{"id":303884,"date":"2024-02-23T08:38:39","date_gmt":"2024-02-23T07:38:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=303884"},"modified":"2024-02-23T08:38:42","modified_gmt":"2024-02-23T07:38:42","slug":"met-office-fails-to-retract-false-claim-of-more-intense-storms-due-to-climate-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=303884","title":{"rendered":"Met Office Fails to Retract False Claim of \u201cMore Intense\u201d Storms Due to Climate Change"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From The Daily Sceptic<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0CHRIS MORRISON<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Met Office is refusing to retract a claim made by a senior meteorologist on BBC Radio 5 Live that storms in the U.K. are becoming \u201cmore intense\u201d due to climate change. This is despite admitting in Freedom of Information (FOI) documents that it had no evidence to back up the claim. The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) noted the \u201cfalse\u201d claim seriously misled the public and demanded a retraction<\/a>. The Daily Sceptic<\/em> covered the story<\/a> last Thursday and has since contacted the Met Office on three occasions seeking a response. \u201cFalse information of this kind does much to induce climate anxiety in the population and I am sure you would agree such errors should be corrected by any reputable organisation,\u201d it was noted. No reply was received \u2013 no retraction has been forthcoming.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The storm claim was made by Met Office spokesman Clare Nasir on January 22nd and led to an FOI request<\/a> for an explanation by the investigative journalist Paul Homewood. The Met Office replied that it was unable to answer the request due to the fact that the information \u201cis not held\u201d. Interestingly, the Met Office\u2019s own 2022 climate report noted that the last two decades have seen fewer occurrences of maximum wind speeds in the 40, 50, 60 knot bands than previous decades. The Daily Sceptic<\/em> report went viral on social media with almost 3,000 retweets on X, while GWPF\u2019s demand for retraction was covered<\/a> by the Scottish Daily Express<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The lack of action by the state-funded Met Office is very interesting. Extreme weather is now the major go-to explanation for the opinion that humans largely control the climate, despite a general lack of scientific evidence. Backing away from this \u2018settled\u2019 narrative risks damaging a potent tool nudging populations across the world towards the collectivist Net Zero political project. Mainstream media usually take care to fudge their reporting of any direct link, using phrases such as \u2018scientists say\u2019 and sprinkling words \u2018could\u2019 and \u2018might\u2019 in the copy. The mistake Nasir made was to forget this basic requirement of broadcast fearmongering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There appears to be an arrogance around the Met Office, an arrogance it shares with many other organisations and scientists promoting Net Zero. At the heart of this assumed superiority is the ludicrous claim that the science around human-caused climate change is \u2018settled\u2019. As a result of this, it seems many have lost the ability to debate their work with anyone taking an inquiring position. The scientific process has largely broken down in the climate science world. Secure in the knowledge that it will not be challenged, almost anything can be said on legacy media from a \u2018consensus\u2019 narrative point of view to promote the supra-national aims of Net Zero. On the legal front, this arrogance was in evidence in the summing up in the recent Mann v Steyn<\/em> defamation trial in Washington D.C. The jury should award punitive damages to Michael Mann, inventor of the temperature \u2018hockey stick\u2019 graph, \u201cso that in future no one will dare engage in climate denialism\u201d, said Mann\u2019s defending lawyer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is possible that if the Met Office is obliged to explain or retract what was after all just a routine scare broadcast on a tame state-reliant media outlet, it might be forced into more substantial scientific debate. How it abolished the global temperature pause from 2000-2014 by adding 30% extra warming on a retrospective basis<\/a> to its HadCRUT5 record, and why it insists on promoting temperature records<\/a> from busy U.K. airbases, are two subjects that spring immediately to mind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ineffable superiority was certainly on display when the Daily Sceptic<\/em> recently reported that the Met Office was considered ditching the measurement of changes in temperature using data from the past 30 years in favour of a measurement compiled with 10 years\u2019 past data and 10 years\u2019 future modelled estimates. This was designed to promote a possible earlier breach of the political 1.5\u00b0C threshold. Lead author Professor Richard Betts, Head of Climate Impacts at the Met Office, tweeted a \u2018rebuttal\u2019 on X, noting we had taken three weeks to review the paper. \u201cOr are they just very slow readers? I suppose our paper does use big words like \u2018temperature\u2019 so maybe they had to get grown-ups to