Zqu6qghBlCWc_5aO8BsDxxySSj61SZF3_KWzFPqbhacdn891EWFW4NVhvRcAiV-tD7ve8PUS0wuuh7sqS_6IN4fm87SNKz1PSO-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQMncnDOD9uhG33Bc_ugPvPVENTcC9Zqu6qghBlCWc_5aO8BsDxxySSj61SZF3_KWzFPqbhacdn891EWFW4NVhvRcAiV-tD7ve8PUS0wuuh7sqS_6IN4fm87SNKz1PSO-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQMncnDOD9uhG33Bc_ugPvPVENTcC9Zqu6qghBlCWc_5aO8BsDxxySSj61SZF3_KWzFPqbhacdn891EWFW4NVhvRcAiV-tD7ve8PUS0wuuh7sqS_6IN4fm87SNKz1PSO-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQMncnDOD9uhG33Bc_ugPvPVENTcC9Zqu6qghBlCWc_5aO8BsDxxySSj61SZF3_KWzFPqbhacdn891EWFW4NVhvRcAiV-tD7ve8PUS0wuuh7sqS_6IN4fm87SNKz1PSO-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C638&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=303890"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303890\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":303897,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303890\/revisions\/303897"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/303895"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=303890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=303890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=303890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}