help,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is the Met Office struggling to come up with any evidence to back up its claim that bad weather is caused by climate change? Because there is precious little of it. \u201cPeople are going absolutely nuts these days about extreme weather,\u201d  writes the distinguished academic and science writer Roger Pielke Jr. \u201cEvery event, anywhere, is now readily associated with climate change and a portent of a climate out of control, apocalyptic even. I\u2019ve long given up hope that the actual science of climate and extreme weather will be fairly reported or discussed in policy \u2013 nowadays, climate change is just too seductive and politically expedient,\u201d he notes<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In its latest \u2018Sixth Assessment Report<\/a>\u2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports that attempts to discern human involvement in severe storms outside natural variation remain of \u201clow confidence\u201d. In fact, it is unable to find human involvement in a wide range of weather-related events, not just in the past but out to the turn of this century.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Beyond natural variability, the IPCC, much to the disappointment of alarmists, has concluded there is little or no evidence that the following events (table above) are or will be affected by human-caused climate change: river floods, heavy rain and pluvial floods, landslides, drought (all types), fire \u2018weather\u2019, severe wind storms (Met Office please note), tropical cyclones, sand and dust storms, heavy snowfall and ice storms, hail, snow avalanche, coastal flooding and erosion, and marine heatwaves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Perhaps the Met Office doesn\u2019t want to apologise for misleading the public over winter storms \u2013 it might put down an unwelcome marker for mea culpas<\/em> becoming general across the entire media and climate front.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris Morrison is the<\/em>\u00a0Daily Sceptic\u2019s<\/em>\u00a0Environment Editor.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Met Office is refusing to retract a claim made by a senior meteorologist on BBC Radio 5 Live that storms in the U.K. are becoming \u201cmore intense\u201d due to climate change. This is despite admitting in Freedom of Information (FOI) documents that it had no evidence to back up the claim. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":303888,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"The Met Office is refusing to retract a claim made by a senior meteorologist on BBC Radio 5 Live that storms in the U.K. are becoming \u201cmore intense\u201d due to climate change. This is despite admitting in Freedom of Information (FOI) documents that it had no ","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818389,691819134,691819743,691818514,691821755,691818808,691818154],"class_list":["post-303884","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-bbc","tag-climate-alarmism","tag-climate-propaganda","tag-extreme-weather","tag-fact-check","tag-met-office","tag-net-zero","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1h3m","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":462313,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=462313","url_meta":{"origin":303884,"position":0},"title":"Cherry-Picking Met Office Drops Declining Wind Speed Chapter From Its Latest Annual Climate Report","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/12\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Lower UK wind speeds and less powerful storms have always been a bit of a disappointment to activists whipping up a climate crisis frenzy to back the Net Zero fantasy. Going back over 50 years, the data is clearly showing a declining trend.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Data\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Data","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-data"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-ChatGPT-Cherry-Picking-Met-Office-Drops-Declining-Wind-Speed-Chapter-From-Its-Latest-Annual-Climate-Report.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-ChatGPT-Cherry-Picking-Met-Office-Drops-Declining-Wind-Speed-Chapter-From-Its-Latest-Annual-Climate-Report.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-ChatGPT-Cherry-Picking-Met-Office-Drops-Declining-Wind-Speed-Chapter-From-Its-Latest-Annual-Climate-Report.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-ChatGPT-Cherry-Picking-Met-Office-Drops-Declining-Wind-Speed-Chapter-From-Its-Latest-Annual-Climate-Report.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-ChatGPT-Cherry-Picking-Met-Office-Drops-Declining-Wind-Speed-Chapter-From-Its-Latest-Annual-Climate-Report.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301857,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=301857","url_meta":{"origin":303884,"position":1},"title":"Met Office Cannot Provide Evidence For \u201cMore Intense Storms\u201d\u00a0Claim","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/15\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"It is little wonder that so many have little confidence in the Met Office anymore. Even Richard Betts would have difficulty defending this latest disgraceful episode!","rel":"","context":"In \"Met Office\"","block_context":{"text":"Met Office","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=met-office"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/06d9dc68209de55f96c29a3e649ce419c.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/06d9dc68209de55f96c29a3e649ce419c.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/06d9dc68209de55f96c29a3e649ce419c.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/06d9dc68209de55f96c29a3e649ce419c.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/06d9dc68209de55f96c29a3e649ce419c.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292117,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292117","url_meta":{"origin":303884,"position":2},"title":"Two More BBC\u00a0Complaints","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/21\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In both cases, the BBC have merely cut and pasted press releases, as all the media seems to have done. However, that does not excuse them from printing false information.","rel":"","context":"In \"BBC\"","block_context":{"text":"BBC","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bbc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/1_112080366_p08c03dy.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/1_112080366_p08c03dy.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/1_112080366_p08c03dy.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/1_112080366_p08c03dy.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259826,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=259826","url_meta":{"origin":303884,"position":3},"title":"Wrong, The Guardian, Climate Change Isn\u2019t Causing More Climbing Deaths on Mount Everest","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/31\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"An article in\u00a0The Guardian\u00a0claims that climate change is killing people on Mount Everest. This is a false. Climate change is not highly localized nor does it occur in a single year. Evidence suggests other factors are behind the recent increase in deaths on Mount Everest.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0where-is-mount-everest-568b305f3df78ccc1543f913.jpg?fit=1200%2C812&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0where-is-mount-everest-568b305f3df78ccc1543f913.jpg?fit=1200%2C812&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0where-is-mount-everest-568b305f3df78ccc1543f913.jpg?fit=1200%2C812&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0where-is-mount-everest-568b305f3df78ccc1543f913.jpg?fit=1200%2C812&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0where-is-mount-everest-568b305f3df78ccc1543f913.jpg?fit=1200%2C812&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265460,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=265460","url_meta":{"origin":303884,"position":4},"title":"Hottest Evah June!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/04\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The fact that the warmest June came in 1846, and 1676, 1822 and 1826 were also hotter rather demolishes the claims about global warming.","rel":"","context":"In \"BBC\"","block_context":{"text":"BBC","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bbc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/02588894.jpg?fit=1200%2C1067&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/02588894.jpg?fit=1200%2C1067&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/02588894.jpg?fit=1200%2C1067&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/02588894.jpg?fit=1200%2C1067&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/02588894.jpg?fit=1200%2C1067&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271563,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=271563","url_meta":{"origin":303884,"position":5},"title":"The Express Covers My New BBC\u00a0Paper","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The BBC\u2019s coverage of climate change and related policy issues, such as energy policy, has long been of serious and widespread concern. There have been numerous instances of factual errors, bias and omission of alternative views to the\u00a0BBC\u2019s narrative.","rel":"","context":"In \"BBC\"","block_context":{"text":"BBC","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bbc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Success-road_254745814-1037x830-1.jpg?fit=1037%2C830&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Success-road_254745814-1037x830-1.jpg?fit=1037%2C830&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Success-road_254745814-1037x830-1.jpg?fit=1037%2C830&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Success-road_254745814-1037x830-1.jpg?fit=1037%2C830&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0dataset-card.jpg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303884","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=303884"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303884\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":303889,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303884\/revisions\/303889"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/303888"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=303884"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=303884"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=303884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}